brennen
/
lurkers-guide
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 0 Pull Requests 0 Releases 0 Wiki Activity
The Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
51 Commits
1 Branch
88 MiB
 
 
 
 
Branch: master
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from 'master'
${ noResults }
lurkers-guide/ftp/Guide/053.Point-of-No-Return

557 lines
33 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

[1][ISMAP]-[2][Home]
### GUIDE ### [3][Background] [4][Synopsis] [5][Credits] [6][Episode
List] [7][Previous] [8][Next]
_Contents:_ [9]Overview - [10]Backplot - [11]Questions - [12]Analysis
- [13]Notes - [14]JMS
_________________________________________________________________
Overview
As the Earth Alliance plunges toward civil war, internal strife
threatens to shatter the command structure of B5. Zack's loyalties
are put to the test when the Nightwatch is ordered to take over
station security. Londo receives another glimpse of his destiny.
[15]Majel Barrett as Lady Morella. [16]Marshall Teague as Ta'Lon.
[17]P5 Rating: [18]9.31
Production number: 309
Original air week: February 26, 1996
Written by J. Michael Straczynski
Directed by Jim Johnston
_Note: this episode is more momentous than most. Think twice before
proceeding to the spoilers; it's worth seeing unawares._
_________________________________________________________________
Backplot
* After the death of a Centauri emperor, custom states that his
spirit lives on in the body of his consort, who speaks both for
herself and her late husband.
* Londo is destined to become emperor. That part of his future
cannot be avoided, according to Lady Morella. Vir is also destined
to become emperor. One will become emperor after the other dies,
but it's not clear which.
* Londo has already passed up two chances to avoid the destiny he
fears awaits him. There will be three more. He must save the eye
that does not see. He must not kill the one who is already dead.
And failing those, at the last, he must surrender himself to his
greatest fear, knowing that it will destroy him.
* One result of G'Kar's Kosh-inspired revelation in [19]"Dust to
Dust" is the belief that humans are the key to the salvation of
the Narn race. He also believes, as Kosh suggested, that the Narn
must give up their pride and their vengeance or risk being
completely destroyed, and that his people must sacrifice
themselves by the hundreds or even the millions if all are to
benefit in the end.
Unanswered Questions
* Is General Hague on his way to the station?
* What impact will Sheridan's new security forces have? Will they
immediately turn Earth against him?
Analysis
* One of Londo's two squandered chances was undoubtedly his action
in [20]"The Coming of Shadows," which sparked the Narn-Centauri
War. The other is less clear. Perhaps it was his initial meeting
with Morden, or the attack on the outpost in [21]"Chrysalis." It
may also have been his decision to ask the Shadows to defend
Gorash 7 ([22]"The Long, Twilight Struggle,") without which the
Centauri wouldn't have been able to crush the Narn as thoroughly
as they did.
* "The eye that does not see" might refer to the Eye, the symbol of
Centauri nobility that marked the start of Londo's association
with Morden ([23]"Signs and Portents.") It may also refer to
G'Kar's eye, which appears to be injured or missing in Londo's
dream ([24]"The Coming of Shadows.")
* The one who is already dead might be Morden, who's officially dead
according to Earth Alliance records ([25]"In the Shadow of
Z'ha'dum") or perhaps G'Kar, whose old life is certainly gone.
It's also possible that it refers to the memory of someone who is
to die; Londo may be presented with an opportunity to discredit
someone who would otherwise serve as a martyr. Along similar
lines, it may refer to the wishes of someone already dead; for
instance, destroying the chance for peace that Emperor Turhan
sought before his death, something that would have been the
Emperor's legacy.
Another possibility is a connection to the transfer of Minbari
souls to humans; the owner of a particular previously-deceased
Minbari soul (perhaps Sinclair) may prove troublesome to Londo in
the future.
* Londo's greatest fear might be the downfall of the Republic, or
perhaps his own death.
* It's likely Londo will squander at least the first two of his
remaining chances, given the fact that there will be a third --
assuming Morella is correct.
* What did Sheridan and the others say to convince Zack to go along
with their ruse? It may have been as simple as convincing him that
the order from the Political Office was illegal, just like
Sheridan told the trapped Nightwatch members. Using that to
convince him would have been the safest course of action, since as
a loyal officer he'd be inclined to go along with the plan even if
his sympathies had shifted toward Nightwatch.
* What were all the non-security Nightwatch members doing during the
crisis? Were they unaffected by the takeover order in the first
place, and thus largely unconcerned with what was going on?
Notes
* An official [26]press release about Majel Barrett's appearance is
available.
* Many of the Nightwatch members in this episode are production
staff members, including the production secretary and an assistant
director.
* Lady Morella is said to be returning from a visit to Ragesh 9. The
Ragesh system is the same one attacked by the Narn in
[27]"Midnight on the Firing Line."
jms speaks
* _Posted to the CompuServe Star Trek forum_
Before you hit the *kill* button...a thought or two in your
general direction. First, if you're eager for the actual news part
of this message -- and it is kinda important -- it appears at the
end of this message. If you've got a second, stick around.
In every interview he's given on the subject, Walter Koenig has
spoken glowingly of BABYLON 5, as a show he feels is fighting for
genuine quality SF in television, with serious, mature stories for
fans who grew up on STAR TREK and are looking for more of that
quality...none other than Majel Barrett Roddenberry has gone on
record at conventions, including Toronto Trek and the recent Wolf
359 convention, as saying that BABYLON 5 was "the only other
intelligent science fiction series out there" besides the ST
shows, and urged ST fans to support it.
If you've tried the show, and it wasn't to your tastes...fair
enough. No one should be expected to like everything. If you'd
like to give it another shot, that's fine, but there is no need to
defend your opinion; we respect it. Not every show works for every
viewer.
If you *haven't* tried the show...if you liked the original ST and
the work of Majel and Walter and Harlan and others involved in
it...if you like the work of Peter David, who has written for B5
and supports it...you may want to give it a shot in
October/November.
The final four episodes from year two will be broadcast starting
the week of October 11th, with the new year three episodes
beginning the second week of November. These nine episodes in a
row contain some of the best work we have ever done. Acting,
writing, directing, effects...we stand behind all of them. (The
year two Final Four were held back from earlier broadcast to lead
into the debut, so these are new to the US, although they have
already aired to substantial praise in the UK.)
If perhaps you have been turned off by some of the more vigorous
messages from B5 viewers, I'd only ask that you consider those
comments in light of the fact that Paramount (NOT the people doing
ST, but the studio itself) has done everything possible to hinder
the progress of B5, which engenders certain reactions from
everyone; and that to a man or woman, virtually all of the more
vigorous posts have come from those who have long considered
themselves fans of STAR TREK, voicing many of the concerns which
are stated right here in this forum by current viewers...which
they had long before there was a B5... as well as some of the
praises found here.
The ironic thing is that there is no problem between those who
make B5, and those who make ST..Jeri Taylor is a friend, Majel
supports the show, when ST does an episode with great EFX we call
them, when we do a good one they call us...it's almost entirely a
matter of perception.
So for what it's worth, direct from those of us who make BABYLON
5, if you haven't checked out the show before, or if you're
curious to see where we stand now...I would like to personally
invite you to check out the new batch of episodes starting around
October 11th. If you want to give us all nine episodes, that's
great; if less, that's fine too. If not at all, that's also fine.
Over a late dinner with Majel, I observed that after the original
STAR TREK, which for the first time presented truly *human*
characters, with all their flaws and frailties and bravery and
nobility, in a science fiction series, the ball was dropped, and
no one picked it up again for years. She agreed with this...and it
is my hope that you will find this coming season of BABYLON 5 to
be that show.
Because it isn't an either/or, sum/zero game...one can watch, and
enjoy, BABYLON 5 and STAR TREK equally, for different reasons,
since their approaches are very different. And this is the perfect
time to come into B5, since these episodes encapsulize a lot of
background, and will take you quickly into the background, the
universe and the characters.
Which is why, I'm pleased to announce, Majel Barrett will be
appearing as a guest star on BABYLON 5 this coming season...a
gesture of support from her, and a gesture of respect from all of
us at B5. The deal has been signed, it's a done deal...she'll be
appearing in episode #9, "Point of No Return," as Emperor Turhan's
third wife, Lady Morella. We're very much looking forward to her
appearance in the B5 universe.
For all these and other reasons, I hope you'll give BABYLON 5 a
try.
* She'll be playing a Centauri female, the Lady Morella, Emperor
Turhan's third wife; also a prophetess and seer.
* When we first announced casting Walter Koenig on B5, lots of
people moaned, "Oh, no, not Chekov on B5." What you got was
Bester, who has become one of our most noted and discussed
characters. It's unfortunate, but some people confuse the role
with the person. "...the worst character ever in the entire ST
universe" has nothing to do with the person, or the role she will
be portraying: the Lady Morella, Emperor Turhan's third wife, a
prophetess and seer. It's a *very* serious, significant role,
absolutely unlike anything she's done before.
This, btw, is called "typecasting," which is one of the primary
reasons why so many talented actors who helped to create Star Trek
and other series couldn't get work for so many years...they did so
good a job that they forever *became* that character. Let's not be
guilty of that crime here. Majel's character will no more be Troi
than Bester is Chekov.
* Ellen: thanks. As for the episode in question, it's entitled
"Point of No Return," and the role of Lady Morella was written
specifically for Majel. I hustled to get it finished prior to the
Wolf 359 convention, where I gave her a copy of the script. She
read it overnight, and fell in love with the story, the character,
and what it was going to do with and to the BABYLON 5 universe (to
wit: start turning it upside down). Next morning, she said "I'm
in." And she is.
Yes, it's a jms script, and is one of the most pivotal of this
season, episode #9, which with the one before it, "Messages from
Earth," builds to a major turning point in #10, so it should be a
very popular, intense and memorable episode in every respect.
* I'd just like to say that Majel did a great job for us on B5, and
we are hoping we can come up with other opportunities for the
character to return. I know that Majel is interested in pursuing
other acting gigs outside ST, and I wish her all the best. I think
other shows would do well to utilize her abilities; everyone had a
great time working with her, and she should be recognized for work
other than ST.
* _Was Morella's speech about greatness intended as a tribute to
Gene Roddenberry?_
There's probably a fair amount there that could apply to Gene,
yes...
* If a word comes out of a character's mouth, it's usually mine. The
bit about greatness was one of them; had a number of different
subtexts going on behind it.
* Of course, there are many who don't see such people in a Good
Light; even Washington had people out smearing his name every day
(which, among more altruistic reasons, was why he didn't want to
stay in charge forever). We are never so greatly appreciated as
when we're safely and conveniently deceased.
* Btw, on the topic of titles...it's important for the season title
to accurately reflect the events of the season. And as I've
watched more and more of season 3 being filmed, it becomes
increasingly clear that "I am become Death, the destroyer of
worlds" isn't as apt, emotionally, for what's going on. (I've
actually felt this for a while, which is why I've been hesitating
on locking down the title publicly.) The single most emblematic
title, and single episode, for the whole season, really, is "Point
of No Return," because on every level, that's what happens this
season.
* Thanks...it ratchets things up a bit more, certainly. The big
stuff's just around the corner.
* Most of the Omega class of destroyers are given Greek names, such
as Achilles, Alexander, Agamemnon and others.
* Correct, the Alexander would've come off the assembly line a bit
after the Aggy.
* We could've easily played the EFX full-screen, as WB used them in
the promos, after all. But it's a slow tease, a reveal. You do it
big in Messages, hold it back just a bit, at arm's length, in
PoNR, then bring it all REAL close again in the next episode. By
putting it at some remove in PoNR, it makes the viewer almost like
one of those in the Zocalo, fighting for a better look, stranded
out far away, trying to figure out what's going on.
* _Did someone call out "Furillo, Francis" during the roll call of
security guards? Furillo was a "Hill Street Blues" character._
No, actually, the name was Pirello, Francis...hadn't realized it
was a sound-alike for Furillo until dailies came in.
* I think Zack was mainly nervous in that last bit, which may
account for his twitchiness. And yes, Morella often prophesied for
Turhan.
* _About Morella's prophecy_
There's another way to look at this, which occured to me as I was
writing it, so I structured it accordingly.
Morella: "You must save the eye that does not see."
Londo: "I...do not understand."
I.
Eye.
We never actually saw how she spelled or meant this.
Given Londo's background, one could almost make the case that the
discussion was about him. Not saying that's it, but it's a
possibility and a subtext.
* _Which side is Dr. Franklin's father on?_
Stephen's father is a by-the-book guy; he doesn't think his job is
to set policy, only to implement policy.
* _Aren't those Nightwatch posters a bit too much? Wouldn't people
object?_
It's not always as simple as that. You also take a uniquely
Western perspective. Look around at Russia, Cuba, 1930s Germany
and the beer hall putsch, Iraq, Iran...a leader can survive all
kinds of opposition if he has sufficient control of the armed
forces. After the Gulf War, it was generally assumed that Saddam
would be gone within a few months; now his position is stronger
than ever.
Also, Clark didn't (ostensibly) declare martial law to protect
himself, he did it because of an imminent alien threat which was
detected long before these allegations came out, we just had
Ganymede attacked and that's spitting distance from the primary
Earth jump gate at Io...there is indication of collaboration and
conspiracy among some in the Joint Chiefs (and in fact that's
correct, from his point of view, given Hague's
activities)...there's enough ammo there to justify martial law.
Dissolve the Senate? Just happened a couple years ago in Russia,
when we had tanks firing on the Senate building. Some might say
that Yeltsin was in the same position as Clark in that his motives
might be saving himself.
(The majority of our posters, btw, are taken from genuine WW II
propaganda and war-support posters that were actually in use. We
make some slight modifications, but the gist is there. Yes, we do
fall for these things, we do go for these things. We always have.)
As for the USA-western perspective...during WW II we saw Japanese
civilians interned in camps along the West Coast...afterward we
saw people prosecuted for being Reds, saw careers and lives
destroyed by even the hint of "commie" influence. If you look at
newsreels and documentary footage from the time, you see a
populace, fresh out of a war, who survived by focusing on the
Enemy, given a new enemy. Might they have gone along with some
kind fo martial law if they thought that if they *didn't*
cooperate, the nation might be vulnerable to Russian nukes or
invasion? I think the climate was perfect for it.
Could it happen right here, right now? No, because the surrounding
climate isn't right. Could it happen if the conditions *were*
right? Of course it could. We're not genetically or evolutionarily
different from the Germans or the Russians or the Cubans or the
Iraquis. If we think we'd never fall for that, we place ourselves
in *exactly* the position of guaranteeing that we *will* fall for
it. Because we won't recognize it when it happens. We can justify
and rationalize it as something else.
Yeah, people back on Earth still have guns. What of it? Right now,
with martial law, the streets are quiet, the news is more positive
than usual for a change, the quarrelsome jerks in the senate have
been given a good kick in the butt, the president's getting things
*done*, we've all still got our jobs, the muggers are hiding out,
life goes on except for the lawbreakers. You gonna go out on your
own and start shooting at Earthforce troops armed to the teeth
with *vastly* more advanced weaponry? On whose behalf? The aliens?
The troublemakers? What're we rallying for? Or against? This'll
blow over soon, it always does. It never lasts. Right now, just
ride it out, wait and see what happens. Who knows...maybe Clark's
right? Who wants to be perceived as a traitor?
Those are the thoughts of any populace in this situation. Just as
when Yeltsin declared martial law in Moscow, as when Mayor Daly
sent in the shock troops in Chicago, on and on.
Here's the number one rule: a population will always stay passive
for as long as they perceive that they stand to lose more by
opposing the government than by staying quiet. It's when they have
little or nothing left to lose that they rise up; the politicos
first, then, more reluctantly, the general population.
* Here's something to consider in this.
It's easy -- safe and reassuring -- to dismiss Nightwatch and the
whole political climate on Earth at this time as referring to Nazi
germany...SS, Stormtroopers, informers...but if we know our
history, it shows that this is not so isolated as we might think.
If we say it was just the Nazis, then it's a non-repeatable
phenomenon, we needn't worry about it again.
But, of course, it does happen again...it did, and it will, to
varying degrees. Go back to the Inquisition, and forward to Joe
McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC)
which destroyed lives and reputations based on association, past
history, social contacts and party affiliations (the items
specified by Musante to the EA folks in Nightwatch). Stalin and to
a lesser extent Lenin would have been right at home in Nightwatch.
Several of the leaders speaking for parties in the ruins of what
was once Yugoslavia would also fit.
It's easy, and safe, for us to say, "Oh, we would never do that,
only THEY did that." But the "they" in this ARE the we on the
other side...and "we" have done it, are doing it now, and will
continue to do it. Only when we *know* the history of such things,
when we recognize the rhetoric of control, when we oppose
blacklisting and scapegoating and dead-catting do we help to
assure that they *won't* arise again. Remember the quote: "Those
who do not remember history are condemned to repeat it."
There's a great deal of generalized historical and political
metaphor in the show, never one-to-one because that's too easy,
but disguised in one form or another, transumted. The Centauri
Republic isn't a real republic by any stretch of the
imagination...any more than the Roman Republic from which it draws
some of its political structure, particularly the Centarum, the
ruling body. There's a great deal of Japanese political and social
structure to the Minbari, in their culture and art and some of
their philosophy. You can find parallels to the story in World War
II, and the bible, among a few dozen others.
Too little of TV these days is *about* anything...it's all
context, no subtext. This show is about a lot of things...but
never in the mode of telling you what to think. We'll ask *that*
you think, that you consider the world around you, and your place
in it...but defining that is your business, not ours.
* "I don't believe a conservative nightwatch would be tolerated
either."
Senator Joseph McCarthy. The House Un-American Activities
Committee. You can look it up.
Also, there was a PBS documentary this past week on the blacklist;
I suggest that ANYone who thinks we would never fall for something
like the Nightwatch should take a look at it. It makes the
Nightwatch look pale by comparison.
* _The House Un-American Activities Committee wasn't that powerful._
I disagree. When even Truman was loathe to take on HUAC and
McCarthy, you've got a real problem. You make the impact sound
minimal; but people committed suicide when their careers were
ruined by HUAC and Tailgunner Joe. I personally know writers who
were at the top of their form and their careers who never worked
again because they were blacklisted or greylisted.
It was also the climate created by HUAC that threatened much more
widely than the actions of the committee itself. Take Red
Channels, a sleazy little rag published by the owner of a
*SUPERMARKET CHAIN* in which he listed those he considered --
based on whim or divine revelation -- reds or sympathetic to reds.
Even a publication like that had tremendous destructive power. I
know one of the writers listed in Red Channels; the networks
grey-listed him instantly. It was *years* before he could work
again.
The whole red-baiting hysteria of the 50s came as close to
destroying the American dream as any threatened invasion. If it
had been led by someone a little less self-destructive than
McCarthy, I hate to think what would've happened.
* "Even in the USSR the military would not support an attempt of
martial law."
You mean like when Yeltsin called up the military, dissolved the
Senate, and had tanks open fire on the Senate building to keep
from being ousted in a coup...you mean like that?
* Yes, right to assemble, free speech rights, they're all open to
abridgement. Travel can also be restricted.
* Thanks. No, I understand the point, I'm just getting into the
details a bit. One last point I forgot to mention was that even
for the US, there has never yet been a situation where we as an
entire *species* stood on the brink of extinction by an alien
race. That'll definitely affect your mindset a bit....
* "Zack is the key figure here. He's the one questioning if he's on
the right side and just what his allies are up to. I've heard some
good analogies to present days situations kicked around on these
boards, but It seems mostly Republicans want to accuse democrats
and vice versa. What we need is more Republicans willing to
criticise fellow republicans and democrats willing to criticise
fellow democrats."
A very good point. Zack is, to all intents and purposes, the
Everyman character in this; he wants, desperately, to do what's
right. But he doesn't exactly *know* what's right, because he's
getting conflicting information...or rather, a lack of *real*
information and a plethora of agendas. Who is he to believe? Which
way does he jump when he's not sure which pit holds the lion?
When a culture become factionalized, when it becomes us vs. them,
everyone starts setting up consistently smaller camps...first it's
democrats vs. republicans...then it's mainstream republicans vs.
conservative republicans...then it's conservative republicans vs.
religious right republicans (with the democrats having equal
problems on their side). As soon as we forget that we're *all* US,
it begins to fall apart.
* Corwin's question is really one that hits a lot; you see things
starting to fly apart, but you keep thinking it's gonna work
out..then it all goes to hell, and you're standing there trying to
figure out how it all slipped away. It's a very innocent, yet
universal question.
* "...I wanted Sheridan &Co. to cut themselves free of Earthgov, and
they didn't."
'Course, if you were to do anything that monumental, you'd spike
right smack in the middle of your three-part story.
One of the things about these three episodes that's again worth
stressing is that they're really one story, linked carefully. Each
of the three begins *one frame* after the other. After they've
aired, if you sit down with a VCR and edit them together, you'll
find that they flow absolutely SEAMLESSLY from one to the other.
So PoNR is at the dead center of the piece that propels you toward
the last third, like the second act in a three-act play (which was
my structure for this).
That may help.
* We knew that at some juncture they'd be split, so numbering them
as parts 1, 2 and 3 would be awkward. And distribution hates
having to market multi-parters, for reasons of their own.
So...three episodes.
* Glad you enjoyed "Point." It sets everything up, so we can knock
it all down in "Severed Dreams." Now everyhing I need is right
where I need it to be....
* Certainly G'Kar has had...a revelation, I suppose is the best way
of putting it, and that tends to transform you. What form emerges
from this remains to be seen.
* _Ta'Lon's line about answers and replies_
No, I don't think that's a quote from anywhere but the show, at
least insofar as I know.
* _Was bringing Ta'Lon back something you wanted to do from the
start?_
I liked Ta'Lon, and definitely wanted to bring him back.
* We've already established in the episode that the bodyguard is the
same as in "All Alone." We did that when the two had a drink in
the zocalo. It was in dialogue.
* _I liked Londo's line about politics._
Thanks, and I agree with those scenes. (For me, the Vir/Londo
scene in the tag is just hysterical.) Re: "politics has nothing to
do with intelligence," yeah, I kinda liked that one. I have
fun....
* Centauri are always suspicious, and if you knew you might be
emperor after the other is dead, you might be encourage to...help
that process along, however you might like someone. It's just good
business.
* When we come back, the very next episode has a very funny scene
re: Londo and Narn security. And yes, that was the Schwartzkopf.
* _Is the fact that Hague was on the Alexander a reference to
Alexander Haig?_
Y'know, I think this was one of those subconscious things the
brain does sometimes...I hadn't put it together when I put him on
that ship. It's a sad thing when you can't even trust your own
brain anymore.
* "Ok, at the end of this ep. Susan explains that 4 of the 5
cruisers with Gen. Hague where distroyed. So did Earthforce get
them or did Clark have the shadows do it?"
It was an ambush by Earthforce ships. (Actually, only 3 were
destroyed, the other two took off separately, trying to throw off
a united pursuit. But you know how ISN's been lately....)
* Delenn was taking care of some business on Minbar.
* There's not a lower house in the EA, in the sense that each
nation/state has its own various houses, and its own leader, but
that leader is also part of the EA senate. One per nation/state.
Each nation/state has its own constitution, but must not
contravene the larger principles of the EA constitution.
[33][Next]
[34]Last update: October 30, 1996
References
1. file://localhost/cgi-bin/imagemap/titlebar
2. LYNXIMGMAP:file://localhost/lurk/maps/maps.html#titlebar
3. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/background/053.shtml
4. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/synops/053.html
5. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/credits/053.html
6. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/episodes.php
7. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/052.html
8. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/054.html
9. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/053.html#OV
10. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/053.html#BP
11. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/053.html#UQ
12. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/053.html#AN
13. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/053.html#NO
14. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/053.html#JS
15. http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+Barrett,+Majel
16. http://us.imdb.com/M/person-exact?+Teague,+Marshall
17. file://localhost/lurk/p5/intro.html
18. file://localhost/lurk/p5/053
19. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/050.html
20. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/031.html
21. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/022.html
22. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/042.html
23. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/013.html
24. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/031.html
25. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/038.html
26. file://localhost/lurk/misc/barrett-release
27. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/001.html
28. file://localhost/lurk/lurker.html
29. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/053.html#TOP
30. file://localhost/cgi-bin/uncgi/lgmail
31. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/episodes.php
32. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/052.html
33. file://localhost/home/woodstock/hyperion/docs/lurk/guide/054.html
34. file://localhost/lurk/lastmod.html