You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
29 lines
2.1 KiB
29 lines
2.1 KiB
IdeaLogging.
|
|
|
|
* [http://www.zmag.org/awatch/awatch.htm Zmag: Anarchy Watch]
|
|
|
|
* Wikipedia's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism article on Anarchism] is of (heavily) disputed neutrality, which means you can learn something from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anarchism the discussion page] about the article.
|
|
|
|
* NoamChomsky
|
|
** [http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/interviews/9612-anarchism.html Chomsky on anarchism]
|
|
** [http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/interviews/9505-anarchism.html Anarchism, Marxism and hope for the future]
|
|
** [http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/other/notes-on-anarchism.html Notes on Anarchism]
|
|
* PierreJosephProudhon - M. "property is theft" himself.
|
|
* MikhailBakunin - ''GodAndTheState''.
|
|
* KennethRexroth
|
|
* PaulGoodman: 'There cannot be a history of anarchism in the sense of establishing a permanent state of things called "anarchist." It is always a continual coping with the next situation, and a vigilance to make sure that past freedoms are not lost and do not turn into the opposite, as free enterprise turned into wage-slavery and monopoly capitalism, or the independent judiciary turned into a monopoly of courts, cops, and lawyers, or free education turned into School Systems.'
|
|
* AlexanderBerkman
|
|
* EmmaGoldman
|
|
|
|
* AnarchistCollectives
|
|
* IronweedCollective
|
|
* FirstInternational
|
|
* ParisCommune
|
|
* AnarchistSpain
|
|
|
|
* [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/dward/newrightanarchocap.html The New Right & Anarcho-capitalism] (Was always going to read this...)
|
|
* [http://www.reason.com/links/links060905.shtml American Anarchist: The Life of Mary Frohman]
|
|
|
|
[http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/interviews/9612-anarchism.html Chomsky on anarchism]:
|
|
|
|
:Anarchism, in my view, is an expression of the idea that the burden of proof is always on those who argue that authority and domination are necessary. They have to demonstrate, with powerful argument, that that conclusion is correct. If they cannot, then the institutions they defend should be considered illegitimate. How one should react to illegitimate authority depends on circumstances and conditions: there are no formulas.
|