===========================================================================
|
|
| This text is compiled from posts by J. Michael Straczynski on the Usenet
|
|
| group rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5. This document contains material Copyright
|
|
| 1994 J. Michael Straczynski. He has given permission for his words to be
|
|
| redistributed online, as long as they are marked as being copyright JMS.
|
|
| This document, as well as other Babylon-5 related material, is available
|
|
| by anonymous FTP at ftp.hyperion.com.
|
|
===========================================================================
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 1 Dec 1994 15:49:43 -0500
|
|
Subject: Ship Names (minor ADS spoiler)
|
|
|
|
So tell me, Ligia, if Cortez had NOT landed in northern Mexico, do
|
|
you think it would have remained undiscovered until now?
|
|
|
|
Fact #1: somebody was bound to discover the Americas.
|
|
|
|
Fact #2: any sufficiently advanced civilization or culture will
|
|
inevitably attempt to exploit any civilization or culture not sufficiently
|
|
advanced to fight back on a level playing field.
|
|
|
|
Blaming explorers for exploring has always seemed to me really kind
|
|
of silly; do people *really* think that if Columbus hadn't landed here,
|
|
it'd be 1994 and we still wouldn't know the world was round and that
|
|
this continent was here? It doesn't matter who discovered it, the same
|
|
result would've come. Somebody had to discover it sooner or later.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 3 Dec 1994 08:57:58 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Re: insignia
|
|
|
|
Rank insignia are on the shoulders, as per tradition; the bars under
|
|
the EA logo are for area; gold for command, green for security, red for
|
|
medical, and so on.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 3 Dec 1994 09:03:48 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Baseball game
|
|
|
|
I don't recall the SeaQuest game results; I do know that ST called and
|
|
challenged us to a game...we said yes...haven't heard back since.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:21:32 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: renewal notice when
|
|
|
|
If we bombed in November, we'd get NO. If we did good, we'd get
|
|
Maybe. So far, we're still (happily) in Maybe. We likely won't know
|
|
for sure though until March/April.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:24:04 -0500
|
|
Subject: Dayton Daily News B5 article
|
|
|
|
If somebody has a hard-copy of this article, it'd be great if it
|
|
could be sent my way.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:26:13 -0500
|
|
Subject: Boxleitner, the new William Sh
|
|
|
|
First people complained that Sinclair wasn't expressive enough; now
|
|
they complain that Sheridan's TOO expressive...Sinclair smiled too much,
|
|
then he was too serious...now Sheridan smiles too much....
|
|
|
|
The Canadian TV Guide said Sheridan was as "wooden" as Shatner; now
|
|
he's called as overly expressive as Shatner....
|
|
|
|
I dunno...maybe the hangup some people have with Shatner is the
|
|
problem...and maybe they ought to get over it.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:34:31 -0500
|
|
Subject: jms:interaction on net?
|
|
|
|
I appreciate the thought, Roxanna; I guess my main concern isn't
|
|
so much nitpicking, that's part of the game going in; it's just whether
|
|
or not my presence in an unregulated environment brings in so many
|
|
poison darts from trollers and those out to make a hassle that it ruins
|
|
it for others.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:34:43 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: jms:interaction on net?
|
|
|
|
And, of course, the reality is that there has not been ONE show
|
|
ever produced in the history of television that could withstand the kind
|
|
of scrutiny generally given to SF series.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:37:17 -0500
|
|
Subject: HEEELP!!! Dilgar War????
|
|
|
|
The war against the Dilgar was the one referenced in "Deathwalker."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:37:40 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Sex questio
|
|
|
|
Me, I'm just waiting for somebody to refer to "The Long Dark" as "The
|
|
Long Duck"....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:38:06 -0500
|
|
Subject: Is B5 really the "best hope fo
|
|
|
|
This is, of course, one of the great ironies of any free society,
|
|
that in order to BE a free society you have to create the very conditions
|
|
that could turn right around and destroy that freedom. You have to
|
|
allow things you don't like in the hope that there are enough checks and
|
|
balances, and enough attractions to the current system to encourage
|
|
folks not to change over. (I think it was Che Guevara who said that
|
|
every nation is three meals short of revolution.)
|
|
|
|
I keep playing with the notion of an opening narration a year or two
|
|
down the road that says, "the Babylon Project was our last, best hope for
|
|
peace. It failed."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:38:31 -0500
|
|
Subject: Spider in the Web CC fiasco no
|
|
|
|
Apparently there was a mixup on PTEN's side as to the order of
|
|
episodes, and there wasn't time to get this one CC'd for the first
|
|
airing, though it *will* be close-captioned for the rebroadcast.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:39:35 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS Quick question about comme
|
|
|
|
I actually don't know which sponsors would be considered primary;
|
|
probably should, huh...?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:41:07 -0500
|
|
Subject: Aliens
|
|
|
|
The green/blackish scaly-headed aliens are the Drazi; the ones with
|
|
the cthulhoid tentacles for mouths are pak'ma'ra; the fish-heads seen in
|
|
"Deathwalker" are the Abbai...just for starters.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:42:38 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATT JMS: What would have happ
|
|
|
|
Okay, alternate-universe time to answer your question....
|
|
|
|
"What if Sinclair had not left Babylon 5?" (Isn't this kinda like
|
|
the Marvel What If? comics..."What If Dr. Blake's Nurse Had Been The One
|
|
to Find Thor's Hammer?")
|
|
|
|
The differences would be more noticeable in the later episodes of
|
|
this season, rather than the first batch, which are still dealing in
|
|
large measure with the after-effects of the season finale.
|
|
|
|
So the first few episodes would have been somewhat the same in some
|
|
ways to what is there with Sheridan. The problem that I had was that he
|
|
was becoming (and would have become) mainly a problem-solver character;
|
|
there's a squabble or a problem between other characters who are rising in
|
|
profile (G'Kar, Londo, Delenn, etc.), and he solves the problem in some
|
|
way. These, to me, were the least interesting episodes of our prior
|
|
season.
|
|
|
|
It would've been necessary to bring in another character with a
|
|
direct connection to the shadowmen, since Sinclair's main connection is
|
|
to the Minbari, and it would've been straining credulity to plug him too
|
|
much into THAT story as well...hero of the line, missing 24 hours, Minbari
|
|
soul, AND a tie to the Shadowmen...c'mon, what else does he do, fly under
|
|
his own power?
|
|
|
|
Had he stayed, the Shadowman tie probably would've gone to either
|
|
Keffer or Garibaldi. Which, again, further removes Sinclair from the
|
|
main thrust of the story. He would have stayed on as more of an observer
|
|
of other people *acting*, while he *reacted*.
|
|
|
|
I can't get too specific otherwise without revealing, by contrast,
|
|
what's going to happen later on this season. Suffice to say this: watch
|
|
the show up to and through "The Coming of Shadows," "All Alone in the
|
|
Night," "Acts of Sacrifice," and "Hunter, Prey." (That's about episode
|
|
#13.) You can then ask the question again, but I have a real suspicion
|
|
that once you've seen those episodes, and what Sheridan does, you won't
|
|
NEED to ask, because you'll see how he fits into the overall story in a
|
|
very specific fashion with is 180-degrees different than Sinclair.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 00:48:57 -0500
|
|
Subject: Sinclair Who? or The Long Dark
|
|
|
|
Re: Sheridan...thanks, and I think you'll continue to like him more
|
|
the deeper we get into the season and we discover what's *really* going
|
|
on with him. Last season, "Chrysalis" was the episode at season's end
|
|
that kind of turned the show on its head; this season it starts a LOT
|
|
sooner than that...there are several episodes mid-season that whop the
|
|
series upside the head and send it spinning in a very different direction,
|
|
and they mainly involve Sheridan. In particular, watch for "A Race
|
|
Through Dark Places," "The Coming of Shadows," "All Alone in the Night"
|
|
(which is a biggie, though it's designed NOT to look like that for most
|
|
of the episode), "Acts of Sacrifice" and "Hunter, Prey." With one or
|
|
two exceptions, they run in a block come February.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 01:28:56 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: This show of yours, "Baby
|
|
|
|
Well, it's good to know all those electives in college came in
|
|
handy SOMEWHERE....
|
|
|
|
(I think I racked up enough electives in philosophy to come close
|
|
to a major; as it was I minored in philosophy and literature in my first
|
|
two degrees.)
|
|
|
|
There's a vast wealth of literature, poety, ideas, philosophy, that
|
|
people -- average viewers -- know nothing about, because they may have
|
|
been led to think it's dry,and dusty, and irrelevent, and less than
|
|
interesting. So if I can slip that in, and make it interesting, and
|
|
encourage them to seek out this stuff (I can't tell you how many folks
|
|
have written me to mention they checked out Yeats and Tennyson based on
|
|
seeing it in this show), then we're doing something worthwhile.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 01:29:04 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Ed Wasser-Good actor or n
|
|
|
|
Ed Wasser is sort of our discovery; I pretty much wrote the part
|
|
of Morden with him in mind for the role. He's great in it.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 01:32:41 -0500
|
|
Subject: "The Long Dark" Review -- Spoi
|
|
|
|
RE: Londo looking "more wicked," we're doing some very small,
|
|
subtle things to his appearance, his wardrobe, pulling him into a
|
|
darker range of fabrics. (Honest to god, you wouldn't believe how
|
|
careful and detailed we are in setting this stuff up.) He'll even be
|
|
getting a new, slightly darker coat, straighter lines, closer in style
|
|
to Refa's, before the season's out. It's really interesting when you
|
|
know where you're going....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 01:32:58 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Where's the Ring? (minor L
|
|
|
|
Anyone who looks too closely for LoTR allegories will over the long
|
|
haul be disappointed; remember, we're also constructing a story that
|
|
casts an eye toward the events of the last 25 or so years, our own fall
|
|
from a vision of the future, and it's designed to have some parallels to
|
|
the story of the original Babylon. Thus far, though a few have started
|
|
to get glimmers of where this puppy's going, very few yet really get
|
|
just how *big* this story is going to get.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 7 Dec 1994 23:10:47 -0500
|
|
Subject: IMHO's on LONG DARK **** SPO
|
|
|
|
Yes, we will eventually show the view into sheridan's office; we
|
|
did it small in "Geometry," but not well, I think; we need to be back
|
|
further. So we'll do it again.
|
|
|
|
Until we get it right.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 9 Dec 1994 00:22:38 -0500
|
|
Subject: Yeats: The Second Coming (spec
|
|
|
|
Joseph: the only thing I'll say is that you stumbled upone one very
|
|
VERY important element in your message...but I'm not telling you which
|
|
one.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 9 Dec 1994 00:23:07 -0500
|
|
Subject: Hey JMS! Great Show!
|
|
|
|
Many thanks; encouragement like this helps us keep going....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 9 Dec 1994 00:29:20 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS - Are Most T.V. Writers Ti
|
|
|
|
Television writers do, and risk, as much as the industry will allow
|
|
them to. The television business inclines one toward timidity, toward
|
|
not making trouble, to the lowest common denominator. The few that rise
|
|
above that are those willing to take a stand and risk losing everything
|
|
if they mess up (Bochco, Kelley, others).
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 9 Dec 1994 00:33:44 -0500
|
|
Subject: Harlan Ellison gone?
|
|
|
|
Harlan is still with the show, and his credit appears in the opening
|
|
of each show's first act.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 9 Dec 1994 23:27:41 -0500
|
|
Subject: Babylon 5 credits font
|
|
|
|
Serpentine Medium.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 9 Dec 1994 23:36:36 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Spelling of Zahadoom?
|
|
|
|
Z'ha'dum.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 9 Dec 1994 23:41:14 -0500
|
|
Subject: Uncredited Actor?, Future plot
|
|
|
|
Conaway is credited in the episode.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 00:00:27 -0500
|
|
Subject: Bab-5 on German TV???
|
|
|
|
I believe it'll be on Sat Eintz starting December/January.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 00:02:09 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Murder she wrote?
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I was there on Murder for two years; fun show.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 00:02:25 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: From whence "Understandin
|
|
|
|
I just kinda thunk it up, based on my past experiences with these
|
|
kinds of essentially theological organizations.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 01:22:43 -0500
|
|
Subject: What's in Joe's head?
|
|
|
|
What's in Joe's head?
|
|
|
|
Gophers, mainly.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 15:09:51 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Can you help with Au
|
|
|
|
This is something I have *zip* control over, alas....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 15:12:59 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Why keep harping on San D
|
|
|
|
Having lived in San Diego from 1974-81, it's just my way of giving
|
|
a wink to the old home town. Though there are some important things
|
|
going on underground, in areas no one goes...the choice of SD is just
|
|
a bit of fun.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 19:52:52 -0500
|
|
Subject: Theron: WE WANT PROOF. OR, SHA
|
|
|
|
I hate to be the one to point this out, but B5's ratings have been
|
|
steadily on the rise now for weeks; in fact, the President of WB/PTEN
|
|
distribution came here to the stage this week to congratulate everyone
|
|
involved with the show. We're the 3rd rated dramatic series overall,
|
|
in both ratings and demographics, and the demos are *killer*. Our last
|
|
rating for "Long Dark" gave us a 5.2, which will definitely put us in
|
|
the top 18 or even 15 of ALL syndicated shows.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 21:22:20 -0500
|
|
Subject: Moronic Fanboys
|
|
|
|
Excuse me, but has *anyone* here considered that Sheridan just might
|
|
still be talking to the same tech he was speaking to not *five seconds
|
|
earlier*? He wasn't talking to himself, so much, or the audience, though
|
|
the push-in (the only shot we had) worked against that. He *was* talking
|
|
to the tech. Honest.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 21:28:21 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Comments & question re B5
|
|
|
|
It's not supposed to be a blasted landscape around Geneva, and didn't
|
|
look like that in the pencils.
|
|
|
|
Ah, well....
|
|
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 21:28:34 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Making of Babylon 5
|
|
|
|
I'm sure it'll eventually come out again somewhere...
|
|
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 21:37:30 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: What does Harlan do?
|
|
|
|
Harlan does on the show whatever he *wants* to do on the show. He
|
|
helped create the Ombuds character, added to the narration, does the
|
|
final VO on the credits, sometimes talks with other writers about the
|
|
show...he's our own personal free-floating agent of chaos....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 22:08:46 -0500
|
|
Subject: ANSWER ME!!!!
|
|
|
|
Some will. Some won't. Simple enough?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 22:09:05 -0500
|
|
Subject: How are you doing?
|
|
|
|
So far, we're doing fine...but there's still a very long road
|
|
ahead of us.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 10 Dec 1994 22:10:54 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATN JMS: Chrysalis (spoiler) a
|
|
|
|
Yes, if Laurel had stayed with the station, either she would have
|
|
pulled the trigger on Garibaldi, or been directly involved in other ways.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 11 Dec 1994 04:24:20 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATT:JMS Re: Jeff Conaway
|
|
|
|
Yes, Conaway will be seen from time to time in the show.
|
|
|
|
We get a *very* good selection of name actors, many of whom don't
|
|
generally do syndication (not at what we can afford to pay, much less
|
|
than ST has), but they're generally drawn by the material. At least
|
|
that's what they tell me, and out of convenience and hubris I have come
|
|
to accept it as true.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 11 Dec 1994 23:04:43 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Media mention, well,
|
|
|
|
Now that's comedy....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 11 Dec 1994 23:27:30 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Ivanova squirms (was Re: I
|
|
|
|
"I wanna see those gloves come off. WHEN she's with someone."
|
|
|
|
How's the next batch of new episodes...soon enough for you?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 11 Dec 1994 23:30:33 -0500
|
|
Subject: Trading cards
|
|
|
|
There are also apparently supposed to be real trading cards coming
|
|
out from Cardz eventually.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 13 Dec 1994 02:16:43 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: your faves
|
|
|
|
So far the best episodes of this year (in my view) are those in the
|
|
next batch, starting January/February. (My favorite from the first
|
|
group is "Geometry.") I think "The Coming of Shadows" may be the best
|
|
(or at least my favorite) from the entire series to date. I'd also put
|
|
"Chrysalis," "Babylon Squared," "A Race Through Dark Places" and
|
|
"Revelations" toward the top. I suspect that "All Alone in the Night"
|
|
will be up there, but I just today got the director's cut, and haven't
|
|
seen it yet, though the dailies were terrific.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 13 Dec 1994 04:20:28 -0500
|
|
Subject: G'kar and Londo Tango.
|
|
|
|
Ah, but you're assuming that the Londo-strangling-scene is as it
|
|
seems to be; maybe it is, but maybe it isn't. You don't know the context
|
|
yet.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 13 Dec 1994 04:20:42 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: A note of thanks.
|
|
|
|
The thanks more properly belong with those who've supported and
|
|
discovered the show for what it is, like yourself....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 13 Dec 1994 04:20:55 -0500
|
|
Subject: Thanks, JMS, for your guest st
|
|
|
|
McCallum was *very* pleasant to work with, very unassuming and
|
|
quiet. We've been very lucky with our guest stars; they have a strong
|
|
respect for the text, and don't stray. And they bring a lot to each
|
|
performance. On the subject of genre actors...they often created great
|
|
characters, so memorable that they got typecast, and couldn't find work.
|
|
This to me is a crime, and if we can cast them in ways totally opposite
|
|
what they've done before (Koenig as Bester), and show the real range and
|
|
skill these actors possess, we pay back a little of what they've given
|
|
us, which we kinda owe them, I think. It's simply a gesture of respect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Our first season, when Walter did his episode, when he would come
|
|
to the lunch table -- all writers, producers, crew and actors eat
|
|
together at the stage every day -- all the other cast members used to
|
|
stand until he'd sat...tradition for a senior officer.)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 13 Dec 1994 04:21:12 -0500
|
|
Subject: Moving Stars (One More Time...
|
|
|
|
Because the window is so large, making a revolving cyclorama with
|
|
fiber-optic stars is physically impossible. Doing matte composites for
|
|
the lengthy shots which generally take place in C&C is also impossible;
|
|
we could spend time rendering all those shots, but then wouldn't have
|
|
time to render any OTHER CGI for the show. We're still looking for a
|
|
better solution, but for now, it is what it is.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 13 Dec 1994 04:22:57 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Hook-up with David Brin
|
|
|
|
I know David Brin; have spoken to him, had lunch, you name it. I
|
|
think our working habits are attidudes are *very* far apart.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 13 Dec 1994 04:28:55 -0500
|
|
Subject: Attn JMS (was Re: Is B5 really
|
|
|
|
And in my more evil moments, in light of the analysis of "it was the
|
|
dawn of the third age of mankind," I'm constantly fighting the temptation
|
|
to have someone show up at the station with his young daughter in tow and
|
|
say, "This is Dawn. She's three."
|
|
|
|
Just to watch everyone's antennae explode....
|
|
|
|
(This to Dawn Sharon, who reminded me of it.)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 01:29:52 -0500
|
|
Subject: SitW link to Stalking the Nigh
|
|
|
|
The Bureau 13 name was *entirely* coincidental on Larry's part.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 01:31:34 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Tom McDevitt tribute
|
|
|
|
Actually, it was caused by a charity SFWA auction; I bought the
|
|
rights to have a ship named after me in Tom's new book (at that time).
|
|
Ed Bryant was the auctioneer, who snared me into a bidding war with a
|
|
woman with an even longer name than mine, finally provoking me with, "If
|
|
you were a REAL man you'd jump another hundred dollars and shut her down."
|
|
|
|
I'm such a stooge....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 01:31:54 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Tv Guide Editor's View
|
|
|
|
I hear they're going to print a slightly edited (minus the more
|
|
inflammatory stuff, I was in a bad mood at the time) version of my letter
|
|
in their magazine, with a note from the editor to the effect that he will
|
|
maybe give B5 "another chance."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 01:51:45 -0500
|
|
Subject: Question for JMS: Mimbari Warr
|
|
|
|
Prior to the time of Valen, the Minbari's greatest spiritual leader,
|
|
there was killing of Minbari by Minbari. There were three warring castes,
|
|
which he pulled together when he formed the Grey Council (three from each
|
|
caste forming nine, Worker, Warrior, Religious Caste). Since that time,
|
|
and the Minbari have been in space for well over a thousand years, they
|
|
have pretty much hewn to that rule; it is their greatest taboo. Once the
|
|
three sides were integrated, the warrior caste mainly contented itself
|
|
with external threats.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 04:29:29 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: another clipping for your
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the info; much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 04:31:19 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: save $$ on CC? (was: Spid
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, the CC company isn't set up to handle those kinds of
|
|
files. (And btw, we don't handle that directly; WB/PTEN makes the deal
|
|
with the CC company.) Generally, on the rare occasions when it isn't on
|
|
first-run, it IS cc'd on the second run.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:30:05 -0500
|
|
Subject: Not exactly technobabble... (b
|
|
|
|
I don't think referring to a medical problem or illness is in any
|
|
way either technobabble or medbabble. Either babble is just that, a long
|
|
string of terms which suffice for plot points. New medical conditions
|
|
come along all the time, and require names. Twenty years ago we didn't
|
|
have the term AIDS. If that had been used prior to the illness being
|
|
discovered, would that be considered technobabble?
|
|
|
|
I think we need to be somewhat sensible here; from time to time one
|
|
must explain something or refer to something of a technical nature. I
|
|
don't think that this must lead to a kneejerk response of classifying
|
|
any kind of technical reference as technobabble. Terms have meaning,
|
|
and the more you generalize those terms, the less meaning they have.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:34:53 -0500
|
|
Subject: jms: Sinclair's return
|
|
|
|
If I were to tell you when and where Sinclair might be seen again in
|
|
year two, it would *totally* ruin any surprise generated by this when it
|
|
happens.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:35:05 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: FOX SCI-FI SPECIAL
|
|
|
|
They used the only episode Warners gave them...I could say more, but
|
|
why steam up your monitor...?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:36:46 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: What about the new viewers
|
|
|
|
One of the focus groups done by Warners had the same reaction from
|
|
one of the people; that B5 was too much a drama, too much character stuff,
|
|
and not enough of what SF is. So he was asked what he considered SF to
|
|
be. He lit right up and said, "Power Rangers."
|
|
|
|
I almost went for him, right through the two-way glass....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:36:57 -0500
|
|
Subject: Sinclair is "The One" - Right?
|
|
|
|
"Sinclair is 'The One' -- right?"
|
|
|
|
Question is, the One *what*?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:37:12 -0500
|
|
Subject: Thanks, JMS, for a great show!
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much; your kind words are very much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:37:27 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Other comic stories
|
|
|
|
Part of me wants to follow the other characters from the pilot, but
|
|
another part of me knows that only a relatively small portion of B5
|
|
viewers have actually *seen* the pilot, and it might kinda lose them. I
|
|
dunno, still considering it.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:37:42 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN: JMS Question on Sensors
|
|
|
|
As Sheridan states in the conference room in "Points," they've
|
|
never been able to crack the Minbari stealth tech, so there's no real
|
|
upgrade to make.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 18:37:57 -0500
|
|
Subject: Is JMS a Vorlon?
|
|
|
|
Yeah, a lot of my posts are dated in the wee hours, 1-3 a.m. or
|
|
thereabouts; sometimes later. (Though a few, like this one, are a bit
|
|
more ordinary.) You have to understand the schedule: I get to the
|
|
studio early, I try to be on stage for filming as much as I can, then
|
|
there's casting, meetings, editing, mixing, tone discussions with
|
|
directors, on and on and on...then I come home around 8 p.m. or so, grab
|
|
a fast bite, go into my office, write scripts until around midnight or
|
|
one (occasionally blipping onto the modem while the dinosaur part of my
|
|
brain tries to work out a story point), then do the bulk of my modeming
|
|
live and on-line from then through the wee hours. Then I crash and do it
|
|
all over again the next day. (I can use Tapcis for some off-line
|
|
composing, but all my GEnie stuff and Internet stuff is written on-line,
|
|
since the GEnie gateway can't handle offline stuff; once I've read a
|
|
message here, it vanishes from my mailbox.)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 1994 23:41:06 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Situation in Seattle, WA?
|
|
|
|
I don't know what the situation is or will be, but I'll endeavor to
|
|
find out. (Meanwhile, if you want to roll out the cavalry, feel free.)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 15 Dec 1994 01:42:03 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Showing support for
|
|
|
|
Of everything, writing your local station remains the best way of
|
|
supporting B5. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 16 Dec 1994 00:40:30 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS : The name Vorlon?
|
|
|
|
This question is going to require considerable thought before I can
|
|
find how to take what's in my head and explain it.
|
|
|
|
Also an exorcism, probably....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 16 Dec 1994 00:40:46 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS:Who watchers the watchmen?
|
|
|
|
"Who watches the watchmen" is an old Latin phrase, sometimes
|
|
translated as "who guards the guards?" Given sufficient time I could
|
|
probably dig up the origin of the phrase; it's fairly common.
|
|
|
|
And thanks re: Ivanova...she's a hoot. (And btw, Claudia and I are
|
|
tentatively set to do a Horizons convention in England around Apilr or
|
|
(er, make that April or) May.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 16 Dec 1994 00:41:50 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Your letter to TV gu
|
|
|
|
I think if I posted it here, intact, it'd blow out the hub and crash
|
|
the system...
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 16 Dec 1994 00:43:40 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: phony promo for "Soul Mat
|
|
|
|
Not a fake promo, the WRONG promo...sigh...this one airs later.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 16 Dec 1994 02:57:57 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Re: Question for JMS: Min
|
|
|
|
There are some differences in appearances, over years of tradition
|
|
and change, between castes; primarily, the warrior caste tend to bring
|
|
their bone-crests to jagged points.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 16 Dec 1994 02:58:11 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS:Is The Future Fixed?(ie. P
|
|
|
|
"I think that pre-destination is about as unscientific as you can
|
|
get."
|
|
|
|
Y'know, that's EXACTLY the sort of thing you'd say. It was
|
|
inevitable.
|
|
|
|
Free will or predistination...I don't think either has been in any
|
|
way scientifically proven. And your message indicates that you think one
|
|
or two people CAN stop a war. How? With what information? You're
|
|
attributing godlike powers to our characters. Sadly, in real life, all
|
|
too often we're stuck watching the car accident in slow motion, knowing
|
|
what's coming but unable to stop it.
|
|
|
|
The war *will* come (and they don't hear the narration, that's just
|
|
for you the viewer); question is, how will it come out? There's room for
|
|
fluidity there, certainly. So it's both...the war is inevitable; the
|
|
outcome, less so.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 16 Dec 1994 17:27:38 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Keep the comic topical
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I haven't seen the colored pages of later issues, but the
|
|
pencils and, for the most part, inks are improving a bit. And thanks
|
|
again for the support.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 16 Dec 1994 17:30:43 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Is B5 doomed?
|
|
|
|
You're mixing apples and oranges; it may be tied for 20 with ALL
|
|
show, but you're including talk shows, and game shows, and Entertainment
|
|
Tonight. In the ratings, you break out categories; and we're the third
|
|
rated dramatic series, #3 out of 16 or 17. And our demographics are
|
|
stellar. So things are looking very good right now.
|
|
|
|
Seeing numbers is one thing, but you have to know how they are
|
|
interpreted by ad agencies and networks for it to count.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 17 Dec 1994 04:24:14 -0500
|
|
Subject: PARADOX!! Re: JMS:Is The Futur
|
|
|
|
Yeah, one can drag chaos theory into this...but this is a work of
|
|
fiction, with a fairly traditional epic structure, meaning overall I'm
|
|
more interested in myth than math.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 17 Dec 1994 04:54:38 -0500
|
|
Subject: Attn. JMS: JMS as Father Chri
|
|
|
|
Okay, let's see, what can I tell you to tide you over...the next
|
|
six new episodes that'll run are, in order, "A Race Through Dark Places,"
|
|
"The Coming of Shadows," "GROPOS," "All Alone in the Night," and "Acts of
|
|
Sacrifice," with "Hunter, Prey" being the final new one in that cycle.
|
|
|
|
I can say that all of those episodes (with the nominal exception of
|
|
"GROPOS," which though it is a solid arc episode doesn't change the
|
|
overall direction of the series) are stories that have major and
|
|
substantial effects on the show's direction. In season one, we built all
|
|
season to maybe three major WHAM episodes. ("Sky," "Signs," "Chrysalis.")
|
|
This year we have double that number at minimum, and with greater impact.
|
|
|
|
All of our major characters will start going through major
|
|
upheavals in their lives during this period. It's a *very* intense six
|
|
weeks. Several characters make decisions that completely change the
|
|
direction of the show, and the way their character fits in with the
|
|
series. One episode will look very much unconnected to the arc until the
|
|
last five minutes, at which point there's a revelation that will likely
|
|
astonish some and confirm suspcions for some other viewers.
|
|
|
|
Simply put, by the end of those six episodes, in many ways the show
|
|
you're used to isn't the same anymore, and the relationships between
|
|
several major characters simply aren't the same anymore. And most
|
|
interesting for me is that we get to push some of the characters'
|
|
emotions to the very edge...and snap them.
|
|
|
|
These six represent some of the strongest episodes we've ever done;
|
|
I consider "Coming" to be probably the best episode to date. In "GROPOS"
|
|
we're going for broke and are doing some *amazing* CGI stuff.
|
|
|
|
How's that for a start?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 17 Dec 1994 04:54:50 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Signs reaction, ....
|
|
|
|
Thanks; "Signs" is definitely a real hoot....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 17 Dec 1994 04:55:01 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Sinclair-Garibaldi Closen
|
|
|
|
Garibaldi is cautious, and careful, and his friendship with Sheridan
|
|
will have to grow -- sometimes awkwardly -- with the new CO. We are doing
|
|
some intersting things with the Londo/Garibaldi axis, however....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 18 Dec 1994 04:11:05 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS-?'s and observations about
|
|
|
|
San Diego was nuked by terrorists some time earlier; but if you dig
|
|
deep enough, you could probably build something with enough money; and
|
|
who knows how bad it *really* is.
|
|
|
|
Ratings are very encouraging right now....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 18 Dec 1994 04:11:15 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: BABYLON 5 Charges re: PARA
|
|
|
|
It's hard to believe that anyone could consider B5 "too expsensive"
|
|
since it costs considerably *less* than DS9 or Voyager to produce, by
|
|
quite a margin.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 18 Dec 1994 05:07:21 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Female Chars (Ivanova's T
|
|
|
|
Placement in credits has got *nothing* to do with placement in the
|
|
story arc; it's a function of how many episodes the character appears in,
|
|
and what the actor can negotiate for. Totally separate issue.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 18 Dec 1994 19:55:34 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Londo and Shakespeare? (
|
|
|
|
The interesting thing for me in this and related conversations is
|
|
that I frequently notice messages indicating that "jms is doing the whole
|
|
Kennedy thing," or it's the Lord of the Rings, or it's Dune, or it's
|
|
tracking the Bible, or it's following Yeats...or it echoes Shakespeare,
|
|
as in this case.
|
|
|
|
In a way, they're all right, and in a way, they're all wrong. Right
|
|
in the sense that in trying to create myth, or a story using traditional
|
|
epic structure, you can see echoes not only between B5 and other such
|
|
stories, but also between those other epics. The mistake is in thinking
|
|
(and this isn't directed at you, just sorta woolgathering) that it is in
|
|
fact a parallel to any one of them. That leads you into the error of the
|
|
blind men each touching a part of an elephant; if you think the trunk IS
|
|
the elephant, you've erred, and all conclusions that follow are thus
|
|
skewed incorrectly.
|
|
|
|
To the question of Shakespeare and Londo...yes, there's some
|
|
resonance there, because Londo is an almost archetypal tragic/comic, or
|
|
romantic/tragic figure. There was certainly a fair amount of Falstaff in
|
|
him; references to consulting three technomages certainly resonates with
|
|
MacBeth being "endorsed" as it were by the three witches. You can look at
|
|
Londo and see Lear, or Hamlet, or others...and they all resonate to one
|
|
degree or another, but none of them is wholecloth.
|
|
|
|
Right now, all that most viewers have of the B5 story is a piece of
|
|
the elephant, and are assuming that that *is* the elephant. Another good
|
|
comparison would be to say that if you stop a reader part way into The
|
|
Lord of the Rings, they'll assume it's all about some hobbits on the road,
|
|
having adventures. Because they don't yet know about Mordor, or Sauron,
|
|
or the Rings, or Rivendell, or the sheer *scope* of the thing. I don't
|
|
think anyone has yet twigged to what this story is, really.
|
|
|
|
One of the things really lacking in American culture, I think, is a
|
|
sense of *myth*. So the story of Babylon 5 has a very mythic kind of
|
|
structure. I think that's important. Which is why a lot of the elements
|
|
I draw on aren't traditional television devices...literature, poetry,
|
|
religion, hard SF, metafiction, Jungian symbology...there are an awful
|
|
lot of ingredients in this particular pie, culled from the less likely
|
|
aisles in the supermarket. You have to remember that my degrees are in
|
|
psychology and sociology, with minors in literature and philosophy. So
|
|
my tastes and predilections and resources are fairly eclectic and lean
|
|
toward the classical. (How else to explain an atheist who's read the
|
|
Bible cover to cover *twice*?)
|
|
|
|
And I think I just answered your question in far more detail than
|
|
could possibly have been desired....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 18 Dec 1994 20:12:48 -0500
|
|
Subject: Observations on Season Two to
|
|
|
|
The only quibble I have with your message, and it's a small one, is
|
|
your statement, "The success of Trek made B5 possible."
|
|
|
|
Not true. In fact, Trek has made it infinitely *harder* to get
|
|
other SF on the air, including B5. The general concensus in Hollywood is
|
|
that the market isn't big enough to sustain more than one SF show at a
|
|
time (particularly if it's space-oriented), and that's ST. (That may only
|
|
NOW start to change with the growth of B5's ratings.)
|
|
|
|
At every network, every studio in town, we were told -- repeatedly --
|
|
that there is NO market for space SF other than Trek, that they had the
|
|
field to themselves, and there was no interest in trying to buck that
|
|
scenario. That's one of the reasons that PTEN was so cautious in putting
|
|
B5 on the air, among others. Even when we got the go for series, we were
|
|
told that this was a dubious endeavor, because "we just don't think the
|
|
market can sustain more than one show like this; we'll try it, but we'll
|
|
just have to see what happens."
|
|
|
|
So believe me, ST has not "made B5 possible." It has been an
|
|
obstacle (one of many) to overcome. Not just for us, but for other sF
|
|
projects that have tried to get off the ground. And over the last few
|
|
months, we've now heard of other new SF shows gearing up in this area,
|
|
because we've shown it can be done. And I think it's terrific; the more
|
|
shows, the more we have to compete with one another, the better the shows
|
|
will become, and the ultimate beneficiary of this is the viewer.
|
|
|
|
Look at it this way...in the 25+ years since ST (and for the moment
|
|
leaving out Buck Rogers, about which the less said the better), how many
|
|
American SF series have there been set in the future with us as space
|
|
faring people that have lasted more than just *one* season? Answer: zero.
|
|
If ST had proven a market, wouldn't there be some in there? ST has never
|
|
shown that there's a market for more SF, only that there's a market for
|
|
more ST. B5 is the first show in over a quarter-century to play in this
|
|
particular back yard and go more than one season.
|
|
|
|
So you'll undertstand why, when people sometimes suggest that ST made
|
|
B5 possible, the hairs on the back of my neck stand up....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 18 Dec 1994 20:24:34 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Universal Moral code and G
|
|
|
|
The idea of getting all sentient life forms, human and alien alike,
|
|
to agree on a UNIVERSAL MORAL CODE is utterly impossible. Hell, get 15
|
|
people together and have them decide on where to go for LUNCH can take
|
|
you *days*. The UN brought forth a Universal Bill of Human Rights, and
|
|
there are STILL nations that haven't signed it, don't agree with it. Can
|
|
you imagine the GREATER differences of opinion when you start bringing
|
|
non-humans into the equation?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 19 Dec 1994 03:08:22 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Observations on Season Two
|
|
|
|
"Space: 1999" is, I think, *really* splitting hairs, in the sense
|
|
that it is and was a British series. Whether or not it was targeted for
|
|
Americans, or made *acceptable* to Americans, is a debatable issue. But
|
|
it was something in the back of my head when I wrote my message....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 19 Dec 1994 03:26:53 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: BABYLON 5 Charges re: PARA
|
|
|
|
Yes, stations "have bills to pay," but buying a cheaper show isn't
|
|
necessarily the solution if that show doesn't pull ratings. Because the
|
|
money a station earns to PAY those bills comes from advertisers, based on
|
|
the ratings. And B5 is currently rating very well.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 19 Dec 1994 03:27:04 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: JMS: Londo and Shakespear
|
|
|
|
"People with psychology backgrounds are sneaky, devious,
|
|
underhanded, untrustworthy bastards."
|
|
|
|
Yeah...and...?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 19 Dec 1994 05:54:29 -0500
|
|
Subject: re: predestination
|
|
|
|
Your interpretation is correct; the narration is designed as future
|
|
history.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 00:45:18 -0500
|
|
Subject: OFFICIAL UK C4 airdates for Se
|
|
|
|
If the problem is showing bare-kunckle fighting to the death, then
|
|
somebody should point out to C4 that *nobody dies* in the match.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 05:06:56 -0500
|
|
Subject: UK:Channel 4 latest
|
|
|
|
I'm piggy-backing this note to a UK letter in order to reach our
|
|
friends across the pond.
|
|
|
|
Hullo!
|
|
|
|
I have a question/favor to ask.
|
|
|
|
There's a puppet kid's show that aired in the US around the early
|
|
1960s that was made in England. There it was called "Space Patrol," but
|
|
here it was called "Planet Patrol" to distinguish it from another show
|
|
called "Space Patrol." I've been looking for copies of this show for
|
|
literally decades; I've only found one. I would be willing to make
|
|
whatever arrangements necessary to get additional copies of this show.
|
|
|
|
(Hey, it was my fave show as a kid, what can I say...?)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 05:07:05 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Observations on Season Two
|
|
|
|
Correct; Battlestar Galactica wasn't about Earth's future; it was
|
|
about them looking for us, their lost tribe, in our present. Doesn't fit
|
|
the bill.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 05:07:14 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Universal Moral code and G
|
|
|
|
Of course, getting everyone to agree to support and promote life and
|
|
intelligence means coming up with a definition everone out there would
|
|
agree upon for both those areas. Would some species even consider us
|
|
intelligent? Would their sensory apparatus be sufficient to distinguish
|
|
us as living beings, or their biology be so different that by their
|
|
standards we don't qualify?
|
|
|
|
And even here at home, some can use that debate for their own
|
|
purposes. I saw a documentary last night about Nazi propaganda films used
|
|
before and during the war to encourage doctors to terminate the physically
|
|
and mentally disadvantaged, particularly the latter. They were routinely
|
|
gassed in asylums. The logic they used: the mentally insane suffered
|
|
from "existence without life." Thus there was no crime in eliminating
|
|
them.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 05:07:22 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS Re: Power Rangers
|
|
|
|
Steen wanted to leave POWER to pursue other things; so I gave her a
|
|
good death....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 05:23:50 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Any images from the
|
|
|
|
Will try to upload a few down the road a bit.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 21:24:48 -0500
|
|
Subject: B5 CD Booklet: Why stiff O'Har
|
|
|
|
I was actually kinda surprised by the omission myself; I do believe
|
|
there's a photo of Michael in there (him and Jerry standing in front of
|
|
the big fan set)...I can only assume that it was done under the current
|
|
licensing, and that department sent him what was to be on there.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 21:24:56 -0500
|
|
Subject: Attn JMS: Where and When is th
|
|
|
|
The Horizons con is in late April or May sometime, and takes place
|
|
in Bristol. Claudia and I aren't in any way involved, just working on
|
|
the show. (There's a chance Peter Jurasik may also attend.)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 21:26:32 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Universe Today?
|
|
|
|
Re: putting out an expanded Universe Today...y'know, that's not a
|
|
bad idea....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 21:56:54 -0500
|
|
Subject: att jms: cramps?
|
|
|
|
If your desire is to be equal...we've already shown Sinclair and
|
|
Garibaldi taking a whiz in the men's room.
|
|
|
|
And it's doubtful that Garibaldi's jockstrap would play much of a
|
|
role in the story arc....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 21:58:30 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: How Many Planets? Balance
|
|
|
|
Earth Alliance has about 14 worlds/colonies in 12 different solar
|
|
systems.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 21:58:38 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS-Demon Night
|
|
|
|
Thanks. For a first novel, DEMON NIGHT is okay; learned a lot
|
|
doing it. Mainly just wrote it for myself, when I couldn't find the sort
|
|
of book I wanted to read, then when finished, shoved it in the closet and
|
|
left it there for about 2 years, when my agent said I should really write
|
|
a book someday. I said that I had, just for myself. She asked to read
|
|
it, loved it, sent it to an agent affiliate of hers, the agent in NY sent
|
|
it to an editor, and the first one who read it, bought it. Go figure....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 22:00:20 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: JMS: Londo and Shakespear
|
|
|
|
OOOPS! Just realized that the writer of that extremely perceptive
|
|
message that I just replied to is a woman, not a man (looked at the
|
|
name/address of the wrong message). Well, you're welcome to a cigar
|
|
too, Melanie. Pull up a chair, and let's sit here and belch at each
|
|
other, whattaya say...?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 22:00:31 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: ? Re: Futurequest PB
|
|
|
|
Yep, the folks at Futurequest asked if we could donate our stages
|
|
for their use when we weren't using them, and we said yes. (So far I've
|
|
seen part of our central corridor, and the dome tech's pit in C&C.)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 22:00:41 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: JMS: Londo and Shakespear
|
|
|
|
"We see aspects of different myth-forms in Babylon 5 because they
|
|
were the paradigms JMS used in developing his writing style, not because
|
|
he's 'doing the Shakespeare thing.'"
|
|
|
|
Somebody give that man a ceegar.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 20 Dec 1994 23:59:39 -0500
|
|
Subject: Believers: operating over pare
|
|
|
|
Of course the surgical scars would've been a dead giveaway that
|
|
surgery had been performed. Also, lying to them would have also been a
|
|
violation of medical ethics. This was not a story about easy solutions.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 02:25:37 -0500
|
|
Subject: B5 clips spotted on PBS "Futur
|
|
|
|
I know that shot (the work crew in EVA suits) has been used in the
|
|
show; I'll be damned if I can remember in which episode it appeared.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 02:25:46 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: ATTN JMS: ? Re: Futureques
|
|
|
|
I seem to vaguely recall someone mentioning to me about maybe
|
|
wanting to be interviewed on FutureQuest; I just wasn't sure what I would
|
|
have to say that would be the least interest to anyone. All of the really
|
|
interesting stuff comes out of my characters' mouths. You gotta
|
|
understand, the overwhelming reaction upon meeting me is that there's
|
|
less here than meets the eye. Stick a camera in front of my face and I
|
|
end up just standing there, finger in ear, going bibble-bibble-bibble
|
|
until it's over.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 04:55:17 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Observations on Season Two
|
|
|
|
I recently got a better understanding of what may have been forcing
|
|
Paramount's hand re: their struggle to get a death grip on the stations,
|
|
even at the cost of B5. Over the weekend I had the chance to talk with
|
|
somebody WAY up the ladder in the Star Trek arena, a major name. From
|
|
what I was told, the Paramount Network was in serious trouble of not
|
|
getting the required number of stations for some time.
|
|
|
|
What this means is as follows: you're a national sponsor. You want
|
|
to make sure your commercials hit a certain percentage of the population.
|
|
One of the ways to assure this is to get a certain number of TV stations
|
|
in major markets; fall below that threshold, and the sponsors drop off.
|
|
Call that figure X. Apparently, up until a few weeks ago, Paramount had
|
|
X minus about 10. If indeed they were pressuring stations, that would
|
|
seem to be the reason for it. As of last week, however, apparently they
|
|
now have the correct number of stations, and all is well (which explains
|
|
why one person here on the Internet was told recently by his local
|
|
station that it *was* kind of preferred that B5 be dropped, but that this
|
|
wasn't the case anymore).
|
|
|
|
Overall, we've lost a few stations, but nothing so substantial that
|
|
we can't find ways around it. They've got their stations, we've got ours,
|
|
and in most cases they're the same stations. Fair enough.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 17:04:46 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: B5 clips spotted on PBS "F
|
|
|
|
The cleanup crew in "Revelations" was out working the hazmat
|
|
platform, that was a different object than the one shown in the clip.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 17:07:46 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS:Is B5 broadcast letterbox?
|
|
|
|
B5 is broadcast in traditional aspect ratio; the letterbox version
|
|
will only be available later.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 17:10:53 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: How come Dr. Franklin did
|
|
|
|
How do you know Franklin DIDN'T know about the biological changes
|
|
Delenn is going through? Remember the scene in "Revelations;" he's
|
|
allowed inside ONLY on the condition that he not tell anyone what he
|
|
learns. A doctor's oath of confidentiality is crucial.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 17:11:07 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Language in the comic?
|
|
|
|
The word "bastards" was in the script I turned in to DC. It got
|
|
changed to "demons" by the editor. That change was made at the last
|
|
minute; all the inked and penciled versions I'd seen before had the right
|
|
word in it. I'm considerably less than thrilled about it.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 17:11:25 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: What about Projectile Wea
|
|
|
|
I have no objection to showing mass drivers, and the main problem
|
|
with projectile weapons inside the station is that they have a nasty
|
|
tendency to breach the hull, eliminating both parties. Though you will
|
|
see some projectile-type weapons used elsewhere around the first part of
|
|
February.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 21 Dec 1994 17:13:06 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Universal Moral code and G
|
|
|
|
Eric: I will now collapse your 114 line message into what you were
|
|
trying to say behind the fog of words: you want YOUR belief system
|
|
to be the primary one portrayed, because yours is the truth, and the rest
|
|
are, as you say, "bullshit."
|
|
|
|
So get your own damned show...aside, of course, from the hundreds of
|
|
hours of religious programming *already* filling the airwaves and cable
|
|
systems every day of the year.
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but I'm under no obligation whatsoever to reinforce your or
|
|
anyone else's particular idea of what the Truth is. And your particular
|
|
breed of intolerance is on of the uglier aspects of modern christianity.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 22 Dec 1994 02:54:29 -0500
|
|
Subject: ok, I wrote, now what?
|
|
|
|
Now you can rest, at peace with the knowledge that you have worked
|
|
off at least fifteen karma points from that rather unfortunate prior life
|
|
in the middle ages....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 22 Dec 1994 02:54:39 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: The big "E-A"
|
|
|
|
How the EA symbol came about is really kind of interesting. I knew
|
|
that we needed something nifty, but the preliminary designs created for
|
|
this just didn't do it for me. So I sat down with the graphics designer,
|
|
and we started sketching stuff out. At this point we were looking mainly
|
|
for the right silhouette. Circle was out; oval was too soft; triangle
|
|
was too Trek. At one point he did a star variation. I looked at it, and
|
|
somewhere in my head the right configuration was there, so I started to
|
|
erase the points of the star, round them off, filled out the middle (and
|
|
if you've ever seen me draw, it's a scary thing; I should stick to
|
|
writing).
|
|
|
|
I knew the shape was right when I'd finished, but I knew there was
|
|
still something missing. That night, the designer called and said he'd
|
|
been looking at it again, and he suddenly noticed that what we'd done was
|
|
to put a silhouette E over a silhouette A, and when he sketched in the
|
|
inner horizontal bars, tucked in the corner of the feet on the A, it
|
|
came together perfectly.
|
|
|
|
My problem is often that I can see what I want in my head, but I'm
|
|
limited on actually drawing it. When we were doing the prosthetic design
|
|
for the pilot for Delenn, our prosthetic designer hit a wall on the
|
|
headbone section, finally threw up his hands and didn't know what to do
|
|
with the thing. I went over to the studio, we talked for a while, I
|
|
couldn't quite communicate what was in my head, so I grabbed one of the
|
|
sticks they use to shape the clay and started re-shaping the back and
|
|
sides of the crest. (He'd had them going straight down; I started to
|
|
curve them, and hollow them out, making them more shell-like.) By the
|
|
time we were done, we had it worked out.
|
|
|
|
Which is really part of the fun in doing your own series; you get to
|
|
stick your nose into parts of the production that normally you'd never get
|
|
near, and do your best to screw it up, because that's what bosses do.
|
|
I'm directly involved in costume approval, prosthetics, EFX, production
|
|
design approval, everything. (On a couple of occasions I've sketched out
|
|
what I had in mind for costumes, much to the amusement of our costume
|
|
designer, because they look like something a 5-year old would draw. A
|
|
drunk 5-year old, actually. But they communicate the silhouette, and
|
|
that's the important thing, despite the fact that she's keeping the
|
|
sketches for blackmail.)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 22 Dec 1994 02:54:49 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Symbolism vs. Functionalit
|
|
|
|
To the notion that there's no symbolism or ritual in the ways humans
|
|
do things like cleansing oneself (unless, of course, you're from India,
|
|
where there is a very real sense of ritual to these things), such
|
|
symbolism can always be *introduced* into the routine.
|
|
|
|
Say, by showering with a chicken.
|
|
|
|
Works for me.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 22 Dec 1994 03:25:27 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: the original concept for
|
|
|
|
Yes, since you've sussed it...the plan was to turn Delenn from
|
|
male to female in "Chrysalis," in my original plans, as well as making
|
|
her half-human. And yes, it would've had one hell of an impact...but my
|
|
concern when I made that decision not do do this back in the pilot was
|
|
based on the reality that we couldn't do it well. The "male" voice,
|
|
altered by computer-enhancement, just sounded REAL bogus; we couldn't
|
|
get it right, and I had to decide between dropping it, and doing something
|
|
the people would rightly describe as lame all season, just for one big
|
|
payoff. It was a tough call, but it had to be made.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 22 Dec 1994 03:25:38 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: ATTN JMS: ? Re: Futureques
|
|
|
|
Re: repeat performances (or is that re: peat performance)...I said
|
|
just about all I could think of to say. The show really has to speak for
|
|
itself, and most of anything I'd have to say should be said there. I
|
|
don't tend to do a lot of interviews; I generally okay about one out of
|
|
every twenty or so requests. Don' wanna be no star. The story is the
|
|
star, and the actors are the stars.
|
|
|
|
To quote Meatloaf, "I ain't in it for the power, And I ain't in it
|
|
for my health, I ain't in it for the glory of anything at all, And I sure
|
|
ain't in it for the wealth."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 23 Dec 1994 03:50:19 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Exercise on B5?
|
|
|
|
Actually, bear in mind that while C&C is one-third G, the rest of
|
|
the station is not, and the closer you get to the hull, the greater the
|
|
gravity. If Ivanova wants to experience one-g, she doesn't have to use
|
|
exercise machines, she just has to go down to the right level.
|
|
|
|
Not entirely unrelated, though, we're figuring on gradually working
|
|
our way to showing exercise, sports and sporting events on B5; just want
|
|
to be sure that when we do it, it looks right.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 23 Dec 1994 03:55:01 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Great Job on second seas
|
|
|
|
Thanks; slowly but surely, we're figuring out how to make this
|
|
show work....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 23 Dec 1994 03:55:20 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Why does it hurt?
|
|
|
|
Scanning only hurts if it's a deep scan, trying to dredge out lost
|
|
or buried thoughts, or if the other person is resisting. It can be
|
|
anything from a headache to a migraine in intensity in general..
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 23 Dec 1994 04:07:03 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Attn JMS: Why is Londo the
|
|
|
|
"Morden is the mongoose."
|
|
|
|
So what's needed now is a conveniently placed cobra....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 23 Dec 1994 19:39:31 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: JMS: Great Job on second
|
|
|
|
"So there really isn't enough action right now for my tastes."
|
|
|
|
You should be careful what you wish for...because you're going to get
|
|
more than your share of action in the batch of episodes beginning January
|
|
23rd...and when the dust settles, you may wish you'd wished otherwise....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 24 Dec 1994 00:54:47 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Water on B5?
|
|
|
|
One can't do *science* fiction without some occasional references to
|
|
technology; don't let ST poison the well here.
|
|
|
|
There's a fair amount of water on B5, all of it recycled carefully.
|
|
You have to allocate some drip-irrigation for stuff like the hedge maze
|
|
and a few other things because the mind needs stuff like that. I would
|
|
think that they manage to siphon off any growing humidity inside the
|
|
central area rather than allow for unplanned rainstorms that might muck
|
|
things up.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 24 Dec 1994 01:19:49 -0500
|
|
Subject: A visit from St. Joe
|
|
|
|
Dear Mr. DiMuzio:
|
|
|
|
I believe the Nuremberg Literary Crimes Committee would like a word
|
|
with you....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 24 Dec 1994 01:21:38 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Attn JMS: Why is Londo the
|
|
|
|
I think you're being far, far too literal in looking for snake
|
|
imagery....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 25 Dec 1994 03:18:57 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Attn JMS: Why is Londo the
|
|
|
|
There would have been more than one answer that would have sufficed,
|
|
but one answer was better than all the rest. Just the right mix of
|
|
resentment, nostalgia, ambition, frustration and a sense of displaced
|
|
destiny. Londo was hitting all those cylinders when he answered Morden's
|
|
question.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 25 Dec 1994 03:19:05 -0500
|
|
Subject: HEY JOE, Where's N'Grath ????
|
|
|
|
I kinda got disenchanted with the way n'grath came out; he may or may
|
|
not return. (In my mind I keep seeing some new enforcer with n'grath's
|
|
head on his desk....)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 25 Dec 1994 19:22:55 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Where did episode #
|
|
|
|
207 is "A Race Through Dark Places," guest-starring Walter Koenig.
|
|
Because 207 required extra post-production work, and we wanted to bang
|
|
in with a good name guest star at the top of our next batch of new eps,
|
|
we moved 208 "Soul Mates" down one, as the last of the batch just aired.
|
|
Everyone at PTEN was notified of this, but somehow somebody didn't get
|
|
the word, and misinformation got out. So for the week of January 23rd,
|
|
that'll be "Race," followed by the rest pretty much in production
|
|
sequence.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 26 Dec 1994 19:47:18 -0500
|
|
Subject: Hey JMS : Small season 2 plot
|
|
|
|
Not a plot hole; wait for "All Alone in the Night."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 26 Dec 1994 19:47:27 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Collars?
|
|
|
|
The collar change-over is intentional, carrying through the tradition
|
|
of men's collars closing one way, women's another.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 26 Dec 1994 23:49:33 -0500
|
|
Subject: Peter David does it again.
|
|
|
|
You mean like showing two of our command staff in the men's room
|
|
taking a whiz? (Oops, sorry, we already did that one.) Maybe having the
|
|
command staff talk about their zippers. (Oops, did that one, too.)
|
|
|
|
Just thought of several others, but we've done those, too.
|
|
|
|
This show is about *people*, not statues or icons. And it's in the
|
|
little details, hassles, and physicality that we are reminded of their
|
|
frailities and humanity...and see a little of ourselves in the process.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 04:19:00 -0500
|
|
Subject: More concerns regarding the se
|
|
|
|
...sigh....
|
|
|
|
Nobody at the network has been messing with the show. My general
|
|
feeling is that at the start of a new season, you're going to get a lot
|
|
of new people to the show, sampling it, and you want to bring them in
|
|
gradually. (And as it is, there's been a LOT about the shadows in the
|
|
first batch of episodes, in "Revelations," in "The Long Dark," and in
|
|
other episodes.)
|
|
|
|
The first seven episodes were mainly to introduce Sheridan, and to
|
|
ease in the new folks. The next six new ones are *extremely* intense, and
|
|
get into ALL the areas you said you wanted to see, from Santiago to the
|
|
Psi Corps to the Shadow, you name it.
|
|
|
|
I don't think a show like this can be rushed; people tend to get
|
|
impatient, which is understandable. This show will get where it's going,
|
|
but it'll have to do so at its own pace.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 04:19:08 -0500
|
|
Subject: More concerns regarding the se
|
|
|
|
P.S. It occurs to me to correct what may be perceived as the tone
|
|
of my reply, sent seconds ago. I just answered the same question on
|
|
another system (though that one was phrased rather...aggressively), and
|
|
upon seeing it not fifteen minutes later, I just sorta sighed at it.
|
|
It's a valid question, and I hope my tone didn't imply otherwise.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 04:48:10 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Peter David does it again.
|
|
|
|
G.T. Walton says, "I have followed Peter David since his early
|
|
days."
|
|
|
|
Well...okay...but the peeking in his windows after dark has *gotta*
|
|
stop....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 04:48:18 -0500
|
|
Subject: What repercussions ? Opinions
|
|
|
|
And here the same, as just noted earlier.
|
|
|
|
We're only seven episodes into the new season; you have to build up
|
|
to some of this stuff. Episodes 8 - 13 should satisfy just about all of
|
|
your requests. And then some. B5 is a novel, and like any novel you have
|
|
to have little diversions and asides along the way to continue to bulid
|
|
(build) the universe and your characters. The deeper you get into it, the
|
|
fewer of those you get. But we ain't nearly that deep yet.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 20:45:58 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Delenn Sex-Change?
|
|
|
|
Yes, originally Delenn would also have changed sex in "Chrysalis."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 20:46:12 -0500
|
|
Subject: ST-TNG vs. B5 fans, any e
|
|
|
|
"TV needs more JMSs...."
|
|
|
|
Oh, dear....
|
|
|
|
"Hey, Morrie! MORRIE! Get another one of those crates down here!
|
|
Yeah, the JMS-7 models. How the hell do I know, some lady named Stef
|
|
called down from the main office and said they needed some more, what am
|
|
I, a crystal ball? Just get it down here. I don't *care* if you dropped
|
|
it on its head and now all it does is sit inna corner and go "wubble."
|
|
Happened to the last one, too, and nobody's complained yet...."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 20:49:18 -0500
|
|
Subject: What are we to be called?
|
|
|
|
What to call fans of B5? How about the Incredibly Discerning
|
|
In-Crowd, which would obviously be shortened to --
|
|
|
|
I can't...I just can't do it....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 20:51:02 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: JMS: the original concept
|
|
|
|
Correct; once we'd decided to commit to Delenn being female in the
|
|
series, the makeup was modified to lose some of the more male elements.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 20:51:14 -0500
|
|
Subject: Hey, Joe-TV38 is moving B5 all
|
|
|
|
The ratings are strong, but the ratings are also a function of when
|
|
the show is aired. Move the show around a lot, and the ratings will fall
|
|
on any show, because folks can't find it. Sometimes it's accidental,
|
|
sometimes not. "It is *life*" -- Zathras.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 20:51:24 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Favorite B5 lines
|
|
|
|
"Susan always gets the best lines, doesn't she?"
|
|
|
|
Yup. Ah LIKES writing for Ivanova. She's a hoot.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 20:51:33 -0500
|
|
Subject: B-5 Comic Sold Out?
|
|
|
|
You were told wrong. The book has sold very well, and DC is
|
|
committed to further improving the project, both in terms of artwork, and
|
|
quality in general (such as going to a better stock of paper in another
|
|
issue or two, which won't bleed the color so much).
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 27 Dec 1994 21:20:10 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Favorite B5 lines
|
|
|
|
See, for me, the best part about all of this isn't determining WHAT
|
|
is a favorite line, but just that there ARE favorite lines....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 28 Dec 1994 01:49:09 -0500
|
|
Subject: B5 rules!
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the kind words (and my address appears above)....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 28 Dec 1994 01:49:29 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Favorite B5 lines
|
|
|
|
Everything that the character says is the writing; everything the
|
|
character does while saying it is the actor.
|
|
|
|
It's a funny kind of perception; I've now been at a number of cons
|
|
with the cast members, and invariably they get the questions of "How do
|
|
you create your character, how do you determine who the character is?", and
|
|
I get the overall story-arc questions...almost as if these characters had
|
|
existed outside, or were in the actors, and I stumbled upon them and put
|
|
them into this arc.
|
|
|
|
When asked this question at LosCon, Peter Jurasik gave his usual
|
|
answer, "I just say what they write for me to say." Which obviously is
|
|
a modest understatement; Peter breathes life into Londo and makes the
|
|
lines work. It's all synergy, I suppose....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 28 Dec 1994 05:17:48 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Pronouncing "Ivanova"
|
|
|
|
I've known Russians who've used the same kind of pronunciation we
|
|
have given Ivanova. It does vary. Heck, my name is pronounced
|
|
STRUH-ZIN-SKI, when it *should* be correctly pronounced STRA-CHIN-SKI.
|
|
Both are acceptable. And you get different pronunciations in central
|
|
Russia from places like byelorussia or the more Eastern provinces.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 28 Dec 1994 05:17:59 -0500
|
|
Subject: B5
|
|
|
|
If you like those kinds of character flips, you're gonna love the
|
|
next batch of episodes....
|
|
|
|
There are some real surprises in there, some relating back to first
|
|
season stuff, and characters.
|
|
|
|
It's easiest to flip a character when the story elsewhere is fairly
|
|
straightforward, so you lull the audience in with a sense of "okay, this
|
|
is the story, nothing major, shouldn't change anything," then you whap
|
|
them hard when they're not looking. So whenever you see a jms script,
|
|
and there doesn't seem like there's that much to it...be careful. The
|
|
simpler the premise -- just a visit by someone to the station, someone
|
|
taken prisoner and trying to escape -- the more you're being set up.
|
|
|
|
It's kinda like the nak'a'leen feeder...as long as you can hear it,
|
|
you're safe...but the moment you hear nothing....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 01:48:37 -0500
|
|
Subject: Zathrus- Minbari/Human offspri
|
|
|
|
Nope; Zathras is one of his race, which aren't offspring of any
|
|
other two groups.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 02:16:31 -0500
|
|
Subject: New episodes?
|
|
|
|
New eps start week of January 23rd.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 02:16:42 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Do other B5 staff lu
|
|
|
|
I know that Larry DiTillio (my story editor) recently gained access
|
|
to Internet; some other crew folks hang around, pulling out interesting
|
|
stuff and posting hardcopies on the B5 Buzz: Messages from the Internet
|
|
board erected outside Stage A.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 02:19:46 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Valen query
|
|
|
|
Valen called the Nine together and formed the Grey Council about
|
|
a thousand years ago, give or take; died not long thereafter.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 02:19:55 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Favorite B5 lines
|
|
|
|
Though Caitlin left B5 to pursue offers to star in romantic lead
|
|
parts, nothing to do with typeasting...your general concern is correct.
|
|
We've tried to help avoid that on behalf of the actors. For instance,
|
|
visually, you can hardly recognize Peter Jurasik in makeup; ditto for
|
|
Andreas and the rest of our alien cast. This shouldn't inhibit their
|
|
work in other areas (as opposed to seeing someone very recognizeable, but
|
|
with pointy ears, which caused Nimoy great trouble for a long time).
|
|
|
|
In terms of the human characters, I've tried not to wrap any of them
|
|
around one specific character trait. They range from serious to comic,
|
|
and do different things.
|
|
|
|
Typecasting is a real concern, and it has to be addressed by those
|
|
who make the show.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 02:20:03 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Characters and Cult
|
|
|
|
Re: "turning weakness into strength," that's generally what humans
|
|
DO. We stare into the abyss, we *know* the cause is hopeless, we know
|
|
we're probably gonna get creamed trying, but we straighten our shoulders
|
|
and *do* it.
|
|
|
|
It is, I think, one of our better traits.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 02:20:12 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: ? on Amanda Carter
|
|
|
|
Larry slipped in the reference to John Carter of Mars, not our former
|
|
prez....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 02:20:21 -0500
|
|
Subject: Filming order
|
|
|
|
All scenes in an episode are filmed together, over a seven day
|
|
span. If you mixed and matched scenes, by different directors, in the
|
|
same episode, you'd have big problems with the directors' Guild, and in
|
|
determining director's credit.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 02:20:30 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Con Alert Question
|
|
|
|
No plans for that part of the world, alas...but if they should ever
|
|
materialize, I'll be sure to post the info here.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 04:46:48 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: B5 rules!
|
|
|
|
(Putting this here only because there's nothing else relevant to
|
|
tag it onto....)
|
|
|
|
Anybody out there with cheat codes for Wing Commander III...I would
|
|
hardly object if one day I found them in my internet mailbox....
|
|
|
|
(I gotta get a *real* life....)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 29 Dec 1994 04:49:10 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: ATTN JMS: Do other B5 staf
|
|
|
|
What gets posted on the B5 Buzzboard is mainly reactions to specific
|
|
episodes, analyses of where the story may be going...understand that
|
|
making TV is like yelling into a vacuum; there's no feedback other than
|
|
the ratings, so folks take any chance they can to see how viewers react.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 30 Dec 1994 01:45:47 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Cost of production CAPT P
|
|
|
|
The cost of an average POWER episode was supposed to be about
|
|
$500,000 (for a half-hour show), but often ranged into $650,000 per half
|
|
hour, which puts it WAY above B5 today on a per-hour basis. It was such
|
|
out-of-control costs that led me to wonder if one could design an SF show
|
|
so that it could be done SENSIBLY....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 30 Dec 1994 04:45:28 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: B5 vs. DS9 Legal Question
|
|
|
|
No legal action was initiated by me against anyone on this subject;
|
|
my feeling in general is that such actions only poison the water for BOTH
|
|
sides. The better determinant is the open marketplace of ideas and public
|
|
opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 30 Dec 1994 04:45:37 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Episodes
|
|
|
|
I think they'll repeat the year one episodes after they've finished
|
|
the new year two episodes.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 30 Dec 1994 04:47:23 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Psi Corps Question
|
|
|
|
There are genetic tests that check for the gene, which can be present
|
|
or recessive; also, there's a network by which people who think they are
|
|
telepathic, and thus troubled, can contact the Corps for help. The
|
|
vast majority of PC members come to them in very early childhood.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 30 Dec 1994 04:50:25 -0500
|
|
Subject: ATTN JMS: Loose threads...
|
|
|
|
1) The first B5 novel is due out from Dell in January, from John
|
|
Vornholt.
|
|
|
|
2) The Grimjack movie is awaiting final negotiations between the
|
|
various parties, and for me to clear out some room on my desk to be able
|
|
to do the script justice.
|
|
|
|
3) I'm finishing the first draft of one SF series pilot movie over
|
|
the brief Christmas break, due for one of the major cable networks; another
|
|
project is awaiting some executive decisions. (These things take time;
|
|
B5 took five years.)
|
|
|
|
4) I'm hoping we'll see videotapes of B5 out by spring for the first
|
|
season, laserdisks to follow maybe summer or fall.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 30 Dec 1994 04:50:33 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Favorite B5 lines
|
|
|
|
Timov's "WHO IS THIS?!" in that high-pitched voice would also be a
|
|
great one for an answering machine.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 30 Dec 1994 04:50:41 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: ST-TNG vs. B5 fans, any ex
|
|
|
|
On the whole Trek/B5 thing, here's something to ponder....
|
|
|
|
Over the Christmas break, my associate, Doug Netter (also an exec
|
|
producer on the show) was staying at a hotel in New York. One day, as he
|
|
was going up in the elevator from the garage below, who gets in at the
|
|
first floor but....Patrick Stewart. Doug introduces himself. Patrick
|
|
is pleased to meet him, and mentions that he likes Babylon 5 quite a bit;
|
|
that he thinks it has great promise, is constantly improving, and wishes
|
|
it only good fortune. He even invited Doug to tea, but Doug had family
|
|
engagements, and had to pass.
|
|
|
|
Passed along for whatever use that piece of information may be....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 04:07:02 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: ST-TNG vs. B5 fans - JMS
|
|
|
|
I would think that Patrick Stewart has considerably bigger fish to
|
|
fry than appearing on a syndicated SF series as a one-shot.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 04:07:16 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: B-5 in chicago?
|
|
|
|
WPWR is becoming a Paramount station, yes; I believe, though, that
|
|
B5 is being moved to another day, so should still be there.
|
|
|
|
(Just because I'm curious by nature...noting that your sig line
|
|
indicates sysop of the National Islamic BBS...is there much notice of B5
|
|
among the Islamic community? I'm told that in some areas in Iraq and
|
|
Iran, where some are able to pick up B5 off the satellite link, the show
|
|
is known and responded to well, particularly since this is a Western show
|
|
which is set in Babylon, which makes it a positive place. [I believe,
|
|
but am willing to be corrected, that both Iran and Iraq tend to claim
|
|
Babylon for their own, though those who live there tend to feel very
|
|
independent of both sides.] Is there much awareness of the program among
|
|
the American Islamic community, which you're probably more plugged-into,
|
|
given the nature of your BBS? I've had several letters from people
|
|
noting, accurately, that Minbari comes from the word minbar, the pulpit
|
|
in a mosque. Anyway, just curious....)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 04:14:33 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: Battle of the Line number
|
|
|
|
Minbari losses at the Line were fairly minimal, more the result of
|
|
good luck than strategy, or EA ships doing kamikazi runs into Minbari
|
|
cruisers. Very light.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 04:16:09 -0500
|
|
Subject: B5 parties / cons in UK?
|
|
|
|
I believe there is a B5 con planned for April or May in Bristol,
|
|
England. Attending will be me, Claudia Christian, and Peter Jurasik.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 04:24:50 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Favorite B5 lines
|
|
|
|
One of my favorite exchanges, which never seems to show up, is from
|
|
PoD v.1, when G'Kar says to Tu'Pari, who has come looking for Ambassador
|
|
G'Kar, "This is Ambassador G'Kar's quarters. This is Ambassador G'Kar's
|
|
table. This is Ambassador G'Kar's dinner. What part of this progression
|
|
escapes you?"
|
|
|
|
Favorite line in the next new episode, from Sheridan: "I'm not saying
|
|
what I'm saying. I'm not saying what I'm *thinking*. For that matter,
|
|
I'm not even *thinking* what I'm thinking."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 04:36:21 -0500
|
|
Subject: jms: Robert Jordan Influences?
|
|
|
|
Alas (and I suppose I should be ashamed of myself), though I've heard
|
|
of Robert Jordan, I've never actually read anything by him.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 06:19:52 -0500
|
|
Subject: Dont trust Sheridan (was JMS:
|
|
|
|
The president spoke truthfully; Sheridan could petition for a
|
|
promotion for her, but it's up to Earthforce to grant it, so the line
|
|
still tracks. (Note also there's no pronoun there; "Giving her a field
|
|
promotion." The imperial We still stands, though.) Also, Sheridan says
|
|
he put through the paperwork the day after he got there; which is fairly
|
|
close to the time frame in the story in which the President says they'll
|
|
be giving Ivanova a promotion. There's no discontinuity here.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 22:49:56 -0500
|
|
Subject: Church of Chris Carter WAS:
|
|
|
|
Waitaminnit...just wait one friggin' minute...is or is not the Chris
|
|
Carter of teleport.com who logs on here, to whom I've communicated on
|
|
numerous occasions, THE Chris Carter of X-Files, or another? If the
|
|
answer is "another," that's a *terrible* thing to do to me; if the answer
|
|
is yes....
|
|
|
|
Yo! Chris! (waving arms) There are maybe two or three shows each
|
|
week that I endeavor to catch; yours is one of them. Absolutely terrific.
|
|
Terrific writing and performances, and some *very* nice cinematography
|
|
and direction. Probably one of the best shows around. It's one of the
|
|
few shows that, if we miss it, we'll call around to all our friends (both
|
|
of them) and see if they taped X-Files.
|
|
|
|
Good to see somebody else doing it *right* out there.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 22:50:05 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: B5 & Voyager making
|
|
|
|
Bigfoot is also a legend....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 22:50:14 -0500
|
|
Subject: JMS: B5/ Canadian Cons?
|
|
|
|
No B5 reps that I'm aware of, though many negotiations go through
|
|
the actors' agents, and we may not hear about it.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 22:50:23 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: ST-TNG vs. B5 fans, any ex
|
|
|
|
Steve...that'll be interesting to see their response....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
From: straczynski@genie.geis.com
|
|
Date: 31 Dec 1994 22:50:34 -0500
|
|
Subject: Re: Church of Chris Carter WA
|
|
|
|
See my note elsewhere here, if this is the correct Chris Carter.
|
|
|
|
(Same header.)
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|