|
|
- Transcription of "One Step Beyond" radio program 7/24/94,
- KDHX-FM, St. Louis. Chuck Lavazzi, producer.
-
- Transcription by Maria Ana Montalvo [I've attempted to be as accurate
- as possible. Verbal hesitations (such as "um") have either been deleted,
- or indicated by "..". Verbal "keep busy" phrases, such as "uh huh," in
- the middle of short speeches have also been deleted; I kept those in
- long speeches to make this easier to read. When I couldn't understand a
- phrase, my best guess is indicated with square brackets and question marks,
- e.g. [?? guess ??]. (Of course, this whole thing is my best guess.) Enjoy.
- mam 8/8/94]
-
- Revised 10/30/94: Fixed some misspellings; filled in one of the spots
- I didn't understand, based on a net discussion. mam
-
- Cast:
- Chuck = Chuck Lavazzi
- Otis = Otis Woodard
- jms = J. Michael Straczynski
- assorted callers
-
-
- [introductory business deleted]
-
- Chuck: ... And this week our special guest, from his home in California,
- J. Michael Straczynski, the creator and executive producer of the science
- fiction TV series, Babylon 5. And if you'd like to talk to him, and us,
- you can do it by calling 664-FM88. We'll put you on the line, and you
- can talk to the man who created this show.
-
- Otis: Well, say his name again.
-
- Chuck: J. Michael Straczynski [stra-chin-ski]. I think I pronounced it
- right. If I didn't, he'll tell me what's right [laughs] when we put him
- on 'cause he's listening to this right now.
-
- Otis: Well, the Babylon 5, and I'm sure there are people out there who are
- fans of the Babylon 5 ...
-
- Chuck: I sure am.
-
- Otis: ... just like the Firesign Theater [last week's guests] so,
- you'll get your ears full today on this wonderful show.
-
- Chuck: So stay tuned for science fiction, Babylon 5, J. Michael Straczynski,
- we're going to give away some tickets, and we're going to be playing some
- sort-of science-fiction-oriented comedy and music in there on the show where
- it's never the same show twice, you know, it's One Step....
-
- Otis: One Step Beyond ...
-
- Chuck: ... this one here.
-
- [music containing sound bites from Lost In Space]
-
- [Michael O'Hare's voice]: It was the dawn of the third age of mankind, 10
- years after the Earth-Minbari war. The Babylon project was a dream given
- form. It's goal: to prevent another war by creating a place where humans
- and aliens could work out their differences peacefully. It's a port of call,
- home away from home for diplomats, hustlers, entrepeneurs, and wanderers.
- Humans and aliens wrapped in 2,500,000 tons of spinning metal, all alone in
- the night. It can be a dangerous place, but it's our last best hope for
- peace. This is the story of the last of the Babylon stations. The year is
- 2258. The name of the place is Babylon 5.
-
- [theme music]
-
- Chuck: All right, and right now you're probably asking yourself, "What in
- the world do those two cuts have to do with each other?" OK, here it is.
- The first cut you heard is something called "Celebration." It was put
- together several years ago for a Lost in Space convention, and we got that
- from one of our listeners who calls himself Doctor Smith. And of course,
- among the many voices you heard on that was the voice of Billy Mumy. Now,
- it just so happens that Billy Mumy is featured in Babylon 5 as Lennier, the
- assistant to the Minbari ambassador, so of course, the next thing we heard
- was the main title for the TV series Babylon 5. And the reason we did that
- (finally we're getting around to the point here at 9 minutes after the hour)
- is because on the phone with us right now, unless I've screwed up, is
- J. Michael Straczynski, the creator and executive producer of Babylon 5.
- Joe, are you still there?
-
- jms: I hope so.
-
- Chuck: Yes, you are. You've been very patient. We've had you on hold for
- about 20 minutes now.
-
- jms: It's always fascinating.
-
- Chuck: We're glad to have you here.
-
- jms: And you said it right. The European version is stra-chin-ski.
- The Americanized version is stra-zin-ski, but you can call me Joe.
-
- Chuck: We'll do that, 'cause it'll be easier. It's better than jms or
- Great Maker, in terms of radio anyway.
-
- jms: I think so.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. Let me explain, once again, that ... for those of you who
- might not know, Babylon 5 is an internationally syndicated science fiction
- television show. Here, in St. Louis, it's seen on KPLR Channel 11 in Dolby
- stereo at 10 a.m. on Saturday, which I think is an odd time, and repeated
- at 8 p.m. on Sunday, so, you have a chance to see this week's episode,
- which I believe is Legacies, and .. more than that I won't say, because
- I'm going to turn this over to Joe, to tell us a little bit about Babylon
- 5, and how it might differ from some of the other science fiction shows you
- may have seen on TV. And I also want to remind you, our listeners, that
- you can call us on 664-FM88, if you want to go on the air and talk to Joe.
- So, Joe, lay it on us.
-
- jms: Babylon 5 is a series set in the future about 250-some-odd years,
- aboard a space station which is about 5 miles long, and serves as a port of
- call, or a way station, if you will, similar to Venice, or other parts of
- Europe during the 14th century.
-
- Chuck: Uh huh.
-
- jms: A place of commerce, trade, diplomacy, where different parties can meet
- and work out their problems. And .. what we're trying to do with the show,
- which is I think different than what's been done before for American
- television certainly, is that Babylon 5 is a five-year story. Each episode
- stand alone, because it has to. You can't be sure to watch every single
- week. But over the long haul, as well as seeing the individual stories we
- have in the series, you'll see a much larger story with a beginning, a
- middle and end that unravels over 5 years. It's an attempt to do for
- American television what the British have often done. Like The Prisoner was
- a self-contained story ...
-
- Chuck: Right.
-
- jms: ... and it had a definite end point. And this also has a definite end
- point. I also want to try and do for science fiction television what ... as
- the print medium has been doing for..ever. I grew up on the, on the true
- sagas of science fiction, the Foundation books, the ...
-
- Chuck: Oh, Asimov, yes.
-
- jms: [?? Krell | Carroll ??] books, and the Dune books, the Lord of the Rings,
- and asked the question, why has no one really tried to do something on that
- scale for American television. And I figured, well, someone has to be the
- first one, might as well be me.
-
- Chuck: So, I mean, this is kind of unusual, too, because it's rare for us to
- actually have a science fiction either movie or TV that is really produced,
- or the brain-child of an actual science fiction fan, ironically enough.
-
- jms: Yes, this is the case where the loonies are running the asylum.
-
- Chuck: Yes! Yes, we're all in favor of that here.
-
- jms: And certainly I've worked other shows, and very often they find guys who
- really don't know science fiction at all, but have track records running
- shows in general, and say here's a science fiction show; go run it. And they
- approach it with either no knowledge of the series or contempt for science
- fiction in general.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. Yeah.
-
- jms: A number of years ago, when I used to be a journalist, I was
- assigned to interview the producers of the series V.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- jms: Uh, not the miniseries which was terrific, but the series itself. And,
- one thing one of the producers said, was that as long as we have space
- ships and laser blasts, and funny-looking aliens, we are guaranteed the
- science fiction audience. We have to go beyond that. And I was astonished
- at the level of real contempt showed toward the audience. And that
- extends ... either contempt or lack of knowledge extends up and down the
- entire Hollywood system. Fortunately, that is starting slowly to change as
- the old farts die off....
-
- Chuck: [laughs] That's a very frank way to put it, yes.
-
- Otis: That's very good.
-
- jms: And those of us who know and grew up with this stuff can take their
- place.
-
- Chuck: Is that really happening; I mean, do you see that as a real
- trend? At this point?
-
- jms: It's ... an evolutionary trend, yeah. In the sense of one level
- dying off, the next taking its place. The other main concern, of course,
- has always been .. the budget, because science fiction shows have
- perennially been budget breakers. They always cost huge, hideous
- amounts of money, and they always go over budget. And one reason that
- networks and stations are leery of them is because they always do this.
- Babylon 5 is the very first American science fiction TV series in history
- ever to come in a few bucks under budget for the year.
-
- Chuck: I didn't know that.
-
- jms: Yeah, and because of that, because of the model that we're using in our
- production, suddenly the networks are looking around saying, well, maybe it
- can be done, if we use the Babylon 5 model. So now we have network and
- studio VPs making tours of the facility, seeing how the heck we're doing what
- we're doing.
-
- Chuck: Oh, really? So you're attracting a lot of attention with this.
-
- jms: Yeah, and it is our hope ... that this will encourage more science
- fiction on television. Because I think that, the more competition there is,
- the better off we're all gonna be, both those who make the shows as those
- who watch the shows.
-
- Chuck: Oh, for sure. You know, let's back up a second. You said the Babylon
- 5 model is enabling you to come in under budget. What is that model? I
- mean, how does that differ from, oh, I don't know maybe, the Star Trek
- series, or some other series people might know.
-
- jms: What we're trying to do is ... my sense is when someone hands you 20 or
- some-odd million dollars to make a show, it kind of behooves you to act
- responsibly, which by itself is a bit of a break from tradition.
-
- Chuck: [laughs] I guess in Hollywood, I guess that's true, yes.
-
- jms: But beyond that, we're doing what no one else is doing in town, is
- taking full advantage of technology, and the changes in technology in
- production, and post-production and other areas. We have almost a
- completely-digital studio, which no one else has at this point. In
- addition to that, we plan things out way ahead of time, because, again,
- this is a planned-out series, where every episode story is worked out 5
- years in advance. I have every story for 5 years in my head. Before we
- roll one frame of film, we know what stories we're going to be doing that
- year, what sets we're going to have to have constructed, what effects we're
- going to have to have, and we have at minimum of 6 scripts already in hand.
- So this gives all the different parties concerned enough time to sit
- down ... and design things and build things properly, without having to
- rush. It comes down basically to planning. Which no one else does in this
- town. It's always last minute [?that?] you're getting paid is on the stage,
- you're paying 24 hours of overtime to get things built in time, which is
- madness. If you know where you're going, and you plan out ahead of time,
- you can save a lot of money and get more out of the process.
-
- Chuck: I want to remind our listeners here two things: we're talking
- with J. Michael Straczynski, the executive producer of Babylon 5; the
- phone number here is 664-FM88 if you want to jump in here and talk to Joe
- and Otis and myself, and what else was I going to say, there was something
- else I was going to bring ... Oh yeah, I was going ... so ... what you've
- just been saying is that really, one of the things that distinguishes
- Babylon 5 from some other stuff we may have seen is that it is planned out
- and has a finite beginning and end. Is this why we sometimes, or at least
- I sometimes, get the feeling looking at other shows, that they're making it
- up as they go along [British accent], as they said in Monty Python?
-
- jms: Well, most shows do, to one extent or another. I think that Brisco
- County, to some extent, was an exception to that, with their whole orb
- story line. They kind of had an idea where they were going, and that made
- it, you know, for me as a viewer, an awful lot of fun.
-
- Chuck: Because it seemed to be something extended. I think someone wants
- to go on the air here, so let's give 'em a shot. Hello, you're on the air
- with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Yes, good afternoon.
-
- Chuck: Good afternoon.
-
- caller: My question was, how did you manage to get such intelligent
- programming on commercial television.
-
- Chuck: [laughs] That's a good question. Stay on the line, because ...
- you know, he's here, you're here, and .. we don't have a tape delay, so
- go ahead.
-
- jms: You lie to the stations.
-
- [all laugh]
-
- Chuck: I knew it! That's the secret!
-
- jms: You tell them you're going to give them Baywatch in space, and
- you give them this instead. By the time they find out, it's too late. No,
- what's very fortunate for us is that as we took the show around for 7 years
- it took us to get the show on the air, we'd find out that executives that
- we had meetings with either got it, or they didn't get it, immediately.
- And the first person who got it was Evan Thompson, from ChrisCraft [sp?]
- Television, which was at that time putting a partnership together with
- Warner Brothers. And the Warner Brothers' vice president, Dick Robertson,
- also saw the potential of what we had in mind to do, and believed in us,
- and said stick with us and we'll make this thing happen. And what you have
- to do is find people like these, who understand the concept and are willing
- to support it, where often the emphasis is on dumbing down the show. And
- these guys don't. They're very good people.
-
- caller: Terrific. Well, that's a wonderful thing. Thank you.
-
- jms: Thank you.
-
- Chuck: OK. Thank you for calling. And, we'll take her off the line. Once
- again, the number is 664-FM88, if you want to talk to Otis and I, and J.
- Michael Straczynski, the producer of Babylon 5. And I'll tell you what I
- want to do at this point, Big O, we've got some business to do....
-
- Otis: Yes, we have a little business to do.
-
- Chuck: We got some business to do, and then we're going to play a couple of
- pieces of music, and then we'll be back with J. Michael Straczynski, and
- your calls about Babylon 5 and science fiction and stuff like that. So,
- Big O, lay the business on us.
-
- [business deleted: PSA & promo]
-
- Chuck: Well, once again, our guest is J. Michael Straczynski. He's the
- producer, executive producer of Babylon 5, and we're going to drop off for
- a couple of songs here that are science-fiction related, then we'll be back
- with him and us and your calls.
-
- Otis: That's right, you can dial 664-3688, and you can talk to a real, real
- producer.
-
- Chuck: Hollywood producer type. Although, I don't ... Joe, I guess you're
- not really a Hollywood producer in the old sense, from what you said.
-
- jms: I really try not to be.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: And one last point, very quickly, I was thinking about your caller's
- questions.
-
- Chuck: Oh, OK.
-
- jms: And the other path, or the answer to her question is that you produce
- intelligent science fiction by hiring intelligent science fiction writers.
-
- Chuck: Ah.
-
- jms: And you have your, like, Dorothy Fontana, David Gerrold, Harlan
- Ellison, and others involved in your show, it certainly helps.
-
- Chuck: And, I'm going to come back to that point, after the music. So,
- we're going to drop out here for a couple of things. Well, here's one of
- our favorite groups, the Bonzo Dog Band, and I guess, since we're in outer
- space and also in the city, it's only fair we play a cut called I'm the
- Urban Space Man on the One Step Beyond show, KDHX, St. Louis. The phone
- number here is 664-FM88 if you want to get in on the conversation. We'll
- be back in about, oh, five minutes or so.
-
- [music]
-
- Chuck: Well, there he goes. That's Harry Nilssen [sp?] with Space Man,
- and this is the One Step Beyond show, KDHX, St. Louis community radio with
- Chuck and Otis and our special guest, J. Michael Straczynski, from
- California.
-
- jms: Hi there.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, you're still there. Ok.
-
- jms: I'm in here.
-
- Chuck: Yes.
-
- jms: Surprising to both of us, but I'm still here.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, hey listen, we've got ... it looks like someone's calling in.
- Otis is going to screen the call and see if they want to talk to you on
- the air but.... Let me remind folks, J. Michael Straczynski, the executive
- producer and creator of the science fiction TV series Babylon 5, and we
- have someone on line who wants to talk to you.
-
- jms: Great.
-
- caller: Good afternoon.
-
- Chuck: Hello. You're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Good afternoon.
-
- jms: Hi there.
-
- caller: First of all I've got a comment, and I speak for several of
- a roomful of people we've got sitting here. We really appreciate
- the way Babylon 5 gives a realistic treatment of different religious
- points of view as opposed to some of the other space shows that are on TV.
-
- Chuck: Which shall remain unnamed.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: yeah. There are so many.
-
- jms: Well, I appreciate that. One thing that ... personally I am an
- atheist. I make no bones about it. But, as a writer, my obligation first
- and foremost is to be honest in my work. And as you look around what you
- realize very quickly is that religion, whether it is human or alien or what
- have you, is, and always has been, mankind's foremost and first means of
- trying to understand the universe, and our place within the universe. It
- tries to answer the questions we haven't answered anywhere else yet.
- Consequently, I think it behooves you to a) treat it with respect, and b)
- to realize that it ain't gonna go away in 250 years. It's been with us
- since the dawn of sentient life on this planet, and it's going to be here
- for a long time to come.
-
- caller: OK, and I have a question. When you talked about a station of the
- magnitude of Babylon 5 with a quarter of a million people on it, it raises
- some tremendous logistics problems, and I wonder if any background had been
- put into that, as far as the development of the story went.
-
- jms: Can you be more specific on that?
-
- caller: Well, like, how many shipments a day of food and removal of waste
- and processing of air and all....
-
- jms: Got it. Yeah, we have indeed put some work into that, trying to
- figure out roughly the maximum number of ships that can come through any
- one particular time, how much space we have for living quarters, and we try
- to answer those questions in a realistic fashion without necessarily going
- into them every single week. It forms sort of a backdrop in the back of
- our heads; whether we use it or not, it's always there. And we try at all
- times to again be realistic in how we handle this stuff. For instance,
- once problem you're going to have in an enclosed environment like this
- aside from the obvious problems of waste products and food and so on and so
- forth, is the fact that a lot of people, as with any large metropolitan
- area, are going to come looking for a new life. For a better life, for job
- opportunities. And they're going to come to the station. And in our
- universe, again, being realistic, space travel costs money. You don't just
- hop on a ship and go somewhere; it's going to cost you a lot of bucks. And
- once you get to Babylon 5 some of the people who are looking for new lives
- spend a lot of money to get there, and have some money on hand to live for
- a while in hopes of finding that new opportunity. When they can't find it,
- they often can't afford a ticket off the station. So the question becomes,
- what do you do with these guys? And you can't just, you know, throw 'em
- off into space and kill 'em. To send all of 'em back to their relative
- homeworlds is going to cost you an awful lot of money, which their
- government doesn't want to pay for, and the [?business?] doesn't want to
- pay for. So they end up migrating down to the lower depths of the station
- where they become known as lurkers.
-
- Chuck: Oh, OK.
-
- jms: And, they're basically Babylon 5's homeless. And, they scavenge, they
- scrounge. Very often you have guys who are doing less than legitimate work
- and they go down there and say I need 10 guys or 5 guys to do a job for us.
- And it's a real problem. How do you, how do you deal with that problem?
- We're trying to answer that question.
-
- Chuck: So, we'll still have homelessness 250 years in the future, you think.
-
- jms: Yeah. Yeah. In particular in this kind of environment where you can't
- just go somewhere else. Once you're there, there's the station, and there's
- space.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: And you can't walk out the door.
-
- Chuck: So I guess it's not dissimilar from the position people were
- in, I guess, pre-mass-transportation when they'd reach a big port of call.
-
- jms: In a way, yes. It's kind of ironic, where we've come much further in
- transportation technology, but, you know, by being in a restricted location
- like a space station, it causes similar problems to what we had a long time
- ago.
-
- Chuck: Are we going to be seeing something more of the lurkers, 'cause so
- far they've been kind of tangential, it seems to me.
-
- jms: We will see them from time to time, yeah, certainly toward the end of
- the season we see 'em popping up in a few places. We try not to give too
- much story weight there, because there's a limitation of what you can do
- with that storyline.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: But we do have some plans for down the road, though, yes.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- caller: Thanks for a wonderful show.
-
- jms: Thank you.
-
- Chuck: Thank you for calling. And we've got another call, so I might as
- well go ahead and put them on. Hello, you're on the air with J. Michael
- Straczynski.
-
- caller: Hi. Uh, I had a question for you about something regarding a
- musical request.
-
- Chuck: Oh, for me! OK, well, go ahead.
-
- caller: Yeah, I'd like to, yeah, um, I was wondering, I was wondering if
- you were, if you were gonna play, I don't know the name of the song, it's
- really famous, but I don't really remember the name too awfully well.
-
- jms: La Traviata.
-
- Otis: That's funny.
-
- caller: But, the theme, the theme, the theme music they used off of, off
- of Dark Star.
-
- Chuck: Dark Star. No, I know that's kind of a cult science fiction film,
- but I've never seen it. Joe, have you....
-
- caller: I like, I like the, I like the title, I like the, I like the,
- I like the song they used for the title off of that. I was wondering,
- I thought maybe, I thought maybe if you, if you were gonna, gonna
- have that theme for the songs you could play that one.
-
- Chuck: I don't think I have that with me though.
-
- caller: Oh, heck.
-
- Chuck: But thanks for calling anyway.
-
- caller: OK.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- caller: Well, it's a good show. I've seen it a couple of times. It's
- all right.
-
- Chuck: OK, thank you. Do you happen to know, Joe, what the theme
- song for Dark Star was, 'cause I've never seen it.
-
- jms: For some reason, Dark of the Sun is coming to mind, but that may
- not be correct.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. We have another caller here. Hello, you're on the air
- with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Hi, Chuck, how are you?
-
- Chuck: Hi!
-
- caller: I just wanted ... I know I said I wasn't probably gonna call in,
- but I just....
-
- Chuck: Oh, this is ... OK, it's, yeah, OK, this is a friend of mine, Joe,
- who is....
-
- jms: My condolences to both of you.
-
- Chuck: Oh no, she and I are both big fans of the show. We watch it
- together a lot. OK.
-
- caller: Yes, and I have to tell you that when I started watching the show,
- I didn't expect to like it. I really didn't. I've been a science fiction
- fan from way back, and most of the time things fall really short. This
- is ... it's absolutely wonderful. And the reason it's wonderful is
- because it's so well thought out. And planned out. And it has a definite
- storyline. And I just wanted to congratulate you.
-
- jms: Well, thank you. I appreciate that. That means a whole lot. We're
- trying to really be faithful to the genre, and have some fun doing it
- while we're at it.
-
- caller: Well good. Thank you.
-
- jms: OK.
-
- caller: Byebye.
-
- Chuck: OK, thanks Lynn. Yeah.... Well, there we obviously, we have some
- Babylonians out in the audience.
-
- Otis: Yes, you know, I was listening, and you know, I think that, that
- every now and then you expect something, you know listening, and
- [??viewers??] saying that, that in the back you have these logistical
- problems that sometimes you, you really don't, don't really confront, you
- know, and I was thinking to myself as I looked at the enormity of this, of
- this place, you know, the... I always think that the next big war that the
- world, the world sees is gonna be one over garbage. It's gonna be some
- country taking over another country to dump garbage on. You know, I think
- that looking for a planet that we could use as our really big garbage dump
- is gonna be a big project. And I wondered, you know you [laughs] as you
- look at future plots, do you see anything like that zooming up ahead?
-
- Chuck: Ecological concerns or any of that sort of thing.
-
- jms: [laughs] Ecological concerns, or finding a planet to dump on?
-
- [laughter]
-
- Otis: Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's right, finding a planet to dump on.
- [laughing] That's probably that's what I'm looking at.
-
- jms: We already have New Jersey.
-
- [laughter]
-
- jms: What more does one need?
-
- Chuck: [laughing] What more would we need with a planet, yes.
-
- Otis: [laughing] I guess you took care of that question right quick.
-
- Chuck: Good thing there's nobody from New Jersey out there.
-
- Otis: Yeah, I'll betcha there is.
-
- Chuck: That seems to have provoked another phone call.
-
- jms: Hey, I'm from New Jersey, what do you want.
-
- Chuck: Oh, really? That seems to have provoked another phone call,
- however. Let's put 'em on the air. Hello, you're on the air.
-
- caller: Oh, hi. This is uh, Bob Mattingly. Uh, the theme song
- for Dark Star was Benson, Arizona.
-
- Chuck: Oh, OK. By who?
-
- caller: I have no idea who played it.
-
- Chuck: OK. Well, as long as you're here, did you want to talk to
- our guest, or did you just want to let us know about that.
-
- caller: No, just a little bit.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- caller: Bye.
-
- Chuck: Thank you. Well, there you go.
-
- jms: You know, Chuck, for 5 years I hosted a show like yours here in Los
- Angeles. I'm....
-
- Chuck: Did you really!?
-
- jms: I'm recovered now.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Otis: [laughing] It took a little while, I'll bet.
-
- Chuck: I'm not, obviously. I'm still doing this. But uh ... let's see,
- well, here's another caller, so let's put 'em on the air. Hello, you're
- on the air.
-
- caller: Yeah, this is a guy from New Jersey, and I think you're all pretty
- rude.
-
- Chuck: Ok, well ... oops.
-
- jms: From New Jersey, you have to _be_ rude.
-
- Chuck: Yes, that's true.
-
- jms: To survive ... with all that toxic waste that gets into
- your veins after a while. It gets into your brain.
-
- Chuck: Is that what it is?
-
- jms: Must be.
-
- [Otis garbled, talking at same time]
-
- jms: That's why I'm a writer.
-
- Chuck: And.... Writer, that's right, I was going to go into that. Now,
- you had mentioned earlier that you had a, a number of fairly well-known
- science fiction and fantasy writers who had worked on the show. And
- we only touched on that briefly. I'd like to maybe go back into who
- some of those folks are and what we may expect to see from them.
-
- jms: Well, they include some of the best and the brightest. This past
- year, we have ... our creative consultant on the show is Harlan Ellison,
- who is probably known to every SF fan out there. He wrote some of the
- best Outer Limits episodes, Soldier, Demon with a Glass Hand. He wrote
- the Star Trek episode City on the Edge of Forever.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: He's written multiple ... dozens and dozens of collections of short
- stories. He does the Sci-Fi Channel, and, a very well-known science
- fiction writer. We also have .. Dorothy Fontana, a.k.a. D.C. Fontana,
- who was involved with the original Star Trek, writing the episodes for
- them. Worked on War of the Worlds and other science fiction series.
- Logan's Run. David Gerrold, who also worked on the original Star Trek,
- wrote Trouble With Tribbles. And many other science fiction series beyond
- that. My feeling is, if you're going to write a crime or mystery show, you
- want to get mystery writers. You want to write a science fiction show, get
- science fiction writers. For some reason, this, this logic eludes a lot of
- Hollywood producers.
-
- Chuck: It never seems to occur to them, either in TV or the movies, does it.
-
- jms: No, it doesn't as a rule, and again, go back to V for a second, the
- writers they brought on for that show were almost all soap opera writers.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: And it showed [?then?] in the final product.
-
- Chuck: That's what you get. We have another caller, so let's put
- 'em on the line. Hello, you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Yeah, it's me again.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- caller: I've got another question talking about the, the writing backup
- you have. Do you have .. actual .. technical backup, scientifically-based
- people that give you input, because your science seems a lot more real
- than, say, Star Trek.
-
- jms: We do have technical consultants, medical consultants we used on, on a
- script-by-script basis if something comes up. But by and large, because
- Harlan and Dorothy and David Gerrold and I, and others on the show grew up
- reading science fiction, and have a pretty good science background, a lot
- of it we just happen to know. Which, again, makes it a little bit
- different. You walk down the halls of Babylon 5 production offices, you
- don't tend to hear guys talking about their agents. They're talking about
- the latest improvements in SCSI technology coming from Intel, you know.
- It's, it's that kind of a crowd. And so because we're, you know, pretty
- well-rounded in that area, we can just put it in ourselves. We still have
- a fact-check from time to time by guys who know, you know, the really good
- stuff.
-
- caller: That really shows. I've seen a behind-the-scenes on, on Star Trek
- where the script had blanks in it with "tech" in parentheses, and they
- required other people to just fill in some technical mumbo-jumbo, and
- watching that, as an engineer, it doesn't really come off all the time.
-
- jms: Yeah, we never do that.
-
- caller: Yeah, and it shows.
-
- jms: Well, thank you.
-
- caller: So, thanks a lot.
-
- jms: All right.
-
- Chuck: OK, thanks for calling. Well, that's a good point, actually, and I,
- I would agree that the technology, I mean obviously, it's still science
- fiction. So, I mean we really don't have faster-than-light travel, and we
- still don't have jumpgates and so on, but it does to me seem a little more
- plausible than let's say some of the near-magical things we've seen on some
- other shows.
-
- jms: Well, bear in mind that, that about 80% of the technology shown on
- Babylon 5 is, is a technology we already have and have access to. We
- create .. gravity on Babylon 5 not by some magical button you push to
- create artificial gravity, but the station rotates to create the gravity.
- Most of what we use is more or less based on current technology, things....
- We could do Babylon 5, we could create a Babylon 5. It'd be a massive
- endeavor, but what you see, you could build. The jumpgates and a few other
- areas are, of course, you know, they're a, they're a little bit fuzzier as
- far as the science goes. A little more rubber science going in there. But
- for the most part, we don't use faster-than-light travel; jumpgates allow
- you to get around relativity, by going through, you know, hyperspace.
-
- Chuck: Yes.
-
- jms: Which, it takes care of the whole time dilation problem. So we're
- trying to stay pretty, pretty close and rigorous to it. As a matter of
- fact, we got an award a couple of months ago from the Space Frontier
- Foundation.
-
- Chuck & Otis: Oh, OK.
-
- jms: For best vision of the future, and, and I sat with Pete Conrad, who
- also got an award, because they were saying this was the first time anyone
- had sat down and really looked at the commercial civilian space prospects
- and done it in a realistic fashion.
-
- Chuck: It makes sense to me.
-
- Otis: Yes. It is really... it is really interesting that .. when are the
- ages, when or what, what do you find the age, what age group are you really
- hitting. I'm just saying, like, you know Chuck Lavazzi, seems like, that
- he's, he's kind of one of those boomers, I believe.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] Guilty as charged.
-
- Otis: Are you, are you, are you really hitting the boomers, 'cause it seems
- like all of the sudden the boomers are really catching on to these kind of
- things.
-
- jms: I don't know. They tell me at Warner Brothers that the demographics of
- the show are very good; that we're hitting .. the audience that we're
- supposed to be hitting. My personal feeling is I don't really write for any
- particular audience. I write what I think amuses _me_, and interests me,
- in the hope that if it does so, there are enough people out there who are
- as bent and twisted as I am, that will respond to the same thing.
-
- Otis: Well, you know, kind of picking your mind, you know, my son, you know,
- I have a, I have a couple of sons, and they're biracial. And they look at,
- they look at a show like yours that put people in this certain ... you know,
- they're looking at, at, at a fast progression of a, of a race that's, that's
- almost one color. They see, they see a show like yours as being a place
- where that, that whole process has escalated _fast_. ... I know I kind of
- leave you speechless, but my, my, my little boy, he, he sees your show as a
- place where, where, where the integration of the races just comes real fast.
-
- Chuck: Ok, where perhaps that sort of thing is no longer as important.
-
- Otis: Yes, that it's not important.
-
- jms: Yes, definitely it's not important and, and we, we have had every single
- ethnic mix you can think of on the show.
-
- Otis: And we know.
-
- jms: All of the .. the pairings on the show, the romantic pairings, have been
- interracial. My feeling is that, if we're going to go to the stars, either
- we're all, we're all going to go, or nobody's going to go.
-
- Otis: There you go.
-
- jms: And that when you see something that is not a human coming at you,
- suddenly the fact that the guy to your right is black doesn't make a whole
- hell of a lot of difference. 'Cause you're both humans. And I think that'll
- have a great unifying force. And that when we do go to the stars, I think
- we're going to bring with us our language, our culture, our ethnic
- backgrounds, and, and everything that makes us, makes us _humans_ have to go
- with us. And we're trying to hit that very strongly in the show.
-
- Chuck: Hey, we got a caller here, so I'm going to put him on. Hello, you're
- on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Hello, welcome. This is a very, very minor point, but you'd
- mentioned that .. Babylon 5 was 5 .. 5 miles long.
-
- jms: Approximately.
-
- caller: Uh huh. Well, I was thinking, that .. in 250 years, do you think
- that our conversion to the metric system would be complete?
-
- [laughter]
-
- jms: Yes, but mine is not.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] Well, that makes sense.
-
- caller: OK. I was just wondering, because it's long overdue. We were
- supposed to convert, you know in a 10-year period in this country.
-
- Chuck: So this is one of the cases where, we're talking miles and so on
- because it just happens to be the way it's written.
-
- jms: We're talking miles as it, as we're looking at it from the current
- perspective.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: But in the show, we tend by and large to use kil, uh, the metric
- system, in kilometers and stuff.
-
- Chuck: Oh, OK.
-
- jms: I think once or twice we slipped, and, and put in, you know, miles or
- something, or feet. But we, we try and keep it metric.
-
- caller: Ah.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- caller: Very good. All right.
-
- Chuck: Thank you. You know, you touched on something. We got us some
- business to do here, but I want to just throw this out. I think it's,
- while it is true as Otis was mentioning that racial division don't seem
- to mean much among humans, we are now seeing in the Babylon 5 universe a
- transference of that kind of inter-group hatred to humans versus the
- non-human species.
-
- Otis: Yes.
-
- jms: That's correct. There are, there ... We as a race, one of our, our,
- our less admirable attributes is that we always look for someone to blame.
- And, someone to scapegoat. And, once we have realized that we're all
- pretty much the same, we're gonna look around for someone out there to
- blame for our problems. And so we blame alien immigration, and alien
- migration, and aliens buying up real estate by the square mile, and .. as
- a way of dealing with our own problems. And in addition to which, the
- Earth Alliance is only 10 years out of the war that we almost lost very
- badly. It almost wiped out humanity. And when that happens, and you get
- caught up short like that, it tends to give you kind of an inferiority
- complex for a while. When someone hands you your head, you get kind of
- nervous for a while there after.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] Yes.
-
- jms: And so that, that inferiority complex is manifesting itself as
- aggression among various parts of the human population. You have the Home
- Guard, which is .. sort of an anti-alien terrorist group. You have political
- stuff going on behind the scenes, which is saying, aliens, you know, we have
- to, to restrict them, and keep their culture away from our culture. And that,
- that is a real problem in the time of Babylon 5.
-
- Chuck: It's 3:45 in the afternoon, and Big O, you want to throw some business
- at us here?
-
- [business deleted: PSA, promo]
-
- Chuck: Thank you, Big O. And I want to remind our listeners we're talking
- to J. Michael Straczynski, who is the creator and executive producer of the
- science fiction TV series Babylon 5, and we're taking your calls at 664-FM88.
- So you can talk to him, and us, if you just give us a buzz.
-
- jms: One follow-up, by the way.
-
- Chuck: Yes.
-
- jms: You asked me before what Babylon 5 is about.
-
- Chuck: Yes.
-
- jms: And on one level, the answer that I gave you is absolutely correct.
- But there is a second level that is to be considered. And, and it's the
- kind of thing which when you say this to, as I did by accident once, the
- network executives asked, well what is the show about, and I made the error
- in one meeting we had of telling them the truth.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: Oops.
-
- jms: And ... it is this. You guys and I, and probably most listeners who
- are out there, are more or less in the same age range probably, in the 30s,
- 40s, somewhere around there, given the audience we're probably going out to.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: There is a sense in people more or less in our age range and a little
- bit older that somewhere in the last 20, 25 years, we fell off the
- merry-go-round. That we stumbled. And that we stumbled in Vietnam, we
- stumbled with John Kennedy and Bobby Kennedy and King. We stumbled in
- Korea. Wherever it was, or maybe it wasn't any one thing. It was a
- series of stumbles. And the problem is, when you stumble _a lot_, you
- look at your feet. You look down. And what science fiction television
- specifically, and television in general, must do, I believe, is to make
- people raise their eyes back up to the horizon. Because when you do that,
- people discover something extraordinary. That they're part of a grand
- parade that is building the future. That behind us are our ancestors
- looking to us to say, make our lives have had meaning. Make it so it
- wasn't for nothing. And ahead of us are our inheritors and our children,
- saying, build the world we're going to live in. And that it isn't just a
- question of having a job, and coming home in the evening, and watching
- television. You're building the future. That we have come to this place
- through 2 million years of evolution, struggle, and blood, and that the
- culmination of all of this is not Beavis and Butthead. There is more to
- come. And that's the obligation of television, and science fiction, to
- tell that to people, and say move on. Build the future. If you want it,
- and you make them want it now, they'll build it tomorrow.
-
- Chuck: Amen and preach it. What can I say.
-
- Otis: Wow. [laughter] That's well said.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, Otis was going yeah, yeah, go for it, while you were saying
- that.
-
- Otis: Right on. Yes.
-
- Chuck: I want to remind you we're talking with J. Michael Straczynski, the
- creator of Babylon 5. We are going to drop out for another music break,
- and during this music break, we are going to give away some stuff.
-
- [rest of music intro, etc. deleted]
-
- Chuck: ... 3:54 in the afternoon on the One Step Beyond show, KDHX
- St. Louis community radio for the [?bipedal?] area, and here is Chuck, and
- there's Otis, and here on the line from California J. Michael Straczynski,
- producer... executive producer and creator of Babylon 5.
-
- jms: Hi there.
-
- Chuck: So, still with us, obviously. Yes, obviously a somewhat more
- dystopic idea of the near future there in that song. But in a way, but
- Babylon 5 in its own way, you were saying earlier, is .. both optimistic
- and maybe not so optimistic as some other visions of our future, it seems
- to me.
-
- jms: Well, what Babylon 5, and most science fiction set in the future says
- is that we do go on. We don't wipe ourselves out in a nuclear holocaust;
- we manage to keep, keep ourselves going somehow. But, that, as we go into
- the future and toward the stars, that which makes us human are our frailties
- and our flaws as well as our nobilities, stay with us.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: And we must still work at overcoming the problems that we have.
- Personally, as a viewer of science fiction, I find the process of watching
- someone in the process of overcoming more interesting than someone who has
- already overcome everything.
-
- Otis: Yes, so, Chuck is, Chuck is screening one of your calls out
- right now, and, you said you had done radio at one time and was it ...
-
- Chuck: I'm back.
-
- Otis: ... was it this kind of radio that you were doing at one time?
-
- jms: Yes, for 5 years I was the host of Hour 25 here in Los Angeles.
-
- Chuck: Oh right! I read that in your bio, yes.
-
- jms: Yeah, it's a science fiction talk show, 2 hours like your, your format
- is. And, so we had a lot of guys on from the science fiction community,
- come on and talk about their work.
-
- Chuck: Well, we've got 2 people on hold now who want to talk to you,
- so I better get 'em on the air. Let's get the first on one. Hello,
- you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Oh, thank you. First of all, I wanted to .. give him a comment about
- how much we appreciate his accessibility on .. radio shows like this, and also
- on .. Internet.
-
- Chuck: Great. Yeah, I was gonna bring that up, but, thank you.
-
- caller: And, I also have an Internet comment for him. I, I read his post on
- Internet every day, and I was wondering if the good comments and criticisms
- and the help he gets from that balance out the damage done by people who
- refuse to respect the no story ideas request.
-
- jms: In general, yeah, it does balance it out, and, and, I'd say that 99.9%
- respect that request, and the other [?hundredth?] percent you just have to
- deal with. I find that the net is very very useful for me, in one sense
- because it gives you a sense of the room, as it were. And on the other
- level, as a writer, my job is to think of every possible question about my
- characters and my universe, so that when I do sit down to write the show,
- it is well-thought-out, and there is verisimilitude to it. But I cannot
- think of every possible question. However, on the nets, I get every
- possible question. And then some. And, by virtue of having to answer those
- questions, and think about parts of the show I had never thought about
- before, it helps me, when I write the show, to have a much broader
- background of it. So, I would say that, that over the long haul,
- although there are, there are occasional flame wars, and occasional
- aberrations, that the experience and the experiment has been more than
- worthwhile.
-
- Chuck: Great.
-
- caller: OK, thank you, so I really appreciate that, and I definitely
- enjoy reading all your posts, especially the sarcastic ones....
-
- [laughter]
-
- jms: Thank you. It takes some, some kind of stupid to sit down and
- mess with a writer in a written medium.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: No kidding.
-
- Chuck: Boy, that's the truth, yes.
-
- jms: Ah, but I enjoy when they do, because you can get them so well.
-
- caller: OK.
-
- Chuck: Well, thank you for calling.
-
- caller: Thank you.
-
- Chuck: And we have another caller who's been waiting to talk to you
- here, so let's put her on. Hello, you're on the air with J. Michael
- Straczynski. Ooh, and you'd better turn down your radio.
-
- caller: Ok, yeah, I'm right here now. Yeah, uh, my name is Don,
- and, I tuned into the program because of .. J. Michael Straczynski
- I've been following ... uh ...
-
- jms: Well, stop following me.
-
- caller: Oh, yeah, there, I'm following _you_, OK. I've been following
- your, your .. column in Writer's Digest from time to time. And, what Chuck
- and Big O may not realize is that you're kind of a Hollywood success story.
- I mean you had very humble beginnings, and, you kind of starved to death for
- a long time and, maybe you tried .. a couple of different genres before you
- arrived at science fiction. And, I wondered if you could talk a little
- bit about ... genres.... Personally, lately I've been following westerns
- a lot, because I think it sort of an up-and-coming genre. Big O this week
- has been sort of, lampooning westerns with....
-
- Chuck: [laughing] That's true, yes.
-
- caller: [laughs] And, so, can you talk a little about .. other genres that ..
- may have some future. And maybe westerns as an example.
-
- jms: I, I, I am probably the last person you want to talk to and ask what's
- going to be happening next year that will make some money, or, or be a big
- genre, because I'm almost always wrong. If you want to make money in the
- comic book business, follow me around to the store and buy whatever I don't
- buy.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] OK.
-
- jms: I ended up in science fiction more or less because that was always my
- first, my first _love_. When I came to, to Los Angeles originally, there was
- not a lot of science fiction being done; there weren't 2 shows. The majority
- of what is done in television is cop shows and mysteries and what have you.
- And I've always wanted to do science fiction, and always seized the
- opportunity to do so. And, it wasn't so much not knowing which genre to go
- for as ... it wasn't around; there wasn't much, much venue. And now there
- is more science fiction being done, thus I've ended up where I am. My, my
- sense is .. that you'll be seeing more science fiction certainly to come ..
- in the next couple of years. I think that the westerns are in the process
- of a slow and gradual comeback. But unless, but if, and if the next
- couple, three shows to come down the pike are very good, that will cement
- that revival. If they are not very good, then that will pretty much kill
- the revival. I think that the, the cop show is currently being very well
- revitalized. The mystery show is kind of floundering right now. I think
- it's going to go by the boards after the last season of Murder, She Wrote
- for a while. It'll go into sort of a, a hiatus.
-
- caller: You were involved in Murder, She Wrote, too, weren't you?
-
- jms: Yeah, I was there for 2 years, that is correct.
-
- caller: OK.
-
- jms: And, but beyond that it's always, it's always a crap shoot
- because you never know what's going to happen. Everyone said that ..
- cop shows were once dead on television, and that .. the franchise had run
- its course. But in point of fact it's always come back. So, you never
- really know what's going to come back, come back out at you.
-
- caller: OK. Thank you very much.
-
- Chuck: Thank you for calling.
-
- jms: What the, the caller was also alluding to, Harlan Ellison refers to,
- you know, my background as kind of a Hora.., Horatio Alger story. In
- that, I'm a Jersey street kid by, by nature and upbringing. And when I
- came here to Los Angeles in 1981, it was without any contacts in the
- business, without any friends in the industry, without family in the
- industry. And, my wife and I .. struggled to get in. And, had some
- very very rough times, but I am living proof that you don't have to
- have someone who knows you in the business to break in. You can, if you
- have the persistence, the talent, and the luck, to do it on your own.
- It's a longer and harder road. I didn't eat a whole lot. I'm 6 foot 5,
- and there's a photo of me from that period of time where I weigh 150 pounds.
-
- Chuck&Otis: Oh, whoa.
-
- jms: Yeah, 'cause I was using money that I should have been using to
- eat, and spending it on supplies. Writing supplies.
-
- Chuck: So you really were the literal starving artist for a while there.
-
- jms: Literally, yeah. It got so bad, one day I was, I was trying to
- write, and I got this obsession for a candy bar. And I didn't have 25
- cents to go out and get a candy bar. So I went down to the corner,
- [?it made you even mad?] after a while, and shoplifted a candy bar. I
- ate it, it tasted like gall; I couldn't even finish it. And, later on in
- the week I got a check, a small check and went back to the store, bought
- the same kind of candy bar, walked out, walked back in again, and put it
- back. 'Cause I just couldn't live with myself for having done that.
-
- Chuck: So it's not only the Minbari who have a strong sense of honor
- here. [laughs]
-
- jms: I just couldn't sleep at night, it just bothered me.
-
- Otis: I understand that, I guarantee you.
-
- Chuck: I think I do, too. We need to drop out for a couple of quick
- bits of business here, and, I want to remind you we're talking to
- J. Michael Straczynski, the executive producer of Babylon 5, and as
- soon as we come back we're going to take your calls at 664-FM88.
- And ... when we do come back I'd like to, we haven't talked much
- about the, some of the alien races that are in the Babylon 5 universe,
- and I think they're pretty fascinating. So...
-
- Otis: Yes.
-
- Chuck: I wondered, Joe, if we could go into that when we come back.
-
- jms: Sure thing.
-
- Chuck: OK. We're going to drop out here, Otis has got something to
- lay on ya, and then we got a couple of quick bits of business.
-
- [business deleted: 2 promos]
-
- Chuck: And this is the One Step Beyond show, and this is Chuck, and
- Otis is on hand, and, on the line with us, all the way from
- California, is J. Michael Straczynski, the creator and executive
- producer of the science fiction TV series Babylon 5....
-
- jms: [?So?] there.
-
- Chuck: ... So, welcome back. So there. And we've already got a
- caller who wants to talk to you. I want to remind everybody,
- 664-FM88, 664-3688, is the phone number if you want to call up
- and go on the air and talk to Otis and I and Joe. Feel free to
- do that, and here's someone who just did it; hello, you're on the
- air.
-
- caller: Hello. Yes, I wanted to first of all comment and say this is
- a really great station....
-
- Chuck: Thank you!
-
- Otis: Thanks.
-
- caller: Well, you know, you gotta know who, who to rub and where and all.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: [laughing] Yes, ok.
-
- caller: Well, actually, I'm from Indianapolis and I'm visiting some
- friends here in St. Louis, partially because I knew that jms was going
- to be on the phone and I wanted to hear this. So, there are some ..
- fairly .. big fans of the show. I just wanted to make some comments,
- maybe ask a couple of questions.
-
- Chuck: That's what we're here for.
-
- caller: OK. Uh, yeah, we have a large group of fans at work, and
- we sit there and we discuss the show afterwards, and try to figure
- out what's going on, and of course, it's, it's kind of like
- Twin Peaks, you have no idea, it seems like when you're sure you
- know what's going on, the next thing some left curve goes out and
- blows you away. No, that's good, I like that. At least you can't
- second-guess it like a lot of the .. sitcoms and things like that
- where, you know, you have the, it's, there's always, I, I guess you
- can break it down into A occurs then B occurs then A does this to B
- and B is embarrassed, but then C is cool, so they do that, you know.
- But [?you don't?] follow that pattern at all, and I really really like
- that, which makes this basically my favorite show on TV right now.
-
- jms: That's great, thank you.
-
- caller: Anyway, one thing that I, that I really like about the show
- specifically is that the .. the people slash aliens or, I guess we want
- to call them non-humans because, you know, "alien" is probably not
- politically correct. But anyway, yeah, that's a comment about your intro,
- by the way. Humans and aliens, now, come on, these are modern times,
- we can't be doing this.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: We do it anyway....
-
- jms: [laughing] It's a matter of perspective; they call us aliens,
- we call them aliens.
-
- caller: Right. I guess that's true. Anyway. But on "the other
- program," we note that, you know, Vulcans are always good; humans are
- good; Klingons were bad, of course, but now they're good, they're our
- friends; Cardassians and Romulans are bad. And what's interesting in,
- in .. B5, is that we can't really figure this out. It's like we have
- Narms [sic] who appeared .. harmless and bad, but, not always. And the
- Centauri who seem to be harmless, but they, they have a, they have a cold
- streak. The Minbari, who appeared good, but then also not always also.
- And of course we, nobody can figure out what's going on with the .. Vorlons.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: Yeah, who knows, right.
-
- caller: Yeah, who knows. Well, I know one person that does know.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: He's on the line with us right now, yes.
-
- jms: And I ain't talkin'.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: [laughing] Yes.
-
- caller: Theoretically, of course. Anyway, one thing I do like is it's
- kind of different to watch this program because, one thing, and I'm
- certain that this is intentional, it shows that basically everybody is,
- everyone is self-interested. And their self-interest doesn't even
- necessarily match what their respective governments or worlds. And I
- know this is intentional and, and that's one thing that, that actually
- keeps my interest in watching the program, because you could tell that
- there's .. even friction caused by .. [?yeah, I don't know?] like,
- somebody's decision, and you know, well, they probably weren't supposed
- to do this, but they did it because it matched their own self-interest.
-
- jms: Well certainly there is... in one of our scripts I dropped in a
- line about that, where a character, I think it's G'Kar, says that there
- are 3 elements in the universe: energy, matter, and enlightened
- self-interest [laughter] and that makes everything run. My feeling is
- that I, I, as a science fiction viewer and fan, I'm kind of tired of
- the monolithic alien species, where they're all exactly alike.
-
- Chuck: Yes, really.
-
- jms: There must be differences between them, and, and in their heart
- where, they are good or bad depending on circumstances. I also wanted
- to create a scenario in which we.... When the show first went on the
- air, everyone said, OK, fine, this is a good guy, good alien, this is a
- bad alien, this is the comic relief. And they all got very smug and
- satisfied with that. Then ... which was the, the purpose and the
- intent. Now we move the chairs around a little. All of a sudden, the guy
- you thought was your friend, ain't your friend any more. All of a sudden
- your world is turned upside-down. And I, I like surprises.
-
- Chuck: Another *WHAM*, as it were.
-
- jms: Yeah. I like being surprised when I watch a television show, when
- you see the most unlikely thing happen, and .. when G'Kar saved Catherine
- Sakai, no one saw that coming. They all figured that he had some, some
- agenda; he was going to hurt her or whatever. Nope. He just did it
- because it was the right thing to do at that particular moment.
-
- Chuck: He had his reasons, yes.
-
- jms: He had his reasons.
-
- Chuck: He had his reasons.
-
- jms: And they may be exactly what he said. Why not?
-
- Chuck: Although, didn't he also say in that same episode that nobody on
- Babylon 5 was what they appear to be?
-
- jms: That's right. And he was totally correct.
-
- caller: Yeah, that, that was G'Kar that said that. That was kind of
- interesting. Of course, and here's Mr. Heartless, and .. he smiles and
- says, [?], not everyone is who they appear to be, and then of course
- everyone is going uh-oh, what's going on.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: We thought we had it figured out, but not.
-
- jms: Well, all of our characters go through an arc, a change in their
- character, and, and, for that to happen you must start 'em at point A,
- and move 'em toward point Z, and that means changing them along the
- way, very subtly.
-
- caller: Well, see, there's a little bit of a problem with all this. And
- that is that, basically, you, either intentionally or not intentionally
- have gotten everyone conditioned that watches this, that we don't trust
- anything now; we think that, you know, if you watch Twin Peaks, you know,
- they'll show a close-up of a little, you know, you'd have this big wide
- expansive room, and then, the camera just pans in and pans in, and before
- you know it, it's looking at .. a little candle, where the flame is now
- full-screen, and, and then you think, Oh, that's significant, and then,
- of course, maybe it's not. And that, that, that's what makes it
- interesting. But I did want to comment on that, and that is that....
- I know that you've said before, on some of the computer nets and things,
- that you don't want to drag things on so long that people lose interest.
- And, you know, that's, that's of course my concern. Not only that, but
- also, has to do with the, the .. fact that there is this long-term
- background story, and that the concern that I had, and that was the problem
- with let's say Twin Peaks, was that, unless you watched absolutely every
- episode, if you missed one you were basically _in trouble_. And....
-
- Chuck: Even if you didn't miss one, you were in trouble, 'cause I used to
- watch that series.
-
- caller: That's true. But you had at least a fighting chance.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] Yes.
-
- caller: If you didn't, if you didn't watch every episode you were totally
- in trouble. And that's, that's one thing that I want to know, is about
- this possibility of people maybe getting lost, and the question is, is the
- viewership increasing, and, and/or will the earlier episodes repeat again,
- I know they've repeated some of them already once, so people can catch up?
- Or, or is it carefully designed in such a way that you won't have this
- problem?
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- jms: Yes.
-
- caller: Oh, thank you. That's it?
-
- [laughter]
-
- jms: The viewership does seem to be increasing. What we try and do
- with the show is that whenever there's an episode where prior
- knowledge helps grasp what's going on, that information is imparted
- verbally in the course of the episode. So that, it was designed in
- such a way that you can watch all the shows, half the shows, watch
- them in order or _out_ of order....
-
- Chuck: And you can still know what's going on.
-
- jms: And still know what's going on.
-
- Chuck: In fact, we just saw an example of that this past week's
- episode Eyes, which relies on a number of things that happened in the
- past, and those things are at least briefly touched on in the dialog.
-
- jms: Yeah, we always check these things. I, I go to some people who don't
- watch the show every so often, and I have a script that requires prior
- knowledge which is recapped in the script, I give it to the guys who don't
- watch the show and say, does this make sense to you? If you, never having
- watched an episode, can you follow what happens here. And they come back
- and say, I was confused, we revised it so that it's clearer, so that you
- can come in wherever you want to, and pick up the show.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- caller: OK. One other thing ....
-
- Chuck: I got another call on line, so... [?make it quick?]
-
- [a couple of people talking at the same time]
-
- caller: OK, one quick thing. The question is concerning, at least in
- Indianapolis, our, our problem is that, and I know people in certain
- areas that absolutely don't get Babylon 5 at all, our station is 40
- miles away, it's mono, [background sounds of disgust] we have a real
- problem when everyone has these awesome, you know, surround sound TVs
- and things like this. And we can't pick it up, and it's very frustrating
- that .. certain networks or whatever, are monopolizing the independents
- or whatever stations, and it's very hard to get that, and, has anything
- like this been addressed, or how, how are you dealing with that. And
- that's all I wanted to ask. Thanks.
-
- jms: Sure.
-
- Chuck: Thank you, for calling.
-
- jms: Each station tends to evaluate the needs of its local viewers.
- And if you're in a locality which has an independent station or two,
- and you want Babylon 5, your best bet is to write to your local station
- and say please carry the show.
-
- Chuck: Uh huh.
-
- jms: And if they get enough response, people who want to see it, then
- they go ahead and solicit it.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, because if they think there's an audience, they'll fill it.
-
- jms: Yeah.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. We have another call here. Hello, you're on the air.
-
- caller: Yeah, hi there. I got to run real quick, I'm out here on my
- cellular, but, I just wanted to mention one thing that I, I kind of get
- the impression that nobody on your staff has any military experience,
- specifically because you're always calling the Lieutenant Commander
- "Lieutenant Commander." And generally speaking, in the military, you
- don't bother with that subrank when you're speaking with someone, unless,
- of course, you're in the process of verbally slapping them down, at which
- point in time the commander might call a lieutenant commander "lieutenant
- commander" just to make it clear, to put her in her place.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: Is that something you guys did on purpose, or is that just,
- like I say, you don't have anybody with military experience in your life.
-
- jms: No, we actually, we do. In fact if you look at our military
- costumes and the insignia, and lot of it is grounded very strongly in
- military tradition. What we realized, though, is that if you're
- on, on the observation dome, and there's a problem and the tech turns
- and says Commander, two guys are going to turn to you.
-
- caller: Uh huh.
-
- jms: And you want to have some means to distinguish them, because
- the person who runs the station isn't the captain, it's the commander.
-
- caller: Right.
-
- jms: So saying commander could be, you know, vague and confusing. So
- we figure we'll keep this for right now and change it down the road.
-
- caller: Yeah. I just, I just noticed it, you know, in just person-to-person
- conversation, though, and that, like I say, it's, it's, in my experience
- anybody who's ever called me lieutenant colonel is making a point that I'm
- just a lieutenant colonel... [laughs]
-
- jms: Got it.
-
- caller: And I better get my act together.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: OK, well, thank you for calling.
-
- caller: Sure thing. Byebye.
-
- Otis: Oh, that was like being in the Marine Corps when I, when they
- changed the rank and I became an Acting Sergeant. You know, they,
- they, it was a, they, they, I was a sergeant, but they had another,
- they had a little, a little technical thing so I had to .. remake
- Sergeant again. So to be called an Acting Sergeant used to be such a
- put-down; I was so glad to make that extra stripe so that I could be
- called Sergeant.
-
- Chuck: No fooling about it.
-
- Otis: Yes, no fooling around. So are we... I really understand that,
- that caller.
-
- Chuck: See, I never would have known that. 'Cause I, I have no military
- experience myself.
-
- jms: Yeah, we were aware of it. We just felt that this was, for now,
- the better way to go.
-
- Chuck: OK. So it was more of a dramatic decision rather than anything
- else there.
-
- jms: Yeah. Yeah.
-
- Chuck: Once again I want to remind folks we're talking to J. Michael
- Straczynski, the creator and executive producer of Babylon 5,
- here on the One Step Beyond show. And I also want to remind you our
- phone number is 664-FM88 if you want to get in on the conversation
- here. And, well, we have another caller, so I guess we'll get 'em
- on the air. Hello, you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Thank you. A short question and a long one.
-
- Chuck: OK. Oh, this is one of our, this is one of our programmers here at
- the station, it's Elliott.
-
- caller: Oh, hi there.
-
- Chuck: Go ahead, Elliott.
-
- caller: Thank you. Um, what town in New Jersey you from?
-
- jms: I was born in Patterson, raised in Newark.
-
- caller: Oh, intense New Jersey. All right. [? I'm Union, myself??]
-
- jms: Yeah.
-
- Otis: [laughing] Intense.
-
- caller: No, 'cause I just wanted you to know that people from New
- Jersey are still out here. If you remember the old Star Trek
- show, the first one, that was kind of the, the new .. new frontier
- in space. And then they had the, the other Star Trek show, and that
- was kind of .. a little urban yuppie village in space, and, and....
-
- jms: [ ? ] David Gerrold calls a Club Med in space.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: Exactly. Are you kind of the United States in space again,
- or is this a real world colony; is there an African component, an
- African village component; maybe .. an Islamic aspect to things.
- You know what I'm, I'm not, you know what I'm getting at, is there really
- a universal .. thing in space or is this just, once again, the US in
- space.
-
- jms: Well, no, there are, there are and have been, we've shown
- Arabs, Islamic, Africans, American Indian .. Native Americans. We
- try to show everyone there isn't, like, a little Italy, or a little
- Africa, or a little, you know, Saigon, because there isn't room in the
- station. They are all kind of shoved in together with each other.
- And, I think, and that's more interesting in the long run to
- have everyone sort of integrated, having to live with each other, than
- being pushed off into various different small communities.
-
- caller: Is it something like a submarine, where it's tight, and everyone
- has to get along?
-
- jms: Yeah.
-
- caller: And it's, and it's done on a very hierarchical basis, like
- there's the captain, and there's the, you know. Is, is, is the Babylon
- 5 a hierarchical place, or is it ...
-
- jms: Well, only in terms of....
-
- caller: ... uh, a democracy?
-
- jms: It's only hierarchical in terms of the military, which ..
- has its ranks and its orders. But ... Babylon 5 is primarily a civilian
- living area. The best comparison I could give to you would be a
- military governor of a state, like California was, it had a military
- governor before it became a state. And, and, and, they have to deal
- with all the real piddly problems that take place in terms of getting
- water, irrigation put in, and, and construction, and there's a squabble over
- water rights. And has to monitor all of this stuff, and deal with the,
- the Emperor of Mexico down the road, who has his own problems. It's
- more that kind of an environment. It's, it's, it's a mix of things, it
- really is.
-
- caller: I'm intrigued from a question that someone had asked before.
- Does someone truck away the garbage?
-
- [laughter]
-
- jms: Yeah, we got, we got garbage, we got toilets in Babylon 5. We
- did one scene where we have .. Garibaldi and Sinclair talking at
- the urinals, just having a conversation.
-
- Chuck: Something we never saw on any other science fiction series [? I
- ever got ?] [laughter] I always wondered where the bathrooms were
- on the Enterprise, darn it, you know....
-
- jms: Well, we always say where they are, you go right in the front
- door, and you see them doing their business while they're having
- a conversation.
-
- caller: And why specifically Babylon, of all places, or all names?
-
- jms: Well, a number of reasons, first and foremost being that, originally,
- if you look at its history, Babylon was not, did not have the onus
- that it has now. It was designed to be a place of great commerce and
- industry, and people would come from other countries to do business
- there. Gradually it began to unravel and eventually was thrown down
- several times. And rebuilt about 5 times, by the way. Babylon itself
- has been rebuilt about 4 or 5 times. Beyond that, the storyline
- of Babylon 5 is somewhat designed to track the history of the original
- Babylon. So if you were to get out a history book, and read up everything
- there is on the first Babylon, you would get some idea of where the show
- is going to go.
-
- caller: Nineveh. ... That was a joke, never mind.
-
- jms: Yes.
-
- Chuck: There are some things he's not going to comment on, Elliott.
- I should warn you about that.
-
- [laughter]
-
- jms: Mene mene tekel upharsin. [silence] Never mind.
- [Note: This is "The writing on the wall." Thanks to Larry Hiller for
- recognizing this from the clues given in the initial release of this.]
-
- Chuck: Never mind.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: Yeah also, just one more quick question: .. anything on science
- fiction _radio_ that you're.... I know, on my next, if I may do a plug
- for next Thursday's show....
-
- Chuck: Oh, go ahead, Elliott.
-
- caller: I'll be doing some excerpts from Ruby: The Adventures of a Galactic
- Gumshoe.
-
- Otis: Oh....
-
- caller: Specifically the sex with robots section.
-
- jms: I love Ruby. Is this Ruby I or Ruby II?
-
- caller: Ruby I.
-
- jms: Ah.
-
- caller: The one that you can follow and make sense.
-
- [laughter]
-
- jms: Yes.
-
- caller: Do you, is there, do you know of any radio science fiction that's
- coming up that you're interested in, or anything in the past that you
- thought was awesome .. [??], whatever.
-
- jms: I loved Ruby. I have the entire set, as a matter of fact, on disk.
- Ruby's terrific. Alien Worlds I kinda liked, and also worked on
- for a while. I love the Star Wars adaptations, which are now out
- on cassette. As far as new stuff is concerned, there ain't a whole lot
- going on right now.
-
- Chuck: We've got, in fact, an example here that I may get on called
- Gyp Psychic in Hyperspace. Are you familiar with that one?
-
- jms: No. That I don't know.
-
- Chuck: OK, it's by a guy named ... I've forgotten his name now, but
- it's part of something called Audio Comics.
-
- jms: Oh, it's not a ZBS then?
-
- Chuck: No, it's not. No, this is FlamCo Enterprises, some, some weirdo
- somewhere off in the Z who does this, but, we may get around to that at
- some point.
-
- caller: All right, well, thank you very kindly.
-
- jms: Thank you.
-
- Chuck: Thanks, Elliott. And, boy, we've got another caller here. You,
- you seem to be provoking a lot of phone calls here, Joe ...
-
- jms: Great.
-
- Chuck: ... so let's put 'em on the air. Hello, you're on the air.
-
- caller: Oh, thank you. Um, you were talking about such wonderful,
- lofty things before, I thought we'd bring it back down to the gutter
- again. [laughter] On the restroom scene, when .. Garibaldi and
- Sinclair were walking from the restroom, someone passed them and headed
- back into the men's room, and it looked very much like a woman. And
- that's been troubling a bunch of us for some time now. [laughter]
- What's the story about that?
-
- jms: Um, my, my story is that if you go past the men's room, there's
- another hallway there where, you, you really can't see it well on, on
- the shot, but it goes off to the, to women's restrooms.
-
- caller: Oh, OK.
-
- jms: That's my story; I'm sticking to it.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: OK, fair enough.
-
- caller: That window is kind of, you know, kind of placed in a bad spot
- there now, I think I'd take the rest.., the window out of the restroom
- if I was you. [laughs]
-
- jms: Yeah, it was meant to be a mirror, I'm not sure how well that
- came off.
-
- [laughter. Many people talking at once.]
-
- caller: Oh, I see.
-
- Chuck: Oh, all right.
-
- jms: Yeah, the director [ ?? ] shot for that.
-
- Chuck: I'm afraid we missed that completely.
-
- jms: Yeah, so did I.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: Thank you.
-
- Chuck: Thanks. Byebye. Boy, here's another call. But once it....
- The phone number here is 664-FM88. We're talking with J. Michael
- Straczynski, the man who created Babylon 5, and here's another caller.
- Hello, you're on the air.
-
- caller: Oh, hello, I want to stay with the bathroom scene.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: [laughing] Oh, please....
-
- jms: See what you've done now, what you've opened up with this.
-
- Otis: Yes.
-
- caller: There was a recent episode where the, I don't know what,
- the PsiCops are trying to, to pay back the Commander of Babylon 5.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, that was Eyes.
-
- caller: OK.
-
- Chuck: That was last week's episode.
-
- caller: Ok. I thought I'd seen it before, but there was one scene
- where the younger, the PsiCop that's with the military guy, has confronted
- the, I don't know her name, the executive com.., the executive officer.
-
- jms: Ivanova.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, Ivanova.
-
- caller: Yeah. In the restaurant. And .. she loses her temper, and
- refers to tearing his head off and using it as a chamberpot.
-
- Chuck: Yes. [laughing]
-
- caller: Well, in the 23rd century [laughter] what is the character's
- basis for using that term?
-
- jms: Well....
-
- caller: I'm sure you have a _good_....
-
- jms: I got a flash for you.
-
- caller: OK.
-
- jms: Which is that most of our language and terminology goes back several
- hundred years. A lot of it goes back a lot further than that. Wednesday
- was Odin's day, you know. Thursday was Thor's day.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. Frika's day was Friday. Yeah. Right.
-
- jms: Yeah. But the point being that, we're still using terminology
- now that goes back literally hundreds of years. And, and to me, one
- thing that is important with the show is to keep pointing toward the
- continuity of the human species. That parts of our traditions do go with
- us. We use the term bar-and-grill all the time. How many realize
- the fact that where that comes from was a time in, where, in, like the
- 17- or 1800s when isolated pubs would have a grillwork put in, you know,
- there were no police in the area. And to buy a drink you had to go in,
- pass money through the grill, the grillwork, they'd slide the bottle
- out to you, and keep the rest of it hidden behind, behind the wall.
-
- Chuck: I didn't know that.
-
- jms: That's where that comes from. So to me, that, that terminology
- will still be around; it may be archaic, as much of our language today
- is archaic, but we still use it.
-
- caller: But obviously it has to mean enough to them to use in extreme
- emotional .. moments, because she was furious; that's the first thing
- that came to her mind.
-
- jms: Also she is, I'm sure she is read up on history, in particular
- the Russian history, and there may be parts of Russia that still, that
- don't have all the inner plumbing they should really have at this point.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Otis: And why wouldn't a spaceship sometimes, in, in circumstances, not
- have a pot? I, I, I could understand that, you know, some, somehow
- this is coming clear to me.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: It's possible that the chamberpot may have changed somewhat in its
- technology, but who knows, yes.
-
- Otis: Be made out of different material but [laughing].
-
- jms: All right, I'll resolve this for you right now. Chamberpot is
- a new word in the 23rd century that means TV antenna. [laughter]
- OK? We're clear on this now?
-
- caller: I think I've got the big picture now.
-
- jms: I'm coming over there.
-
- caller: So I'll keep watching to see how all this great plotting .. gets
- together with all the characterization and the dialog, and I'll keep, I'll
- keep those things in mind.
-
- jms: OK.
-
- Chuck: Ok, and thank you. I'm not gonna take another toilet query. I
- mean ...
-
- Otis: No no no no no no. I'm happy ...
-
- Chuck: ... I don't want any more of this.
-
- Otis: ... I'm happy to know that, I'm happy to know that there will be boys
- and girls in the future.
-
- jms: Oh absolutely.
-
- Otis: That's right, not just one kind, just, boys and girls. And you
- just satisfied that, thank you.
-
- Chuck: Big O, you've got some business to do here. Let's get that out
- of the way and maybe we won't get any more toilet questions.
-
- Otis: I don't know....
-
- [business deleted: PSA & promo]
-
- Chuck: ... This is the One Step Beyond show, of course, with Chuck and
- Otis, and we're talkin' to J. Michael Straczynski, who is the creator
- and executive producer of Babylon 5. Joe, I've been wanting to ask about,
- and talk a bit more about the alien races, 'cause we haven't discussed
- them very much. And there's some ...
-
- jms: No, we haven't.
-
- Chuck: And there's some really interesting ...
-
- jms: And we're not going to.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, let's, let's .. could you give us, give the listeners an
- overview of the various aliens that are showing up on Babylon 5.
-
- jms: Well, we have in addition to humans the, which are one part of
- the big 5....
-
- Chuck: Right.
-
- jms: We have the Centauri. These are our first contact we ever made
- with another civilization, about, roughly a hundred years ago, in B5
- story time. And it was from them where we first began to get jumpgate
- technology that allowed us to go to the stars. And .. they began trading
- with us and, good relation, and they said, you know, Oh, we run everything,
- we run the whole universe, the whole galaxy, we are in charge of everything.
- Which we bought for a long time, until we got out there, and found out
- they were lying to us. [laughter] Which, you know, well, what do you want,
- it was a bookkeeping error, you know.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: And .. then there are the Narns, who were conquered and ..
- suppressed by the Centauri for the better part of a hundred years, and
- have recently staged their own revolution and kicked them off, off the
- homeworld. And now the Narns are sort of the new kids on the block,
- being very aggressive, and trying to, to overcompensate for what was
- done to them by doing it to somebody else. Then there are the Minbari,
- who we ran into about 10 years ago, 12 years ago storytime-wise.
- And .., the first contact we had with the Minbari, Delenn's people,
- went terribly awry. We first encountered a convoy of their ships,
- for the first time; we don't know who they were, they didn't know who
- we were. They offered a gesture of respect of opening their gun
- ports, which, we didn't take as being anything but an act of aggression,
- and we opened fire. They took it as being a, a surprise attack.
-
- Chuck: Oh boy.
-
- jms: Which destroyed their main ship and killed their leader. And ..
- their religious leader Dukhat.
-
- Chuck: Ouch.
-
- jms: And they declared jihad, a religious war, and determined to wipe
- us off the face of the universe....
-
- Chuck: This sounds.... OK.
-
- jms: ... They .. and then, they, for, for reasons unknown, on the
- edge of wiping us out, stopped the, stopped the war, and surrendered,
- and no one quite knows why. That's one of the big mysteries of
- our show, why did the Minbari surrender on the eve of victory.
-
- Chuck: Right.
-
- jms: Then there are the Vorlons....
-
- Chuck: Yes, there are the Vorlons, [laughs] whatever they are.
-
- jms: They .. we only see one of them. He is in his encounter suit at
- all times which is required, or may not be required, it could be
- camouflage to keep us from seeing what he actually is inside.
- We've been aware of the Vorlons for, you know, some time now, but no one's
- ever seen one. All ships trying to enter Vorlon space have terrible
- accidents. They say don't do it again. And, who and what they are
- and what they want is our, is another enigma in our show.
-
- Chuck: And in fact, the only two humans who ever saw a Vorlon got
- transferred off the station.
-
- jms: Very quickly.
-
- Chuck: Yes. Now, I gotta ask you, was that actually part of the plotline,
- or was that just, a matter of the actors not being available.
-
- jms: In, in, in both cases, we and the actors couldn', didn't reach
- a, a meeting of minds for different, different reasons. But, the one
- thing about having a storyline tracked out ahead of time is that you
- have trapdoors built in for every single character.
-
- Chuck: Aha.
-
- jms: And, and that departure _served_ us wonderfully by giving us another
- layer to the paranoia we try to create in the show.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. So, serendipitously it all worked out.
-
- jms: It did indeed.
-
- Chuck: We got another caller here on line. Hello, you're on the air.
-
- caller: Hi Chuck, it's Brice.
-
- Chuck: Oh, hi Brice.
-
- caller: Two observations. One, language and its terms are even older
- than .. you and .. the author are describing. I mean there are terms
- that date back a couple of thousand years.
-
- jms: Absolutely.
-
- caller: So you might as well use the old worlds; they'll change in their
- meaning but they'll be the same. It's like bar-and-grill, that's a good
- example. And the other thing is the Japanese use co-ed public toilets now,
- to go back to the subject you didn't want to. So this'll ...
-
- Chuck: Gee, thanks, Brice.
-
- caller: ... probably help the program [laughs] sell more in Japan; I don't
- know, they'll feel right at home. That's all.
-
- Chuck: OK. Thank you.
-
- caller: Uh huh. Bye.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, I should point out, I, I know that caller. He is, in fact, a
- linguist by trade.
-
- jms: Ah.
-
- Chuck: So....
-
- jms: Yeah, I think, I think I mentioned it, they do, some of them do go back
- a couple of thousand years, to the .. Eurasian and Euro-Indian ..
- roots. So, it does go back an awful long ways.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- jms: And why not use that language to show the continuity of the human
- species.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. Well, of course at the same time it helps if you do have
- somethings that refer to contemporary, the contemporary world, just by
- virtue of the fact that really it's, it is a TV show that's being shown
- to a 20th century audience. So....
-
- jms: You would think so, yes.
-
- Chuck: You would think so. And of course, I mean, obviously that's why...
- we understand what the people are saying; realistically 250 years in the
- future, whatever language was being spoken would probably be about as
- comprehensible to us now as, our English would be to say, someone from
- Shakespeare's time.
-
- jms: Well, then again, not necessarily.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- jms: Pick up, there are a number of books which have, odd enough,
- letters, from children, at the time of George Washington, 200, well over
- 200 years ago.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- jms: Those letters are as legible and readable today as they were then.
- Ah, the [?? speeches ??] of Abraham Lincoln ring as soundly today as
- they did then. There, there is this, this sense people have that,
- that the future will change dramatically from what it has been. And,
- and the future ain't what it used to be; it doesn't change that much
- any more. There was a great movie, for, for those of your audience who
- are science fiction fans ... Just Imagine was the name of it.
- It was a 1930's black-and-white science fiction musical.
-
- Chuck: Whoa, this is a new one on me.
-
- jms: It was set in the year 1980, 50 years hence.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- jms: And, and, in their version of the future, people ate pills
- instead of having food, they had numbers instead of names, they
- gave birth by machine. And all these things, you know, to their mind
- 50 years was incalculable and all these things had to change. Where
- in point of fact it hasn't changed that much.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. It sounds like a cross between Hugo Gernsback and Brave
- New World.
-
- jms: Yeah, the chrome of technology has changed. And, and certain
- new words have come into the language, but if you were to blip back in
- time right now to George Washington's period, you would not have that
- hard a time understanding them, or them understanding you.
-
- Chuck: I guess that's a valid point. Ok. I'll buy that. Oh, here's
- another caller coming in, so let's put 'em on the air. Hello, you're
- on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Yeah, hi Chuck, it's David.
-
- Chuck: Oh, hi.
-
- caller: I just wanted to echo what he was just saying, his points are
- very valid. The largest changes that have been noticed, in terms of
- science fiction accurately predicting what the future is actually
- going to look like, are technological. The, you know, Flash Gordon,
- as one commentator once put it, lives forever in a world of analog
- pages long after the rest of the universe has gone digital.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- caller: Yeah, the old fashioned, the U-meters and things like that, of
- the sort that you don't see in science fiction today because everything
- is all, you know, digital readouts now.
-
- Chuck: Uh huh.
-
- jms: There's a great example of this in the early Buck Rogers serials.
- Their, their ship's been hit, and they're going down, and and and Buck
- says to the other people in the ship, "All right, grab your anti-gravity
- belts," and they pick up these slim belts, which could be anti-gravity
- belts, you know, and put them on. "Grab your ray guns," and they
- grab what could pass for very good ray guns. "Grab the portable radio,"
- and they pick up these _huge_ [laughter] boxes, like 2 feet by 2 feet
- with huge antennas, because they knew what a radio was. They couldn't
- get past where they were in current technology to foresee that a radio
- could be the size of your palm.
-
- caller: Yeah, there's an episode of The Flash that spoke to that too.
- A character's been in cryogenic stasis for 30 years, and he wakes up
- and says, "where are my personal helicopters, where are my gigantic
- cities of the future," you know, you know, "what happened to my future?"
- he cries.
-
- [laughter]
-
- jms: Part of the problem, I think, is that Americans view 200 years as
- being a real long time when that's all we've been here for. But if
- you travel outside the country, to England or to Ireland, or or ...
- I stood in, in [? New Grange ?], in a burial mound that goes back
- to the Bronze Age, before the Bronze Age. There you get a sense of
- what real time is. Stand on the cobblestones of Trinity College, and
- you realize that at some point someone ran down those same cobblestones
- to say there's a revolution breaking out in America. To them this is
- like yesterday's news. We don't understand what real time is in this
- country, but I think over the next few centuries we'll figure it out.
-
- Chuck: We've gotten a bit myopic, I guess.
-
- caller: It is hard to get a grasp on that. Chuck's housemate, Jeffrey,
- used to go to college in Jacksonville. And he showed me... you know,
- one of his, one of the earlier graduates of that school was William
- Jennings Bryant. And he showed me a brick wall where... you know
- we think of Bryant as the great orator, you know, "You shall not
- crucify mankind upon a cross of gold," and all that stuff. And he
- showed me a brick wall where young student William Jennings Bryant
- carved his initials into the brick with a penknife. And that made it
- all real.
-
- jms & Chuck: Yeah.
-
- caller: We thought of him as a young human being suddenly; he came
- to life in a way he never had before. So you're right, we do have a
- trouble grasping that, without something concrete, as it were, to grasp
- on to.
-
- Chuck: Or brick, as the case may be.
-
- caller: Yes.
-
- Chuck: Hey, listen, thanks for calling. We've got another call coming
- in.
-
- caller: You're welcome. Byebye.
-
- Chuck: Byebye. Ok, and here comes another caller. Hello, you're on
- the air.
-
- caller: Thank you.
-
- Chuck: You're welcome.
-
- caller: Ah, jms, after reading some of your more sarcastic posts on
- Internet, and then hearing some of Ivanova's comments on the show, I was
- wondering if she was your alter-ego on the show, or if there's some of
- you in all the characters.
-
- jms: There's some of me in pretty much all the characters, particularly
- Kosh.
-
- [laughter]
-
- caller: Uh oh.
-
- jms: The less said the better. But .. no, I love Ivanova because ..
- I am.... Straczynski is by nature White Russian background. And I've
- watched Russians portrayed on television, and never quite seen it done ..
- really very well. With a sense of both astonishment and doom that sort
- of follows them around wherever they go. And I love writing for Ivanova.
- And she is probably in some ways the closest to myself. But there's
- something of me in all the characters pretty much. And, and that's kind
- of half the fun, is putting your own personality into some of the
- characters and watching them run around. Basically, I, I go through
- every day with, with Kosh, and Garibaldi, and G'Kar and Londo running
- around in my head 24 hours a day which is a frightening thought on the
- best of days.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: You know, Ivanova, now that you mentioned her, I thought had a
- wonderfully typically Russian comment at the end of Grail, you know
- the one about ...
-
- jms: Boom!
-
- Chuck: ... sooner or later, Boom!, sure. [laughs] You know, it's
- all going to blow up eventually.
-
- jms: It's, it's that Russian sense of impending doom. There's a scene
- in Soul Hunter, where .. she says that, in 200 years from now, we'll
- still be as.. be human, we'll still make the same mistakes over and over
- and over again. And as Franklin says, Oh, you're a pessimist, and she
- says, no, I'm Russian, we understand these things. [laughter] And
- that's exactly who and what she is. That's what the Russian spirit is.
- You hope for the best, expect the worst.
-
- Chuck: Thank you for calling.
-
- caller: OK, thank you.
-
- Chuck: OK. Another caller comin' in here; hello, you're on the line,
- with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Hi.
-
- jms: Hi there.
-
- caller: I sort of, sort of took exception to some of the remarks I
- heard. So, you're warned.
-
- Chuck: Well, OK, a little controversy couldn't hurt. Go ahead.
-
- caller: Well, I've heard this before that, I've heard this before where
- people will criticize science fiction so called from like 50 years ago
- and say, oh well, the future didn't come out like that at all. I don't
- know, I, you know, I think that there's... I would, I would argue that
- there's, you know, that there's lots, lots of folks that would say,
- you know, there's nobody... nobody would seriously take the point,
- nobody would seriously argue that, you know, these people are trying
- to predict the future.
-
- jms: Didn't say they were.
-
- caller: I mean.... Yeah, no, no, not at all. I mean, you can, you can,
- you can pick out, you can pick out .. books and movies that have,
- that can portray just about any future that you can imagine. You know,
- and none of these, none of them are compatible with the others. I think
- a lot of what goes on is you get people .. a lot of these people have
- their own .. peculiar .. sociological theories. And they like to write
- stories that sort of .. bear out their version of things.
-
- jms: Yeah, my only point really was that, there is a sense people have
- that 200 years from now we will be _vastly_ different people, and
- everything will have changed at some point and we aren't really even
- what we are now any more. And in point of fact....
-
- caller: Yeah, I would agree with that, you know, yeah, things change,
- you know.
-
- jms: They do, but not, I think, on a very human level, on a personal
- level. We.... Evolution doesn't work in 200 year bursts.
-
- caller: Well, I'll agree with that too. A lot, you know, .. you, you,
- you're talking about things haven't changed in a long.... A lot of
- things don't change over time, and that's very true. Yeah.
-
- jms: Yeah.
-
- caller: Absolutely.
-
- jms: I mean 200 years ago people got married, they had affairs, they
- got separated, they raised kids, they had jobs, they hoped for a better
- life for their kids. And that'll be the same 200 years hence. The
- technology will change; the chrome will change, but the human heart
- itself will not go through that much of a dynamic, I think.
-
- Chuck: Yeah.
-
- caller: Absolutely. All right, that's all I want to say.
-
- jms: Great.
-
- Chuck: All right, thank you. I think it's a good point. It is
- unrealistic to expect that human nature, whatever that is, is going to
- suddenly radically alter itself within a couple of centuries.
-
- jms: No, no.
-
- Chuck: And I think it's a valid point. I want to remind you it's
- 4:41 in the afternoon; we're talking to J. Michael Straczynski, the
- creator and execugive .. executive [laughs], got my teeth [?? ].
-
- jms: You can call me the resident god.
-
- Chuck: Resident god of Babylon 5. Thank you, that'll do just fine.
- And, Otis has some more business to throw at us here.
-
- [business deleted: PSA]
-
- Otis: ... I can see the big problem on P5.
-
- Chuck: B5?
-
- Otis: On B5.
-
- Chuck: Which is?
-
- Otis: It's Musak. We, all of us, you know, I'll be fighting to get a
- little rap in, you know, and you'll be fighting to get some classical in,
- you know, it'll just be .. the first big war, the big split on B5.
-
- Chuck: We've seen no Musak on Babylon 5, have we?
-
- jms: I try and avoid it. [laughter] I was once scared by Musak. I was,
- honest to God, I was in a supermarket in Glendale, California, and they
- had the Musak going, and .. I heard Helter Skelter done Musak. [laughter]
- I left the supermarket at once, I didn't want to know who was at the
- checkout counter.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: Isn't that one of the signs of the Apocalypse? I think it is.
-
- jms: I think so; it's the end times.
-
- Chuck: It's the end times.
-
- Otis: Well, also....
-
- Chuck: Dobbs would know, Bob Dobbs would know about that; we'll have to
- talk to him about it.
-
- Otis: OK, yeah.
-
- Chuck: We've got another caller on line, so let's put 'em on. Hello,
- you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Well, not only did I call once, but I've called twice.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] Well, OK.
-
- caller: And I just had to say, I've, I've heard so far, I've heard the
- writers praised, I've heard the producers praised, and .. the missing
- element here is the actors, because ...
-
- Chuck: Oh, I was just going to bring that up.
-
- caller: ... they are awfully, awfully good, every single one of them,
- and the restraint with which things are being portrayed, I think, is
- very important. I, I, I, I think it's .. people expect them to chew
- up the scenery and it's certainly not necessary, and .. would bother
- me greatly, so, I just wanted to say that the actors themselves
- deserve a lot of the credit for this, so....
-
- jms: I couldn't possibly agree with you more. We have a terrific cast
- overall, and they do play things in a more human, restrained kind of a
- way than ... what you'll often get, in science fiction television, which
- is sort of a stereotype or an archetype, where they sort of find some
- personality trait to hook it on, and they play that one note for the
- rest of their lives. And .. they're all very talented, they're all
- very good, and they're a joy to work with. And the directors are also
- very good too on the show; they're very sharp, and they try to give the
- show a real, some sense of style.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- caller: Thank you.
-
- Chuck: Thanks. Yeah, I should point out, that .. that the friend
- of mine who called in, and I, are both actors in fact in our spare
- time, in our copious free time. And, we have both been admiring a
- lot of the work we've been seeing on Babylon 5 and, yeah, let's talk
- about some of those actors, because we haven't mentioned names and
- what they do, and how you ended up with them in the cast. But I'd,
- I'd like to into some of that, because I think you have a very good
- cast there.
-
- jms: Thank you. Basically, we just cast the best person to walk in
- the door. The only interesting case off-hand was .. Jerry Doyle, who
- plays Garibaldi. Who used to be a stock broker.
-
- Chuck: Oh, really?
-
- jms: And he got caught up in this whole junk bond thing, as a matter
- of fact. And decided to go straight thereafter. And came to be an
- actor. And walked in the door, and, his resume -- you're going to
- love this -- his resume was 80% fiction.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] OK.
-
- jms: But you figure a guy who worked with junk bonds would do this. And
- at the bottom of his resume: member, Dance Theatre of Harlem. Now....
-
- Chuck: Don't tell me, that was the real part?
-
- jms: No, that's, that's bogus.
-
- Chuck: Oh, OK.
-
- jms: And no one had ever called him on this.
-
- Chuck: Are you serious?
-
- jms: The Dance Theatre of Harlem, what the hell is that?
-
- Chuck: A white guy who looks like ...
-
- jms: Yeah....
-
- Chuck: ... Bruce Willis, in the Dance Theatre of Harlem.
-
- jms: ... Yeah. Yeah. And no one had ever called... all right, all right,
- Jerry, dance. And so he came in, you know, there's a scene where you
- bring the actor in, you put 'em up against the wall, you slate them, which
- means they say their name, and the role they're going for. And so we're
- taping him, and he says, you know, my name is Jerry Doyle. What part are
- you here to audition for? The one I'm going to get. [laughter] When
- he said that, we knew, we found Garibaldi.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] OK. Someone who has that attitude.
-
- jms: Yeah, exactly. And .. Claudia Christian comes to us from a number
- of different films, including Hexed. A terrific actress. And, and all
- of our cast, they came to us, as anyone does, on a standard audition, and
- we tried to find the best possible synthesis of personalities.
-
- Chuck: I was wondering, because I had never heard of or seen most of these
- actors and actresses on the show.
-
- jms: You may have, but not necessarily noticed them. For instance, Peter
- Jurasik, who plays Londo, was of course Sid the Snitch in Hill Street Blues.
-
- Chuck: Yeah, I, my, many Hill Street Blues fans have pointed that out to
- me, yes.
-
- jms: And Andreas gets around a lot, you saw Andreas, who is G'Kar, as
- the one-armed man in The Fugitive.
-
- Chuck: Right, Andreas Katsulas, yeah.
-
- jms: And he was in .. Hot Shots Part Deux....
-
- Chuck: Oh, he got the chicken shot at him, didn't he?
-
- jms: Yeah, yeah. And .. a really nice guy. And .. one thing that's
- great about our cast is they're not only nice people, but they're also
- very sharp. Claudia is a Mensa member, a genius IQ.
-
- Chuck: I didn't know that.
-
- jms: Again, Jerry was a stock broker. These are people who, who know a lot
- of stuff and bring a great deal of intelligence to the role with them.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. I'm .. that's .. I'm just sort of impressed by that. I had
- no idea about those little bits of business. But I was noticing.... I,
- I was one of those folks who downloaded that Babylon 5 interactive, the
- Mac version.
-
- jms: Oh, yeah.
-
- Chuck: You know, which I guess was something you guys had sent out as a
- marketing gimmick ...
-
- jms: Right.
-
- Chuck: ... earlier in the year. And I noticed some of the backgrounds of
- some of these actors, and it is pretty varied, I noticed, but some of them
- have some pretty substantial stage experience. I notice Michael O'Hare,
- who plays Sinclair, has had quite a variety of stage experience, as a matter
- of fact.
-
- jms: Yeah, he's been a Broadway actor for a very long time, and was very
- well respected in that area.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. So it's quite a cast. Here's someone coming in, so we'll
- let them talk to you; hello, you're on the air with J. Michael Straczynski.
-
- caller: Hi, this is your cousin, Chuck, from the television side.
-
- Chuck: [laughing] OK.
-
- caller: I happen to be driving in a car [laughs] hearing you talking to
- the producer there of one of my favorite shows, and .. I was just wondering
- if there was some way I can, that I can leave a card, or I can, that I
- can contact him about possible job position either with his part, or
- with Foundation Imaging who takes care of the special effects.
-
- Chuck: Well, let me ask you this, do you have access to the Internet?
-
- caller: No, not me personally.
-
- Chuck: Ok. I think maybe you ought to call us back after the show is
- over, and we'll talk to you, we'll talk to Joe off-line about that.
-
- caller: OK.
-
- Chuck: Ok, thank you.
-
- caller: All right.
-
- Otis: Hey, can I....
-
- Chuck: Now you got people calling in and looking for jobs.
-
- Otis: No, you see, I got, I got this... I got both of you on the phone,
- and I think that, that right now, this is Otis, and I'm looking at you,
- Chuck, and then I'm listening to Joe, and there's a little society
- developing, it's called the Internet group. We are looking at them,
- and... I'm looking at them with fascination and I'm... I notice that
- when I listen to radio, TV, the announcer or the [??principle??] will
- always say here's the number where you can get me on my Inter... a way
- of getting 'em through the computer. So, it's a whole group of people
- collecting, they seem to be very intelligent, about your age and your
- intelligence.... This group is getting _big_. Is it international?
- Is it, is it, is it ethnic people involved, all kind of folks?
-
- jms: It's otherworldly.
-
- Chuck: It's otherworldly.
-
- Otis: It's otherworldly.
-
- Chuck: It's cyberspace, yeah.
-
- Otis: Amazing.
-
- Chuck: We hadn't really addressed that, Otis, you're right. But, jms,
- Joe... he's known as jms on the Internet, that's how he signs all of
- his posts, and stuff.
-
- Otis: OK.
-
- Chuck: And .. there is on the Internet a Babylon 5 discussion group. For
- those of you who have access to Internet news...
-
- Otis: My, my, my.
-
- Chuck: ... it's rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5. If you have access to news, you
- know what that means, and if you don't, don't worry about it. And, it is
- a discussion group for fans of the show, but what's significant is that
- Joe reads it and posts his own thoughts on it, quite frequently.
-
- jms: About 500 messages a day come over my computer.
-
- Chuck: Whoa. So, that's a very busy group.
-
- Otis: So, so, you get your computer and you're hooked up, you get hooked
- up to access. That's the way you do it.
-
- Chuck: Uh huh. Yeah. And he's able to receive electronic mail from
- the viewers, and is able to respond publicly to their comments about
- the show, which is really kind of unusual. I mean, this is becoming
- more typical, but certainly this is one of the few instances I know
- where the man who is the creator of a major television series has that
- kind of direct feedback from the people who are watching it.
-
- Otis: Yeah.
-
- jms: A few of us have done it on a small basis. Sneakers, for instance,
- came in, and like 2 months before the movie opened, they were on line on
- various services. They were there for a week or two after it opened,
- then they all vanished.
-
- Chuck: Uh huh.
-
- jms: This is.... The Babylon 5 on-line experiment has been going on now
- since before the pilot, and .. has stayed on, on all the various nets
- ever since, to get both the praise and the brickbats. And to learn from
- them. Currently I am on Internet, CompuServe, GEnie, NVN, Bix, FidoNet,
- and like 3 others.
-
- Chuck: Good grief. Now if someone....
-
- jms: I have no life.
-
- [laughter]
-
- Chuck: Well, you know, I mean, but this is so typical, I think what
- especially prompted Otis to mention this was that last week, our
- guests on the show were Phil Proctor and Dave Ossman, of the Firesign
- Theater.
-
- jms: Of course.
-
- Chuck: And .. are you a fan of their also, I'm just wondering.
-
- jms: I've heard it sometimes and enjoy it; I wouldn't call myself a fan
- because I don't follow it that closely.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. And, Phil is also on the Internet, as it turns out, so
- Otis is getting deluged by Internet stuff....
-
- Otis: Oh yeah, it's coming at me.
-
- jms: We're taking over the world.
-
- Chuck: Joe, I gotta ask you something here that I've been wanting to
- bring up. It's something I noticed about Commander Sinclair; I was
- watching Eyes again this morning, and noticed once again that Sinclair
- seems to have a rather striking ability to outmaneuver and outflank
- all the people who try to destroy him.
-
- jms: Uh huh.
-
- Chuck: This is at least the third or fourth time that he has shown
- that he, he knows the law better, and is sneakier than, almost
- everybody they've sent against him, and it suddenly occurred to me
- what this reminded me of. Let me preface this: were you ever a fan
- of the old Secret Agent TV series? With Patrick McGoohan?
-
- jms: Of course, yeah.
-
- Chuck: Sinclair reminds me a lot of John Drake. Is that just accidental
- or....
-
- jms: I can see some of that; I think that anyone who gets to be in his
- position and has survived over the years _has_ to understand how to use
- the rules to your own best benefit. Part of it is also that he was
- trained by Jesuits.
-
- Chuck: Yes.
-
- jms: And Jesuits train you how to use the rule and letter of the law to
- enforce the .. the heart of the law. And so he knows how to do all that
- stuff. And I like a character that doesn't solve every problem by
- punching somebody out.
-
- Chuck: Exactly.
-
- jms: I like someone who is smart enough to, if he sees a wall in front of
- him, doesn't just go through it; he can climb over it, tunnel under it,
- or go around it.
-
- Chuck: Yes, yes. It's sort of like the legal equivalent of jujitsu; it's
- using your opponent's mass or his strength against him.
-
- jms: Right.
-
- Chuck: And I just... I gotta say we saw what I thought was a great example
- of that in Eyes, where, in the final confrontation between Sinclair and
- Colonel Ben Zayn, who is out to literally _get_ him, in any way possible.
- It seems to me that Sinclair literally pushes every single button that
- he knows he can push with that guy, plays him like a violin, and ..
- gets him to self-destruct.
-
- jms: Absolutely.
-
- Chuck: And I thought it was really a very well done scene, and a great
- illustration of the, the superiority in that sense of a brain over just
- sheer massive force.
-
- jms: Yeah, also in that kind of scenario, you really have to be, to be
- committed to going through all the way, because if you don't pull it off,
- if you don't push all the guy's buttons and he doesn't go off at you, you
- just court martialled yourself for insubordination to a superior officer.
-
- Chuck: So it was a very risky thing to do, also.
-
- jms: Very risky.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. That's one of the things I admire about that character, but...
- I'm glad to hear that confirmed, because I knew you were a Prisoner fan.
-
- jms: Oh yeah.
-
- Chuck: But I also didn't know if you were a Secret Agent fan as well.
- Are we going to see any other indications of your interest in The Prisoner
- other than the "be seeing you" that we saw from [laughs] from Bester a
- while back?
-
- jms: Well, that was a nod in their direction. I don't want to do too much
- because then you become, the show becomes a [??] _hommage_ rather than
- what the show was about.
-
- Chuck: Yeah. Good point. Well, I want to remind folks we've been sitting
- here talking with J. Michael Straczynski, the creator and executive
- producer of Babylon 5, and well, here's another person who wants to talk
- to us, so, we're running out of time but we can probably get a few more
- calls in. Hello, you're on the air.
-
- caller: Yes. I have a question about PsiCorps. I don't want to get into
- it too much, but I'm curious as to how you developed that, what's the
- nature of it?
-
- jms: Nature of PsiCorps?
-
- caller: Right.
-
- jms: About 120 years ago, in B5 story time, for the first time they
- were able to prove that telepaths actually existed; they are among us.
- Now, what I have to do is sit back as a writer and say realistically
- how would this develop? And if tomorrow, science said yes, there are
- actually telepaths living among us, they can read you minds, Congress
- will be in the next day making laws about it. [laughter] Particularly
- Congress, 'cause they'd be the first ones to want to hide from these guys.
-
- Chuck: I think that's very plausible, yes.
-
- jms: And they'll want to legislate them, to control them, to protect the
- public from _them_ because of their, you know, the privacy issues. And
- on one level to protect them from the public, which could turn on them.
- To want to create an organization to which you _must_ either belong to,
- or take drugs to suppress your telepathic ability. And the problem is,
- when you set up an organization that will embrace you from cradle to grave,
- and train you in commercial purposes, in military purposes, [?? all of a
- sudden ??] the military gets involved and wants to have the strongest
- telepaths they can get their hands on, that will in time become a rather
- corrupt organization from the inside. There's too much power being put
- into one place.
-
- caller: Well, they actually, they scare me more than the Vorlons, the
- Narns, they scare me more than anybody on the show.
-
- jms: That's the intent. They should be scary.
-
- caller: Well, thank you very much.
-
- jms: Thank you.
-
- Chuck: Thank you for calling. Byebye. Well, we are going to have to
- get out of here, so.... And I ... Joe, you need to get going and I
- really thank you for taking the two hours here to chat with us and our
- listeners.
-
- jms: No problem.
-
- Chuck: Once again, I've been talking here with J. Michael Straczynski,
- he is the creator and executive producer of Babylon 5 which you can see
- tonight at 8 o'clock. This week's episode is Legacies. Is there anything
- you'd like to tell the audience if they haven't seen it yet about Legacies?
-
- jms: Ah... the show should speak for itself.
-
- Chuck: Sounds reasonable. Now, it... just a quick question then: Legacies
- is a new episode; how many more new episodes have we got before the next
- set of reruns?
-
- jms: You've got the two-parter, which begins next week.
-
- Chuck: OK.
-
- jms: Then you've got Babylon Squared, which reveals what happened to
- Babylon 4.
-
- Chuck: OH, OK.
-
- jms: And then .. The Quality of Mercy. And then you've got a possible
- break for reruns, and then, before the new season begins in November,
- they may play Chrysalis, our last episode, the week before the new
- season begins, 'cause it's a killer episode.
-
- Chuck: Ok, that's a real *WHAM* episode.
-
- jms: It sure is.
-
- Chuck: OK. And .. I understand also that we are going to be losing
- Commander Sinclair. Yes?
-
- jms: Yes and no.
-
- Chuck: Sort of.
-
- jms: He's being moved somewhere off the chessboard, but he will be seen
- from time to time.
-
- Chuck: OK, great. Well, Joe, thanks for taking time to talk to us once
- again, and .. we'll be watching, believe us.
-
- jms: Great, I appreciate it.
-
- Chuck: Thank you very much. Byebye.
-
- jms: Thank you. Bye.
-
- Chuck: Well, that was J. Michael Straczynski, he is the creator and
- executive producer of Babylon 5, and he's been our guest here on
- One Step Beyond.
-
- Otis: Well, it's been a great... another one of those mind-expanding
- programs here at One Step Beyond again.
-
- [wrap-up deleted]
|