|
<h2><a name="OV">Overview</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><cite>
|
|
G'Kar brings news of a terrible new enemy. The arrival of
|
|
Sheridan's sister opens up old wounds for the new commander.
|
|
Dr. Franklin employs an unorthodox procedure to try to bring Garibaldi
|
|
out of his coma. Delenn's mysterious change is completed.
|
|
</cite>
|
|
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+Leech,+Beverly">Beverly Leech</a> as Elizabeth Sheridan.
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+Bruton,+Macaulay">Macaulay Bruton</a> as Garibaldi's aide.
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
Sub-genre: Drama
|
|
<a href="/lurk/p5/intro.html">P5 Rating</a>: <a href="/lurk/p5/024">8.40</a>
|
|
|
|
Production number: 202
|
|
Original air date: November 9, 1994
|
|
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000087EYB/thelurkersguidet">DVD release date</a>: April 29, 2003
|
|
|
|
Written by J. Michael Straczynski
|
|
Directed by Jim Johnston
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
<h3>Watch For:</h3>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> <a href="#gaffe">A magically refilling drink.</a>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<hr size=3>
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="BP">Backplot</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> Sheridan's wife Anna was killed two years ago when her ship exploded on
|
|
its way to explore the recently discovered ruins of an ancient
|
|
civilization on the Rim.
|
|
|
|
<li> The Book of G'Quan, the holy book of G'Kar's religion (cf.
|
|
<a href="012.html">"By Any Means Necessary"</a>) mentions an ancient
|
|
enemy that rose to power a thousand years in the past, a power so
|
|
great it nearly overwhelmed the stars themselves. And the book
|
|
contains drawings suspiciously siimilar to the Shadows' ships.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="UQ">Unanswered Questions</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> Is Delenn's new appearance an outward transformation, a complete
|
|
physical rebirth, or something even more fundamental?
|
|
|
|
<li> What exactly has she become?
|
|
|
|
<li> Was the result what she thought it would be? She didn't seem to know
|
|
what had happened to her when she first emerged from the chrysalis;
|
|
clearly she didn't go into the process with detailed knowledge of the
|
|
outcome.
|
|
|
|
<li> How much does G'Kar suspect about Londo's involvement with the
|
|
Shadows?
|
|
|
|
<li> Why did President Clark order Garibaldi's aide returned to Earth? Was
|
|
he aware that the clandestine transfer would take place, or did
|
|
someone else arrange that to stop the prisoner from being interrogated
|
|
by Clark's people?
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="AN">Analysis</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> The Book of G'Quan, assuming G'Kar was describing the text itself
|
|
rather than his interpretation, says that the ancient enemy came from
|
|
the rim of known space, the planet Z'ha'dum.
|
|
That implies that the Narns, or some among them, were
|
|
technologically advanced at least a thousand years ago; otherwise they
|
|
would presumably have had no way of knowing the origin of the enemy,
|
|
certainly not well enough to locate its home planet. Given that they
|
|
are not particularly advanced compared to the other major races, one
|
|
of three things must have happened:
|
|
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li> Some event, possibly the last great war, reduced their
|
|
capabilities enough that they had to start nearly from scratch.
|
|
<li> They advanced technologically at a very slow pace, or not at
|
|
all, over the past millenium.
|
|
<li> Another race used the Narn (or their world) in the war,
|
|
departing when it was over and leaving the Narn with only
|
|
legends of the great enemy.
|
|
</ol>
|
|
|
|
If the second is true, it's possible that some of the other races
|
|
acquired <em>their</em> technology from the Narns, an interesting twist
|
|
on the established idea that the Narns are obsessed with obtaining
|
|
technology from others (cf. <a href="000.html">"The Gathering."</a>)
|
|
|
|
<li> When G'Kar's wingman crashed into the Shadow fighter, the Shadow
|
|
ship appeared to writhe in pain. It appears that employing living
|
|
technology is a common trait of the very advanced civilizations
|
|
(cf. <a href="004.html">"Infection."</a>) The question naturally
|
|
arises: are the Shadow ships <em>ships</em> in the traditional sense,
|
|
with crews or pilots aboard, or are they autonomous entities?
|
|
|
|
<li> The fact that a one-man Narn fighter was able to destroy a Shadow
|
|
ship implies that the Shadows can be overcome by force, assuming they
|
|
aren't so numerous as to overwhelm all their opponents.
|
|
|
|
<li> Delenn flat-out lied when she said her government approved her
|
|
transformation (cf. <a href="023.html">"Points of Departure."</a>)
|
|
Yet they have made no move to replace her as ambassador. Perhaps
|
|
they fear the consequences of working against the prophecy more
|
|
than they fear what she's doing.
|
|
|
|
<li> Dr. Franklin hasn't tried the healing machine on anyone, not even
|
|
experimentally. Perhaps he hasn't been studying it -- which seems
|
|
strange, given its potential to utterly revolutionize the practice
|
|
of medicine. Now that he knows it works, he may be more inclined to
|
|
use it in the future, possibly in place of hazardous conventional
|
|
treatments.
|
|
|
|
<li> Anna Sheridan's research vessel was destroyed in an apparent accident
|
|
on the Rim, on its way to explore an ancient civilization. The
|
|
similarities to the destruction of the Narn ship sent by G'Kar are
|
|
too great to ignore. She very possibly was killed by the Shadows,
|
|
something which won't endear them to Sheridan if he learns about it.
|
|
If that's true, the question of how the ruins of the civilization
|
|
were discovered in the first place remains unanswered.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="NO">Notes</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> The poem G'Kar read to Na'Toth is from "The Second Coming" by W. B.
|
|
Yeats (quoted sections emphasized):
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
Turning and turning in the widening gyre<br>
|
|
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;<br>
|
|
<em>Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;<br>
|
|
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,<br>
|
|
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere<br>
|
|
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;</em><br>
|
|
The best lack all conviction, while the worst<br>
|
|
Are full of passionate intensity.<br>
|
|
<br>
|
|
Surely some revelation is at hand;<br>
|
|
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.<br>
|
|
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out<br>
|
|
When a vast image out of "Spiritus Mundi"<br>
|
|
Troubles my sight: somewhere in the sands of the desert<br>
|
|
A shape with lion body and the head of a man<br>
|
|
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,<br>
|
|
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it<br>
|
|
Reel shadows of the indigant desert birds.<br>
|
|
The darkness drops again; but now I know<br>
|
|
That twenty centuries of stony sleep<br>
|
|
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,<br>
|
|
<em>And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,<br>
|
|
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?</em><br>
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<li> Garibaldi's aide is named Jack, though it's easy to miss; Garibaldi
|
|
mentions the name once after Talia leaves medlab and he speaks to
|
|
Franklin and Ivanova.
|
|
|
|
<li> The closed captioning spells G'Quan "Sh'Quon," but JMS has used the
|
|
shorter spelling on several occasions, so it's the one used here.
|
|
|
|
<li> <a name="gaffe">Continuity gaffe:</a>
|
|
In the scene with Sheridan
|
|
and his sister in his quarters, he drains his drink, walks
|
|
toward the bar, and before he gets there, the glass refills
|
|
and he drains it again.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="JS">jms speaks</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li> Re: the ever-improving CGI...there's an action scene in the teaser
|
|
of the second episode, "Revelations," that is particularly amazing. And
|
|
there is one shot of a Narn ship in extreme close-up toward the end of
|
|
the scene that looks absolutely *solid*, and every bit as real and
|
|
detailed as any model, and then some. It cannot be distinguished from
|
|
a physical object.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> One aspect of the Yeats quote, and the Lincoln quote, and the
|
|
Tennyson quote(s), and the many others, is that I think a lot of folks
|
|
at some point tuned out of, or aren't interested in, literature and
|
|
poetry because they've never really been exposed to it. So just to be a
|
|
little subversive, I work some of it into the show. I choose that which
|
|
has meaning to the show, and the characters, in the hopes that (as has
|
|
happened here), viewers will dig out the original material and be
|
|
exposed
|
|
to some *really* nifty writing. Granted that television must entertain
|
|
at minimum; it should also elevate and ennoble and educate, and this is
|
|
too good an opportunity to waste, provided one does not become didactic
|
|
about it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Speaking of looking into the abyss...which comes from "Revelations,"
|
|
it's a partial quote. Neitzsche: "When you look into the abyss, the
|
|
abyss looks also into you."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Re: inconsistent writing and Narns...please bear in mind that there
|
|
are two ways to encounter shadowmen: going out there, and them coming in
|
|
to see YOU. The Narns need not be (and were not) spacefaring when they
|
|
encountered the shadowmen. Or, more accurately, were encountered BY
|
|
them.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Copies of the evidence were made, but the question is what is the
|
|
available evidence to BE copied? Frankly, there isn't much. There are
|
|
no witnesses, very little physical evidence. If you tried to make a
|
|
case with what they've got, you'd be laughed out of the courtroom.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Yes, since you've sussed it...the plan was to turn Delenn from
|
|
male to female in "Chrysalis," in my original plans, as well as making
|
|
her half-human. And yes, it would've had one hell of an impact...but my
|
|
concern when I made that decision not do do this back in the pilot was
|
|
based on the reality that we couldn't do it well. The "male" voice,
|
|
altered by computer-enhancement, just sounded REAL bogus; we couldn't
|
|
get it right, and I had to decide between dropping it, and doing
|
|
something the people would rightly describe as lame all season, just
|
|
for one big payoff. It was a tough call, but it had to be made.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <em>Why does Delenn's hair go under her bone ridge?</em><br>
|
|
When Delenn's structure changed, the epidermal layer on the head
|
|
grew thinner; there is now a gap between the skin, and the bone which
|
|
has grown out. Hair can be draped through it, or laid over it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Correct; the Narn bridge is CGI. Re: the explosion...we shot a
|
|
lot of live pyrotechnics for Ron's use; but don't recall offhand which
|
|
was used here, live or CGI.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Anna chose to take Sheridan's last name. Her decision. You have the
|
|
option. Some do, some don't. If you start to pass rules that no woman
|
|
CAN take her husband's name or she's betraying something, then you're
|
|
being just as restrictive as those who insist a woman MUST take her
|
|
husband's name. Me, I'm pro-choice on every level. She felt like it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
(And I note that my own spousal overunit kept her own name. But then,
|
|
who in her right mind WOULD take Straczynski...?)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Another thing that can be now re-interpreted is the look on Jack's
|
|
face when Garibaldi didn't go for the whitewash of the security
|
|
guard's financial records in "Sky," and how that body managed to get
|
|
out of the station without security being aware of it....
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Next week, in "Revelations," you get G'Kar, Londo, Delenn, Lennier,
|
|
Na'Toth, Kosh, Garibaldi, Talia and everybody else. Because there
|
|
was SO much happening in #1, that got slid back a bit; also, there's
|
|
a fair amount of time required for everything to do what they're
|
|
supposed to be doing. (Note that we're operating pretty much in
|
|
real-time; "Points" is around 8 days after the events of "Chrysalis,"
|
|
and "Revelations" is about another week after that.)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
One thing I noted here some time ago, as a large part of the reason
|
|
I dropped "to be continued" from "Chrysalis" is that this is more of
|
|
a three-parter than a two, and some threads pulled in "Chrysalis"
|
|
won't be fully resolved in some ways until the third and fourth
|
|
episodes. There is a LOT going on, and if we try to cram it all into
|
|
one episode (as I at first tried with "Chrysalis, Part Two") you
|
|
don't give ANY of them the proper time to have any impact.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Finally, we're getting new people sampling the first episode of the
|
|
season, as is true of most shows. Thus, you have to put into
|
|
dialogue a fair amount of stuff that otherwise you could just imply
|
|
or rely on past experience/prior knowledge. So you kind of introduce
|
|
the newbies to the situation, and that requires a fair amount of
|
|
exposition. This is pretty much localized to "Points," however; with
|
|
the next episode, we're up to full speed. Episode 2 deals with as
|
|
many issues/plotlines as "Chrysalis," with the main difference being
|
|
that here, they're *resolved* rather than left hanging.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Yes, generally stories are self-contained, but in the case of season
|
|
endings like "Chrysalis," it takes time to get everything back up and
|
|
running again. The bigger the explosion, the longer it takes to clean
|
|
up the mess.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Re: Lennier, the Grey Council fellow said, "Tell them what we've told
|
|
YOU," not someone else. Just to clarify.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> [Talia's] not seeing the shooter from outside Garibaldi's POV. That
|
|
shot in particular is *exactly* from Garibaldi's POV. It's a lot
|
|
like what is done in hypnosis, going back into somebody's memory and
|
|
dragging out details they might have seen but not noted; the eye sees
|
|
more than the brain recalls at any given moment. When we shot that
|
|
scene, I was on-set, and the camera was put *exactly* where Garibaldi
|
|
was standing, so we'd be very careful that it WAS his point of view.
|
|
So though I hate to contradict you, it's not "a stupid plot hole from
|
|
hell."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Oh, I'm quite sure there was backup made of the data. But step back
|
|
for a moment and ask what that entails, and will any of it stand up
|
|
in ANY court of law? There's a difference between that which we knor
|
|
or (make that know or) believe, and that which we can prove. Without
|
|
the one most important piece of all, Garibaldi's aide, the rest is
|
|
speculative, inconclusive, circumstantial and conjectural.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Yes, if Laurel had stayed with the station, either she would have
|
|
pulled the trigger on Garibaldi, or been directly involved in other
|
|
ways.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> "Morden is the mongoose."
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
So what's needed now is a conveniently placed cobra....
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The platform seen in the opening of "Revelations" is a hazardous
|
|
materials platform, which is still cleaning up the radioactive debris
|
|
and other stuff from the blown Minbari cruiser in the last ep.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <em>About Na'Toth's change of actresses</em><br>
|
|
The actor wanted to pursue other avenues. She'd primarily worked as
|
|
a romantic lead in films, then came in at the last minute to help
|
|
with season one. She then wanted to go back to that. The character
|
|
stayed because we need the character to have some prior knowledge of
|
|
the situation, rather than bringing in somebody new.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Re: Na'Toth...you have to remember this was not our decision, but
|
|
rather Caitlin's, in order to pursue some romantic lead parts. We
|
|
made an offer equal to the other cast, but she opted out to pursue
|
|
films. We cast the best actor to come in the door to fill Na'Toth's
|
|
boots, and we need that character there because of the prior knowledge
|
|
she needs to have to fill her role in the story. Mary Kay is, I think,
|
|
trying to reinterpret the character. We're nudging in the other
|
|
direction. One way or another, this will be made to work.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Actually, no, it's not a rumor; I'd mentioned this some time ago, but
|
|
apparently some didn't see it....
|
|
<p>
|
|
So to repeat: we'd had to replace Mary Woronov with virtually no
|
|
notice after we found that she really had a hard time with the narn
|
|
prosthetics (wouldn't wear the contacts, and other stuff). In a
|
|
panic, our casting director called in a favor from Caitlin Brown, who
|
|
is mainly a leading-lady type actor. She came in and, in fact, for
|
|
the first episode (shooting almost immediately afterward) wore a
|
|
variation of the Ko'Dath makeup, because there wasn't time to make
|
|
one specific to her.
|
|
<p>
|
|
She came in without being under the 5-year option that generally
|
|
exists in these situations. Did one year, about 9 episodes, as
|
|
Na'Toth. And had to turn down a couple of leading-female parts.
|
|
During the hiatus, she did a romantic lead character in a film with
|
|
Jack Nicholson and Meryl Streep. And had to ask the hard question:
|
|
do I continue to grow as a romantic lead actor in feature films, or
|
|
play Na'Toth? She is a VERY gorgeous woman, and felt awkward hiding
|
|
behind the mask and cutting herself out of leading female parts in
|
|
feature films to do it.
|
|
<p>
|
|
We went 'round and 'round about this for some time, it was a very
|
|
difficult decision for her because she likes the show and everyone
|
|
here, but finally opted out. On one level it's a pain in the butt,
|
|
but we respect her decision. And it *is* her call, not ours.
|
|
<p>
|
|
(Quick aside...pfffttthhpplttt to those who, in their theory that
|
|
Sinclair/O'Hare quit, said that I'd naturally say it was mutual
|
|
because I could never say it was the actors choice because somehow
|
|
I'd get in trouble. No, I *would* say it if O'Hare had opted out on
|
|
his own. And in this case, that's exactly what happened.)
|
|
<p>
|
|
We didn't recast Sinclair because that character is going somewhere
|
|
from whence he may (and will) return, and because that serves the
|
|
story; in this case, we are recasting Na'Toth. By the end of season
|
|
one, Na'Toth knows stuff that I need that character, G'Kar's aide,
|
|
to know. (Though I was briefly tempted to do the Murphy Brown
|
|
Secretary line, with G'Kar getting a new aide every so often due to
|
|
terrible airlock accidents...but I went to lay down for a while and
|
|
the notion passed.)
|
|
<p>
|
|
So no, it's not a rumor, it's quite true. In fact, we just finished
|
|
up a casting session and found someone who's very right for the part;
|
|
and though we weren't confined to this, is actually about the same
|
|
height, same build, same attitude as Caitlin, and whose voice is very
|
|
similar. I don't think much difference will be noted in the long run,
|
|
really.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The Narn aren't waiting. Or, more accurately, G'Kar isn't. The rest
|
|
of the Kha'Ri (Narn inner circle government) are still somewhat
|
|
skeptical.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
The Minbari know the shape of what's coming, but they know full well
|
|
that if they go to us with this, we won't believe them; there's still
|
|
enough residual dislike over the war that they feel we have to find
|
|
this out for ourselves (and we will).
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Let's just say for now that about a thousand years ago, Narn was used
|
|
as a lay-over and supply spot for a Shadowman group that landed there
|
|
for a time, and used it briefly as a base of operations.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@931198604 <em>Is the name "Z'ha'dum" a reference to Khazad-dum
|
|
from "The Lord of the Rings?"</em><br>
|
|
Not really, no...I always imagined that Z'ha'dum was originally
|
|
the Minbari word for the place, and the Z'ha has echoes in Entil-zha
|
|
and Isil-zha. The dum (doom) part is obvious. Not to say I wasn't
|
|
aware of Khazad-dum, but it wasn't on my mind at the time.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Re: "switching places"...this is *exactly* what I noted early on;
|
|
the intent to set up in the very beginning a situation where those
|
|
who've seen basic SF before on the tube will go, "Oh, okay, I got it
|
|
...this is the Bad Guy, this is the Good Guy, this is the Comic
|
|
Relief, this is the Ally," and so on, because that's generally what's
|
|
been the case in TV SF; you set up the various sides from day one, and
|
|
virtually nobody moves.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
So you get them to rely on their conditioning, then you begin to move
|
|
the chairs around, so suddenly what you THOUGHT was the good guy is
|
|
maybe something else; and what you THOUGHT was the comic relief is a
|
|
tragic and dark figure; and what you THOUGHT was the bad guy is maybe
|
|
one of the real heroes of the story. And you try and make the path
|
|
that results in those changes as interesting, moving, or scary as
|
|
possible.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Of course Londo realizes he's being...not exactly set up, but that
|
|
he's getting into a very bad situation. But on the other hand, he
|
|
sees that perhaps this is his last chance to grab for something more
|
|
than what he is; he's not a young man anymore, and offers such as
|
|
this, even though he knows there will be a price someday (as he
|
|
states to Morden), do not come along every day.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Here is the key to characterization: who is your character, what does
|
|
he want, how far will he go to get it, and what is he prepared to
|
|
lose in that process?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Morden is human.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Morden dat I can't say.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Actually, G'Kar's makeup wasn't changed this year; the actor put on a
|
|
few pounds over hiatus, which shows in the face, which changes how the
|
|
prosthetic looks. This was dropped very quickly by Andreas, however,
|
|
and the makeup has adjusted itself. (Hell, we all put on a few pounds
|
|
during hiatus.)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> Oddly, the new makeup takes *longer* for Mira than the old, which went
|
|
on in a couple of fairly straightforward pieces. Now there's a lot
|
|
more detail work and more pieces.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Also, the intent is that G'Kar looked at both Sheridan and Londo, not
|
|
sure which of them may have leaked the info, though I think the
|
|
editing may have focused too much on Londo in that shot.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> The only time a name is associated with his aide is when Garibaldi
|
|
refers to him later, at which time he just says Jack.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <em>Jack had had contact with the PsiCops in "Mind War"</em><br>
|
|
|
|
No, Jack wasn't *seduced* at that time ...but he WAS there to meet
|
|
them, and escort them to see Sinclair. Why him? Perhaps a contact
|
|
there...?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li> <em>What would be different if there hadn't been cast changes after
|
|
"The Gathering?"</em><br>
|
|
The only problem with answering how things would've been different
|
|
is that some information might get out by inference about how things
|
|
might still *be*. However, to do what I can with the question (never
|
|
let it be said I don't try to accommodate....).
|
|
<p>
|
|
If Lyta had stayed on B5, her arc would be pretty close to that of
|
|
Talia, except that she would have begun to form a strong link to Kosh,
|
|
first in the form of dreams, then something with implications that
|
|
could be read as menacing or benign.
|
|
<p>
|
|
If Dr. Kyle would have stayed around, he would have moved more into
|
|
the position of advisor/paternal figure for Sinclair. He also would
|
|
have continued to be more scientist than doctor.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Takashima would have been revealed as having been in on the Vorlon
|
|
assassination attempt by season's end, and would have betrayed
|
|
Garibaldi in the events in "Chrysalis," either giving him over to
|
|
those involved with the coup, or pulling the trigger herself. While
|
|
we would know this, our characters would not, for as much as another
|
|
full season.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Carolyn Sykes would've gotten into major trouble with one of the
|
|
major EarthCorps.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Finally, if Sinclair had stayed with B5 at this juncture, the events
|
|
in "Points" (the reveal of the Minbari surrender) would've taken place
|
|
in episode 3 instead of 1. Episode 1 would've consisted mainly of the
|
|
events in "Revelations," which was mainly as a bystander to the events
|
|
around him, since the sister aspect specific to Sheridan obviously
|
|
wouldn't be there. Basically, with all the events surrounding Delenn,
|
|
Londo, G'Kar and others, he didn't have one whole hell of a lot to *DO*
|
|
in the first six to eight episodes, since that segment was set aside
|
|
primarily to introduce the Shadowman war and get that cranking, and
|
|
Sinclair had no real direct connection to that.
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|