These are messages from J. Michael Straczynski on CompuServe, collected by
|
|
Michele Worley (michele_l_worley@yahoo.com).
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
BABYLON 5: <EYES> FINALLY SAW IT #846124
|
|
DATE: THURS OCT 6, 1994 4:06:25 AM
|
|
|
|
"MORE!"
|
|
|
|
Just 3 more weeks.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
BABYLON 5: CHRYSALIS SPOILER #843485
|
|
DATE: MON OCT 3, 1994 7:15:07 PM
|
|
|
|
That explanation is in the very next episode. Complete and
|
|
in full. Never said otherwise. I've always made it clear that
|
|
this will be resolved in the first episode of year two.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: CHRYSALIS SPOILERS #843491
|
|
RESPONSE-TO: AndyL
|
|
DATE: MON OCT 3, 1994 7:21:02 PM
|
|
|
|
Except, of course, that where everyone goes is important to
|
|
the rest of the story, and that the purpose of the episode is to
|
|
introduce massive change into the story overall; when Sinclair says
|
|
"Nothing's the same anymore," he's deadly serious, and so are we.
|
|
The changes won't just be transitory or for a season-end hook; these
|
|
are permanent and substantial changes in the arc.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: CHRYSALIS SPOILERS #843847
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 12:17:14 AM
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I've watched that episode, between rough cuts and
|
|
producers cuts and mixing and all the rest, something like a
|
|
dozen times...and it still gets to me. Glad you feel the same.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: CHRYSALIS OF COURSE #844818
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 11:53:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Correct; Garibaldi's aide has *always* been a plant. I seeded him
|
|
in from the beginning, specifically for that purpose. It was the aide
|
|
who got Sinclair out of his quarters in "Sky," was the liaison who got
|
|
Benson on line (also in security, you'll remember), and helped dispose
|
|
of the body. If you watch his reaction in "Sky," he's the one who brings
|
|
info to Garibaldi looking to clear Benson; and when Garibaldi sees through
|
|
it, you can see his aide move off looking very worried.
|
|
|
|
Originally, it was Laurel Takashima who would have betrayed those
|
|
around her, as this character did. When Laurel was transferred, I had
|
|
a choice: keep that arc for her replacement (Ivanova), or give this part
|
|
of it to someone else. Now, knowing how the folks here on the nets and
|
|
elsewhere think, and knowing that they knew about the Laurel-possible-traitor
|
|
thread, I figured that everyone would assume that Ivanova would get that
|
|
part. (And, sure enough, a lot of people did.) This became a wonderrfully
|
|
convenient blind behind which to build the *real* plant.
|
|
|
|
And thus far, *nobody's* seen it coming. He was right there in clear
|
|
view, we used him many times (also in "By Any Means Necessary," for
|
|
instance), and nobody ever paid him the slightest attention.
|
|
|
|
It is, in a way, the classic magician's trick of misdirection: you
|
|
try to get everyone to look at your hand so they won't look at the huge
|
|
elephant being wheeled up onto the stage in plain sight.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: CHRYSALIS SPOILERS #845725
|
|
DATE: WED OCT 5, 1994 9:41:25
|
|
|
|
"If the Shadows are active on Earth, we need to ask why
|
|
Psi-Corps haven't picked them up."
|
|
|
|
Yep.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: THURS OCT 6, 1994 3:08:01 PM #846563
|
|
|
|
In the pilot, Lyta specifically states that once she's inside
|
|
Kosh's mind, it's all subjective; and as such, she'll be "seeing"
|
|
her own body, not his. Hence the hand.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: FRI OCT 7, 1994 3:59:08 AM #847356
|
|
|
|
Yeah, we used the photo of LBJ being sworn in as the model
|
|
when we shot that scene; interestingly enough, the day we shot
|
|
that scene was the anniversary of the day LBJ took office after
|
|
JFK was killed. The atmosphere on set was *very* strange that day....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
BABYLON 5: I NEED SOME EPISODES! #846003
|
|
DATE: THURS OCT 6, 1994 12:57:26
|
|
|
|
"My other two (Babylon 5) tapes mysteriously disappeared."
|
|
|
|
Have you checked the Babylon 4 tape archive?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: B5 QUESTIONS FOR JMS #847021
|
|
RESPONSE-TO: SIMON GRIERSON
|
|
DATE: THURS OCT 6, 1994 9:50:02 PM
|
|
|
|
The underground high-tech will be seen again, and will have a role
|
|
to play.
|
|
|
|
Delenn is acting slightly outside the majority opinion of the Grey
|
|
Council in her actions.
|
|
|
|
What's going on with Delenn is not supernatural.
|
|
|
|
There's something going on between the Minbari and the Vorlons, but
|
|
that won't be clear for a bit longer yet.
|
|
|
|
Jason Ironheart won't be returning anytime soon. Not at all, really,
|
|
in any sense we understand. I don't like omnipotent beings running around
|
|
in the storyline; makes some things too easy, and other things too hard.
|
|
|
|
No, Delenn does not become Zathras.
|
|
|
|
And no, I'm *definitely* not taking any kinds of ideas for stories,
|
|
for movies or for episodes, at this time. The point of B5 is that it's
|
|
a self contained novel, which is already written out. I've got more
|
|
stories in the B5 universe running around in my head than I could *ever*
|
|
use in all the episodes, books, comics and so on. In putting together
|
|
all of the background information, the future story arc, the character
|
|
histories, I find myself in kind of a Tolkien-ish situation, where I have
|
|
far more material than I could ever use. Also, receiving any kind of
|
|
story ideas here on the nets endangers my presence here for legal reasons.
|
|
|
|
Finally...as a note, your message contains spoilers, and should be
|
|
noted with brackets to keep from ruining the fun for others.
|
|
|
|
Other than that...thanks, and I'm pleased you enjoy the show.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: CHRYSALIS SPOILERS #843848
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 12:17:16 AM
|
|
|
|
Main thing is, I'd suggest watching "Sky" just before
|
|
watching "Chrysalis."
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: HARLAN ELLISON #837328
|
|
DATE: WED SEP 28, 1994
|
|
|
|
Thanks, and I agree with you 100% about Harlan.
|
|
He's quite a guy.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: GARIBALDI & CO #838193
|
|
DATE: WED SEP 28, 1994
|
|
|
|
Correct, I think that Michael and Bruce are either
|
|
the same age, or Bruce is a smidge older.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: B5 2ND SEASON #848114
|
|
DATE: FRI OCT 7, 1994 9:53:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Yes, the season one ender is "Chrysalis;" season two starts the
|
|
following week; and we do see Bruce in the first episode of year two.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
-----
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 7:43:25 PM #844492
|
|
|
|
I think the UK will be running season two starting in December.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: YEAR TWO GUEST STARS #839197
|
|
DATE: THURS SEP 29, 1994 7:51:07
|
|
|
|
Just a note to apprise everbody on some of the guest stars on
|
|
year two of BABYLON 5. We've been doing some pretty nifty stuff.
|
|
In just the first seven episodes of B5 we've already used the
|
|
following guest stars:
|
|
|
|
Fobert Foxworth. Michael Ansara. Dwight Schultz. Anna Marie
|
|
Johnson. Adrienne Barbeau. Michael Beck. Jessica Walters. James
|
|
Shigeta. Walter Koenig. Russ Tamblyn.
|
|
|
|
Not a bad start, I think....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: FRI SEP 30, 1994 12:22:28 AM #839599
|
|
|
|
Still definitely interested in getting McGoohan one of these days.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: SAT OCT 1, 1994 4:10:01 AM
|
|
|
|
I don't have any personal contact with McGoohan to answer your
|
|
questions; just one more admirer of his work.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: SAT OCT 1, 1994 1:00:12 AM #840685
|
|
|
|
Oh, we have some very interesting plans for Mr. Bester....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: BOXLEITNER #840687
|
|
DATE: SAT OCT 1, 1994 1:00:16 AM #840687
|
|
|
|
The way in which Sheridan comes into the storyline is *absolutely*
|
|
consistent with everything that has come before, and everything that
|
|
follows.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: ATTENTION UK B5 FANS! #839011
|
|
DATE: THURS SEP 29, 1994 5:19:17
|
|
|
|
I'm piggy-backing this message onto Brett's for the UK viewers
|
|
out there.
|
|
|
|
"Chrysalis" airs in just a few days in the UK...Monday evening.
|
|
I would have much preferred that it air more closely to the US
|
|
broadcast, or simultaneously, but PTEN chose otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Of all the episodes I wrote for season one, this is probably the
|
|
best of them. This one works on every single level, including the
|
|
acting, the directing, the lighting...all of it. It's as close to a
|
|
perfect episode that we've done.
|
|
|
|
As you'll discover in a few days, at least half of the show's
|
|
success is in the surprises, and the planned shocks along the way.
|
|
You'll know what I'm talking about instantly, when you see it. As
|
|
stated before, we tip over every table we've got.
|
|
|
|
Specific reactions and spoilers posted here will hit people
|
|
literally WEEKS before it airs. The effect, I think, would be to
|
|
dilute the impact of the story profoundly. So I would like to take
|
|
this opportunity to ask our UK friends for a personal favor.
|
|
|
|
Obviously, discussing the episode on local UK systems is terrific,
|
|
no problem. If it's possible, it'd be wonderful if you could be more
|
|
general or vague in comments here. If you have specific questions
|
|
related to the story, I'll be happy to respond to anything posted
|
|
privately here. I know and appreciate that this would be an
|
|
inconvenience, and there's nothing that obliges anyone to go along
|
|
with this. I ask it only as a personal favor.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: SAT OCT 1, 1994 1:00:14 AM #840686
|
|
|
|
It's not so much with the hole in Sinclair's mind (though that's
|
|
touched upon in a major way)...you could say it's to do with EVERYTHING
|
|
on the show.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
PROS AND PUBLISHING: WANTED - WRITERS #839612
|
|
DATE: FRI SEP 30, 1994 12:32:25 AM
|
|
|
|
Of course, depending on how you choose to define "net revenue,"
|
|
and it can be defined so as to make it look as though there ARE no
|
|
net revenues, regardless of what may actually come in...it's possible
|
|
that the writers and artists could receive *zero* money. (I work in
|
|
Hollywood, and I've seen how bookkeeping can make a huge profit into
|
|
a net loss.)
|
|
|
|
There's no real way of knowing what "net profits" are until and
|
|
unless one audits your books.
|
|
|
|
It is standard, professional behavior to offer a set fee, X-cents
|
|
per word, or a flat fee. If you are not doing this, then I can only
|
|
conclude that something's profoundly wrong about this whole deal.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: NO STORY IDEAS PLEASE #843490
|
|
DATE: MON OCT 3, 1994 7:21:01 PM
|
|
|
|
Fox doesn't produce B5; it's Warners/PTEN, so Fox can't "can" the show.
|
|
|
|
As for fan fiction...I try to discourage it where possible, primarily
|
|
if it's in a place where I can see it, to defuse any legal problems such as
|
|
the one that killed one of Marion Zimmer Bradley's books. There are going
|
|
to be some B5 novels from Dell, but we're working with the writers of those
|
|
books to make sure they're *not* just unrelated throwaways, but are part of
|
|
B5 continuity, and thus nominally canon.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 3:03:01 PM #844240
|
|
|
|
Incorrect; now that she has been legally burned by it, MZB *is*
|
|
openly discouraging fans from "playing in her fiction," as you put it.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 12:17:17 AM #843849
|
|
|
|
A fan wrote an extended piece of fan fiction set in Zimmer's
|
|
universe, which ended up being very close to what Marion was working
|
|
on. The publisher, aware of both, spiked Marion's novel for fear of
|
|
being sued. A year or two of work down the drain.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: THURS OCT 6, 1994 12:51:10 #845997
|
|
|
|
"I'd be more than happy to sign a waiver as long as she would do
|
|
the same."
|
|
|
|
Why should MZB *have* to sign any kind of waiver? It's her universe.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
======
|
|
John Brobston: It makes sense for MZB to sign a waiver relinquishing rights
|
|
to the fan's work.
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
DATE: FRI OCT 7, 1994 3:55:17 AM #847350
|
|
|
|
I don't think you're seeing my point; my question was why MZB would
|
|
have to sign a waiver, not the other person. Getting a waiver or
|
|
disclaimer from the fan is, of course, fine. But for MZB to sign a waiver
|
|
means that she is giving up rights to her own creation...why should she
|
|
have to do that?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: SAT OCT 8, 1994 1:38:29 AM #848386
|
|
|
|
Your suggestion is fine except that it has nothing to do with
|
|
the publishing business.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: NO STORY IDEAS PLEASE #843851
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 12:17:21 AM
|
|
|
|
I know I'm on for some kind of national symposium thingie (could
|
|
I possibly sound any stupider?) in February; that's all I can recall
|
|
offhand. I'll be sure to post more info the closer we get to it.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: B5 MERCHANDISE #844241
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 3:03:02 PM
|
|
|
|
The CD Rom was planned for January, but there have been a lot of
|
|
recent shakeups at Compton's, so that may get pushed back. I'd expect
|
|
LD's sometime in the spring.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
=========
|
|
QUESTION #844432: Will the LDs be single or multiple episodes?
|
|
=========
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 7:43:26 PM #844493
|
|
|
|
Haven't heard for sure, but I'd imagine that they'd be two to a disk,
|
|
one on each side.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: COMIC BOOK #843850
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 12:17:19 AM
|
|
|
|
I think it'll be out the first week of December.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
STAR TREK: DS9 2ND PART WAS AWFUL! #846002
|
|
DATE: THURS OCT 6, 1994 12:57:25
|
|
|
|
Hey, give 'em a break...after all, there's no holodeck on DS9
|
|
to use for creating false stories...had to do *something*...couldn't
|
|
have any of this stuff actually *happen*, now could they?
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
STAR TREK: TREK IS DYING? #844239
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 3:03:00 PM
|
|
|
|
The last season one episode, the quasi-cliffhanger "Chrysalis"
|
|
airs around October 24th, with the first episode of year two following
|
|
the week thereafter.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 3:37:06 AM #843967
|
|
|
|
Thanks. One thing that I think commends B5 to people is the sense --
|
|
which as Henry Kissinger said, "has the added benefit of being true" --
|
|
that the show is made by folks who *genuinely like SF*. The majority of
|
|
people who work on B5 are fans...you walk down the halls and you see
|
|
evidence of this all over the place (particularly in the art department).
|
|
|
|
So it's really a case of people making a show they'd like to watch
|
|
themselves. It means respecting the audience because they/we *are* the
|
|
audience.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE: TUES OCT 4, 1994 1:49:19 AM #843925
|
|
|
|
Hey...there's always section 13 if you want to look around a little....
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
DATE: FRI OCT 7, 1994 12:16:00 AM #847197
|
|
|
|
"I like B5, but it's NO Star Trek."
|
|
|
|
Thank you. Weren't meant to be.
|
|
|
|
That's not a dig, simply a statement of fact and intent.
|
|
|
|
From some of the research done on the show, a *lot* of ST fans
|
|
tuned in to B5 expecting something kinda like ST...and when they saw
|
|
it wasn't it, figured it was a bad version of ST, rather than seeing
|
|
it simply as something utterly different.
|
|
|
|
One could say, of NYPD Blue, "It's NO Cagney and Lacey." Well,
|
|
no, it's not. That's rather beside the point.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: B5 AND COMMERCIALS #848387
|
|
DATE: SAT OCT 8, 1994 1:38:30 AM
|
|
|
|
All b5 episodes consist of a teaser, four acts, and a tag.
|
|
I believe that ST is 5 acts and a teaser. Our acts tend to be of
|
|
uneven length; we just write whatever feels appropriate. Sometimes
|
|
an act can be 7 minutes, or 13 minutes, whatever is best for the story.
|
|
Overall we have the same number of commercials as ST or any other
|
|
syndicated series.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
============
|
|
QUESTION #845650: In S&P, wasn't Sinclair ordering the self-destruct &
|
|
evacuation?
|
|
============
|
|
BABYLON 5: SINCLAIR'S FUTURE MISTAKE #845726
|
|
DATE: WED OCT 5, 1994 9:41:02
|
|
|
|
The voice you hear in B2 is not Sinclair.
|
|
|
|
Also...1) check the name spelling, and 2) unless you append my
|
|
CIS ID-number, I won't see this unless I do a full scan of topics.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: GARIBALDI'S MOTORCYCLE #846994
|
|
DATE: THURS OCT 6, 1994 9:35:16 PM
|
|
|
|
I believe the bike in question was a Ninja. And Jerry Doyle
|
|
is something of an enthusiast, which is part of what led us to that.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
BABYLON 5: EXECUTION SQUAD #845716
|
|
DATE: WED OCT 5, 1994 9:31:11
|
|
|
|
As noted in "The Quality of Mercy," there are still executions,
|
|
usually spacing, for treason and mutiny, so that mainly only affects
|
|
military.
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
|