|
<!-- TITLE No Compromises -->
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="OV">Overview</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><cite>
|
|
As the station adjusts to the arrival of a new command officer and prepares
|
|
for Sheridan's inauguration, a group of telepaths arrives looking
|
|
for sanctuary.
|
|
</cite>
|
|
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Downes,+Robin+Atkin">Robin Atkin Downes</a> as Byron.
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<pre><a href="/lurk/p5/intro.html">P5 Rating</a>: <a href="/lurk/p5/089">7.45</a>
|
|
|
|
Production number: 502
|
|
Original air date: January 21, 1998
|
|
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00019071C/thelurkersguidet">DVD release date</a>: April 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
Written by J. Michael Straczynski
|
|
Directed by Janet Greek
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<hr size=3>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="BP">Plot Points</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 B5 is now under the command of Captain Elizabeth Lochley,
|
|
an Earth Force officer hand-picked by Sheridan for her ability to
|
|
defuse crises without resorting to violence, and her ability to
|
|
fight effectively when required. He has placed her in charge of
|
|
all aspects of station operation except political decisions affecting
|
|
the Interstellar Alliance.
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885923970 B5 hasn't rejoined Earth yet. The Alliance is discussing
|
|
buying it from Earth. In the meantime it remains an independent state.
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Sheridan has allowed a group of rogue human telepaths, led
|
|
by a man named Byron (whose psi powers seem to be quite strong) to
|
|
establish a colony on Babylon 5.
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Narns aren't given their adult names at birth; they're
|
|
given temporary ones for the first ten years of their lives, after
|
|
which they're allowed to select their true names from whatever pantheon
|
|
they've come to believe in. G'Kar was no exception.
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 G'Kar has assembled a declaration of principles for the
|
|
Alliance. It consists of the first page of every holy book of every
|
|
race in the Alliance, a reminder that the Alliance is a multitude of
|
|
voices and beliefs, all worthy of respect. (See
|
|
<a href="#AN.declaration">Analysis</a>)
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 G'Kar continues to write his own book
|
|
(<a href="053.html">"Point of No Return"</a>)
|
|
and has shown it to other Narn and to Garibaldi. The other Narn
|
|
have even begun quoting it.
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Sheridan has named Garibaldi the head of the Alliance's
|
|
covert operations division.
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885924386 B5 continues to employ Narns in its security forces.
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885924386 Sheridan's first assignment in Earthforce was the 54th
|
|
North American Unit.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="UQ">Unanswered Questions</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885479607 When they first met, Sheridan told Lochley, "It's good
|
|
to see you again." Under what circumstances were they previously
|
|
acquainted?
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885480715 Who was the girl in Simon's vision? What was happening
|
|
between (or to) the two of them?
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Did anyone discover the murder of the Gaim ambassador?
|
|
What repercussions, if any, will it have?
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Who was the original G'Kar? A character in the Book of
|
|
G'Quon? Why did G'Kar choose that name? (See
|
|
<a href="#AN.narnnames">Analysis</a>)
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885924316 Why wasn't Lochley at the swearing-in ceremony?
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Did G'Kar put the first page of his own book in the
|
|
declaration of principles?
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885491393 Which side was Lochley on in the civil war?
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="AN">Analysis</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885492665 Lochley was described as Ivanova's replacement, but she
|
|
really replaced both Ivanova and Sheridan, since the latter isn't in
|
|
charge of station affairs any more. Will Lochley bring in additional
|
|
staff to help fill that apparent gap?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885492665 Both Zack and Lochley are in the unenviable position of
|
|
having their predecessors nearby, now civilians but still
|
|
second-guessing their decisions.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885492665 Sheridan's story about washing his own socks echoes his
|
|
conversation with Lorien
|
|
(<a href="068.html">"Whatever Happened to Mr. Garibaldi?"</a>)
|
|
about his life being predicated on finding something to live for. In
|
|
a less drastic sense, that's exactly what Sheridan's drill instructor
|
|
was doing by washing his socks every night. Presumably "washing my
|
|
socks" wouldn't have sufficed as an answer to Lorien, though.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 How strong is Byron? He was able to project his image to
|
|
Lochley, something most telepaths don't seem to be able to do. Is
|
|
that simply a normal ability of high-level psis, or is there something
|
|
different about Byron? One other example of someone able to push
|
|
thoughts to others was Matthew Stoner, Talia's ex-husband
|
|
(<a href="029.html">"Soul Mates."</a>)
|
|
Another example was
|
|
<a href="030.html">"A Race Through Dark Places,"</a>
|
|
in which the combined power of Talia and the rogue telepaths was able
|
|
to project images into Bester's mind.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Byron alluded to Franklin's participation in the
|
|
underground railroad
|
|
(<a href="030.html">"A Race Through Dark Places."</a>)
|
|
How many of his people did Franklin assist? Do they feel indebted to
|
|
Franklin as a result?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885479935 How was the assassin able to steal a Starfury so easily?
|
|
It's been previously implied
|
|
(<a href="011.html">"Survivors,"</a>
|
|
<a href="019.html">"A Voice in the Wilderness, part 2"</a>)
|
|
that Starfury launches -- or more specifically, the launch bay doors
|
|
-- are controlled from C&C. If that's true, the assassin might
|
|
have had inside help, which would in turn imply a wider conspiracy.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
If he did receive inside help, there's some indication (not very
|
|
conclusive) that it might have been Lochley. The assassin served
|
|
with her in the past. Her evasive answer to Garibaldi implied that
|
|
she opposed Sheridan in the civil war. She argued for the inauguration
|
|
to proceed on schedule. She would have had the authority to launch
|
|
the assassin's Starfury, and she wasn't present at the ceremony.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
On the other hand, the assassin may have been the computer expert
|
|
Garibaldi supposed, and may have launched the Starfury the same way
|
|
he sent untraceable messages to Sheridan. His task would have been
|
|
made easier, perhaps, by the fact that it appeared the pilot he knocked
|
|
unconscious was getting dressed for a launch -- a Starfury launching
|
|
on schedule would presumably raise no alerts in C&C.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885491393 How was <em>Garibaldi</em> able to get to a Starfury?
|
|
As a civilian (at the time Sheridan hadn't yet appointed him to any
|
|
official position) he should have been barred from the launch bay as
|
|
well. Of course, by his own admission, Garibaldi is perfectly able to
|
|
circumvent B5's security measures when he needs to.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Garibaldi's ship, incidentally, was his own personal Starfury, as
|
|
evidenced by the Daffy Duck emblem on the right side, between the
|
|
wings -- Garibaldi has been a Daffy fan
|
|
from day one (the cartoon he shared with Delenn in
|
|
<a href="001.html">"Midnight on the Firing Line."</a>)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Sheridan's decision to allow Byron's people on B5
|
|
may be a point of contention with Lochley, even
|
|
though it was arguably a political question from the start. If she
|
|
denied Byron's request, she clearly thought it fell within her
|
|
jurisdiction to make such decisions, and may now feel that any
|
|
decision she makes can be declared a political issue by Sheridan
|
|
and overturned.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885448558 Sheridan's assumption was that by allowing the colony to
|
|
form on the station, he'd be gaining telepathic allies in any future
|
|
war between telepaths and normals. But doesn't that depend on the
|
|
nature of the war? It might be sparked in such a way that it's not
|
|
just a matter of Psi Corps versus everyone else, in which case having a
|
|
colony of telepaths, some quite powerful, aboard Babylon 5 would be a
|
|
tremendous liability. For example, Edgars' telepath virus
|
|
(<a href="082.html">"The Exercise of Vital Powers"</a>)
|
|
would clearly be seen as a threat by all telepaths, regardless of their
|
|
political affiliation, and all normals would be potential carriers.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885491687 If Psi Corps propaganda can be believed (comic
|
|
<a href="/lurk/comic/011.html">"The Psi Corps and You"</a>)
|
|
the circumstances surrounding the establishment of the Corps (a
|
|
telepath foiling the assassination of the Earth Alliance president)
|
|
closely resemble those of the establishment of Byron's colony. Whether
|
|
the colony will mirror the Corps in other ways remains to be seen.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885492665 Another on-station colony, of sorts, also helped uncover a
|
|
murderous criminal: Theo's monks, who identified the bomber in
|
|
<a href="046.html">"Convictions."</a>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925199 Byron said his people refuse to have anything to do with
|
|
technology (except, presumably, the ships that brought them to the
|
|
station.) In some ways that makes his group the opposite number of the
|
|
technomages
|
|
(<a href="025.html">"The Geometry of Shadows."</a>)
|
|
Both achieve near-magical results, the technomages using advanced
|
|
technologies honed to an art, Byron's people using no technologies at
|
|
all. And both want to be left alone by the rest of society.
|
|
Will the two groups ever meet?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885492665 This wasn't the first time an attempt was made on
|
|
Sheridan's life following a shift in political power: in
|
|
<a href="055.html">"Ceremonies of Light and Dark,"</a>
|
|
a gunman almost killed him in the Zocalo following B5's break from
|
|
Earth, and a ceremony celebrating the new order (the Minbari rebirth
|
|
ceremony) was disrupted.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@886360919 How do Garibaldi's new job duties differ from Delenn's
|
|
as head of the Rangers? Though their presence is public knowledge
|
|
now, the Rangers have traditionally been a covert intelligence-gathering
|
|
group. Are they no longer performing that function? Will they be
|
|
reporting to both Garibaldi and Delenn, or will Garibaldi put together
|
|
a separate group answerable only to himself?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885923970 <a name="AN.narnnames">The exact workings of the Narn</a>
|
|
naming custom are still unknown. G'Kar said that Narns pick their true
|
|
names at ten years of age, but he didn't say what that meant exactly.
|
|
He named three examples of religious persuasion: G'Quon, G'Lan, and
|
|
Na'Kiri. From that, it's possible to infer that only the prefixes of
|
|
Narn names come from their religions (G'Kar, Na'Toth, etc.) But it's
|
|
equally possible that Narns select their entire true names from their
|
|
religious texts.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885492665 Which holy books did G'Kar choose to represent humans? In
|
|
<a href="005.html">"The Parliament of Dreams,"</a>
|
|
it was implied that humans have a far greater diversity of religious
|
|
beliefs than the other races. Did G'Kar attempt to represent all
|
|
of humanity's religions, or just the major ones? He might have had
|
|
some help from Theo's monks, who, if they're still on the station,
|
|
are already engaged in the work of cataloguing the religious beliefs
|
|
of all the races on the station
|
|
(<a href="046.html">"Convictions."</a>)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885924287 <a name="AN.declaration">It's possible that the book</a>
|
|
G'Kar used for the swearing-in wasn't intended to be the declaration of
|
|
principles at all, and that G'Kar is still writing the declaration.
|
|
Swearing on a holy book may be as common among alien races as it is
|
|
among humans, so G'Kar may have intended the book of holy books simply
|
|
as a ceremonial device.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885538410 The question of who controls B5 is a bit muddled.
|
|
Lochley is an Earthforce officer, but at least some of her senior
|
|
staff (Zack and Franklin) are, judging by their uniforms, affiliated
|
|
with the Interstellar Alliance. So is Sheridan, who is in some ways
|
|
her superior and in others not. The rest of her subordinates, the
|
|
crew of the station, are presumably employees of a sovereign state
|
|
until B5's final disposition is determined. Though on a day-to-day
|
|
basis this jumble of affiliations may not be problematic, it's
|
|
probably untenable in the long term. For example, if some of the
|
|
crew want higher pay, as in
|
|
<a href="012.html">"By Any Means Necessary,"</a>
|
|
it's not clear to whom they'd make their appeal.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="NO">Notes</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@885492665 Sheridan and Delenn are alternating between their
|
|
quarters, apparently on a nightly basis.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885479607 Garibaldi's comparison of Sheridan to
|
|
<a href="http://www.mcs.drexel.edu/~gbrandal/Illum_html/Joan.html">Joan
|
|
of Arc</a>
|
|
is another instance in which the prospect of burning in fire is used a
|
|
metaphor for imminent danger. Others are Delenn's repeated
|
|
references (following Valen) to going into darkness and into
|
|
fire, and Kosh's predicting all would end "in fire"
|
|
(<a href="031.html">"The Coming of Shadows."</a>)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885493590 As Garibaldi tried to figure out the assassin's identity,
|
|
he mused about the historical references in the message to Sheridan.
|
|
Though the error did lead him in the right direction, he was wrong
|
|
about Lincoln's assassin being a soldier on the opposite side in the
|
|
Civil War:
|
|
<a href="http://www.insiders.com/civil/t13person1.htm">John Wilkes
|
|
Booth</a>
|
|
was never in the Confederate army, though he was in the Virginia
|
|
militia for a time.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@887272943 The Gaim have been around since season two (they first
|
|
appeared in
|
|
<a href="040.html">"Confessions and Lamentations"</a>)
|
|
but this episode was the first time one was shown without its helmet.
|
|
According to the
|
|
<a href="/lurk/resources/products.html#software">official CD-ROM encyclopedia,</a>
|
|
Gaim ambassadors aren't typical of their species, but are specially
|
|
bred bipedal creatures engineered to more comfortably interact with
|
|
other races.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885538615 Despite the title, there were several compromises in
|
|
this episode: Sheridan and Lochley compromised over responsibility
|
|
for the station. Garibaldi took a job that's a compromise between
|
|
reenlisting and remaining a civilian. Sheridan and Delenn compromised
|
|
about their quarters.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885923970 Continuity glitch: During the swearing-in ceremony, after
|
|
the assassin was dispatched, G'Kar held out the book to Sheridan.
|
|
He was holding it in his left hand in the shots showing him from
|
|
the front, and in his right hand in the shots showing him from behind.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885923970 Possible continuity glitch: The Acheron, the ship that
|
|
brought Lochley to the station, was an Omega-class destroyer (the
|
|
type with the rotating middle section.) Later, an exterior shot
|
|
of the station showed an Earth ship nearby, but it was missing the
|
|
rotating middle section (a Nova-class destroyer.) It's not clear
|
|
that they were intended to be the same ship, though.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885755966 Effects glitch: When the Starfury is shown floating
|
|
outside the station, maintaining a more or less fixed position
|
|
relative to the window, the lateral thrusters on the right
|
|
side of the ship (from the pilot's point of view) can be seen
|
|
firing, presumably to keep up with the window as the station
|
|
rotates. Unfortunately, that's wrong. The thrusters on the
|
|
<em>bottom</em> of the Starfury should have been firing instead.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
To see how this works, imagine B5 as a planet and the Starfury as
|
|
a satellite that wants to attain a circular orbit. To do so, it
|
|
has to get the desired distance away from the surface of the planet
|
|
(not very far, in this case, but with no atmosphere to create drag
|
|
that's fine) and move in the direction of its orbit at a high
|
|
enough speed that it's always inching away from the surface at the
|
|
same rate that gravity is pulling it down. Once that speed is
|
|
reached, no further adjustments are required; momentum will pull
|
|
it away from the planet and gravity will pull it toward the planet
|
|
and the two will cancel each other out.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
In the case of the Starfury and B5, there's no appreciable gravity
|
|
from the station. So the Starfury would have to apply the same
|
|
force gravity would have supplied, thrusting toward the axis of the
|
|
station at the same rate that it was drifting away. Since the pilot's
|
|
head was facing the station (implying, incidentally, that the ship
|
|
had a slight spin) that would mean continuously firing the bottom
|
|
thrusters.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Once the correct orbital speed is in place, any acceleration in the
|
|
direction of the orbit would cause the Starfury to move past the
|
|
window. In an atmosphere, of course, the side thrusters would have
|
|
to fire just to maintain that speed, thanks to drag slowing the
|
|
Starfury down otherwise. But there's no appreciable atmosphere
|
|
outside B5, so that wouldn't have been a factor here.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@887703539 Possible timing glitch: Byron visited Lochley in a cafe
|
|
and asked her to meet him in two hours. Franklin interrupted her lunch
|
|
by asking her to come to Medlab right away; she agreed and left.
|
|
She arrived in Medlab and was there only a few minutes when she
|
|
received a call from C&C reminding her
|
|
of an appointment, which (judging by the fact that it was the next
|
|
scene) was the meeting with Byron. That means it took her two hours
|
|
to get from the cafe to Medlab to the meeting with Byron. Of course,
|
|
it's possible she did something else on her way to Medlab, or that
|
|
the station's transportation systems are just that slow.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="JS">jms speaks</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li>@@@886064865 <em>About the title</em><br>
|
|
I picked "No Compromises" because that was my approach for this
|
|
season: we aren't going to give an inch on the quality of the show.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@874171922 John Copeland and I just did the producer's
|
|
cut on 502, the first S5 episode...and Tracy [Scoggins] is *terrific*.
|
|
I think she's going to go over like gangbusters. It's a solid episode,
|
|
and her presence adds a great deal to the show.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@877413204 BTW, saw the first pass today on the S5 title sequence,
|
|
based on my outline to the editors...looks pretty spiffy, and a big
|
|
difference from what we've done before, stylistically.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885407265 <em>Whose idea was it to put your name on the back of the
|
|
station?</em><br>
|
|
I confess it was my idea...damn taggers are everywhere...it's my one
|
|
indulgence in 5 years. Doesn't any good artist sign his work?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885407362 This in some ways is my favorite title sequence.
|
|
It took a long time to make it, and it was very difficult to assemble.
|
|
Usually I can design the title sequence on paper, and the working with
|
|
the editors part doesn't take that long...here it took a Long Time to
|
|
painstakingly choose the images, use counterpoint dialogue, pick the
|
|
high moments and make it all flow from one year to the next, sort of a
|
|
Cliff's Notes version of the history of the show. And the music is
|
|
terrific...very mature, solid sounding.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
As for the back of the station...y'know, those damn taggers are
|
|
everywhere, aren't they?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885407362 In about two dozen comments so far about the S5 title,
|
|
only one has been negative, the rest loving it. It helps to place each
|
|
season for the new viewers, recaps things, hits the high points, and
|
|
the new music gives it a more mature sound. I'm pleased. (Since I
|
|
designed it, I guess I'd better be....)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885480715 <em>Won't it confuse new viewers?</em><br>
|
|
I think the newbies will be fine...unless and until you know the
|
|
context of the scenes from S1-4, they're just pretty pictures.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@882987731 <em>My local station didn't show the end of season 4.
|
|
Should I avoid season 5?</em><br>
|
|
My gut reaction...because S5 starts pretty cleanly, and Sheridan's new
|
|
situation is set up right from the git-go, I think that you'd be okay to
|
|
just dive in. Not knowing at the time that there'd be any kind of
|
|
problem in the airing of the final 4, but having learned from experience
|
|
that nothing about this show is EVER easy or predictable, I did sort of
|
|
a primer about where things stand now in the top of the teaser, done
|
|
breathlessly by Corwin as Lochley arrives.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
(That ain't much of a spoiler since it happens in the first few minutes
|
|
of the show.)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885761816 One note: due to the TNT ad blitz, we went into this on
|
|
the assumption that we were (and did) pick up a LOT of viewers who had
|
|
never before seen B5. These folks would need to be brought up to speed
|
|
on the returning characters and situations, and the regular viewers
|
|
would need to be brought up to speed on Lochley...so I wrote it with
|
|
that intention.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@889549848 <em>Robin Atkin Downes played Morann in
|
|
<a href="111.html">"In the Beginning."</a> Coincidence?</em><br>
|
|
We were impressed by his portrayal of Minbari, and that led to
|
|
him coming in for Byron.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925199 <em>Garibaldi is completely bald this season, and Sheridan
|
|
has a beard. Whose choice was that?</em><br>
|
|
Jerry has been shaving his head, getting shorter each year, and
|
|
it worked for where his character is going, so I let it stay...Bruce
|
|
would love nothing more than to get rid of the beard (I suspect Melissa
|
|
doesn't like it also), but for me it's important to make the character
|
|
visually different, and to give him a more mature look, so Bruce
|
|
graciously indulges me.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925199 We always start out slow each
|
|
season...especially in this case, knowing that we're going to get a lot
|
|
of new viewers, I structured the show so it would bring folks up to
|
|
date asap on who everybody is, and where things stand. Believe me,
|
|
there's plenty of tragedy and pathos lurking right around the corner.
|
|
It picks up at the end of the season, after some very rough things for
|
|
the characters, because I can't end it all on a downer, but at the same
|
|
time, it has to have meat to it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
"Isn't the Psi Corps still formally a branch of EarthGov? If so, then
|
|
wasn't Captain Lochley duty-bound to report Byron's people to the Psi
|
|
Cops as soon as she found out that they were rogues?"
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
You'll find that question answered soon enough.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925199 <em>About Lochley</em><br>
|
|
It's easy to mistake the actor for the character in
|
|
situations like this.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
It's a vastly different character from Ivanova also, not meant
|
|
to fit in the same place, do the same things, or be the same person.
|
|
They're both strong characters, but different in their approach.
|
|
Ivanova tended to be a shouter, and on the impatient side...Lochley is
|
|
a thinker, and more inclined to the blade than the ball-bat. But both
|
|
are equally lethal.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Lochley, I think, also has the maturity of character you need to
|
|
rise to the rank of captain in the military, and the voice of moral
|
|
authority, which both Sinclair and Sheridan had, in comparable
|
|
positions.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925199 Oh, she has a sense of humor...but we don't see it
|
|
here in this episode any more than when Ivanova first came in, because
|
|
both are in new situations and that requires a certain degree of
|
|
seriousness. We'll see some of her humor along the way...it's also
|
|
different from Ivanova's, more a sly kind of humor, the sort that slips
|
|
past you and ricochets around the corner half an hour later to nail you
|
|
between the eyes.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885480715 <em>About Sheridan</em><br>
|
|
There's certainly a messianic streak running through the
|
|
character, though he himself might challenge that notion.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925199 <em>What is G'Kar's position now?</em><br>
|
|
A lot of that will be established this season, but technically,
|
|
he's still the Ambassador from Narn.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@886064821 <em>The ship that brought Lochley was named the
|
|
Acheron</em><br>
|
|
Actually, the Acheron is the river of woe....
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885480715 "Does anyone know whether Byron's "The geometries that
|
|
circumscribe your waking life draw narrower until nothing fits inside
|
|
them anymore" came from anywhere. My first (rather obvious) guess was
|
|
that it was a line from Byron."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
No, that was me.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@889482428 <em>Why did you name the character Byron?</em><br>
|
|
It's a play on words that becomes a bit clearer later.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925199 "Why couldn't the young telepath just broadcast his
|
|
discovery to the others, vs. having to deliver it himself?"
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Line of sight.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@886401531 <em>How does Sheridan know about the telepath
|
|
war? Did he watch
|
|
<a href="088.html">"Deconstruction"</a>
|
|
or something?</em><br>
|
|
This is hardly a new plot element...this has been brewing for 4 years
|
|
now, with the growing telepath underground. As for the latter part of
|
|
that comment...did you already forget that in "Rising Star" there was a
|
|
conversation between Sheridan and Bester about the coming telepath war?
|
|
<p>
|
|
Not my fault if you're not paying attention.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<em>Wouldn't Garibaldi believe the telepath war had been averted since
|
|
Edgars was killed?</em><br>
|
|
No, Edgars wasn't trying to *start* a war, he was trying to solve it
|
|
BEFORE it started. He knew it was coming, is coming, and was trying to
|
|
give normals an edge. That edge is now gone. Again, you're
|
|
misinterpreting or misremembering what's been established and saying
|
|
it's an error on our part.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<em>If B5 is a free port, why did Byron need to ask permission? Isn't
|
|
the station open to anyone?</em><br>
|
|
Individually, yes...but again, pay attention, we're talking about a
|
|
COLONY, which means you've got several hundred people living in one
|
|
area, under one authority (Byron), with an unknown or unspecified
|
|
agenda, whose presence might bring problems from the Psi Corps and
|
|
elsewhere. So yeah, they're going to need somebody's permission.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<em>Why did Sheridan break his promise to Lochley?</em><br>
|
|
He didn't break his promise...he moved this into a political decision,
|
|
which is his purview. He said specifically, "If it's a political
|
|
problem, or involves the Alliance, it's my turf." This is a strategic
|
|
decision on behalf of the Alliance.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<em>How can Byron project images? We haven't seen that before. It
|
|
took an entire mob of telepaths in
|
|
<a href="030.html">"A Race Through Dark Places"</a>
|
|
to fool Bester.</em><br>
|
|
Well, now you've got a contradiction. Either we have seen this before,
|
|
or we haven't seen it before. You say where did it come from, then
|
|
cite an example of where it's been seen before. And if you'll go back
|
|
and rewatch that episode, you'll see that teeps can act collectively
|
|
and be very strong.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
[...] No...again, you're distorting the situation. The task wasn't
|
|
just to send an image into his [Bester's] head, it was to CONVINCE HIM
|
|
that this image had really happened, and it took a lot of them to do
|
|
this to a Psi Cop. That's why it took so many of them; he's a strong
|
|
target. It ain't the same as doing it to a normal. You're not
|
|
thinking through what you're saying.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<em>Why don't Byron and his people just turn invisible and live on
|
|
the station without anyone knowing they're there?</em><br>
|
|
Maybe because they are (or are trying to be) the good guys? Maybe
|
|
because they don't actually vanish, or turn off sound, they can
|
|
individually manipulate somebody by pressing on receptors and
|
|
distorting things like their time sense...but they're going to show up
|
|
on cameras, and on sensors, and unless they want to constantly try and
|
|
control every single person on the station in large groups as they pass
|
|
by, they're going to be discovered, and booted off the station. So
|
|
they may as well do the right thing and ask. Just because someone
|
|
*can* steal doesn't mean they *should* steal.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Besides, where are they going to live? Quarters have to be assigned,
|
|
and they're always short on space. Food has to be paid for. On and
|
|
on. Your contention doesn't make sense...they're not gods.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885480715 "That last one is what hooked me. I figured you'd be
|
|
spending the next few weeks explaining how you really hadn't broken the
|
|
cardinal rule of B5 [<em>"No cute kids or robots"</em>] by introducing
|
|
little Simon."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
That means you went for the okeydoke...and thus didn't see the
|
|
last bit coming. That was the intent.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925271 <em>How did the assassin manage to position himself
|
|
outside the window so precisely?</em><br>
|
|
Excuse me, folks, but he was using a B5 starfury, which is programmed
|
|
like all starfuries there to sync up with the station's rotation for
|
|
purposes of docking, ejecting, and holding position for repair purposes.
|
|
All a pilot would have to do is tell the on-board computer to sync up
|
|
the thrusters with the station's rotation, and it'd be done.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
This is a no-brainer...which is why I didn't specify it in dialogue
|
|
(also it would've killed the drama of the moment).
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@885925199 <em>Was Garibaldi's "it's a little crooked" comment
|
|
about the EA logo meant as foreshadowing?</em><br>
|
|
No, but it was certainly meant as a subtle double-entendre, given his
|
|
recent experiences.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|