|
<h2><a name="OV">Overview</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><cite>
|
|
Second season premiere.
|
|
As a new commander assumes control of the station, a renegade Minbari
|
|
warship arrives, threatening trouble.
|
|
</cite>
|
|
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+Foxworth,+Robert">Robert Foxworth</a> as General Hague.
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
(Originally titled "Chrysalis, Part II")
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
Sub-genre: Intrigue
|
|
<a href="/lurk/p5/intro.html">P5 Rating</a>: <a href="/lurk/p5/023">7.92</a>
|
|
|
|
Production number: 201
|
|
Original air date: November 2, 1994
|
|
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000087EYB/thelurkersguidet">DVD release date</a>: April 29, 2003
|
|
|
|
Written by J. Michael Straczynski
|
|
Directed by Janet Greek
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<hr size=3>
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="BP">Backplot</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> During the Earth-Minbari War, Captain John Sheridan managed to score
|
|
Earth's only real victory, destroying the Minbari flagship Black Star
|
|
and several cruisers by mining the asteroid belt between Jupiter and
|
|
Mars with fusion bombs. This earned him the name "Starkiller" among
|
|
the Minbari warrior caste, as well as their continuing hatred.
|
|
|
|
<li> The Minbari population has been slowly declining for two millenia.
|
|
|
|
<li> The Grey Council ordered the end of the war after capturing Sinclair.
|
|
He was the first human to have direct contact with the Council.
|
|
Their original intent was to interrogate him and find out about
|
|
Earth's defenses, but upon scanning him, they found that Minbari
|
|
souls were somehow being reborn in human bodies. Since Minbari
|
|
religion teaches that all the souls of the Minbari form a greater
|
|
whole, continuing the war would mean, in effect, killing part of
|
|
themselves. Realizing that the knowledge that this was happening
|
|
to Minbari souls would prove destabilizing to society -- presumably
|
|
some would blame humans for the shrinking population, not to mention
|
|
how the <em>humans</em> would react to the news -- they decided
|
|
to keep their discovery a secret, and protect it with lethal force
|
|
if necessary.
|
|
|
|
<li> After the suicide of the warleader Sineval (cf.
|
|
<a href="017.html">"Legacies"</a>)
|
|
at the end of the war, the crew of his ship, the Trigati, defied the
|
|
surrender order and vanished into exile for nearly twelve years.
|
|
|
|
<li> Before her service on Babylon 5, Ivanova served under Sheridan at the
|
|
transfer point on Io.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="UQ">Unanswered Questions</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> How did a scan reveal that Minbari souls were being reborn in humans?
|
|
|
|
<li> Will the crew of the Trigati be considered martyrs by the warrior
|
|
caste in spite of their death at Minbari hands?
|
|
|
|
<li> Why did President Clark already know why the war ended? (see
|
|
<a href="#JS:clark">jms speaks</a>, and comic
|
|
<a href="/lurk/comic/001.html">"In Darkness Find Me"</a>)
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="AN">Analysis</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> The presence of the unnamed Grey Council member on Babylon 5 implies
|
|
that the Council knew Delenn would disobey its order, and further,
|
|
that they know the purpose of the chrysalis. In fact, there seems to
|
|
be more division within the Council than they want to admit (cf.
|
|
<a href="020.html">"Babylon Squared"</a>)
|
|
since one of the Councilmembers gave Delenn the triluminary even
|
|
though the council had advised her to wait.
|
|
|
|
<li> Sinclair was the first human to have contact with the Grey Council,
|
|
but there's still ample evidence that that's not the only thing
|
|
unique about him. Delenn has hinted that she believes he has a great
|
|
destiny (cf.
|
|
<a href="015.html">"Grail"</a>
|
|
and
|
|
<a href="019.html">"A Voice in the Wilderness, part 2"</a>)
|
|
and even in this episode, Lennier says, "A change is coming.
|
|
Sinclair was the first. There will be others," implying that something
|
|
has happened to him that hasn't yet happened to anyone else.
|
|
|
|
<li> In fact, the Council may have identified a specific Minbari soul in
|
|
Sinclair, perhaps the reincarnation of a great figure in their history;
|
|
that would explain why they're so interested in him in particular.
|
|
|
|
<li> It's possible that the information about Minbari souls isn't even known
|
|
to all of the Grey Council. When Delenn visited the Council (in
|
|
<a href="020.html">"Babylon Squared"</a>)
|
|
she spoke of the prophecy as the reason for ending the war, and some
|
|
of the other Councilmembers weren't sure that humans were the ones
|
|
the prophecy referred to. If they had seen whatever scan results
|
|
convinced Delenn that humans had Minbari souls, they presumably would
|
|
have argued with her about those results rather than a vague
|
|
interpretation of the prophecy.
|
|
|
|
<li> The only thing that looked remotely like a scan in Sinclair's
|
|
recollection of his capture on the Line was when one of the Minbari
|
|
held a triluminary up to him. (cf.
|
|
<a href="008.html">"And the Sky Full of Stars"</a>)
|
|
It's at least plausible that the triluminary was instrumental in
|
|
determining that Sinclair had a reincarnated Minbari soul. If its
|
|
function is indeed on such a spiritual level, the fact that it was
|
|
part of Delenn's machine (cf.
|
|
<a href="022.html">"Chrysalis"</a>)
|
|
suggests that her transformation may be as much mental as physical.
|
|
This interpretation of the triluminary's function is supported by
|
|
the comic issue
|
|
<a href="/lurk/comic/001.html">"In Darkness Find Me."</a>
|
|
|
|
<li> Sheridan's comment that he was the <em>late</em> president's choice
|
|
to replace Sinclair is odd; why would Santiago want someone who would
|
|
be sure to anger the Minbari and increase tensions?
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="NO">Notes</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li> The Agamemnon was also a ship in the British fleet, at one point
|
|
commanded by Lord Nelson (best known for the Battle of Trafalgar.)
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@887274116 Possible factual error: Sheridan said the Dalai Lama ate
|
|
dinner with him, implying an evening meal. But Buddhist monks,
|
|
including the Dalai Lama, don't eat after noon. It is, of course,
|
|
possible that Buddhist practices have changed between the twentieth
|
|
and twenty-third centuries, or that "dinner" wasn't meant to imply
|
|
an evening meal, but rather the last meal of the day.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="JS">jms speaks</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> As for Chrysalis, there's about 8 to 10 days in "story time" between
|
|
it and the events in "Points." The next few shows track in real-time.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <i>Why do the Minbari have a grudge against Sheridan? It was wartime,
|
|
after all.</i><br>
|
|
They don't much like the way he did it, which was rather sneaky.
|
|
My sense is that the Minbari have something of a superiority
|
|
complex; the idea of being beaten, even briefly, by a technically
|
|
inferior race is going to grate on them. Also, bear in mind, that
|
|
the military caste has not been fully informed about WHY they were
|
|
ordered to surrender...so there's a great deal of animosity just
|
|
barely submerged there, which is pointed at the only real human
|
|
they know from the war...because he cost them.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Heads definitely rolled (figuratively speaking) in the Minbari
|
|
warrior caste after the Black Star incident. They allowed themselves
|
|
to get cocky, and didn't do a proper job, which was more than an
|
|
embarrassment to them.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> It kinda bothered their sense of superiority; also, their sense of
|
|
honor lies more in the direction of one-to-one combat, rather than
|
|
mining something as a trap. Consider it the way British troops did
|
|
toward American revolutionary fighters who hid behind trees and used
|
|
guerilla tactics rather than fighting the way the British *wanted*
|
|
them to fight, out in the open, in nice, easily shot-at rows....
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> We will be changing the main title sequence after "Revelations"
|
|
airs to include the new version of Delenn. Would be silly of us to
|
|
include the new version in episodes prior to her unveiling.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The fact that Minbari believe in souls does not make it so.
|
|
<p>
|
|
If a story is rigorously SF, but some of the people who inhabit the
|
|
story have belief systems, does that automatically invalidate it as SF?
|
|
<p>
|
|
I don't think it's the position of this show to state whether or not
|
|
a belief system is true but rather to explore the actions of those who
|
|
THINK it's true; not to resolve arguments, but to start arguments. (See
|
|
"Believers" for more on this one.)
|
|
<p>
|
|
What the characters believe is subjective, and is their business.
|
|
Or, as Sheridan says in a later episode, "I'm not saying what I'm
|
|
saying. I'm not saying what I'm thinking. For that matter, I'm not
|
|
even THINKING what I'm thinking."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <a name="JS:clark">This is correct.</a>
|
|
Sheridan did NOT tell President Clark about the
|
|
Minbari soul situation. Clark already knew about it. Sheridan's line
|
|
is, "I spoke with the president. He is the only other person who knows
|
|
why the Minbari surrendered." Also, in the first issue of the comic,
|
|
this prior knowledge on Clark's part is clear as well.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> BTW, and just for the heck of it...the line about paying off karma at
|
|
an accellerated rate is something Kathryn has been muttering for ages;
|
|
I popped it into the script for fun.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Sheridan asked what kind of scanners the fighters were using because
|
|
he couldn't figure out why they were picking up the Minbari fighters.
|
|
He wanted to be sure nobody had snuck by some kind of new tech. Once
|
|
he knew they were the same tech as before, he knew something screwy
|
|
was up.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Correct above; Sheridan says, quite specifically, in the conference
|
|
room with Ivanova after the Grey Council guy is gone, "they used some
|
|
kind of stealth technology WE'VE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO BREAK." It's not
|
|
a matter of old or cheaper tech; we just haven't broken their
|
|
technology yet.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> And yes, ships can sit in hyperspace (something also mentioned by
|
|
Laurel Takashima in the pilot, "If I were the Vorlons, I'd have a
|
|
warship standing by in hyperspace just waiting to attack."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Basically, I decided to name the EA Lounge "Earhart's" because she
|
|
is an important figure in aviation history, and I wanted a 40s art
|
|
deco style to the place, down to big band music, and it fit perfectly.
|
|
There have been more women aviators, civilian and elsewhere, than we
|
|
know, particularly during WW II at home, and they deserve recognition.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The Earthforce lounge (EA personnel only) is Earhart's, named after
|
|
the famed aviator.
|
|
<p>
|
|
(Consequently, as tradition, only swing or big-band music is ever
|
|
played in Earhart's.)
|
|
<p>
|
|
Yes, we brightened things up a notch, but only a notch, because we
|
|
discovered that a lot of the good work being done on the sets and the
|
|
costumes wasn't being seen because we were too dark. So we went up
|
|
about one f-stop, but at the same time began using more shadows,
|
|
textures and colors, so the show has a denser look to it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> As noted elsewhere...we have previously established that the Dome is
|
|
periodically on Standby Mode, when the system is performing autmoated
|
|
(automated) backups, routine maintenance, that sort of thing. It was
|
|
in "Midnight," when Garibaldi informs Ivanova that that's where he
|
|
likes to go, when it's on standby, and is quiet. It was in "Sky,"
|
|
when Ivanova asks Tech 1 if there are any more ships due in for a
|
|
while, is told no, and she puts her feet up on the console, nobody
|
|
else around.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Also, B5 tends to run on human cycles of day and night, something we
|
|
try to reflect in the sets and effects, showing the Garden bright
|
|
during day times, and dark during night stuff (as around dinner time
|
|
in the Fresh Air Restaurant). Maintaining such cycles has been found
|
|
to be critical in these kinds of environments.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
The standby mode only happens every 36-48 hours, for about an hour.
|
|
Most departments also have their own control areas, using C&C mainly
|
|
when command personnel are required. In addition, there are folks
|
|
monitoring C&C, and if anything *should* happen, someone could be
|
|
there within seconds.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The Hyperion was built before the EM war, and survived.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
The Agamemnon, a much superior ship, was built afterward. Sheridan
|
|
was not commanding the Aggy during the war. It's one of the best
|
|
ships we've got, almost the equivilent of an aircraft carrier or
|
|
battleship, and it took a lot of seniority and work to get it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Yes, you will see the Agamemnon again.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Nothing has been dumbed down or simplified; in a first season episode
|
|
(in other words, the first episode of any given season), you get a lot
|
|
of sampling. If the show is obscure, or there's too much prior
|
|
knowledge required to get into it...they go away fast. So there was a
|
|
bit more straightforward exposition in this episode in order to avoid
|
|
scaring off new viewers.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
And I stated, some time ago, that this was a lighter episode because
|
|
it's sandwiched between two very intense episodes, "Chrysalis" and
|
|
"Revelations," and I think you need some relief there.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
And as Walker noted, there are times when the dome is on standby, as
|
|
noted in "Midnight." The systems every 36 hours or so go through a
|
|
period of self-repair and maintainance for an hour or two; if anything
|
|
comes out of the gate or into local space, someone's there within
|
|
seconds.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> I wouldn't look for too much of Garibaldi in the first episode; he
|
|
was shot in the back...my feeling is that, TV logic to the contrary,
|
|
it takes TIME to recover from that. Consequently, this will take a
|
|
few episodes to get even remotely back on track.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Yes, the quote definitely comes from Lincoln. I hated the old
|
|
Babcom logo, so we dumped it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Re: yankeecentrism...we always strive for balance. Yes, he quoted
|
|
Lincoln, but he also noted that on his 21st birthday, he flew to see
|
|
the new Dalai Lama being sworn in.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Thanks. If you think PoD was a "wham," then I can't wait to see
|
|
your reaction to "Revelations."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Interestingly enough, I figured on giving Sheridan a tie to the
|
|
Civil War through his ancestor, General Philip Sheridan (sometimes
|
|
called "Little Phil" by Lincoln). Afterward, I discovered that Bruce
|
|
is a big civil war buff, so the Lincoln stuff worked very well.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
One of my favorite sequences from this episode is the stuff aboard
|
|
the Minbari cruiser during the Battle of the Line; the shots
|
|
surrounding Delenn and the other Minbari gives it a very god-like
|
|
aspect. Just wonderful.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Yes, Sheridan is descended from Gen. Philip John Sheridan of the
|
|
Union Army.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Sheridan is a soldier. A soldier is told, in wartime, THIS is your
|
|
enemy. You kill the enemy or your enemy kills you. Afterward,
|
|
you're in the same position American soldiers were in after the end
|
|
of WW II when it came time to reconcile with the Germans and the
|
|
Japanese. It can sometimes be very awkward...and sometimes
|
|
reconciliation takes a while.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> For what it's worth, Sheridan is neither a "space cowboy" nor a
|
|
"gung ho type." This description has nothing to do with the
|
|
character, and I'm not quite sure where you got this. Certainly I
|
|
never said or implied it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Captain John Sheridan is a war hero, of sorts; he squeaked out the
|
|
only real victory of the Earth/Minbari War. (Which means the Minbari
|
|
don't generally like him a lot.) He did what he did because that's
|
|
his job. He's a professional soldier. For the last two years, he's
|
|
been commanding the Agamemmnon, a high-visibility Earthforce starship
|
|
on deep patrol. As such, he has had to learn to work with a number
|
|
of different races and species.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
In some ways, his character is somewhat more well-rounded than was
|
|
the case with Sinclair, over whom a general sense of doom often
|
|
seemed to hang. Sheridan is often very thoughtful and introspective;
|
|
at other times, he can be just a bit eccentric; he leads by
|
|
respecting those who work under him, and givingthem room to grow;
|
|
like any career officer, he HATES the bureaucracy with a passion, and
|
|
this is the one thing that can drive him nuts; he knows that
|
|
commanding B5 is a great opportunity, but he also knows that his
|
|
presence brings certain complications with it, and he's very
|
|
ambivilant about that aspect; he's the son of a diplomatic envoy who
|
|
disappeared on his 21st birthday, running off to see (of all things)
|
|
the new Dali Lama being installed; he has a very easygoing manner,
|
|
and a great sense of humor. He quickly re-forms a friendship with
|
|
Ivanova, for whom he has great respect and professional admiration.
|
|
(For a time she served under him at Io.)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
He is, actually, a fascinating and intriguing character with a lot
|
|
of different shadings...none of which have *anything* to do with
|
|
being a "space cowboy" or "gung-ho type."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Anyway...point being...when it was announced that there was going to
|
|
be a new Lieutenant-Commander, a number of folks went ballistic and
|
|
said the show would now be ruined. I said, in essence, look...I
|
|
created Takashima; I can create an interesting character to replace
|
|
her. And I thunk up Ivanova, who according to the rec.arts.b5 poll
|
|
is the most popular character on the show. When it was announced
|
|
that Sinclair would be STAYING with the show, after the pilot, a
|
|
number of folks said this was bad, he was wooden, he stunk, get him
|
|
off...and ended up being very enamored of him. My only reply now
|
|
about Bruce...give him, and me, a chance. I genuinely think you will
|
|
like what you see a *lot*.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
In the course of the first season, Ivanova, Garibaldi, G'Kar, Londo,
|
|
Delenn, others...they've exploded into strong characters. You need
|
|
an equally strong character designed to hold his own, and be
|
|
memorable, in that august company. Sheridan was designed knowing we
|
|
had a much elevated playing field around the character.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Obviously, clearly, and irrefutably, an actor brings a *lot* to any
|
|
role. No question. But it tends to begin with what is created.
|
|
I've seen it said here, repeatedly, that none of the characters are
|
|
uninteresting; they all have lives, and agendas, that make them
|
|
fascinating to watch: Londo, Morden, G'Kar, Delenn, Garibaldi,
|
|
Ivanova...what those characters are came out of my head, in terms of
|
|
who tey are, what they say, what they believe, where they came from
|
|
and where they're going. Why would I invent a new character that was
|
|
any less involving, or interesting, or multifaceted? Particularly
|
|
knowing that he's going to be a central character?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Speaking as someone who's been in fandom a long, long time, I know
|
|
there is always a tendency for panic, to assume the apocalpse is
|
|
upon us, that something is never going to be the same again. I heard
|
|
this after the Enterprise was destroyed in "The Search for Spock."
|
|
I've heard this a lot over the years. It's generally over-reaction
|
|
and worry before anyone has even seen a frame of film.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Bottom line being...wait and see, then judge. I've tried very hard
|
|
not to let you down, and I think so far I haven't done so...I have no
|
|
intention of starting now. Bruce is doing an absolutely *brilliant*
|
|
job as Captain Sheridan, bringing a thoughtfulness and intensity and
|
|
charm and intensity to the part that is a joy to behold. Give him a
|
|
chance.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Alas, I wrote my note about Bruce around 1 or 2 in the morning, and
|
|
I meant to balance out *intensity* with *intelligence*, but my
|
|
brain saw the first letters i-n-t-e, and vapor-locked.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <em>How important to the Arc is Sheridan?</em><br>
|
|
How critical was Aragorn to the storyline of Lord of the Rings?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The way in which Sheridan comes into the storyline is *absolutely*
|
|
consistent with everything that has come before, and everything that
|
|
follows.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Sheridan was never on the original list [to command B5] because at
|
|
that time when the EA needed Minbari financing for B5, they knew it'd
|
|
piss off the Minbari to have it there, so he was never considered for
|
|
the post at that time.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> "Sounds like a formula to really PO the Minbari."
|
|
<p>
|
|
Yup.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Just to clarify: in Soul Hunter we set in place the question of what
|
|
these things are, and do not resolve that question. Dr. Franklin
|
|
offers that with the correct technology, it might be possible to
|
|
make (for lack of a better term) a clone of someone's neural patterns,
|
|
copy his personality and memories into a storage device...but also
|
|
dismisses the notion of soul stealing.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
I traffic in ambiguity.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> In a sense, yes, "Believers" now enters the arc...but so does "Soul
|
|
Hunter," in a big way. Replay Lennier's talk to Sheridan and Ivanova,
|
|
then play Delenn's conversation with Sinclair and the Soul Hunter in
|
|
that episode, and suddenly a lot of elements begin to intersect.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Re: you're noticing the line, "You talk like a Minbari" from Neroon
|
|
to Sinclair in "Legacies"....yup. Sometimes this stuff is in broad
|
|
strokes, sometimes in teeny little things like that. Also ties in
|
|
even further with where Sinclair goes.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Note that Lennier says he wishes he could have told them (us) the
|
|
*rest* of the prophecy...and there's definitely more to Sinclair, as
|
|
will be seen later in the season. Remember, the Grey Council never
|
|
tells anyone the whole truth (note how Kalain asks that question
|
|
upon being told that Sinclair is just an ambassador).
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> There really wasn't/isn't time in PoD to get into the angst everyone
|
|
has over Sinclair leaving (though some of that is given to Sheridan,
|
|
oddly enough). But it WILL get brought up in subsequent episodes,
|
|
especially from Garibaldi.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Sinclair was the first human the Minbari (or at least the Grey
|
|
Council) had ever met, having come this far for the final victory.
|
|
The Earth Explorer vessel was part of a military fleet that
|
|
encountered a Minbari convoy, there was a miscommunication, a
|
|
misperceived threat, and our ships opened fire. There was no
|
|
person-to-person contact.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Sure, you could blind-fire at a Minbari cruiser, but it's pretty
|
|
heavily armored. And while you're shooting at it, you're not only
|
|
being hit by cruiser blasts, but the several dozen Minbari fighters
|
|
coming in behind you. And shooting at a sublight traveling fighter by
|
|
eye would absolutely never work. It *has* to be computer guided.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
(BTW, for the sharp of eye...if you go back and sill-step through
|
|
some of the cockpit screen shots in "Sky," you'll note that on the tac
|
|
screen in Sinclair's cockpit it says something to the effect of
|
|
"Unable to lock-onto target.")
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Yes, you can go in and shoot at a Minbari *cruiser* visually...but
|
|
the reality is that any long-range weapon will be intercepted by
|
|
targeting fire, and if you get up real close and personal...well,
|
|
actually, you *can't* get up real close and personal because, as
|
|
Mitchell learned in "Sky," you get shot by the fighters.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
What the fighters tend to remain engaged with are the Minbari fighters,
|
|
which are *incredibly* fast...much too fast to target visually.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
And believe me, as Sheridan stated, Earth's been *trying* to break
|
|
the stealth tech for a while, just hasn't been able to.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Re: [Robert] Foxworth...he was someone we spoke to in case Bruce turned out not
|
|
to be available, and we liked him instantly, and he liked the show.
|
|
So for good luck, we had him come in for this role, which may appear
|
|
again. He's a terrific actor.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <em>What were all those ribbons on General Hague's chest awarded
|
|
for?</em><br>
|
|
I'll have to check, but probably most of those medals are for
|
|
actions during the Earth/Minbari War, and during the Dilgar War.
|
|
I'll have to check to get anything more specific than that.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Well, my thought at the time, and I probably should've put this
|
|
into dialogue in retrospect, was that there's a window about every 36
|
|
hours when the entire C&C system goes through self-maintainance for
|
|
about half an hour, backing things up, doing self-repair, filing logs
|
|
with Earth Central, that sort of thing. They normally pick a slow
|
|
period in docking, and any other routine stuff is handled through the
|
|
backup C&C on the other side of the station axis (you can see it
|
|
directly above the docking bay when the normal C&C is directly below
|
|
it).
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
At first I'd considered putting that in Ivanova's mouth when she says
|
|
"Of all the time he could've picked," but then the reveal of where
|
|
he was and what he was doing fell flat; it needed to be a surprise or
|
|
it lost its impact and the humor. Ah, well....
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> It has been established, in prior episodes, that there are brief
|
|
periods when C&C is in "standby mode," during which time no ships are
|
|
due, the station is in "night" cycle, and the operational equipment
|
|
in C&C goes through routine backup and maintenance. In "Midnight on
|
|
the Firing Line," our first episode, Ivanova is told by Garibaldi
|
|
that Sinclair is in C&C when it's in standby mode because he likes
|
|
the quiet during those brief periods (usually only about an hour or
|
|
so); in "Chrysalis," Ivanova asks Tech 1 if any more ships are due in
|
|
for a while, is told no, and she puts her feet up on the console,
|
|
watching the news, with the place pretty much deserted.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
This isn't the bridge of a starship; this is mainly a center of
|
|
operations for docking and other station activities requiring command
|
|
personnel. Every separate department -- environmental, other
|
|
resources -- has its own separate control center, with lots of
|
|
redundency.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
In addition, there's always somebody monitoring stuff as it comes
|
|
through, so if there *were* any kind of problem, there'd be somebody
|
|
on site in C&C in thirty seconds. Basically, we're talking an hour
|
|
or so once every 36 to 48 hours. I could've explained this in
|
|
dialogue, but it would've taken the edge off the revelation and humor,
|
|
and I figured we'd done this before enough times that it wouldn't be
|
|
an issue.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Just as an advisory...the woman who spoke up in PoD (the tech who
|
|
told Sheridan that Security wanted him) is not a Tech 1 replacement;
|
|
she was there just for that one episode. We have a number of folks
|
|
floating through that area now, because logically you would have
|
|
rotating crews.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> A vibe shower would theoretically use sonic waves (in combination
|
|
with other elements, like disinfecting lighting, as seen in "Signs")
|
|
to remove dirt and kill bacteria.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Delenn staying while Sinclair goes is part of WHY Sinclair goes and
|
|
Delenn stays. It's absolutely part and parcel.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@834423619 Delenn had intended to tell Sinclair much about the soul issue
|
|
before entering the chrysalis.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> It's always interesting, if you have one character upon whom everyone
|
|
else leans, even depends, to *remove* that character for a time.
|
|
Because then those characters have to *react*...to either stand or
|
|
fall on their own. It shakes things up a little...and vastly
|
|
intensifies the characters.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> I'm going to test myself, and see how much I can say without saying
|
|
too much.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
You have X-number of characters. They're all in the same place.
|
|
You're trying to tell a story that has a great deal of scale, and
|
|
covers all kinds of worlds, changing politics, alliances, on and on.
|
|
The question becomes, how do you *illustrate* that? To use a line
|
|
from the original Trek, when a mob guy is brought aboard the
|
|
Enterprise, he says later, "All I saw was a room and five guys."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
So now you start saying, "Hmmm...what if I remove Character A from
|
|
the chessboard, and move him over *here* for a while? He wasn't going
|
|
to be doing much for the next little bit anyway. And we won't just
|
|
"deal" with that change, it's part of the story...it broadens out the
|
|
story to include Place A *and* Place B. It has repercussions down the
|
|
road. It comes up again in the future. Elements from Place B now
|
|
become known on Place A. Character A may even make an occasional
|
|
reappearance to keep us even more closely connected with Place B,
|
|
which is necessary because Place B is very, very important."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
What we have in mind here isn't quite comparable to anything that's
|
|
been done before. The character will still be alive. The character
|
|
will continue to have an impact on the story. The character will be
|
|
spotted from time to time. The character will continue to show up in
|
|
the comic and the novels. And through this move, you have the benefit
|
|
of substantially opening up the B5 universe, you help create the
|
|
realignment of characters and loyalties that was anticipated for this
|
|
season, and it helps kick over the tables, as we did in Chrysalis.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Just a slight refinement on the argument.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> I can probably answer your question a little better after you've seen
|
|
the second episode of this season. For now, let's just say this: in
|
|
working out the story for year two, Sinclair's main line of connection
|
|
was to the Minbari. But the Minbari storyline was diminishing in ways
|
|
onnected to the war in year two; obviously we all know what is on the
|
|
upswing in year two, certain dark forces. I needed someone who has a
|
|
connection to *that* side of the story to personalize it, and Sheridan
|
|
brings that connection to the mix, although he doesn't know it yet.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The Battle of the Line and the hole in Sinclair's mind was always
|
|
intended as the entry point or trigger to the story. It's like Frodo
|
|
being given the Ring in LoTR. The story isn't about that, that's how
|
|
we get INTO it. Frankly, there's no way you can sustain that one
|
|
element for five years, nor did we ever intend to do so.
|
|
<p>
|
|
The only difference in the resolution of that aspect is this: we had
|
|
originally intended to resolve the missing 24 hours, and the Battle
|
|
of the Line, by episode four, season two. We've simply moved it up
|
|
3 eps to the first episode. Because new players are coming onto the
|
|
field, in the form of the Shadowmen, and other forces, and we now
|
|
have to begin turning our attention to new mysteries.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> "Changes are coming; Sinclair was the first, there will be others."
|
|
He was referring to more changes coming.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Sheridan, or more specifically the need for someone *like* Sheridan
|
|
began to get through clearly toward the latter part of last season,
|
|
as I began planning out season two's progression, and kept looking at
|
|
elements of the story and trying to find ways to get Sinclair into
|
|
the heart of them. They felt contrived, for the most part; and the
|
|
other characters, like Londo and G'Kar and Delenn, were *really*
|
|
moving forward in a big way. The role of Sinclair was becoming
|
|
primarily that of a "problem solver," and when that happens, a sort
|
|
of glass bell falls down around the character, and you can't do much
|
|
with him.
|
|
<p>
|
|
So what the writer has to do is break that bell in one way or
|
|
another; do something totally unexpected to him, and bring in someone
|
|
who has a direct, personal connection with the storyline emerging in
|
|
season two, so it's not contrived or forced.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@859396941 All the characters are unique; there seems to be this
|
|
bone-headed notion, that I frequently run into, of "Well,
|
|
Ivanova's just Takashima renamed," or "Sheridan's story is
|
|
just the same as Sinclair's, same guy just renamed." They're
|
|
*not* and never have been. The story of one does not devlove
|
|
automatically upon the other. If you make a change, it's
|
|
because you have something better in mind...otherwise why
|
|
make it?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> I said, from the very beginning, that once the series got rolling, no
|
|
single primary question could be allowed to go more than about one
|
|
season before answering it, otherwise you get into a frustrating Twin
|
|
Peaks situation where *nothing* is resolved. Basically, the events
|
|
begun in "Chrysalis" bleed over into three episodes; the Battle of the
|
|
Line answers were initially only a couple of episodes further down in
|
|
my outline, about episode #3. Making the change, for one thing,
|
|
allowed me to move that storyline forward to episode #1, blow through
|
|
it and get the story moving in year two faster, rather than delaying
|
|
further with loose threads from season one.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The idea of a Chrysalis II went by the boards once I really got into
|
|
the script, and realized that C1 had tipped over too many tables to
|
|
even HOPE to resolve them in one follow-up episode. So the threads
|
|
yanked in C1 will be paid off over several episodes, hence no C2; the
|
|
first episode of year two is "Points of Departure."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <em>What about Catherine Sakai?</em>
|
|
<p>
|
|
This is the one thread that I'm still trying to decide about.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@834859258 They didn't get married. Wasn't time, and his new posting
|
|
precluded that.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> We're dedicated to improving all of these elements on a regular basis;
|
|
CGI, sets, directing, lighting, name it.
|
|
<p>
|
|
The music will change every year, to get in sync with where the season
|
|
is going; the tone and tenor and mood will shift.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Re: the narration...last year, Michael had the benefit of being able to
|
|
see the sequence prior to reading the narration, and reading with the
|
|
images. That was when we were shooting in July to air in January. In
|
|
this case, shooting in August to air in November, Bruce had to wing it,
|
|
without any images for reference, just text. Now that we've got the
|
|
opening completed (and we weren't satisfied with it or done tinkering
|
|
with it until a few days before delivery), we'll probably let him do
|
|
it again with the visuals before him, so he knows what he's reading to,
|
|
since it'll have a *big* impact on how he delivers the stuff.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> There's a reason for this: due to time constraints, we have to get
|
|
Bruce to do the narration *without* having the images in front of him;
|
|
he had no way of knowing where beats would go with the images, or what
|
|
would be under it (since we were still putting the new opening
|
|
together), so we had to artifically build in pauses when we did the
|
|
final transfer (as opposed to year one, where we had the images
|
|
assembled long before we had Michael do the narration). What took
|
|
forever was that 5 fade/dissolve/wipe, which just killed us time-wise,
|
|
but is spiffy to look at.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Now that it's all together, we plan to have Bruce re-do the narration
|
|
with the images in front of him, so he can respond naturally and make
|
|
it flow, the way he would've been able to do had we had the material
|
|
ready in time.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Re: the theme music...to me, one is neither worse nor better than the
|
|
other. They're *different*, and meant to convey different moods and
|
|
themes. Each year it'll change. This year was heavy on strings and
|
|
brass; next year it'll be heavy on percussion. The main theme will be
|
|
reinterpreted and interpolated in different ways. In the B5 universe,
|
|
change is the only constant.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Promoting Ivanova to running the station would not be logical, since
|
|
from a military and diplomatic standpoint she has nowhere *near* the
|
|
level of experience required. It wouldn't be done in real life.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|