|
<h2><a name="OV">Overview</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><cite>
|
|
Talia is involved in carrying out the sentence of a convicted murderer.
|
|
Dr. Franklin investigates a possible medical scam in Downbelow. Londo takes
|
|
Lennier for a look at the less savory sections of the station.
|
|
</cite>
|
|
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+Lockhart,+June">June Lockhart</a> as Dr. Laura Rosen.
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+McNeil,+Kate">Kate McNeil</a> as Janice Rosen.
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+Rolston,+Mark">Mark Rolston</a> as Karl Mueller.
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+London,+Damian">Damian London</a> as the Centauri Senator.
|
|
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+Norton,+Jim">Jim Norton</a> as Ombuds Wellington.
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
(Originally titled "The Resurrectionist")
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
Sub-genre: Suspense/drama
|
|
<a href="/lurk/p5/intro.html">P5 Rating</a>: <a href="/lurk/p5/021">7.29</a>
|
|
|
|
Production number: 117
|
|
Original air date: August 17, 1994
|
|
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006HAZ4/thelurkersguidet">DVD release date</a>: November 5, 2002
|
|
|
|
Written by J. Michael Straczynski
|
|
Directed by Lorraine Senna Ferrara
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<hr size=3>
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="BP">Backplot</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>
|
|
"Spacing" someone (tossing them out an airlock to die) is a punishment
|
|
applicable only in cases of mutiny and treason.
|
|
<li>
|
|
Evidence gained from a telepathic scan is inadmissible in court, as it
|
|
violates the principles of due process.
|
|
<li>
|
|
Very few members of Psi-Corps are trained to handle criminal cases, not
|
|
for lack of demand, but because it's very a stressful field, with lots
|
|
of burnouts.
|
|
<li>
|
|
The station's indigent are denied medical treatment in Medlab if they
|
|
can't afford it (cf.
|
|
<a href="010.html">"Believers"</a>.)
|
|
<li>
|
|
The station's prison is overcrowded already; there's no room for someone
|
|
to serve a life sentence.
|
|
<li>
|
|
Earth possesses the technology to brain-wipe people (cf.
|
|
<a href="015.html">"Grail"</a>)
|
|
and implant new memories;
|
|
it's used as a punishment or rehabilitation measure in certain criminal
|
|
cases. A Psi-Corps member oversees the wipe, performing scans before and
|
|
after to make sure it's complete.
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="UQ">Unanswered Questions</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li> What will Dr. Franklin do with the machine? Will it ever be seen again?
|
|
|
|
<li> Will Franklin and Janice Rosen continue to see each other in subsequent
|
|
episodes?
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="AN">Analysis</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>
|
|
This is the second instance in the series of a mechanism for stealing life
|
|
from one being and giving it to another (cf.
|
|
<a href="009.html">"Deathwalker"</a>.)
|
|
Perhaps the two are related somehow.
|
|
<li>
|
|
Judging by her reactions during the scan, it seems Talia was not trained to
|
|
deal with hardened criminals. Why, then, was she also stuck with the job of
|
|
scanning a murderer on the Mars colony, a place that, as a major human
|
|
settlement, presumably has a Psi-Corps presence? (cf.
|
|
<a href="018.html">"A Voice in the Wilderness, Part 1,"</a>
|
|
though admittedly the presence referred to there was not public knowledge.)
|
|
<li>
|
|
The Centauri's claim that Earth was a lost colony (cf.
|
|
<a href="001.html">"Midnight on the Firing Line"</a>)
|
|
must have been a short-lived ruse, given the revelations about Centauri
|
|
physiology in this episode.
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="NO">Notes</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>
|
|
June Lockhart and Bill Mumy were in another science-fiction show together:
|
|
"Lost in Space."
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="JS">jms speaks</a></h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Of all the scripts I've written, the only one that I'm less than
|
|
absolutely 100% thrilled with is "The Quality of Mercy," because I wrote it
|
|
while absolutely sick with the flu, and have NO memory even of writing it. As
|
|
it is, though, I'm about 90% happy with it, particularly the B-story with
|
|
Londo and Lennier, which came out great.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
In my original thoughts about the episode, there was more of a con
|
|
man ressurectionist angle to the show, which later got dropped.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Psi Corps telepaths are ****NOT**** allowed to scan defendants in any
|
|
official way connected to a criminal act. It violates the right to due
|
|
process. Even if requested, it's simply not allowed. You do NOT want to even
|
|
open the door a *crack* in letting a government-regulated agency begin making
|
|
determinations about who is and isn't guilty of a crime. That way lies
|
|
dictatorship, Thought Police and Big Brother.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
The scan is preparatory to the prisoner being mind-blanked. It is,
|
|
as the Ombuds pointed out, the death of personality, the death of
|
|
one's mind. Hence the black band on the Psi symbol.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<cite>How has your presence on the net affected the series?</cite><br>
|
|
... I was
|
|
initially going to gloss over some of the legal aspects of the Psi Corps
|
|
in "The Quality of Mercy," but when so many people expressed interest in
|
|
how that worked, and when I saw some measure of confusion about it, I
|
|
took the time to indicate how the legal aspects work when it came time to
|
|
complete that script, thus answering the questions.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
The one major reason I decided to begin this interaction, despite
|
|
CONSIDERABLE discourgement and disbelief from my peers, is that I
|
|
think it may be of some use, and because I think that one should be
|
|
willing to stand publicly with what you create, and because though
|
|
many criticisms are issues of taste or subjective preference,
|
|
sometimes (fairly often, actually), I learn something from the
|
|
discussion, or I'm corrected in something, and that realignment is
|
|
eventually reflected in the show. I'm giving some serious thought to
|
|
either revamping n'grath or killing him off given the reaction (paired
|
|
with my own). I won't be dictated to, but in some cases, as with
|
|
n'grath, I may be uncertain, but willing to try and see if the
|
|
experiment works. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, and the
|
|
general perception here seems close to my own. In addition, I was
|
|
initially going to gloss over some of the legal aspects of the Psi
|
|
Corps in "The Quality of Mercy," but when so many people expressed
|
|
interest in how that worked, and when I saw some measure of confusion
|
|
about it, I took the time to indicate how the legal aspects work when
|
|
it came time to complete that script, thus answering the questions.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<cite>About June Lockhart</cite><br>
|
|
No, no scenes with Bill Mumy, though some consideration was given to the
|
|
notion.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@840398824
|
|
Bill kept bugging me to put him in a scene with June, but
|
|
I just felt it'd get in the way.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@840398824
|
|
It would've worked, but the scene would've forever been about
|
|
the mini-LIS reunion. If it isn't important to the story, it shouldn't
|
|
be there.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
We do tend to try and stay open to gender stuff; usuall there's a
|
|
reason why someone is male or female, so it's cast that way. But as
|
|
an example...in "Quality of Mercy," the role as originally written
|
|
was for a father/daughter combination. In the process of casting, we
|
|
thought, why not mother/daughter? So that's how it ended up. In
|
|
"Points of Departure," we have one of your requests already taken
|
|
care of...a part of a war cruiser commander who could've been male or
|
|
female...cast female.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<em>Q: What are Londo's appendages called?</em><br>
|
|
Tentisticularites?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<em>Are Londo's appendages in addition to or instead of human-type
|
|
"appendages"?</em><br>
|
|
That would be instead of, not in addition to.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@846702607
|
|
As for the tentacles...well, there's no rules about showing
|
|
tentacles on TV. I think they didn't even want to deal with it. There
|
|
are some moments when they pretend they didn't see it, and I pretend I
|
|
didn't write it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Centauri males have six.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Centauri females, btw, have six narrow...ummm...slots on their backs,
|
|
three on either side of the spine, right around the base of the spine.
|
|
<p>
|
|
The awful thing is that the two women in props -- who were having FAR
|
|
too much fun with this -- kept bringing me the tentacle to verify the
|
|
shape, size, consistency, do we see veins or not....
|
|
<p>
|
|
I tell you here and now: our staff meetings are something else.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@846702607
|
|
Actually, Centauri have six. They extend out from the sides of
|
|
the body, and "fold" in over the solar plexus when not in, er, use.
|
|
(We actually saw one extended for other purposes in the first season,
|
|
"The Quality of Mercy.") Female Centauri have six...er...slotted areas
|
|
on either side of the spine, just above the hips, three on either side.
|
|
<p>
|
|
To go any further would probably bring in the FBI.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@846702607 <em>Does that mean Centauri women have multiple births on
|
|
a regular basis?</em><br>
|
|
No multiple births, in that sense, not any different than humans.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
"What kind of birth control do the Centauri use?"
|
|
<p>
|
|
Conversation.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>@@@883993388 <em>Which of the six do they use for urination?</em><br>
|
|
That assumes the urinate out of the same organs they use for sex; ain't
|
|
necessarily the case.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
We used a bullwhip sound effect for the
|
|
"retraction" in QoM; when we were in sound editing,
|
|
I asked for the hardest whip-crack they had...and
|
|
got it put in REAL loud. Every time I hear it, I'm
|
|
on the floor....
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
While the TP themes in "Quality" go back through the history of SF,
|
|
including the Demolished Man, among others, the basic storyline (re:
|
|
Talia) came out of the pilot. At the time, I was asked -- frequently
|
|
-- "Why didn't Lyta scan Sinclair to determine if he had tried to kill
|
|
Kosh?" My answer then -- which is in some of the archives -- was that
|
|
it would violate the right to due process, that a defendant cannot be
|
|
scanned to determine guilt or innocence (in fact, I recall a rather
|
|
heated debate about that here a while back). I promised that this
|
|
would be elaborated upon down the road, and mentally logged in to do a
|
|
show with that premise...and I'd already decided about the death
|
|
penalty, and the use of telepaths in it. So "Quality" came out of
|
|
that, long before "Mephisto" was even written. At one point, knowing
|
|
that there were some common story areas, I called Harlan to tell him
|
|
the "Quality" story, so that if there were any problems, I could
|
|
revise it, but he said he saw no problem.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<cite>Isn't brainwiping as bad as killing?</cite><br>
|
|
There are actually many issues to get into in all of
|
|
this. Which is really the "person," the mind, the soul,
|
|
or the body? If a person has an accident, getting amnesia,
|
|
which wipes out his entire personality, is that person as
|
|
good as dead? Is there no difference between amnesia and
|
|
death? If not, why not just kill the amnesiac? But
|
|
obviously there *is* a difference. So what is the person?
|
|
What constitutes death?
|
|
<p>
|
|
We consider the actual death of the *brain* through the
|
|
cessation of brain activity to be the test for death. But
|
|
what if you simply rearrange those patterns?
|
|
<p>
|
|
There is also the question of *justice*. If the person
|
|
is dead, then that person cannot do much to correct the ills
|
|
he visited upon society. It is simply a waste of material.
|
|
So why not take someone who, in any decent society, would be
|
|
executed or forced to live in a 6x9 cage the rest of his life,
|
|
and give the soul, and the body, a new chance by giving the
|
|
person a new personality and letting him, as the Ombuds says,
|
|
"serve the community harmed by his actions"?
|
|
<p>
|
|
Finally, if the person is dead, he's dead; let's say 5
|
|
years down the road somebody finds evidence that proves the
|
|
person was innocent. There is at least the *chance* to
|
|
reconstruct some of the original memories and personality
|
|
profile.
|
|
<p>
|
|
All of this, again, has to be considered in light of the
|
|
fact that we are talking about a *space station* with limited
|
|
space and resources. You cannot warehouse every person who
|
|
kill somebody in a station that small; you would run out of
|
|
space almost immediately. (If you also include basic felons
|
|
and near-killings.) So what *do* you do with them? As was
|
|
noted, Earth doesn't want them and won't pay to have them
|
|
shipped back...what's left?
|
|
<p>
|
|
That's the dilemma I wanted to pose in the episode...what
|
|
*can* you do?
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
"...the 'personality' remaining in the body will
|
|
be punished for a crime that 'personality' did not
|
|
commit."
|
|
<p>
|
|
1) But again, which is the person...the old
|
|
personality, the new one, or something else?
|
|
<p>
|
|
2) Part of the new personality would be the delight
|
|
in serving others.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
You will see the healing machine from "Quality" once more. Part of
|
|
the reason for that story was to set up something within the B5 universe
|
|
that will come in handy a long time later (but I'm *not* going to have it
|
|
lying around indefinitely; it would cause lots of long-term complications).
|
|
<p>
|
|
(Some TV shows foreshadow/set-up stuff an act or two ahead of time;
|
|
we do setups a full *year* ahead....)
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
There are limits to what the healing device can do, for starters;
|
|
it can't repair physical damage to the body, mainly it works with
|
|
disease and basic low-energy stuff; also, bear in mind that it was a
|
|
device used for *capital punishment*...meaning that to save one person's
|
|
life, another must sacrifice his or her own, if it's that far along,
|
|
so it's not really something you can trot out everytime somebody gets
|
|
nailed.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
They cannot carry out the original sentence because the body is
|
|
now dead, which would tend to diminish its social acceptability.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Dr. Franklin did not know that Mueller had yet found Rosen, or even
|
|
knew of it. There are no Babcom systems in DownBelow quarters. To
|
|
send a security team, when they're out searching, without cause, is
|
|
neither realistic nor sensible. He did the correct thing: to go and
|
|
warn her, while at the same time making sure that security knew where
|
|
he was going, and if they didn't hear anything, to send in a team.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<em>Franklin should have had a search warrant.</em><br>
|
|
Allow me to disagree with you.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Dr. Franklin did not require a search warrant to enter Rosen's
|
|
quarters. The door was basically open, and he is NOT an officer of
|
|
the law. Only officers of the law are required to have search warrants.
|
|
Neither was he there to arrest her.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Defense counsel was sitting with the defendant at the table. He had
|
|
no lines, but he was there. The trial had been ongoing; this was the
|
|
part where the verdict is rendered after a decision has been reached.
|
|
<p>
|
|
The pattern of the judge passing sentence is exactly the same as when
|
|
circuit court judges used to work the frontier areas of the US. Where
|
|
would you find a jury on B5? Most civilians are passing through, on
|
|
stop-over for only a day or two...unable to follow a long hearing.
|
|
The only other ones are station personnel, which represents a conflict
|
|
of interest. Your only choice is a circuit court style judge whose
|
|
loyalty is owed to no one.
|
|
<p>
|
|
The alien device was being used on humans without any kind of license,
|
|
she is not a certified doctor, and it was used in the death of a
|
|
human. Under those circumstances, it is within the judge s right to
|
|
confiscate the device for the greater good. (You can have a
|
|
unlicensed firearm in a state that requires licensing, and use it in a
|
|
righteous self-defense shooting, but it will be confiscated afterward.
|
|
No compensation is required because its use is/was unregulated,
|
|
unlicensed, and she was/is not a working doctor.)
|
|
<p>
|
|
It *is* due process. Even according to 20th century terms. Only
|
|
problem is in understanding what due process actually *is*, as
|
|
opposed to what we think it *should* be.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Yes, part of the reason for the QoM episode was to set up the notion
|
|
of an implanted personality as achievable tech.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
David: "The Quality of Mercy" title is drawn from the same source as
|
|
Compton's book, Shakespeare. It has a lot to do with that episode.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Yes, absolutely; in "The Quality of Mercy," you'll get a look at
|
|
how the justice system has come to grips with the uestion of how to
|
|
handle violent crimes in an environment like a space station, which
|
|
has limited room for cells, limited resources, and other complications.
|
|
We do plan to get into this area a bit, without getting too LA LAW
|
|
about it.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
A lot of our episodes are constructed to work as mirrors; you see
|
|
what you put into it. "Believers" has been interpreted as pro-
|
|
religion, anti- religion, and religion-neutral..."Quality" has been
|
|
interpreted, as you note, as pro-capital punishment, and anti-capital
|
|
punishment. We do, as you say, much prefer to leave the decision on
|
|
what things mean to the viewer to hash out.
|
|
<p>
|
|
A good story should provoke discussion, debate, argument...and the
|
|
occasional bar fight.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
There's the sense that A, B and sometimes C stories in TV should
|
|
intersect. My attitude: sometimes yes, sometimes no. Depends on if
|
|
you look at this as a real place or not, as opposed to a thematic
|
|
exercise. What I go through in the course of a day has nothing to
|
|
do with what happens to Larry DiTillio across town, except and unless
|
|
it involves our mutual work. Sometimes, as in "Quality," the stories
|
|
feel like they resonate, and can be used to illustrate one another,
|
|
and so they're linked. In others, what I'm striving for is a sense
|
|
of a "day in thed (the) life" of Babylon 5. The one kind of story is
|
|
neither better nor worse than the other, they're simply different.
|
|
One may like one more than the other, but to say they're "better"
|
|
plots is just silly. There's NO padding in this show, no stories put
|
|
in to fill out time; just stories that we want to tell, period.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Minbari use base 11, not base 10, so twelve would be eleventy-first
|
|
year, and so on.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Minbari base eleven includes fingers and head, from which the
|
|
principle of mathematics comes.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
You're also looking at this from a strictly English-speaking
|
|
perspective; in German, for instance, 21 is "Ein und Zwanzig" (pardon
|
|
any misspellings in there, it's been a while) which is exactly the
|
|
same structure, albeit reversed, used for Minbari counting (and, in
|
|
fact, is more or less what I based his "statement" on).
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
Eleventy-seven = Eighteen base ten.
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
<li>
|
|
One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven
|
|
<p>
|
|
Eleventy-one, eleventy-two, eleventy-three, eleventy-four, eleventy-
|
|
five, eleventy-six, eleventy-seven, eleventy-eight, eleventy-nine,
|
|
eleventy-ten, twelfy
|
|
<p>
|
|
Twelfty-one, twelfty-two, twelfy-three, twelfty-four, twelfty-five,
|
|
twelfty-six, twelfty-seven, twelfty-eight, twelfty-nine, twelfty-ten.
|
|
<p>
|
|
And so on.
|
|
<p>
|
|
Who here still has a problem with this?
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|