|
Transcription of "One Step Beyond" radio program 7/24/94,
|
|
KDHX-FM, St. Louis. Chuck Lavazzi, producer.
|
|
|
|
Transcription by Maria Ana Montalvo [I've attempted to be as accurate
|
|
as possible. Verbal hesitations (such as "um") have either been deleted,
|
|
or indicated by "..". Verbal "keep busy" phrases, such as "uh huh," in
|
|
the middle of short speeches have also been deleted; I kept those in
|
|
long speeches to make this easier to read. When I couldn't understand a
|
|
phrase, my best guess is indicated with square brackets and question marks,
|
|
e.g. [?? guess ??]. (Of course, this whole thing is my best guess.) Enjoy.
|
|
mam 8/8/94]
|
|
|
|
Revised 10/30/94: Fixed some misspellings; filled in one of the spots
|
|
I didn't understand, based on a net discussion. mam
|
|
|
|
Cast:
|
|
Chuck = Chuck Lavazzi
|
|
Otis = Otis Woodard
|
|
jms = J. Michael Straczynski
|
|
assorted callers
|
|
|
|
|
|
[introductory business deleted]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... And this week our special guest, from his home in California,
|
|
J. Michael Straczynski, the creator and executive producer of the science
|
|
fiction TV series, Babylon 5. And if you'd like to talk to him, and us,
|
|
you can do it by calling 664-FM88. We'll put you on the line, and you
|
|
can talk to the man who created this show.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Well, say his name again.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: J. Michael Straczynski [stra-chin-ski]. I think I pronounced it
|
|
right. If I didn't, he'll tell me what's right [laughs] when we put him
|
|
on 'cause he's listening to this right now.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Well, the Babylon 5, and I'm sure there are people out there who are
|
|
fans of the Babylon 5 ...
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I sure am.
|
|
|
|
Otis: ... just like the Firesign Theater [last week's guests] so,
|
|
you'll get your ears full today on this wonderful show.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So stay tuned for science fiction, Babylon 5, J. Michael Straczynski,
|
|
we're going to give away some tickets, and we're going to be playing some
|
|
sort-of science-fiction-oriented comedy and music in there on the show where
|
|
it's never the same show twice, you know, it's One Step....
|
|
|
|
Otis: One Step Beyond ...
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... this one here.
|
|
|
|
[music containing sound bites from Lost In Space]
|
|
|
|
[Michael O'Hare's voice]: It was the dawn of the third age of mankind, 10
|
|
years after the Earth-Minbari war. The Babylon project was a dream given
|
|
form. It's goal: to prevent another war by creating a place where humans
|
|
and aliens could work out their differences peacefully. It's a port of call,
|
|
home away from home for diplomats, hustlers, entrepeneurs, and wanderers.
|
|
Humans and aliens wrapped in 2,500,000 tons of spinning metal, all alone in
|
|
the night. It can be a dangerous place, but it's our last best hope for
|
|
peace. This is the story of the last of the Babylon stations. The year is
|
|
2258. The name of the place is Babylon 5.
|
|
|
|
[theme music]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: All right, and right now you're probably asking yourself, "What in
|
|
the world do those two cuts have to do with each other?" OK, here it is.
|
|
The first cut you heard is something called "Celebration." It was put
|
|
together several years ago for a Lost in Space convention, and we got that
|
|
from one of our listeners who calls himself Doctor Smith. And of course,
|
|
among the many voices you heard on that was the voice of Billy Mumy. Now,
|
|
it just so happens that Billy Mumy is featured in Babylon 5 as Lennier, the
|
|
assistant to the Minbari ambassador, so of course, the next thing we heard
|
|
was the main title for the TV series Babylon 5. And the reason we did that
|
|
(finally we're getting around to the point here at 9 minutes after the hour)
|
|
is because on the phone with us right now, unless I've screwed up, is
|
|
J. Michael Straczynski, the creator and executive producer of Babylon 5.
|
|
Joe, are you still there?
|
|
|
|
jms: I hope so.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes, you are. You've been very patient. We've had you on hold for
|
|
about 20 minutes now.
|
|
|
|
jms: It's always fascinating.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We're glad to have you here.
|
|
|
|
jms: And you said it right. The European version is stra-chin-ski.
|
|
The Americanized version is stra-zin-ski, but you can call me Joe.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We'll do that, 'cause it'll be easier. It's better than jms or
|
|
Great Maker, in terms of radio anyway.
|
|
|
|
jms: I think so.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. Let me explain, once again, that ... for those of you who
|
|
might not know, Babylon 5 is an internationally syndicated science fiction
|
|
television show. Here, in St. Louis, it's seen on KPLR Channel 11 in Dolby
|
|
stereo at 10 a.m. on Saturday, which I think is an odd time, and repeated
|
|
at 8 p.m. on Sunday, so, you have a chance to see this week's episode,
|
|
which I believe is Legacies, and .. more than that I won't say, because
|
|
I'm going to turn this over to Joe, to tell us a little bit about Babylon
|
|
5, and how it might differ from some of the other science fiction shows you
|
|
may have seen on TV. And I also want to remind you, our listeners, that
|
|
you can call us on 664-FM88, if you want to go on the air and talk to Joe.
|
|
So, Joe, lay it on us.
|
|
|
|
jms: Babylon 5 is a series set in the future about 250-some-odd years,
|
|
aboard a space station which is about 5 miles long, and serves as a port of
|
|
call, or a way station, if you will, similar to Venice, or other parts of
|
|
Europe during the 14th century.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
jms: A place of commerce, trade, diplomacy, where different parties can meet
|
|
and work out their problems. And .. what we're trying to do with the show,
|
|
which is I think different than what's been done before for American
|
|
television certainly, is that Babylon 5 is a five-year story. Each episode
|
|
stand alone, because it has to. You can't be sure to watch every single
|
|
week. But over the long haul, as well as seeing the individual stories we
|
|
have in the series, you'll see a much larger story with a beginning, a
|
|
middle and end that unravels over 5 years. It's an attempt to do for
|
|
American television what the British have often done. Like The Prisoner was
|
|
a self-contained story ...
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Right.
|
|
|
|
jms: ... and it had a definite end point. And this also has a definite end
|
|
point. I also want to try and do for science fiction television what ... as
|
|
the print medium has been doing for..ever. I grew up on the, on the true
|
|
sagas of science fiction, the Foundation books, the ...
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, Asimov, yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: [?? Krell | Carroll ??] books, and the Dune books, the Lord of the Rings,
|
|
and asked the question, why has no one really tried to do something on that
|
|
scale for American television. And I figured, well, someone has to be the
|
|
first one, might as well be me.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So, I mean, this is kind of unusual, too, because it's rare for us to
|
|
actually have a science fiction either movie or TV that is really produced,
|
|
or the brain-child of an actual science fiction fan, ironically enough.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yes, this is the case where the loonies are running the asylum.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes! Yes, we're all in favor of that here.
|
|
|
|
jms: And certainly I've worked other shows, and very often they find guys who
|
|
really don't know science fiction at all, but have track records running
|
|
shows in general, and say here's a science fiction show; go run it. And they
|
|
approach it with either no knowledge of the series or contempt for science
|
|
fiction in general.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: A number of years ago, when I used to be a journalist, I was
|
|
assigned to interview the producers of the series V.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: Uh, not the miniseries which was terrific, but the series itself. And,
|
|
one thing one of the producers said, was that as long as we have space
|
|
ships and laser blasts, and funny-looking aliens, we are guaranteed the
|
|
science fiction audience. We have to go beyond that. And I was astonished
|
|
at the level of real contempt showed toward the audience. And that
|
|
extends ... either contempt or lack of knowledge extends up and down the
|
|
entire Hollywood system. Fortunately, that is starting slowly to change as
|
|
the old farts die off....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughs] That's a very frank way to put it, yes.
|
|
|
|
Otis: That's very good.
|
|
|
|
jms: And those of us who know and grew up with this stuff can take their
|
|
place.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Is that really happening; I mean, do you see that as a real
|
|
trend? At this point?
|
|
|
|
jms: It's ... an evolutionary trend, yeah. In the sense of one level
|
|
dying off, the next taking its place. The other main concern, of course,
|
|
has always been .. the budget, because science fiction shows have
|
|
perennially been budget breakers. They always cost huge, hideous
|
|
amounts of money, and they always go over budget. And one reason that
|
|
networks and stations are leery of them is because they always do this.
|
|
Babylon 5 is the very first American science fiction TV series in history
|
|
ever to come in a few bucks under budget for the year.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I didn't know that.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, and because of that, because of the model that we're using in our
|
|
production, suddenly the networks are looking around saying, well, maybe it
|
|
can be done, if we use the Babylon 5 model. So now we have network and
|
|
studio VPs making tours of the facility, seeing how the heck we're doing what
|
|
we're doing.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, really? So you're attracting a lot of attention with this.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, and it is our hope ... that this will encourage more science
|
|
fiction on television. Because I think that, the more competition there is,
|
|
the better off we're all gonna be, both those who make the shows as those
|
|
who watch the shows.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, for sure. You know, let's back up a second. You said the Babylon
|
|
5 model is enabling you to come in under budget. What is that model? I
|
|
mean, how does that differ from, oh, I don't know maybe, the Star Trek
|
|
series, or some other series people might know.
|
|
|
|
jms: What we're trying to do is ... my sense is when someone hands you 20 or
|
|
some-odd million dollars to make a show, it kind of behooves you to act
|
|
responsibly, which by itself is a bit of a break from tradition.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughs] I guess in Hollywood, I guess that's true, yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: But beyond that, we're doing what no one else is doing in town, is
|
|
taking full advantage of technology, and the changes in technology in
|
|
production, and post-production and other areas. We have almost a
|
|
completely-digital studio, which no one else has at this point. In
|
|
addition to that, we plan things out way ahead of time, because, again,
|
|
this is a planned-out series, where every episode story is worked out 5
|
|
years in advance. I have every story for 5 years in my head. Before we
|
|
roll one frame of film, we know what stories we're going to be doing that
|
|
year, what sets we're going to have to have constructed, what effects we're
|
|
going to have to have, and we have at minimum of 6 scripts already in hand.
|
|
So this gives all the different parties concerned enough time to sit
|
|
down ... and design things and build things properly, without having to
|
|
rush. It comes down basically to planning. Which no one else does in this
|
|
town. It's always last minute [?that?] you're getting paid is on the stage,
|
|
you're paying 24 hours of overtime to get things built in time, which is
|
|
madness. If you know where you're going, and you plan out ahead of time,
|
|
you can save a lot of money and get more out of the process.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I want to remind our listeners here two things: we're talking
|
|
with J. Michael Straczynski, the executive producer of Babylon 5; the
|
|
phone number here is 664-FM88 if you want to jump in here and talk to Joe
|
|
and Otis and myself, and what else was I going to say, there was something
|
|
else I was going to bring ... Oh yeah, I was going ... so ... what you've
|
|
just been saying is that really, one of the things that distinguishes
|
|
Babylon 5 from some other stuff we may have seen is that it is planned out
|
|
and has a finite beginning and end. Is this why we sometimes, or at least
|
|
I sometimes, get the feeling looking at other shows, that they're making it
|
|
up as they go along [British accent], as they said in Monty Python?
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, most shows do, to one extent or another. I think that Brisco
|
|
County, to some extent, was an exception to that, with their whole orb
|
|
story line. They kind of had an idea where they were going, and that made
|
|
it, you know, for me as a viewer, an awful lot of fun.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Because it seemed to be something extended. I think someone wants
|
|
to go on the air here, so let's give 'em a shot. Hello, you're on the air
|
|
with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yes, good afternoon.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Good afternoon.
|
|
|
|
caller: My question was, how did you manage to get such intelligent
|
|
programming on commercial television.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughs] That's a good question. Stay on the line, because ...
|
|
you know, he's here, you're here, and .. we don't have a tape delay, so
|
|
go ahead.
|
|
|
|
jms: You lie to the stations.
|
|
|
|
[all laugh]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I knew it! That's the secret!
|
|
|
|
jms: You tell them you're going to give them Baywatch in space, and
|
|
you give them this instead. By the time they find out, it's too late. No,
|
|
what's very fortunate for us is that as we took the show around for 7 years
|
|
it took us to get the show on the air, we'd find out that executives that
|
|
we had meetings with either got it, or they didn't get it, immediately.
|
|
And the first person who got it was Evan Thompson, from ChrisCraft [sp?]
|
|
Television, which was at that time putting a partnership together with
|
|
Warner Brothers. And the Warner Brothers' vice president, Dick Robertson,
|
|
also saw the potential of what we had in mind to do, and believed in us,
|
|
and said stick with us and we'll make this thing happen. And what you have
|
|
to do is find people like these, who understand the concept and are willing
|
|
to support it, where often the emphasis is on dumbing down the show. And
|
|
these guys don't. They're very good people.
|
|
|
|
caller: Terrific. Well, that's a wonderful thing. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
jms: Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK. Thank you for calling. And, we'll take her off the line. Once
|
|
again, the number is 664-FM88, if you want to talk to Otis and I, and J.
|
|
Michael Straczynski, the producer of Babylon 5. And I'll tell you what I
|
|
want to do at this point, Big O, we've got some business to do....
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes, we have a little business to do.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We got some business to do, and then we're going to play a couple of
|
|
pieces of music, and then we'll be back with J. Michael Straczynski, and
|
|
your calls about Babylon 5 and science fiction and stuff like that. So,
|
|
Big O, lay the business on us.
|
|
|
|
[business deleted: PSA & promo]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Well, once again, our guest is J. Michael Straczynski. He's the
|
|
producer, executive producer of Babylon 5, and we're going to drop off for
|
|
a couple of songs here that are science-fiction related, then we'll be back
|
|
with him and us and your calls.
|
|
|
|
Otis: That's right, you can dial 664-3688, and you can talk to a real, real
|
|
producer.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Hollywood producer type. Although, I don't ... Joe, I guess you're
|
|
not really a Hollywood producer in the old sense, from what you said.
|
|
|
|
jms: I really try not to be.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: And one last point, very quickly, I was thinking about your caller's
|
|
questions.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: And the other path, or the answer to her question is that you produce
|
|
intelligent science fiction by hiring intelligent science fiction writers.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ah.
|
|
|
|
jms: And you have your, like, Dorothy Fontana, David Gerrold, Harlan
|
|
Ellison, and others involved in your show, it certainly helps.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And, I'm going to come back to that point, after the music. So,
|
|
we're going to drop out here for a couple of things. Well, here's one of
|
|
our favorite groups, the Bonzo Dog Band, and I guess, since we're in outer
|
|
space and also in the city, it's only fair we play a cut called I'm the
|
|
Urban Space Man on the One Step Beyond show, KDHX, St. Louis. The phone
|
|
number here is 664-FM88 if you want to get in on the conversation. We'll
|
|
be back in about, oh, five minutes or so.
|
|
|
|
[music]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Well, there he goes. That's Harry Nilssen [sp?] with Space Man,
|
|
and this is the One Step Beyond show, KDHX, St. Louis community radio with
|
|
Chuck and Otis and our special guest, J. Michael Straczynski, from
|
|
California.
|
|
|
|
jms: Hi there.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, you're still there. Ok.
|
|
|
|
jms: I'm in here.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: Surprising to both of us, but I'm still here.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, hey listen, we've got ... it looks like someone's calling in.
|
|
Otis is going to screen the call and see if they want to talk to you on
|
|
the air but.... Let me remind folks, J. Michael Straczynski, the executive
|
|
producer and creator of the science fiction TV series Babylon 5, and we
|
|
have someone on line who wants to talk to you.
|
|
|
|
jms: Great.
|
|
|
|
caller: Good afternoon.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Hello. You're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Good afternoon.
|
|
|
|
jms: Hi there.
|
|
|
|
caller: First of all I've got a comment, and I speak for several of
|
|
a roomful of people we've got sitting here. We really appreciate
|
|
the way Babylon 5 gives a realistic treatment of different religious
|
|
points of view as opposed to some of the other space shows that are on TV.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Which shall remain unnamed.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: yeah. There are so many.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, I appreciate that. One thing that ... personally I am an
|
|
atheist. I make no bones about it. But, as a writer, my obligation first
|
|
and foremost is to be honest in my work. And as you look around what you
|
|
realize very quickly is that religion, whether it is human or alien or what
|
|
have you, is, and always has been, mankind's foremost and first means of
|
|
trying to understand the universe, and our place within the universe. It
|
|
tries to answer the questions we haven't answered anywhere else yet.
|
|
Consequently, I think it behooves you to a) treat it with respect, and b)
|
|
to realize that it ain't gonna go away in 250 years. It's been with us
|
|
since the dawn of sentient life on this planet, and it's going to be here
|
|
for a long time to come.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK, and I have a question. When you talked about a station of the
|
|
magnitude of Babylon 5 with a quarter of a million people on it, it raises
|
|
some tremendous logistics problems, and I wonder if any background had been
|
|
put into that, as far as the development of the story went.
|
|
|
|
jms: Can you be more specific on that?
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, like, how many shipments a day of food and removal of waste
|
|
and processing of air and all....
|
|
|
|
jms: Got it. Yeah, we have indeed put some work into that, trying to
|
|
figure out roughly the maximum number of ships that can come through any
|
|
one particular time, how much space we have for living quarters, and we try
|
|
to answer those questions in a realistic fashion without necessarily going
|
|
into them every single week. It forms sort of a backdrop in the back of
|
|
our heads; whether we use it or not, it's always there. And we try at all
|
|
times to again be realistic in how we handle this stuff. For instance,
|
|
once problem you're going to have in an enclosed environment like this
|
|
aside from the obvious problems of waste products and food and so on and so
|
|
forth, is the fact that a lot of people, as with any large metropolitan
|
|
area, are going to come looking for a new life. For a better life, for job
|
|
opportunities. And they're going to come to the station. And in our
|
|
universe, again, being realistic, space travel costs money. You don't just
|
|
hop on a ship and go somewhere; it's going to cost you a lot of bucks. And
|
|
once you get to Babylon 5 some of the people who are looking for new lives
|
|
spend a lot of money to get there, and have some money on hand to live for
|
|
a while in hopes of finding that new opportunity. When they can't find it,
|
|
they often can't afford a ticket off the station. So the question becomes,
|
|
what do you do with these guys? And you can't just, you know, throw 'em
|
|
off into space and kill 'em. To send all of 'em back to their relative
|
|
homeworlds is going to cost you an awful lot of money, which their
|
|
government doesn't want to pay for, and the [?business?] doesn't want to
|
|
pay for. So they end up migrating down to the lower depths of the station
|
|
where they become known as lurkers.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: And, they're basically Babylon 5's homeless. And, they scavenge, they
|
|
scrounge. Very often you have guys who are doing less than legitimate work
|
|
and they go down there and say I need 10 guys or 5 guys to do a job for us.
|
|
And it's a real problem. How do you, how do you deal with that problem?
|
|
We're trying to answer that question.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So, we'll still have homelessness 250 years in the future, you think.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah. Yeah. In particular in this kind of environment where you can't
|
|
just go somewhere else. Once you're there, there's the station, and there's
|
|
space.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: And you can't walk out the door.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So I guess it's not dissimilar from the position people were
|
|
in, I guess, pre-mass-transportation when they'd reach a big port of call.
|
|
|
|
jms: In a way, yes. It's kind of ironic, where we've come much further in
|
|
transportation technology, but, you know, by being in a restricted location
|
|
like a space station, it causes similar problems to what we had a long time
|
|
ago.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Are we going to be seeing something more of the lurkers, 'cause so
|
|
far they've been kind of tangential, it seems to me.
|
|
|
|
jms: We will see them from time to time, yeah, certainly toward the end of
|
|
the season we see 'em popping up in a few places. We try not to give too
|
|
much story weight there, because there's a limitation of what you can do
|
|
with that storyline.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: But we do have some plans for down the road, though, yes.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: Thanks for a wonderful show.
|
|
|
|
jms: Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you for calling. And we've got another call, so I might as
|
|
well go ahead and put them on. Hello, you're on the air with J. Michael
|
|
Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Hi. Uh, I had a question for you about something regarding a
|
|
musical request.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, for me! OK, well, go ahead.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, I'd like to, yeah, um, I was wondering, I was wondering if
|
|
you were, if you were gonna play, I don't know the name of the song, it's
|
|
really famous, but I don't really remember the name too awfully well.
|
|
|
|
jms: La Traviata.
|
|
|
|
Otis: That's funny.
|
|
|
|
caller: But, the theme, the theme, the theme music they used off of, off
|
|
of Dark Star.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Dark Star. No, I know that's kind of a cult science fiction film,
|
|
but I've never seen it. Joe, have you....
|
|
|
|
caller: I like, I like the, I like the title, I like the, I like the,
|
|
I like the song they used for the title off of that. I was wondering,
|
|
I thought maybe, I thought maybe if you, if you were gonna, gonna
|
|
have that theme for the songs you could play that one.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I don't think I have that with me though.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, heck.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: But thanks for calling anyway.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, it's a good show. I've seen it a couple of times. It's
|
|
all right.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK, thank you. Do you happen to know, Joe, what the theme
|
|
song for Dark Star was, 'cause I've never seen it.
|
|
|
|
jms: For some reason, Dark of the Sun is coming to mind, but that may
|
|
not be correct.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. We have another caller here. Hello, you're on the air
|
|
with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Hi, Chuck, how are you?
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Hi!
|
|
|
|
caller: I just wanted ... I know I said I wasn't probably gonna call in,
|
|
but I just....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, this is ... OK, it's, yeah, OK, this is a friend of mine, Joe,
|
|
who is....
|
|
|
|
jms: My condolences to both of you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh no, she and I are both big fans of the show. We watch it
|
|
together a lot. OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yes, and I have to tell you that when I started watching the show,
|
|
I didn't expect to like it. I really didn't. I've been a science fiction
|
|
fan from way back, and most of the time things fall really short. This
|
|
is ... it's absolutely wonderful. And the reason it's wonderful is
|
|
because it's so well thought out. And planned out. And it has a definite
|
|
storyline. And I just wanted to congratulate you.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, thank you. I appreciate that. That means a whole lot. We're
|
|
trying to really be faithful to the genre, and have some fun doing it
|
|
while we're at it.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well good. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
jms: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: Byebye.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK, thanks Lynn. Yeah.... Well, there we obviously, we have some
|
|
Babylonians out in the audience.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes, you know, I was listening, and you know, I think that, that
|
|
every now and then you expect something, you know listening, and
|
|
[??viewers??] saying that, that in the back you have these logistical
|
|
problems that sometimes you, you really don't, don't really confront, you
|
|
know, and I was thinking to myself as I looked at the enormity of this, of
|
|
this place, you know, the... I always think that the next big war that the
|
|
world, the world sees is gonna be one over garbage. It's gonna be some
|
|
country taking over another country to dump garbage on. You know, I think
|
|
that looking for a planet that we could use as our really big garbage dump
|
|
is gonna be a big project. And I wondered, you know you [laughs] as you
|
|
look at future plots, do you see anything like that zooming up ahead?
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ecological concerns or any of that sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
jms: [laughs] Ecological concerns, or finding a planet to dump on?
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's right, finding a planet to dump on.
|
|
[laughing] That's probably that's what I'm looking at.
|
|
|
|
jms: We already have New Jersey.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
jms: What more does one need?
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] What more would we need with a planet, yes.
|
|
|
|
Otis: [laughing] I guess you took care of that question right quick.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Good thing there's nobody from New Jersey out there.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yeah, I'll betcha there is.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: That seems to have provoked another phone call.
|
|
|
|
jms: Hey, I'm from New Jersey, what do you want.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, really? That seems to have provoked another phone call,
|
|
however. Let's put 'em on the air. Hello, you're on the air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, hi. This is uh, Bob Mattingly. Uh, the theme song
|
|
for Dark Star was Benson, Arizona.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, OK. By who?
|
|
|
|
caller: I have no idea who played it.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK. Well, as long as you're here, did you want to talk to
|
|
our guest, or did you just want to let us know about that.
|
|
|
|
caller: No, just a little bit.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: Bye.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you. Well, there you go.
|
|
|
|
jms: You know, Chuck, for 5 years I hosted a show like yours here in Los
|
|
Angeles. I'm....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Did you really!?
|
|
|
|
jms: I'm recovered now.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Otis: [laughing] It took a little while, I'll bet.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I'm not, obviously. I'm still doing this. But uh ... let's see,
|
|
well, here's another caller, so let's put 'em on the air. Hello, you're
|
|
on the air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, this is a guy from New Jersey, and I think you're all pretty
|
|
rude.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ok, well ... oops.
|
|
|
|
jms: From New Jersey, you have to _be_ rude.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes, that's true.
|
|
|
|
jms: To survive ... with all that toxic waste that gets into
|
|
your veins after a while. It gets into your brain.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Is that what it is?
|
|
|
|
jms: Must be.
|
|
|
|
[Otis garbled, talking at same time]
|
|
|
|
jms: That's why I'm a writer.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And.... Writer, that's right, I was going to go into that. Now,
|
|
you had mentioned earlier that you had a, a number of fairly well-known
|
|
science fiction and fantasy writers who had worked on the show. And
|
|
we only touched on that briefly. I'd like to maybe go back into who
|
|
some of those folks are and what we may expect to see from them.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, they include some of the best and the brightest. This past
|
|
year, we have ... our creative consultant on the show is Harlan Ellison,
|
|
who is probably known to every SF fan out there. He wrote some of the
|
|
best Outer Limits episodes, Soldier, Demon with a Glass Hand. He wrote
|
|
the Star Trek episode City on the Edge of Forever.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: He's written multiple ... dozens and dozens of collections of short
|
|
stories. He does the Sci-Fi Channel, and, a very well-known science
|
|
fiction writer. We also have .. Dorothy Fontana, a.k.a. D.C. Fontana,
|
|
who was involved with the original Star Trek, writing the episodes for
|
|
them. Worked on War of the Worlds and other science fiction series.
|
|
Logan's Run. David Gerrold, who also worked on the original Star Trek,
|
|
wrote Trouble With Tribbles. And many other science fiction series beyond
|
|
that. My feeling is, if you're going to write a crime or mystery show, you
|
|
want to get mystery writers. You want to write a science fiction show, get
|
|
science fiction writers. For some reason, this, this logic eludes a lot of
|
|
Hollywood producers.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: It never seems to occur to them, either in TV or the movies, does it.
|
|
|
|
jms: No, it doesn't as a rule, and again, go back to V for a second, the
|
|
writers they brought on for that show were almost all soap opera writers.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: And it showed [?then?] in the final product.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: That's what you get. We have another caller, so let's put
|
|
'em on the line. Hello, you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, it's me again.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: I've got another question talking about the, the writing backup
|
|
you have. Do you have .. actual .. technical backup, scientifically-based
|
|
people that give you input, because your science seems a lot more real
|
|
than, say, Star Trek.
|
|
|
|
jms: We do have technical consultants, medical consultants we used on, on a
|
|
script-by-script basis if something comes up. But by and large, because
|
|
Harlan and Dorothy and David Gerrold and I, and others on the show grew up
|
|
reading science fiction, and have a pretty good science background, a lot
|
|
of it we just happen to know. Which, again, makes it a little bit
|
|
different. You walk down the halls of Babylon 5 production offices, you
|
|
don't tend to hear guys talking about their agents. They're talking about
|
|
the latest improvements in SCSI technology coming from Intel, you know.
|
|
It's, it's that kind of a crowd. And so because we're, you know, pretty
|
|
well-rounded in that area, we can just put it in ourselves. We still have
|
|
a fact-check from time to time by guys who know, you know, the really good
|
|
stuff.
|
|
|
|
caller: That really shows. I've seen a behind-the-scenes on, on Star Trek
|
|
where the script had blanks in it with "tech" in parentheses, and they
|
|
required other people to just fill in some technical mumbo-jumbo, and
|
|
watching that, as an engineer, it doesn't really come off all the time.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, we never do that.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, and it shows.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, thank you.
|
|
|
|
caller: So, thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
jms: All right.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK, thanks for calling. Well, that's a good point, actually, and I,
|
|
I would agree that the technology, I mean obviously, it's still science
|
|
fiction. So, I mean we really don't have faster-than-light travel, and we
|
|
still don't have jumpgates and so on, but it does to me seem a little more
|
|
plausible than let's say some of the near-magical things we've seen on some
|
|
other shows.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, bear in mind that, that about 80% of the technology shown on
|
|
Babylon 5 is, is a technology we already have and have access to. We
|
|
create .. gravity on Babylon 5 not by some magical button you push to
|
|
create artificial gravity, but the station rotates to create the gravity.
|
|
Most of what we use is more or less based on current technology, things....
|
|
We could do Babylon 5, we could create a Babylon 5. It'd be a massive
|
|
endeavor, but what you see, you could build. The jumpgates and a few other
|
|
areas are, of course, you know, they're a, they're a little bit fuzzier as
|
|
far as the science goes. A little more rubber science going in there. But
|
|
for the most part, we don't use faster-than-light travel; jumpgates allow
|
|
you to get around relativity, by going through, you know, hyperspace.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: Which, it takes care of the whole time dilation problem. So we're
|
|
trying to stay pretty, pretty close and rigorous to it. As a matter of
|
|
fact, we got an award a couple of months ago from the Space Frontier
|
|
Foundation.
|
|
|
|
Chuck & Otis: Oh, OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: For best vision of the future, and, and I sat with Pete Conrad, who
|
|
also got an award, because they were saying this was the first time anyone
|
|
had sat down and really looked at the commercial civilian space prospects
|
|
and done it in a realistic fashion.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: It makes sense to me.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes. It is really... it is really interesting that .. when are the
|
|
ages, when or what, what do you find the age, what age group are you really
|
|
hitting. I'm just saying, like, you know Chuck Lavazzi, seems like, that
|
|
he's, he's kind of one of those boomers, I believe.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] Guilty as charged.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Are you, are you, are you really hitting the boomers, 'cause it seems
|
|
like all of the sudden the boomers are really catching on to these kind of
|
|
things.
|
|
|
|
jms: I don't know. They tell me at Warner Brothers that the demographics of
|
|
the show are very good; that we're hitting .. the audience that we're
|
|
supposed to be hitting. My personal feeling is I don't really write for any
|
|
particular audience. I write what I think amuses _me_, and interests me,
|
|
in the hope that if it does so, there are enough people out there who are
|
|
as bent and twisted as I am, that will respond to the same thing.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Well, you know, kind of picking your mind, you know, my son, you know,
|
|
I have a, I have a couple of sons, and they're biracial. And they look at,
|
|
they look at a show like yours that put people in this certain ... you know,
|
|
they're looking at, at, at a fast progression of a, of a race that's, that's
|
|
almost one color. They see, they see a show like yours as being a place
|
|
where that, that whole process has escalated _fast_. ... I know I kind of
|
|
leave you speechless, but my, my, my little boy, he, he sees your show as a
|
|
place where, where, where the integration of the races just comes real fast.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ok, where perhaps that sort of thing is no longer as important.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes, that it's not important.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yes, definitely it's not important and, and we, we have had every single
|
|
ethnic mix you can think of on the show.
|
|
|
|
Otis: And we know.
|
|
|
|
jms: All of the .. the pairings on the show, the romantic pairings, have been
|
|
interracial. My feeling is that, if we're going to go to the stars, either
|
|
we're all, we're all going to go, or nobody's going to go.
|
|
|
|
Otis: There you go.
|
|
|
|
jms: And that when you see something that is not a human coming at you,
|
|
suddenly the fact that the guy to your right is black doesn't make a whole
|
|
hell of a lot of difference. 'Cause you're both humans. And I think that'll
|
|
have a great unifying force. And that when we do go to the stars, I think
|
|
we're going to bring with us our language, our culture, our ethnic
|
|
backgrounds, and, and everything that makes us, makes us _humans_ have to go
|
|
with us. And we're trying to hit that very strongly in the show.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Hey, we got a caller here, so I'm going to put him on. Hello, you're
|
|
on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Hello, welcome. This is a very, very minor point, but you'd
|
|
mentioned that .. Babylon 5 was 5 .. 5 miles long.
|
|
|
|
jms: Approximately.
|
|
|
|
caller: Uh huh. Well, I was thinking, that .. in 250 years, do you think
|
|
that our conversion to the metric system would be complete?
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
jms: Yes, but mine is not.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] Well, that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK. I was just wondering, because it's long overdue. We were
|
|
supposed to convert, you know in a 10-year period in this country.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So this is one of the cases where, we're talking miles and so on
|
|
because it just happens to be the way it's written.
|
|
|
|
jms: We're talking miles as it, as we're looking at it from the current
|
|
perspective.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: But in the show, we tend by and large to use kil, uh, the metric
|
|
system, in kilometers and stuff.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: I think once or twice we slipped, and, and put in, you know, miles or
|
|
something, or feet. But we, we try and keep it metric.
|
|
|
|
caller: Ah.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: Very good. All right.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you. You know, you touched on something. We got us some
|
|
business to do here, but I want to just throw this out. I think it's,
|
|
while it is true as Otis was mentioning that racial division don't seem
|
|
to mean much among humans, we are now seeing in the Babylon 5 universe a
|
|
transference of that kind of inter-group hatred to humans versus the
|
|
non-human species.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: That's correct. There are, there ... We as a race, one of our, our,
|
|
our less admirable attributes is that we always look for someone to blame.
|
|
And, someone to scapegoat. And, once we have realized that we're all
|
|
pretty much the same, we're gonna look around for someone out there to
|
|
blame for our problems. And so we blame alien immigration, and alien
|
|
migration, and aliens buying up real estate by the square mile, and .. as
|
|
a way of dealing with our own problems. And in addition to which, the
|
|
Earth Alliance is only 10 years out of the war that we almost lost very
|
|
badly. It almost wiped out humanity. And when that happens, and you get
|
|
caught up short like that, it tends to give you kind of an inferiority
|
|
complex for a while. When someone hands you your head, you get kind of
|
|
nervous for a while there after.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] Yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: And so that, that inferiority complex is manifesting itself as
|
|
aggression among various parts of the human population. You have the Home
|
|
Guard, which is .. sort of an anti-alien terrorist group. You have political
|
|
stuff going on behind the scenes, which is saying, aliens, you know, we have
|
|
to, to restrict them, and keep their culture away from our culture. And that,
|
|
that is a real problem in the time of Babylon 5.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: It's 3:45 in the afternoon, and Big O, you want to throw some business
|
|
at us here?
|
|
|
|
[business deleted: PSA, promo]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you, Big O. And I want to remind our listeners we're talking
|
|
to J. Michael Straczynski, who is the creator and executive producer of the
|
|
science fiction TV series Babylon 5, and we're taking your calls at 664-FM88.
|
|
So you can talk to him, and us, if you just give us a buzz.
|
|
|
|
jms: One follow-up, by the way.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: You asked me before what Babylon 5 is about.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: And on one level, the answer that I gave you is absolutely correct.
|
|
But there is a second level that is to be considered. And, and it's the
|
|
kind of thing which when you say this to, as I did by accident once, the
|
|
network executives asked, well what is the show about, and I made the error
|
|
in one meeting we had of telling them the truth.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oops.
|
|
|
|
jms: And ... it is this. You guys and I, and probably most listeners who
|
|
are out there, are more or less in the same age range probably, in the 30s,
|
|
40s, somewhere around there, given the audience we're probably going out to.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: There is a sense in people more or less in our age range and a little
|
|
bit older that somewhere in the last 20, 25 years, we fell off the
|
|
merry-go-round. That we stumbled. And that we stumbled in Vietnam, we
|
|
stumbled with John Kennedy and Bobby Kennedy and King. We stumbled in
|
|
Korea. Wherever it was, or maybe it wasn't any one thing. It was a
|
|
series of stumbles. And the problem is, when you stumble _a lot_, you
|
|
look at your feet. You look down. And what science fiction television
|
|
specifically, and television in general, must do, I believe, is to make
|
|
people raise their eyes back up to the horizon. Because when you do that,
|
|
people discover something extraordinary. That they're part of a grand
|
|
parade that is building the future. That behind us are our ancestors
|
|
looking to us to say, make our lives have had meaning. Make it so it
|
|
wasn't for nothing. And ahead of us are our inheritors and our children,
|
|
saying, build the world we're going to live in. And that it isn't just a
|
|
question of having a job, and coming home in the evening, and watching
|
|
television. You're building the future. That we have come to this place
|
|
through 2 million years of evolution, struggle, and blood, and that the
|
|
culmination of all of this is not Beavis and Butthead. There is more to
|
|
come. And that's the obligation of television, and science fiction, to
|
|
tell that to people, and say move on. Build the future. If you want it,
|
|
and you make them want it now, they'll build it tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Amen and preach it. What can I say.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Wow. [laughter] That's well said.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, Otis was going yeah, yeah, go for it, while you were saying
|
|
that.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Right on. Yes.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I want to remind you we're talking with J. Michael Straczynski, the
|
|
creator of Babylon 5. We are going to drop out for another music break,
|
|
and during this music break, we are going to give away some stuff.
|
|
|
|
[rest of music intro, etc. deleted]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... 3:54 in the afternoon on the One Step Beyond show, KDHX
|
|
St. Louis community radio for the [?bipedal?] area, and here is Chuck, and
|
|
there's Otis, and here on the line from California J. Michael Straczynski,
|
|
producer... executive producer and creator of Babylon 5.
|
|
|
|
jms: Hi there.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So, still with us, obviously. Yes, obviously a somewhat more
|
|
dystopic idea of the near future there in that song. But in a way, but
|
|
Babylon 5 in its own way, you were saying earlier, is .. both optimistic
|
|
and maybe not so optimistic as some other visions of our future, it seems
|
|
to me.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, what Babylon 5, and most science fiction set in the future says
|
|
is that we do go on. We don't wipe ourselves out in a nuclear holocaust;
|
|
we manage to keep, keep ourselves going somehow. But, that, as we go into
|
|
the future and toward the stars, that which makes us human are our frailties
|
|
and our flaws as well as our nobilities, stay with us.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: And we must still work at overcoming the problems that we have.
|
|
Personally, as a viewer of science fiction, I find the process of watching
|
|
someone in the process of overcoming more interesting than someone who has
|
|
already overcome everything.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes, so, Chuck is, Chuck is screening one of your calls out
|
|
right now, and, you said you had done radio at one time and was it ...
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I'm back.
|
|
|
|
Otis: ... was it this kind of radio that you were doing at one time?
|
|
|
|
jms: Yes, for 5 years I was the host of Hour 25 here in Los Angeles.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh right! I read that in your bio, yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, it's a science fiction talk show, 2 hours like your, your format
|
|
is. And, so we had a lot of guys on from the science fiction community,
|
|
come on and talk about their work.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Well, we've got 2 people on hold now who want to talk to you,
|
|
so I better get 'em on the air. Let's get the first on one. Hello,
|
|
you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, thank you. First of all, I wanted to .. give him a comment about
|
|
how much we appreciate his accessibility on .. radio shows like this, and also
|
|
on .. Internet.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Great. Yeah, I was gonna bring that up, but, thank you.
|
|
|
|
caller: And, I also have an Internet comment for him. I, I read his post on
|
|
Internet every day, and I was wondering if the good comments and criticisms
|
|
and the help he gets from that balance out the damage done by people who
|
|
refuse to respect the no story ideas request.
|
|
|
|
jms: In general, yeah, it does balance it out, and, and, I'd say that 99.9%
|
|
respect that request, and the other [?hundredth?] percent you just have to
|
|
deal with. I find that the net is very very useful for me, in one sense
|
|
because it gives you a sense of the room, as it were. And on the other
|
|
level, as a writer, my job is to think of every possible question about my
|
|
characters and my universe, so that when I do sit down to write the show,
|
|
it is well-thought-out, and there is verisimilitude to it. But I cannot
|
|
think of every possible question. However, on the nets, I get every
|
|
possible question. And then some. And, by virtue of having to answer those
|
|
questions, and think about parts of the show I had never thought about
|
|
before, it helps me, when I write the show, to have a much broader
|
|
background of it. So, I would say that, that over the long haul,
|
|
although there are, there are occasional flame wars, and occasional
|
|
aberrations, that the experience and the experiment has been more than
|
|
worthwhile.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Great.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK, thank you, so I really appreciate that, and I definitely
|
|
enjoy reading all your posts, especially the sarcastic ones....
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
jms: Thank you. It takes some, some kind of stupid to sit down and
|
|
mess with a writer in a written medium.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: No kidding.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Boy, that's the truth, yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: Ah, but I enjoy when they do, because you can get them so well.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Well, thank you for calling.
|
|
|
|
caller: Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And we have another caller who's been waiting to talk to you
|
|
here, so let's put her on. Hello, you're on the air with J. Michael
|
|
Straczynski. Ooh, and you'd better turn down your radio.
|
|
|
|
caller: Ok, yeah, I'm right here now. Yeah, uh, my name is Don,
|
|
and, I tuned into the program because of .. J. Michael Straczynski
|
|
I've been following ... uh ...
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, stop following me.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, yeah, there, I'm following _you_, OK. I've been following
|
|
your, your .. column in Writer's Digest from time to time. And, what Chuck
|
|
and Big O may not realize is that you're kind of a Hollywood success story.
|
|
I mean you had very humble beginnings, and, you kind of starved to death for
|
|
a long time and, maybe you tried .. a couple of different genres before you
|
|
arrived at science fiction. And, I wondered if you could talk a little
|
|
bit about ... genres.... Personally, lately I've been following westerns
|
|
a lot, because I think it sort of an up-and-coming genre. Big O this week
|
|
has been sort of, lampooning westerns with....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] That's true, yes.
|
|
|
|
caller: [laughs] And, so, can you talk a little about .. other genres that ..
|
|
may have some future. And maybe westerns as an example.
|
|
|
|
jms: I, I, I am probably the last person you want to talk to and ask what's
|
|
going to be happening next year that will make some money, or, or be a big
|
|
genre, because I'm almost always wrong. If you want to make money in the
|
|
comic book business, follow me around to the store and buy whatever I don't
|
|
buy.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: I ended up in science fiction more or less because that was always my
|
|
first, my first _love_. When I came to, to Los Angeles originally, there was
|
|
not a lot of science fiction being done; there weren't 2 shows. The majority
|
|
of what is done in television is cop shows and mysteries and what have you.
|
|
And I've always wanted to do science fiction, and always seized the
|
|
opportunity to do so. And, it wasn't so much not knowing which genre to go
|
|
for as ... it wasn't around; there wasn't much, much venue. And now there
|
|
is more science fiction being done, thus I've ended up where I am. My, my
|
|
sense is .. that you'll be seeing more science fiction certainly to come ..
|
|
in the next couple of years. I think that the westerns are in the process
|
|
of a slow and gradual comeback. But unless, but if, and if the next
|
|
couple, three shows to come down the pike are very good, that will cement
|
|
that revival. If they are not very good, then that will pretty much kill
|
|
the revival. I think that the, the cop show is currently being very well
|
|
revitalized. The mystery show is kind of floundering right now. I think
|
|
it's going to go by the boards after the last season of Murder, She Wrote
|
|
for a while. It'll go into sort of a, a hiatus.
|
|
|
|
caller: You were involved in Murder, She Wrote, too, weren't you?
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, I was there for 2 years, that is correct.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: And, but beyond that it's always, it's always a crap shoot
|
|
because you never know what's going to happen. Everyone said that ..
|
|
cop shows were once dead on television, and that .. the franchise had run
|
|
its course. But in point of fact it's always come back. So, you never
|
|
really know what's going to come back, come back out at you.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK. Thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you for calling.
|
|
|
|
jms: What the, the caller was also alluding to, Harlan Ellison refers to,
|
|
you know, my background as kind of a Hora.., Horatio Alger story. In
|
|
that, I'm a Jersey street kid by, by nature and upbringing. And when I
|
|
came here to Los Angeles in 1981, it was without any contacts in the
|
|
business, without any friends in the industry, without family in the
|
|
industry. And, my wife and I .. struggled to get in. And, had some
|
|
very very rough times, but I am living proof that you don't have to
|
|
have someone who knows you in the business to break in. You can, if you
|
|
have the persistence, the talent, and the luck, to do it on your own.
|
|
It's a longer and harder road. I didn't eat a whole lot. I'm 6 foot 5,
|
|
and there's a photo of me from that period of time where I weigh 150 pounds.
|
|
|
|
Chuck&Otis: Oh, whoa.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, 'cause I was using money that I should have been using to
|
|
eat, and spending it on supplies. Writing supplies.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So you really were the literal starving artist for a while there.
|
|
|
|
jms: Literally, yeah. It got so bad, one day I was, I was trying to
|
|
write, and I got this obsession for a candy bar. And I didn't have 25
|
|
cents to go out and get a candy bar. So I went down to the corner,
|
|
[?it made you even mad?] after a while, and shoplifted a candy bar. I
|
|
ate it, it tasted like gall; I couldn't even finish it. And, later on in
|
|
the week I got a check, a small check and went back to the store, bought
|
|
the same kind of candy bar, walked out, walked back in again, and put it
|
|
back. 'Cause I just couldn't live with myself for having done that.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So it's not only the Minbari who have a strong sense of honor
|
|
here. [laughs]
|
|
|
|
jms: I just couldn't sleep at night, it just bothered me.
|
|
|
|
Otis: I understand that, I guarantee you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I think I do, too. We need to drop out for a couple of quick
|
|
bits of business here, and, I want to remind you we're talking to
|
|
J. Michael Straczynski, the executive producer of Babylon 5, and as
|
|
soon as we come back we're going to take your calls at 664-FM88.
|
|
And ... when we do come back I'd like to, we haven't talked much
|
|
about the, some of the alien races that are in the Babylon 5 universe,
|
|
and I think they're pretty fascinating. So...
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I wondered, Joe, if we could go into that when we come back.
|
|
|
|
jms: Sure thing.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK. We're going to drop out here, Otis has got something to
|
|
lay on ya, and then we got a couple of quick bits of business.
|
|
|
|
[business deleted: 2 promos]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And this is the One Step Beyond show, and this is Chuck, and
|
|
Otis is on hand, and, on the line with us, all the way from
|
|
California, is J. Michael Straczynski, the creator and executive
|
|
producer of the science fiction TV series Babylon 5....
|
|
|
|
jms: [?So?] there.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... So, welcome back. So there. And we've already got a
|
|
caller who wants to talk to you. I want to remind everybody,
|
|
664-FM88, 664-3688, is the phone number if you want to call up
|
|
and go on the air and talk to Otis and I and Joe. Feel free to
|
|
do that, and here's someone who just did it; hello, you're on the
|
|
air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Hello. Yes, I wanted to first of all comment and say this is
|
|
a really great station....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you!
|
|
|
|
Otis: Thanks.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, you know, you gotta know who, who to rub and where and all.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] Yes, ok.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, actually, I'm from Indianapolis and I'm visiting some
|
|
friends here in St. Louis, partially because I knew that jms was going
|
|
to be on the phone and I wanted to hear this. So, there are some ..
|
|
fairly .. big fans of the show. I just wanted to make some comments,
|
|
maybe ask a couple of questions.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: That's what we're here for.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK. Uh, yeah, we have a large group of fans at work, and
|
|
we sit there and we discuss the show afterwards, and try to figure
|
|
out what's going on, and of course, it's, it's kind of like
|
|
Twin Peaks, you have no idea, it seems like when you're sure you
|
|
know what's going on, the next thing some left curve goes out and
|
|
blows you away. No, that's good, I like that. At least you can't
|
|
second-guess it like a lot of the .. sitcoms and things like that
|
|
where, you know, you have the, it's, there's always, I, I guess you
|
|
can break it down into A occurs then B occurs then A does this to B
|
|
and B is embarrassed, but then C is cool, so they do that, you know.
|
|
But [?you don't?] follow that pattern at all, and I really really like
|
|
that, which makes this basically my favorite show on TV right now.
|
|
|
|
jms: That's great, thank you.
|
|
|
|
caller: Anyway, one thing that I, that I really like about the show
|
|
specifically is that the .. the people slash aliens or, I guess we want
|
|
to call them non-humans because, you know, "alien" is probably not
|
|
politically correct. But anyway, yeah, that's a comment about your intro,
|
|
by the way. Humans and aliens, now, come on, these are modern times,
|
|
we can't be doing this.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: We do it anyway....
|
|
|
|
jms: [laughing] It's a matter of perspective; they call us aliens,
|
|
we call them aliens.
|
|
|
|
caller: Right. I guess that's true. Anyway. But on "the other
|
|
program," we note that, you know, Vulcans are always good; humans are
|
|
good; Klingons were bad, of course, but now they're good, they're our
|
|
friends; Cardassians and Romulans are bad. And what's interesting in,
|
|
in .. B5, is that we can't really figure this out. It's like we have
|
|
Narms [sic] who appeared .. harmless and bad, but, not always. And the
|
|
Centauri who seem to be harmless, but they, they have a, they have a cold
|
|
streak. The Minbari, who appeared good, but then also not always also.
|
|
And of course we, nobody can figure out what's going on with the .. Vorlons.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, who knows, right.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, who knows. Well, I know one person that does know.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: He's on the line with us right now, yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: And I ain't talkin'.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] Yes.
|
|
|
|
caller: Theoretically, of course. Anyway, one thing I do like is it's
|
|
kind of different to watch this program because, one thing, and I'm
|
|
certain that this is intentional, it shows that basically everybody is,
|
|
everyone is self-interested. And their self-interest doesn't even
|
|
necessarily match what their respective governments or worlds. And I
|
|
know this is intentional and, and that's one thing that, that actually
|
|
keeps my interest in watching the program, because you could tell that
|
|
there's .. even friction caused by .. [?yeah, I don't know?] like,
|
|
somebody's decision, and you know, well, they probably weren't supposed
|
|
to do this, but they did it because it matched their own self-interest.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well certainly there is... in one of our scripts I dropped in a
|
|
line about that, where a character, I think it's G'Kar, says that there
|
|
are 3 elements in the universe: energy, matter, and enlightened
|
|
self-interest [laughter] and that makes everything run. My feeling is
|
|
that I, I, as a science fiction viewer and fan, I'm kind of tired of
|
|
the monolithic alien species, where they're all exactly alike.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes, really.
|
|
|
|
jms: There must be differences between them, and, and in their heart
|
|
where, they are good or bad depending on circumstances. I also wanted
|
|
to create a scenario in which we.... When the show first went on the
|
|
air, everyone said, OK, fine, this is a good guy, good alien, this is a
|
|
bad alien, this is the comic relief. And they all got very smug and
|
|
satisfied with that. Then ... which was the, the purpose and the
|
|
intent. Now we move the chairs around a little. All of a sudden, the guy
|
|
you thought was your friend, ain't your friend any more. All of a sudden
|
|
your world is turned upside-down. And I, I like surprises.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Another *WHAM*, as it were.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah. I like being surprised when I watch a television show, when
|
|
you see the most unlikely thing happen, and .. when G'Kar saved Catherine
|
|
Sakai, no one saw that coming. They all figured that he had some, some
|
|
agenda; he was going to hurt her or whatever. Nope. He just did it
|
|
because it was the right thing to do at that particular moment.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: He had his reasons, yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: He had his reasons.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: He had his reasons.
|
|
|
|
jms: And they may be exactly what he said. Why not?
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Although, didn't he also say in that same episode that nobody on
|
|
Babylon 5 was what they appear to be?
|
|
|
|
jms: That's right. And he was totally correct.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, that, that was G'Kar that said that. That was kind of
|
|
interesting. Of course, and here's Mr. Heartless, and .. he smiles and
|
|
says, [?], not everyone is who they appear to be, and then of course
|
|
everyone is going uh-oh, what's going on.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: We thought we had it figured out, but not.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, all of our characters go through an arc, a change in their
|
|
character, and, and, for that to happen you must start 'em at point A,
|
|
and move 'em toward point Z, and that means changing them along the
|
|
way, very subtly.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, see, there's a little bit of a problem with all this. And
|
|
that is that, basically, you, either intentionally or not intentionally
|
|
have gotten everyone conditioned that watches this, that we don't trust
|
|
anything now; we think that, you know, if you watch Twin Peaks, you know,
|
|
they'll show a close-up of a little, you know, you'd have this big wide
|
|
expansive room, and then, the camera just pans in and pans in, and before
|
|
you know it, it's looking at .. a little candle, where the flame is now
|
|
full-screen, and, and then you think, Oh, that's significant, and then,
|
|
of course, maybe it's not. And that, that, that's what makes it
|
|
interesting. But I did want to comment on that, and that is that....
|
|
I know that you've said before, on some of the computer nets and things,
|
|
that you don't want to drag things on so long that people lose interest.
|
|
And, you know, that's, that's of course my concern. Not only that, but
|
|
also, has to do with the, the .. fact that there is this long-term
|
|
background story, and that the concern that I had, and that was the problem
|
|
with let's say Twin Peaks, was that, unless you watched absolutely every
|
|
episode, if you missed one you were basically _in trouble_. And....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Even if you didn't miss one, you were in trouble, 'cause I used to
|
|
watch that series.
|
|
|
|
caller: That's true. But you had at least a fighting chance.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] Yes.
|
|
|
|
caller: If you didn't, if you didn't watch every episode you were totally
|
|
in trouble. And that's, that's one thing that I want to know, is about
|
|
this possibility of people maybe getting lost, and the question is, is the
|
|
viewership increasing, and, and/or will the earlier episodes repeat again,
|
|
I know they've repeated some of them already once, so people can catch up?
|
|
Or, or is it carefully designed in such a way that you won't have this
|
|
problem?
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yes.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, thank you. That's it?
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
jms: The viewership does seem to be increasing. What we try and do
|
|
with the show is that whenever there's an episode where prior
|
|
knowledge helps grasp what's going on, that information is imparted
|
|
verbally in the course of the episode. So that, it was designed in
|
|
such a way that you can watch all the shows, half the shows, watch
|
|
them in order or _out_ of order....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And you can still know what's going on.
|
|
|
|
jms: And still know what's going on.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: In fact, we just saw an example of that this past week's
|
|
episode Eyes, which relies on a number of things that happened in the
|
|
past, and those things are at least briefly touched on in the dialog.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, we always check these things. I, I go to some people who don't
|
|
watch the show every so often, and I have a script that requires prior
|
|
knowledge which is recapped in the script, I give it to the guys who don't
|
|
watch the show and say, does this make sense to you? If you, never having
|
|
watched an episode, can you follow what happens here. And they come back
|
|
and say, I was confused, we revised it so that it's clearer, so that you
|
|
can come in wherever you want to, and pick up the show.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK. One other thing ....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I got another call on line, so... [?make it quick?]
|
|
|
|
[a couple of people talking at the same time]
|
|
|
|
caller: OK, one quick thing. The question is concerning, at least in
|
|
Indianapolis, our, our problem is that, and I know people in certain
|
|
areas that absolutely don't get Babylon 5 at all, our station is 40
|
|
miles away, it's mono, [background sounds of disgust] we have a real
|
|
problem when everyone has these awesome, you know, surround sound TVs
|
|
and things like this. And we can't pick it up, and it's very frustrating
|
|
that .. certain networks or whatever, are monopolizing the independents
|
|
or whatever stations, and it's very hard to get that, and, has anything
|
|
like this been addressed, or how, how are you dealing with that. And
|
|
that's all I wanted to ask. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
jms: Sure.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you, for calling.
|
|
|
|
jms: Each station tends to evaluate the needs of its local viewers.
|
|
And if you're in a locality which has an independent station or two,
|
|
and you want Babylon 5, your best bet is to write to your local station
|
|
and say please carry the show.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
jms: And if they get enough response, people who want to see it, then
|
|
they go ahead and solicit it.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, because if they think there's an audience, they'll fill it.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. We have another call here. Hello, you're on the air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, hi there. I got to run real quick, I'm out here on my
|
|
cellular, but, I just wanted to mention one thing that I, I kind of get
|
|
the impression that nobody on your staff has any military experience,
|
|
specifically because you're always calling the Lieutenant Commander
|
|
"Lieutenant Commander." And generally speaking, in the military, you
|
|
don't bother with that subrank when you're speaking with someone, unless,
|
|
of course, you're in the process of verbally slapping them down, at which
|
|
point in time the commander might call a lieutenant commander "lieutenant
|
|
commander" just to make it clear, to put her in her place.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: Is that something you guys did on purpose, or is that just,
|
|
like I say, you don't have anybody with military experience in your life.
|
|
|
|
jms: No, we actually, we do. In fact if you look at our military
|
|
costumes and the insignia, and lot of it is grounded very strongly in
|
|
military tradition. What we realized, though, is that if you're
|
|
on, on the observation dome, and there's a problem and the tech turns
|
|
and says Commander, two guys are going to turn to you.
|
|
|
|
caller: Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
jms: And you want to have some means to distinguish them, because
|
|
the person who runs the station isn't the captain, it's the commander.
|
|
|
|
caller: Right.
|
|
|
|
jms: So saying commander could be, you know, vague and confusing. So
|
|
we figure we'll keep this for right now and change it down the road.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah. I just, I just noticed it, you know, in just person-to-person
|
|
conversation, though, and that, like I say, it's, it's, in my experience
|
|
anybody who's ever called me lieutenant colonel is making a point that I'm
|
|
just a lieutenant colonel... [laughs]
|
|
|
|
jms: Got it.
|
|
|
|
caller: And I better get my act together.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK, well, thank you for calling.
|
|
|
|
caller: Sure thing. Byebye.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Oh, that was like being in the Marine Corps when I, when they
|
|
changed the rank and I became an Acting Sergeant. You know, they,
|
|
they, it was a, they, they, I was a sergeant, but they had another,
|
|
they had a little, a little technical thing so I had to .. remake
|
|
Sergeant again. So to be called an Acting Sergeant used to be such a
|
|
put-down; I was so glad to make that extra stripe so that I could be
|
|
called Sergeant.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: No fooling about it.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes, no fooling around. So are we... I really understand that,
|
|
that caller.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: See, I never would have known that. 'Cause I, I have no military
|
|
experience myself.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, we were aware of it. We just felt that this was, for now,
|
|
the better way to go.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK. So it was more of a dramatic decision rather than anything
|
|
else there.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah. Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Once again I want to remind folks we're talking to J. Michael
|
|
Straczynski, the creator and executive producer of Babylon 5,
|
|
here on the One Step Beyond show. And I also want to remind you our
|
|
phone number is 664-FM88 if you want to get in on the conversation
|
|
here. And, well, we have another caller, so I guess we'll get 'em
|
|
on the air. Hello, you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Thank you. A short question and a long one.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK. Oh, this is one of our, this is one of our programmers here at
|
|
the station, it's Elliott.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, hi there.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Go ahead, Elliott.
|
|
|
|
caller: Thank you. Um, what town in New Jersey you from?
|
|
|
|
jms: I was born in Patterson, raised in Newark.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, intense New Jersey. All right. [? I'm Union, myself??]
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Otis: [laughing] Intense.
|
|
|
|
caller: No, 'cause I just wanted you to know that people from New
|
|
Jersey are still out here. If you remember the old Star Trek
|
|
show, the first one, that was kind of the, the new .. new frontier
|
|
in space. And then they had the, the other Star Trek show, and that
|
|
was kind of .. a little urban yuppie village in space, and, and....
|
|
|
|
jms: [ ? ] David Gerrold calls a Club Med in space.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: Exactly. Are you kind of the United States in space again,
|
|
or is this a real world colony; is there an African component, an
|
|
African village component; maybe .. an Islamic aspect to things.
|
|
You know what I'm, I'm not, you know what I'm getting at, is there really
|
|
a universal .. thing in space or is this just, once again, the US in
|
|
space.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, no, there are, there are and have been, we've shown
|
|
Arabs, Islamic, Africans, American Indian .. Native Americans. We
|
|
try to show everyone there isn't, like, a little Italy, or a little
|
|
Africa, or a little, you know, Saigon, because there isn't room in the
|
|
station. They are all kind of shoved in together with each other.
|
|
And, I think, and that's more interesting in the long run to
|
|
have everyone sort of integrated, having to live with each other, than
|
|
being pushed off into various different small communities.
|
|
|
|
caller: Is it something like a submarine, where it's tight, and everyone
|
|
has to get along?
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
caller: And it's, and it's done on a very hierarchical basis, like
|
|
there's the captain, and there's the, you know. Is, is, is the Babylon
|
|
5 a hierarchical place, or is it ...
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, only in terms of....
|
|
|
|
caller: ... uh, a democracy?
|
|
|
|
jms: It's only hierarchical in terms of the military, which ..
|
|
has its ranks and its orders. But ... Babylon 5 is primarily a civilian
|
|
living area. The best comparison I could give to you would be a
|
|
military governor of a state, like California was, it had a military
|
|
governor before it became a state. And, and, and, they have to deal
|
|
with all the real piddly problems that take place in terms of getting
|
|
water, irrigation put in, and, and construction, and there's a squabble over
|
|
water rights. And has to monitor all of this stuff, and deal with the,
|
|
the Emperor of Mexico down the road, who has his own problems. It's
|
|
more that kind of an environment. It's, it's, it's a mix of things, it
|
|
really is.
|
|
|
|
caller: I'm intrigued from a question that someone had asked before.
|
|
Does someone truck away the garbage?
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, we got, we got garbage, we got toilets in Babylon 5. We
|
|
did one scene where we have .. Garibaldi and Sinclair talking at
|
|
the urinals, just having a conversation.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Something we never saw on any other science fiction series [? I
|
|
ever got ?] [laughter] I always wondered where the bathrooms were
|
|
on the Enterprise, darn it, you know....
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, we always say where they are, you go right in the front
|
|
door, and you see them doing their business while they're having
|
|
a conversation.
|
|
|
|
caller: And why specifically Babylon, of all places, or all names?
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, a number of reasons, first and foremost being that, originally,
|
|
if you look at its history, Babylon was not, did not have the onus
|
|
that it has now. It was designed to be a place of great commerce and
|
|
industry, and people would come from other countries to do business
|
|
there. Gradually it began to unravel and eventually was thrown down
|
|
several times. And rebuilt about 5 times, by the way. Babylon itself
|
|
has been rebuilt about 4 or 5 times. Beyond that, the storyline
|
|
of Babylon 5 is somewhat designed to track the history of the original
|
|
Babylon. So if you were to get out a history book, and read up everything
|
|
there is on the first Babylon, you would get some idea of where the show
|
|
is going to go.
|
|
|
|
caller: Nineveh. ... That was a joke, never mind.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yes.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: There are some things he's not going to comment on, Elliott.
|
|
I should warn you about that.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
jms: Mene mene tekel upharsin. [silence] Never mind.
|
|
[Note: This is "The writing on the wall." Thanks to Larry Hiller for
|
|
recognizing this from the clues given in the initial release of this.]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Never mind.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah also, just one more quick question: .. anything on science
|
|
fiction _radio_ that you're.... I know, on my next, if I may do a plug
|
|
for next Thursday's show....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, go ahead, Elliott.
|
|
|
|
caller: I'll be doing some excerpts from Ruby: The Adventures of a Galactic
|
|
Gumshoe.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Oh....
|
|
|
|
caller: Specifically the sex with robots section.
|
|
|
|
jms: I love Ruby. Is this Ruby I or Ruby II?
|
|
|
|
caller: Ruby I.
|
|
|
|
jms: Ah.
|
|
|
|
caller: The one that you can follow and make sense.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
jms: Yes.
|
|
|
|
caller: Do you, is there, do you know of any radio science fiction that's
|
|
coming up that you're interested in, or anything in the past that you
|
|
thought was awesome .. [??], whatever.
|
|
|
|
jms: I loved Ruby. I have the entire set, as a matter of fact, on disk.
|
|
Ruby's terrific. Alien Worlds I kinda liked, and also worked on
|
|
for a while. I love the Star Wars adaptations, which are now out
|
|
on cassette. As far as new stuff is concerned, there ain't a whole lot
|
|
going on right now.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We've got, in fact, an example here that I may get on called
|
|
Gyp Psychic in Hyperspace. Are you familiar with that one?
|
|
|
|
jms: No. That I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK, it's by a guy named ... I've forgotten his name now, but
|
|
it's part of something called Audio Comics.
|
|
|
|
jms: Oh, it's not a ZBS then?
|
|
|
|
Chuck: No, it's not. No, this is FlamCo Enterprises, some, some weirdo
|
|
somewhere off in the Z who does this, but, we may get around to that at
|
|
some point.
|
|
|
|
caller: All right, well, thank you very kindly.
|
|
|
|
jms: Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thanks, Elliott. And, boy, we've got another caller here. You,
|
|
you seem to be provoking a lot of phone calls here, Joe ...
|
|
|
|
jms: Great.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... so let's put 'em on the air. Hello, you're on the air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, thank you. Um, you were talking about such wonderful,
|
|
lofty things before, I thought we'd bring it back down to the gutter
|
|
again. [laughter] On the restroom scene, when .. Garibaldi and
|
|
Sinclair were walking from the restroom, someone passed them and headed
|
|
back into the men's room, and it looked very much like a woman. And
|
|
that's been troubling a bunch of us for some time now. [laughter]
|
|
What's the story about that?
|
|
|
|
jms: Um, my, my story is that if you go past the men's room, there's
|
|
another hallway there where, you, you really can't see it well on, on
|
|
the shot, but it goes off to the, to women's restrooms.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: That's my story; I'm sticking to it.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK, fair enough.
|
|
|
|
caller: That window is kind of, you know, kind of placed in a bad spot
|
|
there now, I think I'd take the rest.., the window out of the restroom
|
|
if I was you. [laughs]
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, it was meant to be a mirror, I'm not sure how well that
|
|
came off.
|
|
|
|
[laughter. Many people talking at once.]
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, I see.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, all right.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, the director [ ?? ] shot for that.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I'm afraid we missed that completely.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, so did I.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thanks. Byebye. Boy, here's another call. But once it....
|
|
The phone number here is 664-FM88. We're talking with J. Michael
|
|
Straczynski, the man who created Babylon 5, and here's another caller.
|
|
Hello, you're on the air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Oh, hello, I want to stay with the bathroom scene.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] Oh, please....
|
|
|
|
jms: See what you've done now, what you've opened up with this.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yes.
|
|
|
|
caller: There was a recent episode where the, I don't know what,
|
|
the PsiCops are trying to, to pay back the Commander of Babylon 5.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, that was Eyes.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: That was last week's episode.
|
|
|
|
caller: Ok. I thought I'd seen it before, but there was one scene
|
|
where the younger, the PsiCop that's with the military guy, has confronted
|
|
the, I don't know her name, the executive com.., the executive officer.
|
|
|
|
jms: Ivanova.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, Ivanova.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah. In the restaurant. And .. she loses her temper, and
|
|
refers to tearing his head off and using it as a chamberpot.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes. [laughing]
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, in the 23rd century [laughter] what is the character's
|
|
basis for using that term?
|
|
|
|
jms: Well....
|
|
|
|
caller: I'm sure you have a _good_....
|
|
|
|
jms: I got a flash for you.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: Which is that most of our language and terminology goes back several
|
|
hundred years. A lot of it goes back a lot further than that. Wednesday
|
|
was Odin's day, you know. Thursday was Thor's day.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. Frika's day was Friday. Yeah. Right.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah. But the point being that, we're still using terminology
|
|
now that goes back literally hundreds of years. And, and to me, one
|
|
thing that is important with the show is to keep pointing toward the
|
|
continuity of the human species. That parts of our traditions do go with
|
|
us. We use the term bar-and-grill all the time. How many realize
|
|
the fact that where that comes from was a time in, where, in, like the
|
|
17- or 1800s when isolated pubs would have a grillwork put in, you know,
|
|
there were no police in the area. And to buy a drink you had to go in,
|
|
pass money through the grill, the grillwork, they'd slide the bottle
|
|
out to you, and keep the rest of it hidden behind, behind the wall.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I didn't know that.
|
|
|
|
jms: That's where that comes from. So to me, that, that terminology
|
|
will still be around; it may be archaic, as much of our language today
|
|
is archaic, but we still use it.
|
|
|
|
caller: But obviously it has to mean enough to them to use in extreme
|
|
emotional .. moments, because she was furious; that's the first thing
|
|
that came to her mind.
|
|
|
|
jms: Also she is, I'm sure she is read up on history, in particular
|
|
the Russian history, and there may be parts of Russia that still, that
|
|
don't have all the inner plumbing they should really have at this point.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Otis: And why wouldn't a spaceship sometimes, in, in circumstances, not
|
|
have a pot? I, I, I could understand that, you know, some, somehow
|
|
this is coming clear to me.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: It's possible that the chamberpot may have changed somewhat in its
|
|
technology, but who knows, yes.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Be made out of different material but [laughing].
|
|
|
|
jms: All right, I'll resolve this for you right now. Chamberpot is
|
|
a new word in the 23rd century that means TV antenna. [laughter]
|
|
OK? We're clear on this now?
|
|
|
|
caller: I think I've got the big picture now.
|
|
|
|
jms: I'm coming over there.
|
|
|
|
caller: So I'll keep watching to see how all this great plotting .. gets
|
|
together with all the characterization and the dialog, and I'll keep, I'll
|
|
keep those things in mind.
|
|
|
|
jms: OK.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ok, and thank you. I'm not gonna take another toilet query. I
|
|
mean ...
|
|
|
|
Otis: No no no no no no. I'm happy ...
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... I don't want any more of this.
|
|
|
|
Otis: ... I'm happy to know that, I'm happy to know that there will be boys
|
|
and girls in the future.
|
|
|
|
jms: Oh absolutely.
|
|
|
|
Otis: That's right, not just one kind, just, boys and girls. And you
|
|
just satisfied that, thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Big O, you've got some business to do here. Let's get that out
|
|
of the way and maybe we won't get any more toilet questions.
|
|
|
|
Otis: I don't know....
|
|
|
|
[business deleted: PSA & promo]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... This is the One Step Beyond show, of course, with Chuck and
|
|
Otis, and we're talkin' to J. Michael Straczynski, who is the creator
|
|
and executive producer of Babylon 5. Joe, I've been wanting to ask about,
|
|
and talk a bit more about the alien races, 'cause we haven't discussed
|
|
them very much. And there's some ...
|
|
|
|
jms: No, we haven't.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And there's some really interesting ...
|
|
|
|
jms: And we're not going to.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, let's, let's .. could you give us, give the listeners an
|
|
overview of the various aliens that are showing up on Babylon 5.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, we have in addition to humans the, which are one part of
|
|
the big 5....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Right.
|
|
|
|
jms: We have the Centauri. These are our first contact we ever made
|
|
with another civilization, about, roughly a hundred years ago, in B5
|
|
story time. And it was from them where we first began to get jumpgate
|
|
technology that allowed us to go to the stars. And .. they began trading
|
|
with us and, good relation, and they said, you know, Oh, we run everything,
|
|
we run the whole universe, the whole galaxy, we are in charge of everything.
|
|
Which we bought for a long time, until we got out there, and found out
|
|
they were lying to us. [laughter] Which, you know, well, what do you want,
|
|
it was a bookkeeping error, you know.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: And .. then there are the Narns, who were conquered and ..
|
|
suppressed by the Centauri for the better part of a hundred years, and
|
|
have recently staged their own revolution and kicked them off, off the
|
|
homeworld. And now the Narns are sort of the new kids on the block,
|
|
being very aggressive, and trying to, to overcompensate for what was
|
|
done to them by doing it to somebody else. Then there are the Minbari,
|
|
who we ran into about 10 years ago, 12 years ago storytime-wise.
|
|
And .., the first contact we had with the Minbari, Delenn's people,
|
|
went terribly awry. We first encountered a convoy of their ships,
|
|
for the first time; we don't know who they were, they didn't know who
|
|
we were. They offered a gesture of respect of opening their gun
|
|
ports, which, we didn't take as being anything but an act of aggression,
|
|
and we opened fire. They took it as being a, a surprise attack.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh boy.
|
|
|
|
jms: Which destroyed their main ship and killed their leader. And ..
|
|
their religious leader Dukhat.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ouch.
|
|
|
|
jms: And they declared jihad, a religious war, and determined to wipe
|
|
us off the face of the universe....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: This sounds.... OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: ... They .. and then, they, for, for reasons unknown, on the
|
|
edge of wiping us out, stopped the, stopped the war, and surrendered,
|
|
and no one quite knows why. That's one of the big mysteries of
|
|
our show, why did the Minbari surrender on the eve of victory.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Right.
|
|
|
|
jms: Then there are the Vorlons....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes, there are the Vorlons, [laughs] whatever they are.
|
|
|
|
jms: They .. we only see one of them. He is in his encounter suit at
|
|
all times which is required, or may not be required, it could be
|
|
camouflage to keep us from seeing what he actually is inside.
|
|
We've been aware of the Vorlons for, you know, some time now, but no one's
|
|
ever seen one. All ships trying to enter Vorlon space have terrible
|
|
accidents. They say don't do it again. And, who and what they are
|
|
and what they want is our, is another enigma in our show.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And in fact, the only two humans who ever saw a Vorlon got
|
|
transferred off the station.
|
|
|
|
jms: Very quickly.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes. Now, I gotta ask you, was that actually part of the plotline,
|
|
or was that just, a matter of the actors not being available.
|
|
|
|
jms: In, in, in both cases, we and the actors couldn', didn't reach
|
|
a, a meeting of minds for different, different reasons. But, the one
|
|
thing about having a storyline tracked out ahead of time is that you
|
|
have trapdoors built in for every single character.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Aha.
|
|
|
|
jms: And, and that departure _served_ us wonderfully by giving us another
|
|
layer to the paranoia we try to create in the show.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. So, serendipitously it all worked out.
|
|
|
|
jms: It did indeed.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We got another caller here on line. Hello, you're on the air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Hi Chuck, it's Brice.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, hi Brice.
|
|
|
|
caller: Two observations. One, language and its terms are even older
|
|
than .. you and .. the author are describing. I mean there are terms
|
|
that date back a couple of thousand years.
|
|
|
|
jms: Absolutely.
|
|
|
|
caller: So you might as well use the old worlds; they'll change in their
|
|
meaning but they'll be the same. It's like bar-and-grill, that's a good
|
|
example. And the other thing is the Japanese use co-ed public toilets now,
|
|
to go back to the subject you didn't want to. So this'll ...
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Gee, thanks, Brice.
|
|
|
|
caller: ... probably help the program [laughs] sell more in Japan; I don't
|
|
know, they'll feel right at home. That's all.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
caller: Uh huh. Bye.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, I should point out, I, I know that caller. He is, in fact, a
|
|
linguist by trade.
|
|
|
|
jms: Ah.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So....
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, I think, I think I mentioned it, they do, some of them do go back
|
|
a couple of thousand years, to the .. Eurasian and Euro-Indian ..
|
|
roots. So, it does go back an awful long ways.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: And why not use that language to show the continuity of the human
|
|
species.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. Well, of course at the same time it helps if you do have
|
|
somethings that refer to contemporary, the contemporary world, just by
|
|
virtue of the fact that really it's, it is a TV show that's being shown
|
|
to a 20th century audience. So....
|
|
|
|
jms: You would think so, yes.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: You would think so. And of course, I mean, obviously that's why...
|
|
we understand what the people are saying; realistically 250 years in the
|
|
future, whatever language was being spoken would probably be about as
|
|
comprehensible to us now as, our English would be to say, someone from
|
|
Shakespeare's time.
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, then again, not necessarily.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: Pick up, there are a number of books which have, odd enough,
|
|
letters, from children, at the time of George Washington, 200, well over
|
|
200 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: Those letters are as legible and readable today as they were then.
|
|
Ah, the [?? speeches ??] of Abraham Lincoln ring as soundly today as
|
|
they did then. There, there is this, this sense people have that,
|
|
that the future will change dramatically from what it has been. And,
|
|
and the future ain't what it used to be; it doesn't change that much
|
|
any more. There was a great movie, for, for those of your audience who
|
|
are science fiction fans ... Just Imagine was the name of it.
|
|
It was a 1930's black-and-white science fiction musical.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Whoa, this is a new one on me.
|
|
|
|
jms: It was set in the year 1980, 50 years hence.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: And, and, in their version of the future, people ate pills
|
|
instead of having food, they had numbers instead of names, they
|
|
gave birth by machine. And all these things, you know, to their mind
|
|
50 years was incalculable and all these things had to change. Where
|
|
in point of fact it hasn't changed that much.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. It sounds like a cross between Hugo Gernsback and Brave
|
|
New World.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, the chrome of technology has changed. And, and certain
|
|
new words have come into the language, but if you were to blip back in
|
|
time right now to George Washington's period, you would not have that
|
|
hard a time understanding them, or them understanding you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I guess that's a valid point. Ok. I'll buy that. Oh, here's
|
|
another caller coming in, so let's put 'em on the air. Hello, you're
|
|
on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, hi Chuck, it's David.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, hi.
|
|
|
|
caller: I just wanted to echo what he was just saying, his points are
|
|
very valid. The largest changes that have been noticed, in terms of
|
|
science fiction accurately predicting what the future is actually
|
|
going to look like, are technological. The, you know, Flash Gordon,
|
|
as one commentator once put it, lives forever in a world of analog
|
|
pages long after the rest of the universe has gone digital.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, the old fashioned, the U-meters and things like that, of
|
|
the sort that you don't see in science fiction today because everything
|
|
is all, you know, digital readouts now.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
jms: There's a great example of this in the early Buck Rogers serials.
|
|
Their, their ship's been hit, and they're going down, and and and Buck
|
|
says to the other people in the ship, "All right, grab your anti-gravity
|
|
belts," and they pick up these slim belts, which could be anti-gravity
|
|
belts, you know, and put them on. "Grab your ray guns," and they
|
|
grab what could pass for very good ray guns. "Grab the portable radio,"
|
|
and they pick up these _huge_ [laughter] boxes, like 2 feet by 2 feet
|
|
with huge antennas, because they knew what a radio was. They couldn't
|
|
get past where they were in current technology to foresee that a radio
|
|
could be the size of your palm.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, there's an episode of The Flash that spoke to that too.
|
|
A character's been in cryogenic stasis for 30 years, and he wakes up
|
|
and says, "where are my personal helicopters, where are my gigantic
|
|
cities of the future," you know, you know, "what happened to my future?"
|
|
he cries.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
jms: Part of the problem, I think, is that Americans view 200 years as
|
|
being a real long time when that's all we've been here for. But if
|
|
you travel outside the country, to England or to Ireland, or or ...
|
|
I stood in, in [? New Grange ?], in a burial mound that goes back
|
|
to the Bronze Age, before the Bronze Age. There you get a sense of
|
|
what real time is. Stand on the cobblestones of Trinity College, and
|
|
you realize that at some point someone ran down those same cobblestones
|
|
to say there's a revolution breaking out in America. To them this is
|
|
like yesterday's news. We don't understand what real time is in this
|
|
country, but I think over the next few centuries we'll figure it out.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We've gotten a bit myopic, I guess.
|
|
|
|
caller: It is hard to get a grasp on that. Chuck's housemate, Jeffrey,
|
|
used to go to college in Jacksonville. And he showed me... you know,
|
|
one of his, one of the earlier graduates of that school was William
|
|
Jennings Bryant. And he showed me a brick wall where... you know
|
|
we think of Bryant as the great orator, you know, "You shall not
|
|
crucify mankind upon a cross of gold," and all that stuff. And he
|
|
showed me a brick wall where young student William Jennings Bryant
|
|
carved his initials into the brick with a penknife. And that made it
|
|
all real.
|
|
|
|
jms & Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
caller: We thought of him as a young human being suddenly; he came
|
|
to life in a way he never had before. So you're right, we do have a
|
|
trouble grasping that, without something concrete, as it were, to grasp
|
|
on to.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Or brick, as the case may be.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yes.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Hey, listen, thanks for calling. We've got another call coming
|
|
in.
|
|
|
|
caller: You're welcome. Byebye.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Byebye. Ok, and here comes another caller. Hello, you're on
|
|
the air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: You're welcome.
|
|
|
|
caller: Ah, jms, after reading some of your more sarcastic posts on
|
|
Internet, and then hearing some of Ivanova's comments on the show, I was
|
|
wondering if she was your alter-ego on the show, or if there's some of
|
|
you in all the characters.
|
|
|
|
jms: There's some of me in pretty much all the characters, particularly
|
|
Kosh.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
caller: Uh oh.
|
|
|
|
jms: The less said the better. But .. no, I love Ivanova because ..
|
|
I am.... Straczynski is by nature White Russian background. And I've
|
|
watched Russians portrayed on television, and never quite seen it done ..
|
|
really very well. With a sense of both astonishment and doom that sort
|
|
of follows them around wherever they go. And I love writing for Ivanova.
|
|
And she is probably in some ways the closest to myself. But there's
|
|
something of me in all the characters pretty much. And, and that's kind
|
|
of half the fun, is putting your own personality into some of the
|
|
characters and watching them run around. Basically, I, I go through
|
|
every day with, with Kosh, and Garibaldi, and G'Kar and Londo running
|
|
around in my head 24 hours a day which is a frightening thought on the
|
|
best of days.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: You know, Ivanova, now that you mentioned her, I thought had a
|
|
wonderfully typically Russian comment at the end of Grail, you know
|
|
the one about ...
|
|
|
|
jms: Boom!
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... sooner or later, Boom!, sure. [laughs] You know, it's
|
|
all going to blow up eventually.
|
|
|
|
jms: It's, it's that Russian sense of impending doom. There's a scene
|
|
in Soul Hunter, where .. she says that, in 200 years from now, we'll
|
|
still be as.. be human, we'll still make the same mistakes over and over
|
|
and over again. And as Franklin says, Oh, you're a pessimist, and she
|
|
says, no, I'm Russian, we understand these things. [laughter] And
|
|
that's exactly who and what she is. That's what the Russian spirit is.
|
|
You hope for the best, expect the worst.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you for calling.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK, thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK. Another caller comin' in here; hello, you're on the line,
|
|
with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Hi.
|
|
|
|
jms: Hi there.
|
|
|
|
caller: I sort of, sort of took exception to some of the remarks I
|
|
heard. So, you're warned.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Well, OK, a little controversy couldn't hurt. Go ahead.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, I've heard this before that, I've heard this before where
|
|
people will criticize science fiction so called from like 50 years ago
|
|
and say, oh well, the future didn't come out like that at all. I don't
|
|
know, I, you know, I think that there's... I would, I would argue that
|
|
there's, you know, that there's lots, lots of folks that would say,
|
|
you know, there's nobody... nobody would seriously take the point,
|
|
nobody would seriously argue that, you know, these people are trying
|
|
to predict the future.
|
|
|
|
jms: Didn't say they were.
|
|
|
|
caller: I mean.... Yeah, no, no, not at all. I mean, you can, you can,
|
|
you can pick out, you can pick out .. books and movies that have,
|
|
that can portray just about any future that you can imagine. You know,
|
|
and none of these, none of them are compatible with the others. I think
|
|
a lot of what goes on is you get people .. a lot of these people have
|
|
their own .. peculiar .. sociological theories. And they like to write
|
|
stories that sort of .. bear out their version of things.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, my only point really was that, there is a sense people have
|
|
that 200 years from now we will be _vastly_ different people, and
|
|
everything will have changed at some point and we aren't really even
|
|
what we are now any more. And in point of fact....
|
|
|
|
caller: Yeah, I would agree with that, you know, yeah, things change,
|
|
you know.
|
|
|
|
jms: They do, but not, I think, on a very human level, on a personal
|
|
level. We.... Evolution doesn't work in 200 year bursts.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, I'll agree with that too. A lot, you know, .. you, you,
|
|
you're talking about things haven't changed in a long.... A lot of
|
|
things don't change over time, and that's very true. Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
caller: Absolutely.
|
|
|
|
jms: I mean 200 years ago people got married, they had affairs, they
|
|
got separated, they raised kids, they had jobs, they hoped for a better
|
|
life for their kids. And that'll be the same 200 years hence. The
|
|
technology will change; the chrome will change, but the human heart
|
|
itself will not go through that much of a dynamic, I think.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
caller: Absolutely. All right, that's all I want to say.
|
|
|
|
jms: Great.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: All right, thank you. I think it's a good point. It is
|
|
unrealistic to expect that human nature, whatever that is, is going to
|
|
suddenly radically alter itself within a couple of centuries.
|
|
|
|
jms: No, no.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And I think it's a valid point. I want to remind you it's
|
|
4:41 in the afternoon; we're talking to J. Michael Straczynski, the
|
|
creator and execugive .. executive [laughs], got my teeth [?? ].
|
|
|
|
jms: You can call me the resident god.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Resident god of Babylon 5. Thank you, that'll do just fine.
|
|
And, Otis has some more business to throw at us here.
|
|
|
|
[business deleted: PSA]
|
|
|
|
Otis: ... I can see the big problem on P5.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: B5?
|
|
|
|
Otis: On B5.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Which is?
|
|
|
|
Otis: It's Musak. We, all of us, you know, I'll be fighting to get a
|
|
little rap in, you know, and you'll be fighting to get some classical in,
|
|
you know, it'll just be .. the first big war, the big split on B5.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We've seen no Musak on Babylon 5, have we?
|
|
|
|
jms: I try and avoid it. [laughter] I was once scared by Musak. I was,
|
|
honest to God, I was in a supermarket in Glendale, California, and they
|
|
had the Musak going, and .. I heard Helter Skelter done Musak. [laughter]
|
|
I left the supermarket at once, I didn't want to know who was at the
|
|
checkout counter.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Isn't that one of the signs of the Apocalypse? I think it is.
|
|
|
|
jms: I think so; it's the end times.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: It's the end times.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Well, also....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Dobbs would know, Bob Dobbs would know about that; we'll have to
|
|
talk to him about it.
|
|
|
|
Otis: OK, yeah.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We've got another caller on line, so let's put 'em on. Hello,
|
|
you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, not only did I call once, but I've called twice.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] Well, OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: And I just had to say, I've, I've heard so far, I've heard the
|
|
writers praised, I've heard the producers praised, and .. the missing
|
|
element here is the actors, because ...
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, I was just going to bring that up.
|
|
|
|
caller: ... they are awfully, awfully good, every single one of them,
|
|
and the restraint with which things are being portrayed, I think, is
|
|
very important. I, I, I, I think it's .. people expect them to chew
|
|
up the scenery and it's certainly not necessary, and .. would bother
|
|
me greatly, so, I just wanted to say that the actors themselves
|
|
deserve a lot of the credit for this, so....
|
|
|
|
jms: I couldn't possibly agree with you more. We have a terrific cast
|
|
overall, and they do play things in a more human, restrained kind of a
|
|
way than ... what you'll often get, in science fiction television, which
|
|
is sort of a stereotype or an archetype, where they sort of find some
|
|
personality trait to hook it on, and they play that one note for the
|
|
rest of their lives. And .. they're all very talented, they're all
|
|
very good, and they're a joy to work with. And the directors are also
|
|
very good too on the show; they're very sharp, and they try to give the
|
|
show a real, some sense of style.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thanks. Yeah, I should point out, that .. that the friend
|
|
of mine who called in, and I, are both actors in fact in our spare
|
|
time, in our copious free time. And, we have both been admiring a
|
|
lot of the work we've been seeing on Babylon 5 and, yeah, let's talk
|
|
about some of those actors, because we haven't mentioned names and
|
|
what they do, and how you ended up with them in the cast. But I'd,
|
|
I'd like to into some of that, because I think you have a very good
|
|
cast there.
|
|
|
|
jms: Thank you. Basically, we just cast the best person to walk in
|
|
the door. The only interesting case off-hand was .. Jerry Doyle, who
|
|
plays Garibaldi. Who used to be a stock broker.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, really?
|
|
|
|
jms: And he got caught up in this whole junk bond thing, as a matter
|
|
of fact. And decided to go straight thereafter. And came to be an
|
|
actor. And walked in the door, and, his resume -- you're going to
|
|
love this -- his resume was 80% fiction.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: But you figure a guy who worked with junk bonds would do this. And
|
|
at the bottom of his resume: member, Dance Theatre of Harlem. Now....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Don't tell me, that was the real part?
|
|
|
|
jms: No, that's, that's bogus.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: And no one had ever called him on this.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Are you serious?
|
|
|
|
jms: The Dance Theatre of Harlem, what the hell is that?
|
|
|
|
Chuck: A white guy who looks like ...
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... Bruce Willis, in the Dance Theatre of Harlem.
|
|
|
|
jms: ... Yeah. Yeah. And no one had ever called... all right, all right,
|
|
Jerry, dance. And so he came in, you know, there's a scene where you
|
|
bring the actor in, you put 'em up against the wall, you slate them, which
|
|
means they say their name, and the role they're going for. And so we're
|
|
taping him, and he says, you know, my name is Jerry Doyle. What part are
|
|
you here to audition for? The one I'm going to get. [laughter] When
|
|
he said that, we knew, we found Garibaldi.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] OK. Someone who has that attitude.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, exactly. And .. Claudia Christian comes to us from a number
|
|
of different films, including Hexed. A terrific actress. And, and all
|
|
of our cast, they came to us, as anyone does, on a standard audition, and
|
|
we tried to find the best possible synthesis of personalities.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I was wondering, because I had never heard of or seen most of these
|
|
actors and actresses on the show.
|
|
|
|
jms: You may have, but not necessarily noticed them. For instance, Peter
|
|
Jurasik, who plays Londo, was of course Sid the Snitch in Hill Street Blues.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah, I, my, many Hill Street Blues fans have pointed that out to
|
|
me, yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: And Andreas gets around a lot, you saw Andreas, who is G'Kar, as
|
|
the one-armed man in The Fugitive.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Right, Andreas Katsulas, yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: And he was in .. Hot Shots Part Deux....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Oh, he got the chicken shot at him, didn't he?
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, yeah. And .. a really nice guy. And .. one thing that's
|
|
great about our cast is they're not only nice people, but they're also
|
|
very sharp. Claudia is a Mensa member, a genius IQ.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I didn't know that.
|
|
|
|
jms: Again, Jerry was a stock broker. These are people who, who know a lot
|
|
of stuff and bring a great deal of intelligence to the role with them.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. I'm .. that's .. I'm just sort of impressed by that. I had
|
|
no idea about those little bits of business. But I was noticing.... I,
|
|
I was one of those folks who downloaded that Babylon 5 interactive, the
|
|
Mac version.
|
|
|
|
jms: Oh, yeah.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: You know, which I guess was something you guys had sent out as a
|
|
marketing gimmick ...
|
|
|
|
jms: Right.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... earlier in the year. And I noticed some of the backgrounds of
|
|
some of these actors, and it is pretty varied, I noticed, but some of them
|
|
have some pretty substantial stage experience. I notice Michael O'Hare,
|
|
who plays Sinclair, has had quite a variety of stage experience, as a matter
|
|
of fact.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, he's been a Broadway actor for a very long time, and was very
|
|
well respected in that area.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. So it's quite a cast. Here's someone coming in, so we'll
|
|
let them talk to you; hello, you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
|
|
|
|
caller: Hi, this is your cousin, Chuck, from the television side.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: [laughing] OK.
|
|
|
|
caller: I happen to be driving in a car [laughs] hearing you talking to
|
|
the producer there of one of my favorite shows, and .. I was just wondering
|
|
if there was some way I can, that I can leave a card, or I can, that I
|
|
can contact him about possible job position either with his part, or
|
|
with Foundation Imaging who takes care of the special effects.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Well, let me ask you this, do you have access to the Internet?
|
|
|
|
caller: No, not me personally.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ok. I think maybe you ought to call us back after the show is
|
|
over, and we'll talk to you, we'll talk to Joe off-line about that.
|
|
|
|
caller: OK.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ok, thank you.
|
|
|
|
caller: All right.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Hey, can I....
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Now you got people calling in and looking for jobs.
|
|
|
|
Otis: No, you see, I got, I got this... I got both of you on the phone,
|
|
and I think that, that right now, this is Otis, and I'm looking at you,
|
|
Chuck, and then I'm listening to Joe, and there's a little society
|
|
developing, it's called the Internet group. We are looking at them,
|
|
and... I'm looking at them with fascination and I'm... I notice that
|
|
when I listen to radio, TV, the announcer or the [??principle??] will
|
|
always say here's the number where you can get me on my Inter... a way
|
|
of getting 'em through the computer. So, it's a whole group of people
|
|
collecting, they seem to be very intelligent, about your age and your
|
|
intelligence.... This group is getting _big_. Is it international?
|
|
Is it, is it, is it ethnic people involved, all kind of folks?
|
|
|
|
jms: It's otherworldly.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: It's otherworldly.
|
|
|
|
Otis: It's otherworldly.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: It's cyberspace, yeah.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Amazing.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: We hadn't really addressed that, Otis, you're right. But, jms,
|
|
Joe... he's known as jms on the Internet, that's how he signs all of
|
|
his posts, and stuff.
|
|
|
|
Otis: OK.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And .. there is on the Internet a Babylon 5 discussion group. For
|
|
those of you who have access to Internet news...
|
|
|
|
Otis: My, my, my.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: ... it's rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5. If you have access to news, you
|
|
know what that means, and if you don't, don't worry about it. And, it is
|
|
a discussion group for fans of the show, but what's significant is that
|
|
Joe reads it and posts his own thoughts on it, quite frequently.
|
|
|
|
jms: About 500 messages a day come over my computer.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Whoa. So, that's a very busy group.
|
|
|
|
Otis: So, so, you get your computer and you're hooked up, you get hooked
|
|
up to access. That's the way you do it.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Uh huh. Yeah. And he's able to receive electronic mail from
|
|
the viewers, and is able to respond publicly to their comments about
|
|
the show, which is really kind of unusual. I mean, this is becoming
|
|
more typical, but certainly this is one of the few instances I know
|
|
where the man who is the creator of a major television series has that
|
|
kind of direct feedback from the people who are watching it.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Yeah.
|
|
|
|
jms: A few of us have done it on a small basis. Sneakers, for instance,
|
|
came in, and like 2 months before the movie opened, they were on line on
|
|
various services. They were there for a week or two after it opened,
|
|
then they all vanished.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
jms: This is.... The Babylon 5 on-line experiment has been going on now
|
|
since before the pilot, and .. has stayed on, on all the various nets
|
|
ever since, to get both the praise and the brickbats. And to learn from
|
|
them. Currently I am on Internet, CompuServe, GEnie, NVN, Bix, FidoNet,
|
|
and like 3 others.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Good grief. Now if someone....
|
|
|
|
jms: I have no life.
|
|
|
|
[laughter]
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Well, you know, I mean, but this is so typical, I think what
|
|
especially prompted Otis to mention this was that last week, our
|
|
guests on the show were Phil Proctor and Dave Ossman, of the Firesign
|
|
Theater.
|
|
|
|
jms: Of course.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And .. are you a fan of their also, I'm just wondering.
|
|
|
|
jms: I've heard it sometimes and enjoy it; I wouldn't call myself a fan
|
|
because I don't follow it that closely.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. And, Phil is also on the Internet, as it turns out, so
|
|
Otis is getting deluged by Internet stuff....
|
|
|
|
Otis: Oh yeah, it's coming at me.
|
|
|
|
jms: We're taking over the world.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Joe, I gotta ask you something here that I've been wanting to
|
|
bring up. It's something I noticed about Commander Sinclair; I was
|
|
watching Eyes again this morning, and noticed once again that Sinclair
|
|
seems to have a rather striking ability to outmaneuver and outflank
|
|
all the people who try to destroy him.
|
|
|
|
jms: Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: This is at least the third or fourth time that he has shown
|
|
that he, he knows the law better, and is sneakier than, almost
|
|
everybody they've sent against him, and it suddenly occurred to me
|
|
what this reminded me of. Let me preface this: were you ever a fan
|
|
of the old Secret Agent TV series? With Patrick McGoohan?
|
|
|
|
jms: Of course, yeah.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Sinclair reminds me a lot of John Drake. Is that just accidental
|
|
or....
|
|
|
|
jms: I can see some of that; I think that anyone who gets to be in his
|
|
position and has survived over the years _has_ to understand how to use
|
|
the rules to your own best benefit. Part of it is also that he was
|
|
trained by Jesuits.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: And Jesuits train you how to use the rule and letter of the law to
|
|
enforce the .. the heart of the law. And so he knows how to do all that
|
|
stuff. And I like a character that doesn't solve every problem by
|
|
punching somebody out.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Exactly.
|
|
|
|
jms: I like someone who is smart enough to, if he sees a wall in front of
|
|
him, doesn't just go through it; he can climb over it, tunnel under it,
|
|
or go around it.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yes, yes. It's sort of like the legal equivalent of jujitsu; it's
|
|
using your opponent's mass or his strength against him.
|
|
|
|
jms: Right.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And I just... I gotta say we saw what I thought was a great example
|
|
of that in Eyes, where, in the final confrontation between Sinclair and
|
|
Colonel Ben Zayn, who is out to literally _get_ him, in any way possible.
|
|
It seems to me that Sinclair literally pushes every single button that
|
|
he knows he can push with that guy, plays him like a violin, and ..
|
|
gets him to self-destruct.
|
|
|
|
jms: Absolutely.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: And I thought it was really a very well done scene, and a great
|
|
illustration of the, the superiority in that sense of a brain over just
|
|
sheer massive force.
|
|
|
|
jms: Yeah, also in that kind of scenario, you really have to be, to be
|
|
committed to going through all the way, because if you don't pull it off,
|
|
if you don't push all the guy's buttons and he doesn't go off at you, you
|
|
just court martialled yourself for insubordination to a superior officer.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: So it was a very risky thing to do, also.
|
|
|
|
jms: Very risky.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. That's one of the things I admire about that character, but...
|
|
I'm glad to hear that confirmed, because I knew you were a Prisoner fan.
|
|
|
|
jms: Oh yeah.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: But I also didn't know if you were a Secret Agent fan as well.
|
|
Are we going to see any other indications of your interest in The Prisoner
|
|
other than the "be seeing you" that we saw from [laughs] from Bester a
|
|
while back?
|
|
|
|
jms: Well, that was a nod in their direction. I don't want to do too much
|
|
because then you become, the show becomes a [??] _hommage_ rather than
|
|
what the show was about.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Yeah. Good point. Well, I want to remind folks we've been sitting
|
|
here talking with J. Michael Straczynski, the creator and executive
|
|
producer of Babylon 5, and well, here's another person who wants to talk
|
|
to us, so, we're running out of time but we can probably get a few more
|
|
calls in. Hello, you're on the air.
|
|
|
|
caller: Yes. I have a question about PsiCorps. I don't want to get into
|
|
it too much, but I'm curious as to how you developed that, what's the
|
|
nature of it?
|
|
|
|
jms: Nature of PsiCorps?
|
|
|
|
caller: Right.
|
|
|
|
jms: About 120 years ago, in B5 story time, for the first time they
|
|
were able to prove that telepaths actually existed; they are among us.
|
|
Now, what I have to do is sit back as a writer and say realistically
|
|
how would this develop? And if tomorrow, science said yes, there are
|
|
actually telepaths living among us, they can read you minds, Congress
|
|
will be in the next day making laws about it. [laughter] Particularly
|
|
Congress, 'cause they'd be the first ones to want to hide from these guys.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: I think that's very plausible, yes.
|
|
|
|
jms: And they'll want to legislate them, to control them, to protect the
|
|
public from _them_ because of their, you know, the privacy issues. And
|
|
on one level to protect them from the public, which could turn on them.
|
|
To want to create an organization to which you _must_ either belong to,
|
|
or take drugs to suppress your telepathic ability. And the problem is,
|
|
when you set up an organization that will embrace you from cradle to grave,
|
|
and train you in commercial purposes, in military purposes, [?? all of a
|
|
sudden ??] the military gets involved and wants to have the strongest
|
|
telepaths they can get their hands on, that will in time become a rather
|
|
corrupt organization from the inside. There's too much power being put
|
|
into one place.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, they actually, they scare me more than the Vorlons, the
|
|
Narns, they scare me more than anybody on the show.
|
|
|
|
jms: That's the intent. They should be scary.
|
|
|
|
caller: Well, thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
jms: Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you for calling. Byebye. Well, we are going to have to
|
|
get out of here, so.... And I ... Joe, you need to get going and I
|
|
really thank you for taking the two hours here to chat with us and our
|
|
listeners.
|
|
|
|
jms: No problem.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Once again, I've been talking here with J. Michael Straczynski,
|
|
he is the creator and executive producer of Babylon 5 which you can see
|
|
tonight at 8 o'clock. This week's episode is Legacies. Is there anything
|
|
you'd like to tell the audience if they haven't seen it yet about Legacies?
|
|
|
|
jms: Ah... the show should speak for itself.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Sounds reasonable. Now, it... just a quick question then: Legacies
|
|
is a new episode; how many more new episodes have we got before the next
|
|
set of reruns?
|
|
|
|
jms: You've got the two-parter, which begins next week.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: Then you've got Babylon Squared, which reveals what happened to
|
|
Babylon 4.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OH, OK.
|
|
|
|
jms: And then .. The Quality of Mercy. And then you've got a possible
|
|
break for reruns, and then, before the new season begins in November,
|
|
they may play Chrysalis, our last episode, the week before the new
|
|
season begins, 'cause it's a killer episode.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Ok, that's a real *WHAM* episode.
|
|
|
|
jms: It sure is.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK. And .. I understand also that we are going to be losing
|
|
Commander Sinclair. Yes?
|
|
|
|
jms: Yes and no.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Sort of.
|
|
|
|
jms: He's being moved somewhere off the chessboard, but he will be seen
|
|
from time to time.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: OK, great. Well, Joe, thanks for taking time to talk to us once
|
|
again, and .. we'll be watching, believe us.
|
|
|
|
jms: Great, I appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Thank you very much. Byebye.
|
|
|
|
jms: Thank you. Bye.
|
|
|
|
Chuck: Well, that was J. Michael Straczynski, he is the creator and
|
|
executive producer of Babylon 5, and he's been our guest here on
|
|
One Step Beyond.
|
|
|
|
Otis: Well, it's been a great... another one of those mind-expanding
|
|
programs here at One Step Beyond again.
|
|
|
|
[wrap-up deleted]
|