The Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 

940 lines
32 KiB

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Official Transcript of a formal real-time Conference with
J. Michael Straczynski, held Sunday, May 21st, 1995, in
DELPHI's Science Fiction & Fantasy SIG.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
.Gordie>
Good evening, everyone, and welcome to DELPHI's Science Fiction &
Fantasy SIG. For the last few months, we've been having special
Conferences with authors, giving them an opportunity to share a
little insight into how they work, and where they might be going.
Tonight, while seemingly unlike our last few Conferences, we
actually have a rather similar situation. Joe Straczynski is a
writer and not just of individual television episodes, although he
most certainly does that, too. He has written a couple of novels
as well, and as soon as he finishes with some, ah, other commitments,
I suspect he will write others. But what sets Joe apart from the
rest of the crowd is a vision he has. A vision to create a whole
new form of storytelling. The vision we have all come to know
as Babylon 5. I hope Joe will share some of his vision with us
tonight, both for that literary form in general, and for the
television gem, Babylon 5, specifically.
<Guidelines for online behavior snipped.>
With that out of the way, I'll open the floor to Joe for any opening
comments he might like to make. Joe?
STRACZYNSKI>
Many folks have noticed that I'm on a LOT of systems, and have
wondered if it's really me making all these replies. I wish to
state categorically that it IS me writing all those messages, but
since there is a limit on time, obviously this is not actually me
in this conference, but rather someone that I have hired to pretend
to be me while I'm off pretending to be Rondo Hatton, standing on
the ledge of a large building, and I'll jump, I swear, I'll jump.
Go ahead. Ask questions. See if I care. (Boy, is that a long
drop.) ga
ALLBELL>
Do you ever lurk in newsgroups for other shows? Do you find your
reactions differ when you're in the groups for the other shows? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
No, in general, I don't much lurk in other groups for other shows;
I have a hard enough time keeping up with all the B5 groups.
Though I do from time to time lurk on other B5 groups, so that I
can see what folks are saying when they don't think I'm around,
because I'm concerned that my presence sometimes may influence a
group. Unvarnished opinion is a sobering but educational thing. ga
ALLBELL>
Have you gotten any ideas about universe building from the flamewars,
etc. that go on on the Internet?
STRACZYNSKI>
Negative. The only thing that flamewars do is to give me the chance
to try out new Ivanova lines (or lines that BECOME Ivanova lines)
about one's genetic ancestry, cerebral capacity, and other
wonderfulnesses. ga
.Lemming>
What became of the unmade season 1 Gerrold scripts? Will they be
made? Will there be more Gerrold scripts? Thanks, GA
STRACZYNSKI>
There are no unproduced Gerrold scripts. There were, as I recall,
two outlines that never got to script, but no scripts per se; one of
those outlines will be coming out as a two-parter in the B5 comic,
so nothing goes to waste. ga
.Lemming>
This is not really unrelated, but bothering me, in _Knives_, Londo
went one way, his sword the other, then it's back in his hand. Is
this a production glitch or did a shadow push it over? Thanks, keep
up the great work! GA
STRACZYNSKI>
I think that's a camera thing; we shot that in master and close
during that sequence, and the thing landed where it was supposed to;
Londo grabbed forward for it, but I think in the close shot we used,
you can't really see how far he's had to reach forward, which may
account for the discrepency. ga
.Elric>
I have a two part question. 1, It seems that the FOX affiliate in this
area has pushed the B5 episodes back to the wee hours of the morning
instead of the 10:00 slot it once had. Is the B5 series in danger of
being dropped (God forbid) ?!?!? And secondly, in an episode several
weeks ago, they opened the novelty shops and I noticed some models of
the B5 station and of a Starfury. Can fans order these things? If not
will they ever be available? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Stations have the option of airing the show pretty much whenever
they so desire; sometimes they shift it good, sometimes they shift
it bad. It has no real impact on our chances, except in the
cumulative ratings, if enough put us in crummy slots...
As for the toys used, they were just made up for that episode, and
don't exist in reality, nor are they for sale anywhere though you
can take a pretty good guess where the Londo and G'Kar dolls ended
up, and where the station model will end up after the series is
finished. ga (Daffy duck voice: MINE, MINE, MINE!)
.Gumby>
Any truth to the rumour that Sheridan is history and that Sinclair
is back as Station Commander in the 3rd season? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
The rumor is not true. ga
.Gumby>
As well, how much input do you have in the novels and comics (which
are both great, by the way)... ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Total and complete. I review both in detail in outline and in
draft form, I approve the script/pencils/inks in the comic, suggest
stories, and I'm writing a 4-issue arc. The 3rd novel was a bit
off-kilter (no fault of John's), and I sent it back for considerable
revisions, which put it back a month, but I'd rather have it right
than fast. ga
.Gumby>
Right on !!
.Gordie>
Are there any plans to do some kind of multimedia product?
STRACZYNSKI>
Yes, a CD rom is in the works, but not for a while yet. I'm less
interested in ancillary marketing, merchandising, and all that
than just Telling The Story. I've seen merchandising get in the
way too often. ga
.John>
Will Commander (ambassador) Sinclair and his organization play a larger
part in the upcoming season or is he bowing out of the show? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
All I can say for now is that we will see a lot more of the Rangers
in the coming season (assuming we're renewed). As for the rest, I'd
rather hold back just now. ga
.CompuJohn>
Are the rumors true that the last 4 episodes of season 2 won't be
shown in the US until October ?
STRACZYNSKI>
Yes, they are correct. Ain't my decision. The Powers That Be
figure that if they hold off the last 4, they can use them to lead
up to the start of the (hopefully) new season in November, and get
us off to a good start. They say that HUTS (Households Using TV)
figures are very low for June, July and August, since everybody's out.
In September, you're right up against the new blockbuster network
shows, and their PR machine, so that leaves October. My opinion...
...is my opinion. ga (I can chew glass too when required.)
.CompuJohn>
B5 has just the right amount of humor sprinkled in... Is the wall
hanging of Daffy Duck in Garibaldi's room available in stores? GA
STRACZYNSKI>
Yeah, I think it's a commercial print, so it probably is. ga
(It may be on velvet.)
.Neil>
Hi Joe. Dunno if you remember me, but I was six inches and 90
degrees to your left at the I-Con banquet last year. I've heard a
rumor that you're considering compressing the series should a year
four not look to be in the cards. Total BS? Or is it still a total
fight for survival on your end?
STRACZYNSKI>
I'm not sure it CAN be condensed, and certainly I have no current
plans in that area. But it's always a fight to get this thing done
right, and to see it through to the end. But if it was easy,
everybody'd be doing it. ga
.Neil>
Yeah, the offer I made before to send a screener of that film I
translated still stands. Interested at all?
STRACZYNSKI>
Would you like to see the stack of tapes on my desk that I haven't
looked at yet? I appreciate the offer, but....
.Neil>
Gotcha... Maybe some year...
STRACZYNSKI>
...my time is zilch; the only films I've seen in the last 9 months
have been on airlines. 24 hours a day, B5 is my life. ga
.Colin>
There are many subtle (and not so subtle) references to classic SF. To
what extent have you been influenced by EE Doc Smith's Lensman series?
(Humans bail out the galaxy.) (Or for that matter, Heinlein, Clarke,
movies, etc...) ga
STRACZYNSKI>
I've been influenced in a generic sense, rather than in any
particulars; I grew up on the big sagas of SF and fantasy literature
and I'd always wondered why nobody ever did something on that scale
for TV, and the answer is, "Because nobody's done it." ....
So I figured, may as well be me. As for specifics, I grew up on
all the main writers of the genre... Heinlein, Clarke, Bradbury,
Ellison, Matheson, Asimov, you name it...plus my models in many other
ways were writers like Norman Corwin, Rod Serling, Paddy Chayefsky,
Reginald Rose and others who loved language and weren't afraid to
have someone talking for more than 2 lines at a time. ga
.Colin>
Thanks. Just wanted to say that I really look forward to each episode,
and enjoy everything except the size (or rather lack thereof) of the
comic. Any plans to expand it? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
No, all DC comics are the same length, 24 pages. That's immobile. ga
.NumberSix>
This follows nicely upon Colin's question. The references to
_The_Prisoner_ in B5 are fairly clear, and I've started some
discussions here and elsewhere as to whether there is an equivalent
to No. 6 in B5. Any comments? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
First, there is a difference between a nod and a one-to-one
reference or template; if you look for ANY character in B5 to echo
somebody else in another story or series, you won't find it; I didn't
work 5 years to sell this thing just to do the Prisoner or Lord of
the Rings with the serial numbers filed off; this is a unique and
independent story; I nod out of respect, not to leave a knive where I
have extracted something. Second: the REAL number six would NEVER
identify himself as such... so I conclude that you are an IMPOSTER!
Delphi police, arrest this man! ga
ALLBELL>
He is not a free man. He is a number.
.NumberOne>
Thanks! And yes, there is much more to B5 than a Prisoner clone.
STRACZYNSKI>
(The B5 CD soundtrack is playing as I type this. Buy it. It's
great.)
.Rich_L>
Was it your intention to make the Shadows insectile to generate a fear
reflex in the viewers, or did it just end up that way? GA
STRACZYNSKI>
Certainly when I thunk them up, I wanted them to scare the bejeezus
out of people when they appeared; we went through several different
design elements, and that was the one that creeped me out the most,
and thus we went with that one... I'm not sure I said, going in,
"I want big honking bugs," but what we got, I like, and when you look
real close they're not quite as insectlike as they may appear. Very
alien looking. ga
.Rich_L>
It scared my wife enough to give her nightmares for a week... Any
chance we will see more of the enigmatic aliens that Sinclair's
fiance encountered that one episode? I liked them a lot.
STRACZYNSKI>
Hurm.........no comment. ga
GRAGEM>
Do you know when the pilot will be released or rebroadcast?
STRACZYNSKI>
My hope is that it'll be soonish, summer or fall, but I don't know
that for a fact. ga
.Rob>
Artifical intelligence is already under development in today's time.
Will we learn that sophisticated, human-level artificial intelligence
has been been perfected by B5's time and is in commercial and/or
govermental use? As an aside, I *want* a Sheridan Bear (I assume you
can be bribed?:)
STRACZYNSKI>
I can't be bribed, but I can be rented...
.Gumby>
<lol> :)
STRACZYNSKI>
I've kind of set aside a lot of the AI stuff, on the grounds that
it kinda gets in the way, and once all the fooforah is done with, I
suspect that people will want their computer systems to be seen and
not heard, and reasonably obedient. Certainly the B5 system is very
intuitive, but not AI in the sense that we've come to expect it might
be. I dunno...every time I think about trying it, I see Twikki, and
I fall down. "Open the pod bay doors, Hal." Ehhh...I just dunno. ga
.Rob>
::chuckle:: What's up with Keffer? Will he back? Will he stick
around? Will he play a more involved role in the story?
STRACZYNSKI>
The last four episodes of this season show Keffer a lot more. (We
build a little of that in the next ep) ga
DEBGREEN>
How do feel about using things routinely today, that were SF 50 years
ago?
STRACZYNSKI>
I suppose on one level, it's amazing, as you say, but at the same
time, what was incredible 100 years ago was perfectly real 50 years
ago, it's part of human social and scientific evolution. I think if
we weren't constantly amazed, we'd be dead, but on one level, I think
we kind of take it for granted after a while. (I used to own a Kaypro
II with 64K and a 180K floppy, and now I have 2 gig, a 17" monitor,
with amazing facilities and 64MEGS ram and it ain't enough yet. We
are engaged in the parade of humanity toward the future, and imagining
it is fascinating for what is, and what isn't done...
"Just Imagine," a B&W SF MUSICAL in the 1930s showed life in the 1980s,
50 years hence, with private aircars, pills instead of food, people
with numbers instead of names, and little/none of it's true. It's
scattergun. We live in the future; it's ALL amazing. ga
DEBGREEN>
When do you expect to find out about next season's pick-up/cancellation?
STRACZYNSKI>
We keep hoping on an almost daily basis to get the word; the folks
who make the decision will be back in town come Monday, so with luck
we'll hear something this week. ga
SLOMICHAEL>
If KOSH is one of the few remaining old ones, and the Vorlons helped
fight with the old ones a 1000 years ago, does this mean he is not
a Vorlon or there is only one Vorlon-him? Also I believe that the
Minbari on the planet below Babylon 5 will be seen again in the fifth
season. ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Kosh is a Vorlon. The Vorlons fought the Shadows. There are many
Vorlons, back home. (The Writer committed an error in that he used
too many pronouns in that segment of dialogue.) And we'll see Draal
again *this* season. ga
.Lor>
Will we see the original doctor (from the pilot) again or hear more
about what happened to him?
STRACZYNSKI>
See? No, no plans for now. Hear about? Yes. ga
.Lor>
This season? Or later? GA
STRACZYNSKI>
Sorta/kinda both. ga
.Lor>
Thanks! GA
CEKELLEY>
With the war started, and only two seasons down with three to go
how much/how often can we expect to see space and or GroPo combat
scenes? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Not that much gropo stuff, but you're going to be seeing a LOT more
space combat stuff, particularly later this season. There's some
amazing stuff coming, including probably the single biggest engagement
we've shown yet. Something on the order of a dozen fleet-sized capital
ships, plus a couple hundred fighters wizzing around, new and unusual
weapons, and some long-range tactical strategy, rather than everything
at close range (several thousand klicks apart). Nifty stuff. ga
.Gumby>
Cool !
PATGIBBS>
What are the prospects for a successful letter writing campaign to
reverse the PTN decision to delay broadcast of the last 4 Season 2
episodes from June to October? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
If I were to comment on this, or suggest anything, it could be
problematic in my relationship with PTEN. Verstehen Sie? ga
PATGIBBS>
Does PTEN know and or care about the success of B5 on the net? GA
STRACZYNSKI>
Stark cold reality: if you added up every single person on the nets
who watches B5, it wouldn't be .0001 in the ratings and that's all
they care about. I'm here out of respect for the fans, as part of an
experiment, to get a sense of the room and to learn more about my
characters by answering questions; I don't think the networks really
understand/care about the nets sui generis. ga
.Clint>
Can you give us a hint about why Mars is important? Is there a link
to the Shadows? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Possible. Look for the conclusion of, and the current story arc
in, the comic as now being published. GA
.High Res>
In comic #1, Rathenn tells Sinclair that the soul migration has been
going on for nearly six thousand years. In "Points of Departure,"
Lennier tells Sheridan that it's been going on for a much shorter time
period--one or two thousand years, I forget which. Would you be
willing to comment on the discrepancy between the two time periods? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Rathenn spoke incorrectly. ga
.High Res>
In book #2, Accusations, why does G'Kar appear on the cover and not
in the book? And, on page 252, there's a brief reference to Sinclair.
Was that a typo? That's all. ga
STRACZYNSKI>
The covers were done in advance of the books being written; I'm not
thrilled about this, because it can be as misleading as our promos
tend to be. This will, one hopes, be amended in future. ga
.High Res>
And the reference to Sinclair? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Which reference?
.High Res>
Right after the Joint Chiefs of Staff schedule a review for Ivanova,
and it cuts to action with the Asimov docking on the station. The next
sentence starts out "Sinclair" and then switches to Sheridan. ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Typo. Not My Fault. ga
.phil athans>
Is there any opportunity for freelance writers like me to write
for B5? And if so, how does one start that process? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
In the past, I've always tried to stay open to newbies, and the
like, but in this case, bear in mind that we're not looking for
outside stories. We've GOT all the stories. I don't take pitches,
I assign stories out of my outline to writers, usually writers I've
worked with before, or who come with sterling credentials. So, alas,
we're kinda closed. ga
.phil athans>
Oh well... Have you thought about a role-playing game based on B5? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Would love one. Nobody's approached us formally yet. ga
.phil athans>
I'd be willing to try. ga
52RANGER>
A steely eye just opened at Wizards of the Coast ;)
STRACZYNSKI>
You have to have your company, or A company, approach WB and
formally license the thing. ga
.Gordie>
Let me sneak one in here... How do you decide how much of the greater
arc to reveal each week? The balance between saying too much and not
saying enough has to be tricky.
STRACZYNSKI>
Mainly, you just have to feel your way through on instinct and
planning. For instance, in planning for the (hopefully) third year,
I pulled out my notes, and 22 index cards. Went through my series
outline, and picked the eventsI needed at the start of 2260, and the
end; then pulled out all the other incidents that had to happen in
that year, and began assigning one-two to each card, putting the cards
in order so I could see the whole season at a glance if an item seems
light, I may pair it up with another incident, or if it's too arc-heavy,
pull it out and pair it up with a lighter episode. It's all very
subjective. ga
.Gordie>
So the pacing really got locked in when you came up with the whole arc.
STRACZYNSKI>
Mostly. There's some room to maneuver in there, so I can slide stuff
around to make things interesting, and keep the arc fresh but in
general, yeah, it's set. It's a novel, with outline. You always veer
a bit once you hit the book/script, but for the most part, it's set. ga
.Brendan>
I've missed several crucial episodes both this season and last. Are
there any plans to release old eps into syndication or on video once
the series' run is complete? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
This season will be rerun to within an inch of its life. First
season will not, on the theory that folks'll get confused by seeing
a new CO, though I understand that the tapes for year one will be
out later this summer. ga
.Gordie>
Your theory, or Someone Else's? <g>
STRACZYNSKI>
Not mine, jack. ga
.Brendan>
One more quick yes-no question: Was Sinclair's departure planned from
the start?
STRACZYNSKI>
That's a much harder question to answer than you know; but I'll try
to surround it a bit; this may take a while... I always knew, going
in, that I was going to have a hard time folding all of this baggage
into Sinclair's duffel; survivor of the line, head of B5, missing 24
hours, Minbari soul, AND with a connection to the shadows? It
stretched credulity to a tremendous extent. I figured, once I got
into the writing, it would work itself out. It did so by saying,
"Y'know, it'd be a better solution to bring in a new character, and
move Sinclair off the chessboard. It'd let you focus more on Minbar,
bring in the Rangers more smoothly, have someone to bounce new info
off of for newbies to the show, tie in the Shadows, and allow more
conflict and an escalation of the arc." So I looked at that, and saw
that it fillled the areas of the outline that sagged a bit. Remember,
nothing to me is sacred but the telling of the whole story. Nothing
gets in the way of that, including any personal relationships I may
have with cast, writers, crew, anybody. So I went to Michael, and
said, "If we do this, I can do a lot more things than I can do now."
He liked the idea and there were some things he wanted to do, so we
parted company amicably, with the notion that down the road, we might
intersect again for some elements of the story. So parts of the
parting were *indicated* or prefaced by the story going in, but I
didn't know the *shape* of that resolution until I got there. ga
.Brendan>
OK, thanks! ga
.Scott>
Any plans for a map of the galaxy, where the homeworlds are in relation
to each other and such?
STRACZYNSKI>
We have one, kinda, in the office, for our use, but no plans for a
general map. ga
.Scott>
Loved the baseball in "knives"...is football far behind? Thanks for a
great show. ga
.Matt>
When will we learn what the Third Age of Mankind is? ga
STRACZYNSKI>
Eventually. ga
.Matt>
Hehehe..Well, that's definitely non-specific :) We've heard rumors
that there will be new actors for season 3 - Is that true? If so,
can you give us names?
STRACZYNSKI>
Yes, and no names.
.Matt>
Ok, thanks...All of us at StMOO (telnet moo.ravenet.com 1701) would
also like to say thanks :)
.Karen>
I appreciate that B5 mentions God routinely...but Why?
STRACZYNSKI>
Karen...why not? (Stand by, folks, looking for her reply.) ga
.Karen>
No, no, I really glad. Your characters have more depth.. and you've put
a Jew in space!
STRACZYNSKI>
Okay, background here... I'm an atheist. My attitude is that we must
respect those who wish to believe, and those who choose not to, in
equal terms. Consequently, I must properly respect the notion that
in 250 years, religion will still be here and people will still be
wrestling with it in many ways... Bear in mind that, in early history,
science and religion emerged as ways of trying to understand the
universe around us, using very different methods - faith vs. the
scientific method - but the desire and the intent are twin impulses so
why not give respect to the idea that some believe? Hence, I
don't keep religion out of my show. It seems to me that it's the only
way to go if I am to be HONEST in how I portray the future, and my
characters. And the first obligation of a writer is to be honest in
his writing. ga
.Karen>
Well an atheist who can include an ex-Jessuit and a Jew can't be all
bad!
STRACZYNSKI>
Absolutely. I'm just a wonderful human being and a force for good in
my time. Also a snappy dresser. ga
.Brendan>
LOL
.Rich_L>
rotflmao
.Robert>
(geez, it's Bill Shatner)
.Gumby>
<LOL> :)
.John_Drake>
Sorry to keep switching names & numbers, but it's hard to find oneself
in v-space... Since Ellison is 'conceptual consultant,' do you know
if he's still as adamant about the terms 'speculative fiction' as
opposed to 'sci-fi' as ever? BTW, thanks for providing hours of work
tracking down the multitudes of literary, historical, and cultural
references. ga
STRACZYNSKI>
That's m'job. As for Harlan, yeah, he hates Sci-Fi; says it's the
sound of crickets screwing. ga
.Brendan>
LOL again
.Gumby>
Definitely ROFL !!
.Rich_L>
snorts of disgust.
.John_Drake>
Quick followup; any comment on Inonova's possible telepathy?
.Brendan>
Oh don't be such a stick in the mud Rich :)
STRACZYNSKI>
Who said she had telepathy? I never said this. How could I
comment on something I've never said? Such a strange question. ga
.John_Drake>
My wife said she does :)
STRACZYNSKI>
I should believe somebody who married YOU?
WARGAMERDAVE>
Thanks, have any any TV and/or movie stars asked to be on the show?
STRACZYNSKI>
From time to time, yes. We've had folks come to us, but I'm not
sure if it would be correct for me to say who. ga
WARGAMERDAVE>
If for some reason there is no season 3 would you consider doing
some theatical movies to tie up the show?
STRACZYNSKI>
I can't even consider that possibility. The only way this show has
been made is as an act of sheer will. I decided that it would have a
pilot, that we'd get the series order, and we'd go the full run; if I
allow myself the slightest doubt on that, it'll never happen. ga
WARGAMERDAVE>
Thank You..
C_HAMER>
Is there an earth based outlet for the JS bears? (and B5 soundtrack
CD), or do I have to scrape one off the nose of a starfury? GA
STRACZYNSKI>
No bear boutiques. Soundtrack CD is available at any record store
now, from Sonic Images. (The end credits on the show now list the
ID # for the soundtrack.) ga
C_HAMER>
Followup: What is the count of Amigas in the rendering farm?
STRACZYNSKI>
14,287. How the hells hould I know, they tell me it's faerie dust,
and I believe them. (I think it's actually 10.)
.Brendan>
(nearly spewed my coffee there...)
.Gordie>
Matthew, I missed you earlier. You're the host of the B5 Custom Forum,
invite the nice folks over, and ask your question.
.Matthew>
Ok.. thanks.. :) The CF is 118, btw. And my question is when, if at
all, will Zathras be making a return appearance?
STRACZYNSKI>
Eventually, yes. What should I do when I get there? (Can't stay
long, either, btw.) Even though we don't have an order yet for
year three, I have to get X-number of scripts ready regardless. ga
.Matthew>
Well, I was going to show you around the forum, if you have the time.
STRACZYNSKI>
Oh....s'okay, I stopped by yesterday and ran around the place
naked. (You should get a heater in there.) ga
.Matthew>
hehe..
STRACZYNSKI>
Check your logons and you'll see my tracks. (Alas, nobody noticed,
except one user who pointed and said, "MY husband has one just like
that, but bigger.)
.Brendan>
ROFLMAO
.Robert>
Ouch, hot tea out the nose!
.Elric>
I must say that your team along with Ron Thortons team is a perfect
match! Do those guys have time for any other projects? And thanks
for a GREAT SHOW!
STRACZYNSKI>
I've developed several other projects, which are in various stages
with variuos studios, but haven't pushed too hard since B5 remains
my first priority, and I wouldn't be running those shows as a result
the same way I run b5. ga
GRAGEM>
Will Sinclair make another appearance before the end of this season?
STRACZYNSKI>
Not this season, no. But as I peek over at my outline, I see a
possible two-parter... ga
52RANGER>
Opening a jumpgate back to reality...2 quick thankyous JMS...One for
B5...One for your WD Book & column work...Keeps me from straying too
far :)
STRACZYNSKI>
Thanks.
.Gumby>
Is Babylon 5 going to released on laser disc any time soon? This show
BEGS to be seen on laser disc !!
STRACZYNSKI>
Eventually, yes; but to do so, we would have to re-telecine all of
the footage back to its original aspect ratio, then reassemble it all.
Which we've discussed, and I've volunteered (at great personal
sacrifice) to screen the first set of disks for QC when this happens.
But because of the massive work involved, it won't be for a bit
yet. ga
.Gumby>
Rats !!
STRACZYNSKI>
Mice
.Gumby>
<LOL> :)
STRACZYNSKI>
Okay, let's see... How about the narration for year three? Though
I doubt anybody'd be interested in that... Nah, never mind.
.Gordie>
Vir?
C_HAMER>
please.. go ahead
.Robert>
Daffy Duck?
STRACZYNSKI>
You sure?
.Brendan>
YES!
C_HAMER>
Yes...Kosh perhaps?
.Colin>
Yes, please!
STRACZYNSKI>
Wouldn't want to be a bother. (Not who, but what's said.)
.Gordie>
Bother away!
STRACZYNSKI>
Okay, here t'is.
STRACZYNSKI>
"The Babylon Project was our last, best hope for peace. It failed.
But in the year of the shadow war, it became something greater: our
last, best hope...for victory. The year is 2260. The place: Babylon 5."
.Scott>
cool
.Rich_L>
Oh, damn...
ALLBELL>
Victory is not a greater thing than peace.
STRACZYNSKI>
Depends on the war.
.Colin>
Definite Coolness!
ASCHMUECKER>
wow!
GRAGEM>
whoa..
.Brendan>
You'd think these characters would notice sooner or later that
something earth shattering happens every January.. :)
.Gumby>
Tres Cool !!
.Karen>
YES!
C_HAMER>
Please tell me Lando is going to read it again.
STRACZYNSKI>
You'll get a hint in the last ep to who reads it.
.Gordie>
_Our_ last, best hope... Ivanova'd be my guess.
.Karen>
YES, please
WARGAMERDAVE>
gotta be her
STRACZYNSKI>
Could be.
.Gumby>
Damn straight !!
C_HAMER>
Which won't be till October. :(
.Gordie>
Could be Keffer, too...
.Brendan>
In which ep did the war break out?
STRACZYNSKI>
One sorta slides into the other. As wars do.
STRACZYNSKI>
Oh, HR, yours is the last question. No pressure. All these folks
waiting to see what YOU'RE going to ask.
.High Res>
How do you define atheism?
STRACZYNSKI>
...you call that a question?
All these people, who gave you their chance to ask a question, and
THAT'S IT?
.High Res>
It fits the standard definition of a question... Yeah!
STRACZYNSKI>
Well, yes, gramatically, it does, subject, object, punctuation...
Now you want DOCTRINE on atheism? Hasn't the world got enough
problems?
.High Res>
Hey, you make us go nuts _every_week_. I thought I'd see if I could
reciprocate. <g>
STRACZYNSKI>
I don't believe it. (There, THAT'S your definition.)
.Gumby>
ROFL
.Gordie>
Author! Author!
STRACZYNSKI>
(It's true, ANYBODY can get on Delphi.)
.High Res>
Very...elusive. <g>
STRACZYNSKI>
This is kinda like one of those moments when you go to McDonald's
and the guy in the next booth is screaming about that damned Roosevelt.
.Gordie>
Well, I want to thank Joe for taking time to spend with us tonight.
And all of you out there for joining us.
.Colin>
Thanks for the Conference, and most of all, thanks for the show.
STRACZYNSKI>
Thanks, everyone, for supporting the program.
.Gordie>
This CO is officially over!
==========================================================================
This transcript was edited to enhance clarity and correct typos.
==========================================================================
For more information on upcoming guests for DELPHI's monthly
Author's Conference series, please send email to:
Gordie Meyer <biblinski@delphi.com>
=======