WalaWiki content from p1k3.com
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 

76 lines
3.6 KiB

ChapbookProcess
<[Saalon]> Should I buy this one, or is it worth waiting for your final copy? I don't want some special edition director's cut coming out three weeks after I buy this one. ::grin::
<[Brennen]> See, the spin I ''really'' oughta put on this is that right now is your opportunity to own a limited edition preview release.
This is the difference it will make:
* The title might be different if I think of something less stupid.
* There'll be some more text on the copyright/intro page, where publisher info and that sort of thing usually goes.
* I'll put something on the back cover.
* If there are any typos left, I'll fix them. I don't know how there could be any typos left, but there is probably at least one.
<[Anonymous]> I'm curious -- how much did this whole thing cost to publish? Are you getting a percentage of the sales?
<[Brennen]> "Publish" is probably the wrong word; [http://www.lulu.com Lulu.com] is a PrintOnDemand service; you upload some files and they'll turn 'em into a book.
Since I haven't (yet) purchased an ISBN number, I haven't had any up-front costs with Lulu. The downside of this model is that, because each order is printed individually (which usually means one book at a time), and because Lulu wants to make a profit, there's a fairly high per-book cost.
So, frex, ''unrequired poetry'' (iffy title still subject to change) is $10.05. Out of that, $6.05 is production cost, Lulu takes an $0.80 commission, and we wind up with $3.20. I've also got an option to buy books at "cost", and if it's a sizable enough order there're discounts, but I think I'll shop around before I get a substantial number of these printed. Lulu's just one of the easier / more reputable options.
<[caeb]> By the way, did that "pebble in your pocket" poem ever get touched up?
I know I'm all late about asking, but there you go.
p.s.: Very nice.
<[Brennen]> That's a good question. Let me find the relevant bit of the file.
pebble in your pocket
from a driveway in nebraska
reminds you some days
of small things left unresolved.
found feathers dusty as rain
dances that never brought down
lightning, moldy bread
plastic-wrapped on
countertops and
waiting. wine gone
vinegar sour, the
materials of an
unshared communion,
the broken nest
in april,
the spring
day lilac-scent missing
knitted cuff of the second mitten,
and her hand in yours (it was
august).
they gather weight like
freezing fog, shaken off by
northern winds--
caught at rest in folds of jacket.
perhaps they are not
so small after all.
Does that look right?
<[caeb]> We're still losing people on the lilacs line, and I don't know what to do about it.
<[caeb]> Also, H. suggests "Wrote" for a title.
<[Brennen]> "spring day's dead lilacs?" We might just have to let it go.
<[caeb]> "spring day in absence of lilac scent"? Our problem is we like lots of words too much. I think even when we're not acting like it, it shows.
<[caeb]> (I realize it doesn't matter over-much, but it's a Thing.)
<[caeb]> Dad says skip the nest and lilacs, and go straight to the mitten. I am feeling like an idiot for not thinking of that.
<[Saalon]> ...listening to poets talk makes me feel dumb, somehow. As a story-centric prose writer (and reader, for that matter), discussions of losing people at a specific line leaves me scratching me head. I really, really don't get poetry at all.
Is there a "dumb" tag in HTML I can surround this comment with?
<[Brennen]> I think it's entirely a function of scale. A short poem, probably even more than something like a song, lives or dies on one or two lines.