Date: 01-May-96 01:19:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Theresa Kinney <70751.3262@compuserve.com> Subject: Theresa Kinney <70751.3262@compuserve.com> asks: > Who else could it have been? > perhaps we'll see more of the Narn Resistance in the future, > redesigned under the "Round Table" framework? Actually, what I'd said was that these 2-3 eps between big arcs were NOT arc stories per se, but breathers. Just to clarify.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-May-96 12:35:15 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Nope. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-May-96 12:35:16 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Thanks, I look forward to your feeling it's an ongoing quality show. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-May-96 19:59:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Andrew Bradbury <100777.747@compuserve.com> Subject: B5Sword Logo {original post had no questions} Depends on where you got it from. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-May-96 19:59:58 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: SysOp Dupa T Parrot <70040.104@compuserve.com> Subject: HOMer Award: B5 TCoS {original post had no questions} That's great. Thanks to all who voted. It's a good episode, and the recognition coming from CIS is especially gratifying given our/my longstanding relationship with this forum. So, like, is there a statue or anything that goes with this...? jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-May-96 20:00:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > But does this mean that the allies of Light are going to start > recruiting from among Psi Corps? Which character was she? > Can you tell me if there was anything that you told Andreas or > Mira about playing out this sequence, or was it pretty much an > actor playing to another actor kind of thing? Thanks. That's one of the things about the show that makes it very appealing to write; you can go from fall down funny, broad comedy in "Vir" to something more emotional, almost lyrical but serious in "Avalon," then right into something vaguely horrific in "Ship." You get to use all your muscles, not just the same ones over and over. I like to stretch, try something I haven't tried before. Which means from time to time I fall on my face, but that's okay; it's the only way to learn. I have absolutely no qualms about making an ass of myself and failing if it means that the next time, I can do it right. I didn't give Mira or Andreas any instructions on that scene except what was in the script, which was minimal. When you have two performers that solid in the room, just give them the lines and run like hell. Speaking of going back and rewatching episodes...part of this goes right back to the *pilot*, where, you'll recall, G'Kar tried to seduce Lyta, mentioning that there are no Narn telepaths, and they feel very strongly it's important to their survival that they start breeding them at the first opportunity. Ding....! jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-May-96 20:00:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} No, because that would mean doing a story without our main characters, since G'Quan's story took place about a thousand years ago, and I don't think I could sell that. (Unless I did another time travel number, and I only intend to go to that well once, with the B4 storyline.) jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-May-96 21:37:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Kudos from Tampa {original post had no questions} Thanks for the good words, and the encouraging news about how the show is doing out there. Much appreciated. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:01:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Robin L. Small <76640.2012@compuserve.com> Subject: Poisoning Kosh Robin L. Small <76640.2012@compuserve.com> asks: > Has the poising Kosh thread from the pilot ever been completely > addressed? any answers?? What's really left to address? The reasons given were the reasons; the Minbari warrior caste were very much against the Babylon project; an extremist clan within that caste decided to frame Sinclair for murder, using what little info they had on the vorlons, in an attempt to destabalize or defeat the goals of B5. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:01:45 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com> Subject: <>> Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com> asks: > Did Kosh know about the hidden personality within Talia Winters? > Does he simply distrust Telepaths? > Will he ever get to use this Data chrystal? > My memory seems to recall him giving the chrystal to Garibaldi ? > Abbut said somthing along the lines of "Nice doing business with > you Mr Kosh, A pleasure as allways" - did this mean Kosh has had > a lot of Telepaths scanned? > - If so, did he know what Lyita knew - but didn't know what > Telepath was used, so had a number of them scanned? Kosh certainly knew more about her, and almost certainly her second persona, than anyone suspected. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:01:46 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Jeff Sinclair {original post unavailable} If you write to the fan club, you can get the form; and yes, Sinclair returns in this month's two parter. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:01:48 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Brian Kornfeld <75703.1340@compuserve.com> Subject: Bester and... Bester Brian Kornfeld <75703.1340@compuserve.com> asks: > have ANY bearing on your Bester? Yes, it's certainly a tribute to Alfie, a giant in the field. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:01:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} It's got nothing to do with second class citizenship. I'm sorry, but when lives are at stake, *any* justification is acceptable for saving them. When a ship goes down at sea, as much as possible it tends to be the rule that women and children go first. It's not putting women and children on the same social level, that's silly and a misstatement of fact. The notion is that often men are physically better suited to taking care of themselves in a physically dangerous situation *as civilians*. Now, if you're talking military, you need only to watch the same episode, "Severed," and you see women combat soldiers slugging it out, and getting stabbed, and killed, right along with the male soldiers. Some people seem to feel that if one shows compassion for any group, that somehow you are saying that's a lower or second class. It's sad when compassion can become warped around to mean something else. It's also illogical. If the position is that women are second class citizens in this case, then the cry would be, "Don't fire, we've got men down here." Because that would imply that the men are more important; you'd get "men first" on sinking ships because, as first class citizens, men would be more important, and thus more worth saving, yes? In a crisis situation, where people are going to die, you try to get out those for whom you care, and to whom you give status. Those which are important, and may be less able, physically, to deal with great stress or danger. So, basically, no, the statement did not come from any agenda; your analysis, however, *did*. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:01:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Ivanova vs. The Markab {original post unavailable} I'd rather leave the question of what Delenn saw open for now. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:01:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Catherine Becic <73414.2603@compuserve.com> Subject: season finale in October Catherine Becic <73414.2603@compuserve.com> asks: > Is this set in stone? > Can nothing be done? > Must we really be tortured again? > And will the UK get the end of season 3 before we do again? I haven't heard this myself yet formally, so I really can't comment until I know more. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:01:59 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > How difficult do you find it to change emotional strides when > writing stories like this? By the way, any chance I can get the > spelling for the two Narn words that mean "mindwalker" and > "destroyed" that Garibaldi mentioned at one point in that > discussion? No, it's never difficult for me to go from horror to romance to comedy to action; they're just different colors in the artist's toolbox...you go from red to blue to green to yellow, and it's not difficult doing it, just in knowing *when* to do it, and *how* to do it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Yes, Minbari telepaths can also have an effect, as we'll see soon. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rick Sharon <76416.2213@compuserve.com> Subject: Rick Sharon <76416.2213@compuserve.com> asks: > would he? > would he? > Not even HE is that devious, is he? > could he??!? > he couldn't, could he? > will he? > (Hmmmm, B5 repair kit? > The newscaster wasn't visible "below the waist", was she wearing > hip-boots? are the Shadows consumers and we're just consumables? > He's a busy man, who has time for that sort of thing? > But, correction Sheridan, it's not "now we have a weapon", it's > "now we know what kind of weapon could work" - where is Sheridan > going to find an Army of telepaths? could you please arrange to > distribute/broadcast a new B5 episode every 2-3 hours? Whatever > were you thinking? DO YOU HEAR ME??? > Anxiously looking forward to next episode (but, one week? Thanks for that...well, for *all* of that, as there was much good stuff and kind words therein. Just got in from Ohio, so I'm bushed, but still very appreciative. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bruno Melancon <102647.3222@compuserve.com> Subject: Bruno Melancon <102647.3222@compuserve.com> asks: > - Delenn-G'Kar confrontation - Bester helping the cause? > - The War Room - Humans (or telepaths) merging with the Shadows > ships - The telepaths-weapons against the Shadows? About that last > point, can you tell me the name of the colony that is attacked by > the Shadows? Is it a human colony? > Clark be upset with the Shadows? That's Brakiri space they attacked; more on that in the next episode. (They're a League world.) jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:06 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} Thanks...it's a great episode. And they get better. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Logically, he can't just go away indefinitely, and it's going to take a long time before they can get Carolyn in shape. A very long time. If he stays, he'd be noticed and hunted down by the Corps, which ends his usefulness. His staying served no purpose. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:10 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: michael kazalski <72357.2642@compuserve.com> Subject: ExcellenceInBroadcasting {original post had no questions} Thank you very much for those kind words; we work hard on the show, and that sort of feedback is appreciated. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: JMS: Quick Question (blocked) asks: > When Sheridan and Ivanova are off galavanting about aboard the > White Star, who's minding the store on the station? Does > Garibaldi, as head of Security, run things, or would it be Delenn > as she's Sheridan's co-commander of the Rangers in that quadrant? > Just what is the heirarchy of command on Babylon 5, now that it > is an independent state? Yeah, generally it would fall to Garibaldi; it's no longer a rank thing as much as a "who can we trust?" question. And Delenn maintains control of the Rangers in their absence. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:15 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> Subject: <...Avalon> further Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks: > Are there any myth-legend cycles that you are (or later became) > acquainted with that you wished you had room for in B5, but > couldn't fit in, for one reason or another? Dunno...I don't really make a list of what I'd like to do; it's all just one big melting pot in the back of my head, and it all sifts together. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: David Cerreta <72630.3433@compuserve.com> Subject: <> David Cerreta <72630.3433@compuserve.com> asks: > Were there any hints? > Why halfway through our story do the Shadows show their hand? > What is that agenda? > Are the Shadows independent operators or do *they* answer to > somebody? Good points. In general, you always know when I'm going to start answering a question, because I begin to point at it in episodes; I'm now beginning to point to the shadows and ask, "What do THEY want?" The answer is coming. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 Renewal {original post unavailable} We'll know later this month. No word yet either way. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:23 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Toni Muller <75223.1575@compuserve.com> Subject: >>Interludes<< Toni Muller <75223.1575@compuserve.com> asks: > I felt frustration and confusion at his situation (how did it get > this bad? why didn't he get help sooner? > Question: Can Londo hear the Shadows now because he has turned > toward the darkness, or was he allowed to hear so he'd be > intimidated? Our phone rang right after that scene, and I debated > on whether or not to answer it because I was afraid the person > would ask me, "What's wrong?" That battle between the Vorlons and > the Shadows was a joy to watch (can battle be "a joy?" Thanks. The Kosh stuff, his scene with Sheridan, and his passing, is very moving. I showed it at Marcon this weekend in Ohio, and many folks, including Patricia Talman -- who hadn't seen it yet -- were in tears at that. That, to me, is the moment when you know you've done something, when you can make people *feel* something. Not just a plot exercise, but you hit down deep where it hurts, or can make someone laugh. It's all about touching emotion...or what's the point? jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-May-96 22:02:23 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > could it be that the Shadows technical advantage lies in the > field of propulsion? First, why didn't Kosh flee the station and > go into Vorlon space before ordering the attack on the Shadows? > Were Shadow vessels haunting hyperspace in the region of the > station ready to destroy him if he tried to leave? Why didn't he > ask Sheridan and Delenn for Ranger bodyguards? Would the Shadows > have simply killed them and then pressed their attack on Kosh or > would bringing things that far out in the open have left the > Shadows with no more reason not to directly attack the station? > Why was Kosh able to order the Vorlon fleet to attack the > Shadows? Was his position in the Vorlon hierarchy higher than the > title of ambassador would indicate? was he, like Delenn was > originally, part of some kind of governing body? Why did Morden > and the Shadows automatically know that when the Vorlon fleet > attacked them that Kosh was behind it? And most importantly, why > are the Vorlon still "too few" to directly engage the Shadows? So > again, why aren't they ready? Why are the Shadows, who had to play > catchup in a big way, able to field a navy that has the > "thousands" of ships that Londo saw in his vision while the > Vorlons are still "too few"? Because I think, on some level, Kosh knew it was inevitable; a price had to be paid. In a way, Lincoln had the same feelings...why was he to live when so many had died? In a way, he knew he wouldn't live much longer. Also, it would mean running...and the Vorlons don't run. If he fled, another would pay the price...and that also wouldn't be right. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 13:27:48 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mark D. Smith <70254.107@compuserve.com> Subject: Mark D. Smith <70254.107@compuserve.com> asks: > Will he continue to or begin to covertly assist B5 while Carolyn > and the rest of the teeps are on board? Yes, that'll be something Bester will do now. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 13:27:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Toni Muller <75223.1575@compuserve.com> Subject: >>Interludes<< Toni Muller <75223.1575@compuserve.com> asks: > If that is so, then how did Morden know about her before he > talked with the man Vir made the arrangements with? Or was it > something else - something to do with Kosh? Is this because of > what she is hiding - like knowing what the Shadows want? How did > Kosh know what would happen to him if the Vorlons fought the > Shadows? Since he is the link between the Vorlons and the army of > light, did he simply realize that the Shadows would move to sever > that link, or is there more to it? And why couldn't Kosh > successfully defend himself? Was he outnumbered three to one, one > Shadow being equal in strength to one Vorlon? His response: "Why'd > you have to tell me that? The "crystals" were diamonds, he was bribing various people to let him in and otherwise do things for him. And yes, Delenn's holding back some information still, and Kosh was outnumbered. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 13:27:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} There's no relation between the aliens working for the shadows and the Streib. The ones you saw in the flash were "doctors" of a sort doing the work; there was no abduction required except of course the covert kidnapping from the Psi Corps Re-education Center. As for Bester's look behind, he was just looking to the guards behind him, and the ones in front of him. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 13:27:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} True, a woman's added body fat layer can help them cope with the temperatures, but if the sea is roiling and choppy, it takes a lot of upper body strength to stay afloat. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 13:27:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> Subject: >>Interludes<< Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> asks: > Geez, how many of Morella's "chances" did he blow *this* time? Thanks. Yes, I don't think Sinclair would've handled that scene in the same way; it needed someone who'd go toe to toe with something very old and dark and dangerous in his way. He had to get under Kosh's "skin," as it were. Needle and outrage and upset him until he got through...whatever the cost. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 13:27:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bert Johnson <102476.201@compuserve.com> Subject: >>Interludes<< Bert Johnson <102476.201@compuserve.com> asks: > I think it is incredibly symbolic that Kosh visited both Sheridan > in Interludes and G'Kar in the previous episode as their fathers > The one thing that bothers me is that now the Shadows and the war > are out in the open as of at least two episodes, why why why do > they let Morden walk around the station at will? They would do so, but since the fall from Earth, as Susan mentioned, they've had to hire guards who may not be above bribes, as we saw in the teaser. And Morden is good at covering his footsteps. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 13:28:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Poisoning Kosh Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > Why did Kosh cooperate with the effort to poison him? Kosh extended a hand...because he recognized Sinclair. Which is all I'll say for now. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 13:28:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Okay; understood, thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: JMS: gun port=respect? {original post unavailable} Bottom line, Steven...what you're doing is applying not only just Earth norms and standards of behavior to aliens, you're applying distinctly Western modes of behavior, conduct and mentality. You're expecting them to think and act like we do, in the way we consider logical. You can't even apply that criteria to other countries right here on Earth, let alone outside. Is it logical to one day just walk away from all your possessions, just leave them where they are, and start walking, not coming back? Here we consider that abnormal behavior, abandoment...in Australia, among the Aboriginal culture, that principle is called "walkabout" and is quite common and accepted behavior. The idea of ritually mutilating a young woman's genitals is a hideous, terrible notion to any sane person in this country...but in many African nations, it's practiced quite commonly, on an everyday basis as part of their notion of coming into womanhood. Part of having *alien* aliens is that they don't think like us. One big adjustment Americans rarely make when they go overseas is that they expect everyone and everyplace to be just like home in attitude. But there are huge differences...and those differences can start wars. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:18 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Robin L. Small <76640.2012@compuserve.com> Subject: Poisoning Kosh {original post had no questions} It didn't have to get past the encounter suit; he was distinctly shown extending a portion of himself *outside* the suit. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:22 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Jeff Sinclair {original post had no questions} It was a great convention, thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: season finale in October {original post unavailable} All episodes of B5 are closed captioned as a rule, unless something goes wrong at some point. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:26 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Ed Passarella, Ziff-Davi <72241.505@compuserve.com> Subject: Delenn and G'Kar {original post had no questions} Thanks...it's a nifty little scene. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Babylon 5 on video? (blocked) asks: > Do you have any plans to release Babylon 5 on video? In the fullness of time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: JMS: Quick Question (blocked) asks: > Are the former EA personnel now part of the Rangers -- or are > they still separate from the Rangers themselves? Or is it just > kinda mish-mashed together with Sheridan technically being in > command of both entities, with Delenn as official co-ommander on > the Ranger side of things and Ivanova his second-in-command on > the former EA side of things? What do they call themselves now > anyway -- Rebels? The patch signifies their alliance with the Rangers, yes. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:35 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Troy Starr <74752.3172@compuserve.com> Subject: Troy Starr <74752.3172@compuserve.com> asks: > Dare one ask what's happened to the two reporters that were > broadcasting from the ISN news center when "ISN pulled it's own > plug to stop the fake trasmission?" Would people believe that > their (well, his) report was a fake? Finally, is ISN the only > channel out there? ISN is one of the only interstellar networks bounced via the tachyon relay systems from Earth to the outer colonies and beyond. There are lots of other channels back home, but to get this far out you need the support of the government. The other two reporters are, to say the least, in deep guano. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-May-96 21:44:38 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Kevin P. Kenney <104102.352@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: 'Drop Dead' Date? Kevin P. Kenney <104102.352@compuserve.com> asks: > When is that date this year? > Any word if you'll be presenting at the San Diego Comic Con this > year? Any suggestions? I believe the true, honest, drop-dead date is June 10th, which is when we have to pick up the actors' contracts. If it's after that, we lose our options on the actors. Re: Red Clay Ramblers...I'd suggest their album "It Ain't Right," from Flying Fish Records in Chicago. It's got some of their best stuff in it, from the title song to "Ezekiel in the Valley of the Dry Bones" (which was on as I wrote "Ceremonies"), and a wonderfully sick, twisted and funny song called "The Merchant's Lunch." jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 00:41:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Christian Vitroler <100042.662@compuserve.com> Subject: Ivanova vs. The Markab Christian Vitroler <100042.662@compuserve.com> asks: > Any comment on the frequent mangling in German episodes? > So you can wonder, if he (JMS) gives us the voice beyond any > doubt why doesn't he show us her? But is there no such thing as > sort of quality control from the Executive Producer? you're out > once and for all once it's sold? There is absolutely nothing I can do about this except be upset by it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 00:41:45 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Scott Miller <70562.3656@compuserve.com> Subject: Scott Miller <70562.3656@compuserve.com> asks: > Why would they not have their own names for this place--why does > everyone (seem to) universally use the Minbari name? No, it's not a Minbari name, any more than automobile is a Spanish word, even though it's used in the Spanish language (albeit the pronunciation varies just slightly). jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 18:41:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Jimi Vigotty <72316.2103@compuserve.com> Subject: Babylon 5 !!@***!!@*%^** Jimi Vigotty <72316.2103@compuserve.com> asks: > Are you aware of any plans to release the series on Video tape? Thanks, and tapes will doubtless come out in the fullness of time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 18:41:45 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Gail Marsella <71551.3200@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: gun port=respect? Gail Marsella <71551.3200@compuserve.com> asks: > I think she's right - was slavery acceptable just because it was > common, we practiced it for a long time, and a large number of > people found it convenient? Was foot-binding in China acceptable > just because it was always practiced on young girls who had no > way to say "no"? "However, neither is it appropriate to view all alien behavior as acceptable just because it is different....." Never implied it was. In general, on the B5 station, though, if an alien acts toward one of its own kind in a cultural oddity (to us), we tend not to interfere unless so requested; if, however, an alien turns that cultural oddity toward one not of its own species, then the B5 staff would definitely intervene. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 18:41:47 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bill Hirst <104106.431@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: gun port=respect? {original post had no questions} True, though the female version of this, as practiced in some countries, is extremely debilitating and far more violent or severe. Much as we are all attached to our respective genitalia, I'd suggest that snipping the foreskin is not quite so severe as taking a razor blade and cutting OFF the clitoris and parts of the labia major, as is done in some places. But you're right, the practice on either side is certain of a piece (so to speak). jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 18:41:50 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Ganofsky <73354.1057@compuserve.com> Subject: Centauri Hair John Ganofsky <73354.1057@compuserve.com> asks: > They were wondering how the makeup folks do the Centauri hair? All I know is that each Centauri hairpiece is hand-woven into the fabric at an angle; you can't just take a wig and get it to stand up, you have to *hand weave* it. It's a fairly difficult and expensive process. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 18:41:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} I think probably most races that have to evolve through a superstitious phase, at some point enter a religious phase (which is an organized system of superstition by strictest definition) until such time as the tools are there for the more scientific description of the universe. So within that context, yes, most cultures would have at least one major figure in that area in its history. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 18:41:54 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: 'Drop Dead' Date? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > Does the fact that one of the prizes in the recent "Mystery Alien > Contest" was the chance to play an alien in an upcoming episode > mean that they are more likely to renew the show? Doesn't really affect the odds either way; there's always an out in these kinds of things. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 20:44:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Douglas Files Fox <74020.3260@compuserve.com> Subject: Douglas Files Fox <74020.3260@compuserve.com> asks: > Had Geribaldi's "found pin" suffered the same fate as Bester's > pin? Is the addition of the Cyber- Implants, the "Preparation" > Delenn was refering to in "Messages from Earth"? The crew members > of the Icarus, who didn't go along, were they used as Shadow ship > "Central Cores"? So I was wondering if Sheridan's wife could have > been used as a "Core" of one of the Shadow Ships? Yes, the implants are part of the preparation process Delenn referred to in "Messages." As for the rest...only time will tell, cause sure as hell I ain't.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 20:44:06 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: (blocked) asks: > While we're on the subject, when was this little change of heart > for Bester planned? Was it at the start, when you did Mind War, or > something just this season? Yes, this was definitely intended from the start with Bester. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 23:44:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Vicki Mitchell <76234.1317@compuserve.com> Subject: Cheers for Mira Vicki Mitchell <76234.1317@compuserve.com> asks: > Would you please relay to Mira Furlan our highest compliments on > her scene with G'Kar in "Ship of Tears"? I'll tell her when next I see her; thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-May-96 23:49:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Richard M. Perry <76461.2737@compuserve.com> Subject: Richard M. Perry <76461.2737@compuserve.com> asks: > What's next, little miniture Shadow ships painted on the side or > will we see the jackets first? BTW, did someone at WB get a clue > (or replaced by RMES)? Thanks, and that's great to hear about the station's reaction. It's a very hopeful sign, as is the increased advertising from WB. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-May-96 02:15:21 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} "If the theme of the relationship is "All Bester needed was to love and be loved, or he wouldn't have been the slimeball he is today", I will be a bit disappointed." Then you won't be. "It's just a little too simplistic." Absolutely. One mongoose can love another; that won't change its attitude toward pythons. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-May-96 02:18:47 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> Subject: Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> asks: > Do you happen to know what this refers to? > Is this something you do in post, or is that done at the feed > site? "Noticed on the takeboards from the sat. feeds for this and a couple of other episodes: Textless at 1:05. Do you happen to know what this refers to?" Some of the cassettes provided have the opening sequences in a separate section at 1 hour 5 minutes without the titles over them, so that they can be used in promos by the stations. "Also, they say "Color Corrected". Is this something you do in post, or is that done at the feed site?" No, color correction is done in post, to make sure that all the colors are true, and sometimes to enhance one element or another. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-May-96 18:01:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: Poisoning Kosh John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > I suspect that we'll learn more about this in "War Without End"? Yeah, it's fair to say you can imply more about this after "War." jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-May-96 18:01:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > Why am I not surprised? > That right or am I still off? Yes, the ISN person was Alison. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-May-96 18:01:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > Can you tell me which spelling on the name is right, please? It's Brakiri. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-May-96 18:01:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 in Sac {original post had no questions} That's great to hear...the message is getting through. Thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-May-96 22:18:42 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Graham <74166.3727@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: gun port=respect? {original post had no questions} "Different (alien) doesn't mean illogical in my book." I can think of a number of Zen schools of thought that you would consider vastly illogical...but quite human. There are many things we would consider illogical to a western mind that are perfectly reasonable elsewhere. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-May-96 22:18:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Robin L. Small <76640.2012@compuserve.com> Subject: Upcoming EP:Walkabout Robin L. Small <76640.2012@compuserve.com> asks: > Will "Walkabout" deal with the Vorlons' motivations??? That would be telling.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-May-96 01:35:58 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Grabois <74737.2600@compuserve.com> Subject: Michael Grabois <74737.2600@compuserve.com> asks: > I mean, out of all the people on the ship, they just happen to > find the one person who is significant to Bester? I can see what > you wanted to do, but couldn't it have worked better if, say, he > had been brought a list of people who were in the ship? Yeah, they could've brought him a list...and he'd have seen the name instantly, and wouldn't have been hit with his own "blip" careless attitude right in his face...also, she needed to be already being defrosted at that point, and you can't defrost all of them at once. Yeah, it was a coincidence. Synchronicity. It happens. It doesn't happen much on this show, hardly ever. I figured she'd be one of the last in, and thus the first out. Synchronicity and coincidences *do* happen. How many times have you reached for the phone to call someone to find the phone ringing, and it's them on the other end? What're the odds of Oedipus killing his father and marrying his mother out of all the possible kingdoms in the area? It happens. As long as it doesn't happen to excess, it's not something I'm worried about. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-May-96 22:04:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Lynne Caulfield <101647.2616@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Lynne Caulfield <101647.2616@compuserve.com> asks: > Where did you get this information from? Yes, Mara is correct. I'm an atheist. You got a problem with my personal beief system? Tough. You don't get a vote. And if that's enough to make you not watch the show...well, the problem is entirely yours. I leave my personal beliefs *out* of what I write for TV. I don't try to impose my attitudes or conclusions on others, or penalize others for what they think. You ought to try it sometime. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-May-96 22:22:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} No, it means that the person has to be in their line of sight; they don't have to look into the person's eyes or anything as silly as that. It doesn't matter if the person's head or body are covered, as long as there's a definite "focus" for them. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-May-96 22:22:06 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Kosh's Appearance/Form {original post unavailable} Only similarity is that the same EFX person designed Kosh as designed the aliens in the Abyss. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-May-96 22:22:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> Subject: Using B5 names and place Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> asks: > My question is, whether such usage would fall under fair use or > be prohibited by trademarks or if it is possible to gain > permission from you or WB to use such a name, by giving a > guaranty that any sites under that name would not deliver data > that falls under these new indecency laws? There already happens > to be a vorlon.com, did they just use the name or did they gain > permission from WB first? If you make it a .com name, you will eventually run afoul of WB. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-May-96 22:22:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Grabois <74737.2600@compuserve.com> Subject: Michael Grabois <74737.2600@compuserve.com> asks: > By the way, any thoughts on the B5 presentation at the San Diego > Con this year? Yes, I'll be at comic con, and will likely bring nifty stuff to show, as usual. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-May-96 22:22:12 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> {original post unavailable} Let me answer this way...whenever I'm going to unveil something on the show, I begin to point to it in upcoming episodes. I've begun pointing to the question of what the shadows want, and why they're doing it. So, logically, I'm now going to have to follow up on that.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-May-96 22:22:15 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>Interludes<< {original post unavailable} B5 is still a place of considerable commerce, access to lots and lots of other races and diplomats...it serves Londo's purposes for now, and there are probably lots of Centauri back home who would prefer he stay here. As for the rest...better the devil you know than the devil you don't. At least on B5 they can keep somewhat of an eye on him. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 00:25:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Lawless <70262.363@compuserve.com> Subject: >>Interludes<< John Lawless <70262.363@compuserve.com> asks: > Since Kosh knew in advance that he would be Morden&Co.'s target, > why didn't he prepare defenses? Or, failing that, why didn't he > get in his ship and leave for as long as Morden remained on B5? Because he knew a price had to be paid, and if it wasn't him, it'd be someone else. Because he knew there was no getting around it. He's too prideful to run. Remember Gethsemane.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 00:25:18 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Yes, you'll see more of Franklin, as he tries to deal with his problem. At first it's not too bad, but with time.... Re: titles...yeah, you got to watch out with this show, sometimes I put on deliberately dull titles when I want to sneak up behind you quietly. The more innocuous sounding, the more you should worry.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 00:25:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: carrie foreman <76400.1170@compuserve.com> Subject: <> carrie foreman <76400.1170@compuserve.com> asks: > What might have caused the ghosting of a soundtrack? It was probably caused by your local staion taping the show on the satellite downlink over the same tape they used for "Avalon." They likely didn't degauss the tape first. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 13:17:46 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Harvey Mitchell <71172.1220@compuserve.com> Subject: <> {original post had no questions} Thanks...it was a very moving moment for someone whose true face we've never seen. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 13:17:48 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>Interludes<< {original post unavailable} Thanks.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 13:17:50 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Lynne Caulfield <101647.2616@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Lynne Caulfield <101647.2616@compuserve.com> asks: > You're mad aren't you Joe? "...you have so many who never question your show that you're not gonna miss me!" Lynne...here is where you show your stripes repeatedly in this discussion. There is a certain type of poster who is under the curious assumption that only he or she questions me, or this show, and everybody else is just a follower, never questioning. And it ain't true. Believe me, I see more questions, go through more heated drilling about this show than you can possibly *begin* to imagine; no one here is in the least shy about expressing their opinions if something doesn't strike them as being correct. Your comment here, as all have been to date, is self-congratulatory when no such basis for congratulations exist. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 13:17:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Yeah, certainly the flash of light was an echo of Lyta's mask. As for Delenn, I think she was just stunned, just emotionallly worn out over this. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 13:17:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>Interludes<< {original post unavailable} One can certainly argue that Franklin's actions were hasty, that he is basically running away from the *consequences* of the problem he has, as much as from the problem itself. This will, of course, have to be dealt with. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 13:18:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: I&E Support {original post unavailable} Thanks...I'm just waiting for some nit to come out of the woodwork and announce that the real reason for what happened to Kosh was that Kosh had a contract dispute over money or walked off the show.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 13:18:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Steven L. Wiser <102633.3171@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post had no questions} Thanks. Like I've said..if I *had* any answers, I'd be happy to give them in an episode. But all I have are questions. Television, as well as entertaining, should try where possible to get us TO think, not tell us WHAT to think. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 13:18:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> Subject: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> asks: > So Bob the PsiCop *can't* scan someone behind them? > What about through a closed door? > Could Bob scan Mike if he knew Mike was in the next room over? > Would Bob know it was really Jill instead of Mike in the room? > I guess the ultimate question is, if I sneak up behind Bobin the > hallway, wearing a chameleon suit and really quiet shoes, will he > know I'm there Psiwise? If so, will he be able to scan me? > What if I duck behind a corner, outta LOS; can he still scan me? > Is it "seeing" or "knowing"? No, if the person is behind a door, or otherwise can't be located visually, it's difficult to impossible to scan. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 14:01:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com> asks: > What I cannot help but come up with is, magnificence of the > series and storytelling aside, are we being had? Have we been > subject to sales banter and are still expecting to see what we > expected? Have we been distracted from our original impressions by > the sheer brilliance of the show? (i) How come Ironheart who 'knew > everything' didn't see the fake personality? (ii) We saw > interaction between Kosh and her in (was it?) 'Deathwalker' which > resulted in Kosh recording something of her - what ever happened > to that? It's a fair question. I'm going to try and deal with it as best I can. The problem, first and foremost, is trying to explain the craft of writing to someone who isn't a writer. This isn't intended as a slight; if a brain surgeon tried to explain his work to me, I'd be about as much in the dark. I have no idea where music comes from; I can sit with Chris Franke for hours, trying to understand that process. I never will. I'm not hardwired that way. I *am* hardwired for writing. So it's not a judgment, just a minor truth. The creative process is fluid. Has to be. Consider for a moment the position in which I find myself. Let's say I'm writing a novel. I start with a fairly clear notion of where I'm going. Six chapters in, I get a better way of doing something, so I go back and revise chapters 1-5, so it now all fits; you never see what went before. Now, compare that to a situation where you're publishing each chapter as you go, and you can't go back and change anything. (This is pretty much the situation Dickens found himself in, as he published his works chapter by chapter; you can never back up, only go forward.) At the same time, because we're using actors who have real lives of their own, to whom things happen -- broken limbs, health problems that may preclude appearing in a given episode, sudden career changes, you name it -- you have real-life obstacles constantly in your way. The closest thing I can compare this to...is if you're on stage, in front of a large audience, and you have to do a very elaborate dance...and all the while people are throwing bowling balls and chainsaws at you. You either learn how to accommodate all that, and keep pretty much on rhythm, or you're dead. This show was originally conceived in 1986/87. About 10 years ago. Back then, all TV episodic stuff was done pretty much from one person's point of view, your nominal hero. Yes, you'd occasionally dive outside that for a quick scene with other characters, usually to set up something, but for the most part, it was about that one person. In MURDER, SHE WROTE, Jessica Fletcher was always at the heart of every episode; you had the occasional guest character with whom she'd interact, and the recurring supporting cast, but none of them ever changed, and none of them ever really took center stage for more than a few minutes at a time. That's how TV has been done up until now. Novels, on the other hand, are often omniscient in narrative structure, and you blip in and out of multiple points of view. THE STAND, for instance. Now, I've done both; I've written novels and I've written TV. When it came time to pull together B5 initially, you go into the "okay, who is the TV point of view character" question. Which was Londo's narration, and which was the way I'd learned to write TV all these years. Once the series got going, it quickly became apparent that I'd have to learn a whole new way of writing TV that was a lot more like what I'd been writing in my novels, which were multi-POV huge stories. It's a kind of writing that's never really been done before for American TV; and I had to somewhat invent that style or form of writing as I went, in front of millions of viewers. You can't prepare for something like this, as much as you try, because it's never been done before. (On reflection, probably the closest thing to what I've been doing here was the miniseries The Winds of War, in terms of the multiple viewpoints involved.) Also, in the last 10 years, I've become a better writer, learned more about my craft, added more tools to my toolbox. That means being able to perceive better ways of doing things now than I could've seen before. So here we are. I sit at my word processor with my notes from 1986, and I see a better way of doing something from those notes...do I go with what's there, or do I strike off and do the better approach, PROVIDED that it still takes me where I want to go in the arc? To ignore it is to be inflexible. I've stayed fluid. It's the same way I write a novel. You're just seeing the *process* acted out right in front of you, a process which normally the public never gets to see. That, I think, is some part of what you're reacting to. Also, you have to be careful in how you define an arc. There have been definite arcs of character all through this. Look at Londo when we first met him...and look at him now. Same for G'Kar, Delenn, Franklin... look at Sheridan when he first arrived: happy go lucky, smiling, glad to be there, fresh fruit and a hot shower, able to take care of anything and everything, how bad can it be?...and look at the dark, haunted, almost overwhelmed figure we see now. The story has also arc'd, peeling off layer by layer. The Minbari war leads to the secret of the Grey Council, which leads back to the first shadow war, which leads to the current shadow war, each really on a direct line one from the other. The slow corruption of Earthgov, the death of President Santiago, the rise of Clark, the fall from Earth...all of it a very definite arc. It's not just a matter of "living in interesting times." What makes a story is *causality*. A sequence of linked events. "The king died, and then the queen died" is not a story. "The king died, and then the queen died of grief" is a story. It is an arc, however small. Finally, I'd just note the posts -- public and private -- from folks who have sat down and watched the *whole show* as a unit, once per day, or several per day...and the linked aspect, the real *arc* of the show, becomes far more apparent when watched that way right now. It's there. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 22:08:06 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Arisians and Vorlons {original post unavailable} No, I really hadn't been thinking of the Arisians in either direction when I came up with the Vorlons...just what they were, not in relation to anything else. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 22:08:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Cathy Holley <75204.1515@compuserve.com> Subject: I admit I'm an idiot Cathy Holley <75204.1515@compuserve.com> asks: > Now, anybody know where I can get videos of the first two > seasons? How about the pilot? Welcome to the party. Videos aren't currently available, though the second and third season episodes can get rerun over the coming year. And you can always disagree with a decision...and explain why. Around the stage, we have a simple policy...anybody can go up to me and say, "Joe, it sucks." And tell me why. And if they're right, they get to stay.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 22:08:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > What was going on, who was this fellow, and what happened to him? > Who were these two species, have we seen them before, and are > they part of the League of Non-Aligned Worlds (given the hints of > their proximity to Brikiri space)? Thanks. The two aliens in the start of the episode were a Brakiri and a Gaim. "Interludes" for me marks a slight transition in the story, from one "shape" to the next up...the demarkation between the hero-cycle and the myth-cycle in the arc. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-May-96 22:08:13 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: I&E Support (blocked) asks: > Was this the thing you did that caused everybody to avoid you at > lunch for two days? Yeah, it's funny, out of all the awful terrible things I've done to our characters over these 3 years, the one that honked off the whole crew was the Kosh development. On one level, they loved it...loved how it tightened the screws...but they still didn't want to know from me for a day or two. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 01:35:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> (blocked) asks: > Sheridan tells Kosh, "How do we know it's even you in that > encounter suit? Wow, is that foreshadowing or what? > * Is the last voyage or duty of Kosh's ship something we'll see > in more detail? * My husband wants to know if you're going to get > Dick Sergeant to play the new Kosh? Thanks; there's a lot in the episode that plays very well on all the levels you mention. A lot of meat there. As for Kosh's ship...it headed for the nearest star, the local one, and basically dived into it.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 01:35:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Larry Rosenblum <72122.1555@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Larry Rosenblum <72122.1555@compuserve.com> asks: > Why did Londo not mention Adira since his original fling with > her, before this episode? > F Basically because it's hard in an episode to just bring up something out of the blue unless you're going to use it. You're stuck with, "Boy, I wish Adira were here...so what's for dinner?" Which will mean nothing to the folks who didn't see the first season unless you then talk more about her, show her...and then suddenly you REALLY have to deal with it or it's intrusive. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 15:55:31 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Julia E. Linthicum <73114.3530@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 article in paper Julia E. Linthicum <73114.3530@compuserve.com> asks: > Lennier as the "gentle alien"? > And Ivanova as "Sheridan's serious and comely colleague"? Thanks, actually it's an AP article that's appeared all over the place. One can quibble with the details, but it's actually a good piece. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 15:55:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> Subject: Interludes question John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> asks: > Could you please post this note to either JMS, or to the > moderated info notesfile? Was that man Morden, or Sinclair? It was Morden. If it were Sinclair, the actor would've been noted in the credits. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 15:55:37 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} No, it's not B4. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 15:55:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Arline Williams <102551.2346@compuserve.com> Subject: Arline Williams <102551.2346@compuserve.com> asks: > People are upset because you've killed off a main character? > One question: Will we be seeing the Monks again? Yes, you'll be seeing Brother Theo in the next batch of new eps...and thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 15:55:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post had no questions} Darn, you went and told...now it'll be all OVER the place.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 16:10:59 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > PS - Remember after the episodes about the soul hunter and the > one where the Minbari's belief that their souls were > transmigrating to Humans was revealed how all the rabid atheists > jumped down Joe's throat and said that if there was any room for > the objective existence of a "soul" in his story that it stopped > being science fiction and became fantasy and that he would lose > them as viewers? "The atheist is also denying the existence of God on faith since the statement that there is no God anywhere in the universe is equally impossible to prove (all universal statements are impossible to prove and therefore inherently unscientific)." That's a well phrased analysis of the situation...the only problem with it is that it ain't so. By your reasoning, if you say that there are green penguins at the north pole, and I refuse to believe it until you prove it, then I am a believer in non-green-penguinism. I am, therefore, a believer in the negative concept of everything in the universe that has not yet been conclusively proven. At which point the very notion of belief becomes utterly meaningless. If someone comes up to you and offers you a job if you move cross country, wouldn't you want a contract, some proof that the offer is real? Until it's provided, are you believing in non-contractosity? Bottom line, Daniel...if you or anyone else makes a statement, the burden of proof is not on me to *disprove* it, it's on you to *prove* it. Until that point, the question of belief doesn't enter into it. Is it or is it not provable? If not, then it isn't recognized as a real thing. Belief is irrelevant. Once you've shown me my new car, and I've driven in it, it doesn't require faith or belief to know it exists. For my money, no one has yet proven the existence of a supreme or minor deity...so for me, it simply doesn't exist. Again, belief has nothing to do with it. (I used the phrase belief system only because I didn't want to get into a prolonged discussion of it, and that seemed the simplest way of stating it. That'll teach me not to go for the precise terms, even if it means another few paragraphs of explanation.) jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 16:11:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? {original post had no questions} The other thing to bear in mind is that I can't really be responsible for what expectations you bring to it, since I can't see inside your head. (Or if I could I wouldn't tell you...and stop that, you'll go blind.) All I can do is tell the story that's in my head. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 16:11:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Elyse M. Grasso <70302.3304@compuserve.com> Subject: Elyse M. Grasso <70302.3304@compuserve.com> asks: > When it was over and I was breathing again, I wondered, was this > the death where the actor asked "why me?" This was the "now me" episode. The "why me?" episode is yet to come. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:28:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > On another matter, are scripts from already produced episodes of > B5 available commercially from any source? Daniel, you're on a slippery slide into sophistry. Of *course* one can make a blanket statement about some things. Many things, in fact. I can declare, in no uncertain terms, that there are in fact no Minbari. They are a fictional creation. So right off the bat that negates your thesis. And, again, you miss the point...the statement is not "X does not exist," that's the usual argument brought out to try and make someone prove a negative, which is nearly impossible. I repeat: the burden of proof is NOT on the person saying "show me," the burden of proof is on the person making the assertion. You say there's a god. Show me objective, scientifically verifiable, quantifiable, repicable evidence of same. Otherwise, I can say that there is no evidence in it, therefore I don't believe it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:28:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > Now one could attribute this change in Lyta's abilities due to > the Vorlons (since she has undergone some changes), but are we > going to find out more about this and Lyta's abilities later this > season? It's fair to say that Lyta has been...aided, slightly, in her abilities. But I'm not ready to pull the trigger on that one for a while yet. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:28:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks: > Don't we have here a really good example of the Heisenberg > Uncertainty Principle shifted from the laboratory to the > storytelling platform? Are you ever astonished at the > interpretations applied like a varnish over the story as you see > it? Yes, I'm often intrigued -- don't know if I'd say astonished -- at how the story is sometimes interpreted. But that's the interactive part of the process, what the viewer takes away is sometimes only indirectly the result of what's actually *there*. Take modern art for a moment. You show me a white canvas broken only by a single red dot in the lower left hand corner, I see a single red dot in the lower left hand corner of a white canvas, nod and walk away...somebody else takes a look at it, and sees a telling commentary on isolationism and the Communist scare of the 50s and man's basic inhumanity to man. Anything that passes for art reflects the work's creator, and the viewer; it's a mirror that works in two directions, and neither reflection holds the totality of the work individually. Art happens in the moments in-between. jm(could I possibly sound more effete?)s ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:28:07 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Guntis Glinavs <72411.1421@compuserve.com> Subject: Toronto Star B5 Article! Guntis Glinavs <72411.1421@compuserve.com> asks: > Again there are a few inaccuracies - did 500,000 fans really show > up to a B5 con in England? Thanks for letting folks know; I just heard about it myself, and am having a copy or two sent on to me for the files. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:28:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Ray Pelzer <70475.1263@compuserve.com> Subject: Ray Pelzer <70475.1263@compuserve.com> asks: > Are you giving out answers today? I meant you'd see Vorlons as Vorlons, not necessarily Kosh; I think I phrased it that way initially. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:28:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Thanks, and glad to have you on board for the ride.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:28:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: SysOp Dupa T Parrot <70040.104@compuserve.com> Subject: SysOp Dupa T Parrot <70040.104@compuserve.com> asks: > Why did Morden have to open the door to Kosh's quarters before > his Shadowy friends could attack Kosh? Are the Shadows a variety > of Teep? No, they're not a variety of teep. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:28:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> Subject: WwE Part 1 Question Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> asks: > Is it supposed to be a Shadow beam or some other race's? Sigh...no, it's a piece of stock footage from "Sky." We don't make the promos. On the other hand, they've been doing a much better job lately, so I'm not about to complain. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-May-96 22:59:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > In other words, who's challenge will you accept, Mark Twain's or > Pascal's? "This is a discussion that *has* to take place on two different levels. One is the purely empirical where saying "there is a God" and "There is no God" are both statements of nonsense devoid of real meaning because they both claim to describe some aspect of reality yet no test can be devised (again short of dying) that can falsify either of them." Once again, your knowledge of logic is faulty. The attempt in logic, debate or science is not to "falsify" or disprove anything; the goal is to PROVE something. Repeat after me: you cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof of any statement belongs with the person making the assertion, NOT the person receiving it to disprove it. You are simply misstating how science and logic work in order to make a debating point that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. "Without a transcendent God imposing a transcendent morality upon man there is no basis for rights save the state. Without a source of right and wrong that exists outside of the human race there is no basis, except for fickle human opinion, to say that Mother Teresa is better than Adolf Hitler." Another debating trick that also doesn't hold up to close inspection. The notion of a monotheistic god -- *GOD* -- is fairly recent in human terms. The Greeks managed to build an entire civilization that was known for its arts, its philosophy, its advancement in all areas (military included) using a host of household and minor deities who were in NO way ANY kind of guide to what was right and wrong; half of them were capricious and just plain nuts, the the other half were off mating with human women and then writing off their kids. Yes, in time Greece fell. But so did Rome, the spearhead (figuratively and literally) for Christian propagation worldwide in its early history, so I wouldn't necessarily throw *that* into the mix. Very, very, very few people decide not to murder because God wouldn't like it. They don't murder (assuming they choose that) because they're afraid of being apprehended and sentenced under the laws made by humans in order to facilitate cooperation and progress and safety. (If anything, people have proped up the notion of god as rationale for murder for centuries on all sides of the theological coin.) I'm not saying that religion is per se bad, it's like any other human artifact, including technology, it's what humans make of it. But at the same time it's self-indulgent in the extreme for folks who believe to write off the whole of human history and say that if it weren't for their particular deity, we wouldn't know right from wrong, or positive from negative, that we'd just be staggering around blindly...when the notion of that sort of god is extremely recent in human consciousness, and prior to then we did okay; not perfect, we had wars and bloodshed and the like...and we still do. Most of it by believers in one thing or another. When was the last time you heard of an atheist car bombing an embassy because he thought it would bring him closer to the void? When was the last time you heard of an atheist murdering his entire family because he *didn't* hear the voice of god talking in his head? When was the last time you heard of an atheist declaring a crusade or a jihad or a pogrom? (And don't even try to bring the old soviet union into this; that was a political madness that had less to do with belief systems and more to do with the accumulation of personal power at the expense of EVERYthing, that wouldn't allow for ANY divergence from what they considered the norm.) You can write off "fickle human opinion" all you want, but from where I sit we haven't done too badly, all things considered. If my tone seems to imply I took some small offense...the operative word is "small," because I'm used to this. On the one hand, I pretty much don't have a problem with anything anybody believes so long as nobody's hurt by it. On the other, religionists tend to mutter darkly that if it weren't for some god-inspired notion of right and wrong, if we don't have that, well, we're just anchorless, as prone to murder a child as give somebody a gift. That it's all caprice. Well, I happen to be an atheist, and I *can* tell the difference between Mother Theresa and Hitler. And your inference that one can't is simply wrong and condescending. As an atheist, I view every life as *incredibly* valuable because we only get one turn around the merry go round, and then it's over; no backsies, no second chances, no heavenly choir to sing one into the pearly gates no matter how terrible or abusive a life one's led as long as at the end one chooses to Believe. Every life is rarer than the rarest diamond, and since the only future we have is that which we make, the only signs we were here are that which we create, life must be preserved, nourished and given the chance to grow. Because those Greeks -- you remember, the ones who didn't believe in your particular god, with its rules for right and wrong -- actually had the audacity to once define happiness. Not in terms of right and wrong, but in even larger terms. I noted them at Macon. To wit: "The exercise of vital powers along lines of excellence in a life affording them scope." It's about the only creed I live by. Not bad. Bet they could even figure out this whole Mother Theresa/Hitler thing, too.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 13:58:18 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chris Croughton (UK) <100014.3217@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Chris Croughton (UK) <100014.3217@compuserve.com> asks: > Joe, are there any other TV people who believe that? Yes, there are definitely other TV folk who feel that way; difference is, you just don't hear about them a lot. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 13:58:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Act Structure Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> asks: > Is this something that's common in TV drama? > Have I just not noticed it before? > Or is this something uncommon that you've adopted? It's actually something I had to fight for; a number of folks at WB weren't sure about the notion of using the tag (which you refer to as the last act) in quite the way I use it. So yeah, it's a bit off the usual. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 13:58:22 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Not special per se, just to establish that they have more than one design. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post had no questions} "One of the bedrock elements of science is that for a theory to be taken seriously it must be falsifiable." Nope. If that's what you're thinking, then I suggest you go back and check, because that's not correct in any respect. To take the green penguins at the north pole scenario again, I can search for 165 years, and not find any, and you can say, "Well, I guess you just missed them, but they're there." It is not the purpose of scientific endeavor to *disprove* every assertion, only to prove them. Your statement is simply false. I'm sorry. Saying it's so doesn't make it so. So everything that proceeds from that is equally flawed. Any scientist or logician here will back me up on this. You may not want to hear it, Daniel, but you're simply wrong on this. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:06 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post unavailable} No, I'm an atheist. I prefer to define myself. I don't say "maybe there is, maybe there isn't." There isn't. There is no proof to this statement. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post unavailable} No, see my note to the, er, feeder...not an agnostic, an atheist. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:12 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > Since you don't believe in God what standard do you use to judge > Mother Teresa better than Hitler if it isn't human? Without a > viewpoint that exists outside of the human race what basis do you > or the Greeks have for saying that one is ultimately better than > the other that doesn't finally come back to human opinion? Daniel, I hate to burst your balloon, but *everything* comes down to a human standard, to human opinion. Christianity as it's practiced today is nothing like what was originally there around 100 AD. For a long time, the church had no problem with the concept of slavery. Even used sections of the bible as proof that it was a proper activity. Only later, after society began to change, did they come around. Why? Because they reacted to changing human opinions. Once, the proper way to deal with heretics was to burn them at the stake, or press them with stones. That changed as society changed. And I'm sorry, but I've *read* the bible, twice, cover to cover, and I don't see any perfect guide or example of right and wrong there. I see a fictional deity that is capricious, slightly insane, petty, inconsistent, vindictive...jealous, by its own admission, a trait we would deplore in ourselves. The whole Adam/Eve thing was a mean-spirited setup. The tree was the tree of knowledge, remember; the penalty was death. But insofar as we know, nothing died in the garden, certainly no other people had died. So to say "you shall surely die" was a meaningless concept. They were children, they didn't know what the penalty meant. And the kicker is...if the tree truly *were* the knowledge of good and evil, and they didn't have that knowledge until after they ate the fruit...then THEY DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS WRONG WHEN THEY DID IT. They'd only know it was wrong AFTERWARD. And for this they and their inheritors across ten thousnd generations were sentenced to pain and death? This is the example of transcendental rightness you would hold before me? Thank you, but I'll apply elsewhere. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:16 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Marte Brengle <76703.4242@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post had no questions} Here's a little interesting aside...I used to write for Madeline Murry O'Hare's magazine, AMERIAN ATHEIST, back when I was in college. I did a humor column, the occasional article, that sort of thing. But over time, I came to the conclusion that she wasn't just trying to push for rights for atheists, but in fact was working to *eliminate* religion, which I had a moral and ethical problem with. The constitution is there to allow anyone to believe, or not believe, whatever they choose. If the day comes when certain relgions are banned, I'll be right there on the front lines with everybody else fighting for the restoration of those rights (though I have a quiet suspicion that the same might not happen if the situation were reversed). I felt that this was supremely wrong, and resigned as a result. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> asks: > Why would he? No, actually, there's a much simpler answer to the Ironheart question than that. If we all remember the episode, he was trying as hard as he could to control himself, lest his abilities tear the place apart. He was deliberately and with great pain trying NOT to use his abilities in any way, manner, shape or form. He was also in great physical pain, was later shot, and became transcendent...which tends to kind of distract one.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:22 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Arline Williams <102551.2346@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} Thanks. The voice-over is something I mentioned here a few months ago as a tool I was adding to my toolbox to use as counterpoint, or segue, in ways I hadn't tried before. I use it again here and there, though the key with any new tool is not to go nuts and use it all over the place when a better one, maybe the one you already had, is better suited to the task. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Scott Miller <70562.3656@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} I think the nature of the debate is using the wrong language here; I think when people are saying I'm "open-minded" it's possible -- and I'm only suggesting this, not to put words in anybody's mouth -- that the word being searched for is actually "fair." Am I open minded about the possibility of deities? No, in that you're correct. Am I fair and/or open-minded in the treatment of religions on the show, in saying that for many people, it's a good thing *for them*? I like to think so. And that may be what's under discussion. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: David Cerreta <72630.3433@compuserve.com> Subject: <> David Cerreta <72630.3433@compuserve.com> asks: > Apparently every encounter suit is not the same, neh? > The message from Ivanova is beginning to come through > because...of the temporal rift AND because there was no guarantee > that the Whitestar would go 6 years into the past to save B4 from > the Shadow attack, right? Then was the vision Sinclair had of a > future B5 being attacked by a much stronger Shadow fleet a vision > (again) of an alternate future, where he never became ambassador > and remained on B5? Thanks, and yep, you nailed the timeline just right. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-May-96 19:02:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} "I hate you." Why, thank you...then the episode had its desired effect.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > At what point does anything you said address my point that a > standard that isn't divine must therefore be human? Otherwise what > stops me from decreeing that I have a "right" to everything you > own and backing up that claim with the fact that I am better > armed than you? "Otherwise what stops me from decreeing that I have a "right" to everything you own and backing up that claim with the fact that I am better armed than you? Rights must be granted by some force greater than the individual. That leaves God or the state." And, of course, this is exactly what happened on a regular basis throughout human history until only the last couple of centuries. If it was god doing this granting of rights...where was he for the last six thousand years? Snoozing off in a corner somewhere? No, the rights you speak of were won by humans, fighting for their right not to be trammeled upon by greater forces, and bonding together in common cause to make sure it doesn't happen again in this place. While many of the "founding fathers" were believers, many others were simply deists, or freethinkers...they didn't do what they did because suddenly they figured god had given them the right, but because they got pushed to the wall, and we were 3000 nautical miles away from King George, and they in their very human way got fed up with being pushed around and decided it was time to push back, and create a set of laws that would prevent the tyrant from trying it again, or rising from within. Sorry, Daniel, we did this on our own. God's a credit jumper. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: BRIAN COONEY <100551.1656@compuserve.com> Subject: UK Titles BRIAN COONEY <100551.1656@compuserve.com> asks: > After the opening, the actors names and eps title are in a > different text any reason way? I suspect that this is because we provide textless sections in the beginning to foreign markets for various languages, so they set them in a different type. I guess.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:44 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: SysOp Lee Whiteside <76711.2660@compuserve.com> Subject: Radio & TV Museum SysOp Lee Whiteside <76711.2660@compuserve.com> asks: > Do they only include things that they get as part of a festival > or something or can some producer or studio offer them some tapes > to make available for viewing? I hadn't even thought about that aspect...it's certainly one that should be pursued, I agree. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:48 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> Subject: Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> asks: > While I'm sure that you never intended the comparison when you > wrote SoT, (I'd go so far as to lay odds that you've never seen > Captain Eo), were the parallels mentioned by anyone when the show > was being produced? No, it's never come up before, and I think that's WAY stretching it. (How come everybody always spends so much time trying to find out what a show like B5 is *like* instead of just looking at it for what it is? "Oh, it's Cap'n Eo...oh, no, it's Lord of the Rings...Dune, Dune, I tell you, it's Dune...no, it's this over here...no, it's Cap'n Crunch...." Feh. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>Interludes<< {original post unavailable} Actually, no, there are probably fewer. We have a stable of about half a dozen directors at any given time; some move on, some stay, it's the nature of the beast. That's about par for the course, maybe a bit less. I know we had more on Murder, She Wrote. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Cheers for Mira {original post unavailable} Which is pretty much what I told you would be the case by this point. (Nobody ever believes me...do I have an untrustworthy face? Do I look like Robert Vesco trying to sneak back into the country disguised as Moe Howard?) And yes, Bruce is a hell of a lot better than some folks were willing to give him credit for in the beginning. I think that's coming out now as his role becomes more deep and more serious. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Elyse M. Grasso <70302.3304@compuserve.com> Subject: Elyse M. Grasso <70302.3304@compuserve.com> asks: > Are they a lot bigger now? > How big do they grow? No, they're about the same height consistently; it's probably an artifact of the camera angles and lighting. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} If we put in warnings, the impact would be reduced. No word yet on renewal, probably in the next couple of weeks we'll hear something definitive. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:04:59 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} "The "arc" is fully alive for you now, I think. Without these characters living and breathing inside your mind I don't see how one man could write as much as you have over the past two seasons. What I *have* noticed is that all the actors now seem to be responding to the story you're telling." Yeah, it's kind of a funny thing...the deeper we got into the season, as the actors saw only one name on script after script, and they began to understand what was coming, and it's all *very* consistent...the sense of this being a novel really came through for everyone in a very profound way. You could really feel a change in everyone's attitude, though it'd be hard to put into words. A sense of, "This is it, this is the story, we're moving now, we're doing something nobody's ever done." They know how hard it is for anyone to write this many scripts, which is why it's never been done before, and I think they not only respected that, but felt they had to rise to the challenge and give just as much at that end of it. Usually you tend to hit a slump energy-wise in your third year; not here. Everyone's just hitting all cylinders. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:22:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > The closest thing to an insulting term that I have used is to > call human opinion "fickle" but if that isn't a proper term for > the race that produced both Mother Teresa *and* Adolph Hitler, > George Washington *and* Bill Clinton, Babylon 5 *and* Star Trek: > Voyager then what is? Dan, I know you don't understand how one could take offense at some of this, which is why I've more or less been riding closely on my reactions. Let me try and explain: Your statement is that without a "transcendental" outside force, a deity, to tell us right from wrong, that we have no way of distinguishing good from evil, Mother Theresa from Hitler. That's what you *said*. Now, I don't buy into the deity business. Therefore, *by your definition*, I'm one of those folks who can't distinguish a humanitarian from a mass murderer. The problem, Daniel, is that there's so much jingoism in this argument that statements like the one you made are put out there almost reflexively, without thinking. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:22:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks: > Is this difference something that will be addressed at a later > date or a nice detail that will simply be a source of viewer > speculation? Will her reaction to his death come into play in a > later epidose? The red ship was simply another variation on the standard; nothing too major about it...and yes, when Lyta returns from her errand, she'll definitely get into this, and there will have to be some explanations made, though not to her.... And thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:22:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: wwor channel nine nyc (blocked) asks: > Could you do something about it? No, the incidents with local stations can only be affected by local residents, I have zip control or influence over that. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 00:22:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: George Ryerson <70775.142@compuserve.com> Subject: >>Interludes<< {original post had no questions} Actually, no, the replacement isn't Kosh, as you say, it's another Vorlon, with a very different personality...the "we are all Kosh" is more of a conceptual thing.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 15:34:42 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> asks: > I know you said you were going to start pulling some triggers, > but man, are you related to "The Rifleman", or what? Thanks. I like Zathras...he's just nuts. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:14:47 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> asks: > Have you heard anything different? Not only haven't I heard anything new, I hadn't even *learned* that she was missing until about a week ago...the perils of being buried alive in a story. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:14:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Liz P. <76370.2665@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post had no questions} Exactly. The constitution (this is from memory, so I may get a word out of place) stipulates "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibit the free exercise thereof." Which means the state should have nothing to say about it one way or the other. It's a personal matter for each individual. It's a bit of wisdom that goes back about 2,000 years; "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's; and to god that which is god's." That the line gets blurred sometimes is really in violation of what the bible seemed to suggest. The pharisees were synonymous with hypocrites, they had allied themselves with the government of the time, and that was their downfall in the final analysis; the state invariably corrupts religion. The overall sense was to keep away from the government, to strive for something higher. These days a fair amount of religion has become mass theater, much in violation of the suggestion to "go into your closet to pray," and the suggestions that those who made a show of their beliefs were not exactly role models. The state should be religion-neutral, neither encouraging nor discouraging. Sometimes this is unfair to one group or another, but as long as it does so consistently, not favoring either side, then it's okay. The best compromise is one in which neither side feels it's entirely won. (Yes, some of the questions of where and when religious artifacts can be put up stray into grey areas...but at least the patriotism of those involved is not usually up for grabs. During one Presidential election, then Vice-President Bush, on a campaign stop in Chicago, was asked about his reaction to atheists, and he said, "Well, that's certainly their choice, though I don't see how anybody could call them patriots, since this is one nation under god." Substitute catholics or jews or moslems or japanese or irish for atheists in that sentence, and you'd have a firestorm that would've brought down the whole campaign. Here nobody even seemed to notice.) jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:14:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Al Lipscomb <75204.2225@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Al Lipscomb <75204.2225@compuserve.com> asks: > Is any of this making any sense? Exactly. That's a *very* good point; I'd forgotten about Romans 2:14. There are sections that imply that those who don't hear The Gospels will be judged by their own actions and their own conscience, which implies the presence of a conscience (as does the quote you cite) even in the absence of a "transcendental" being, that is, knowing right from wrong. Excellent point. "...the largest problem we have in this country is that we have moved from a justice system to a legal system." Wow...I've never heard that put so simply and so succinctly. And it's absolutely correct. Nicely done. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:14:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post had no questions} Yes, Daniel, but you keep dancing away from the fact that the catholic church, and the Jewish religion, have also had changes and schisms and fractures, as the result of *changes in human opinion*. If there were an eternal truth being practiced, then it should be unchanging. But religion is *constantly* changing because of alterations in social mores and opinions. The role of women in the synagogue. The changes from latin to english mass. The final decision by the church that maybe the sun *doesn't* rotate around the earth. The ordination of women rabbis. The dietary restrictions as set forth in the Bible. Heck, Daniel, the Old Testament goes on and on at great length to explain how the laws work, that the laws are the only ways to get over to the pleasant side of the afterlife...then suddenly in the new testament it's all, "No, no, forget the laws, THIS is how you do it." What, god was just kidding for the preceding couple thousand years? Go back to the early Catholic records, read the Dead Sea Scrolls, the early Roman records, and you'll find that the practice of Christianity today is utterly unlike its early history. Religion changes as the world around it changes...or it dies. The constant, unchanging religion you cite doesn't exist in reality. It's ALL a case of "it seems to me." Every time a new pope comes in, you get a massive case of it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:14:58 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: I. & E. Opinion {original post unavailable} Thanks. Yes, Delenn mentions in the tag that the Vorlons will be sending someone to quietly replace Kosh. It's a bit darker character. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:15:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> {original post unavailable} Actually, Sebastian said that bit about dying alone to both Sheridan and Delenn. Who knows, he may have known something.... Yes, if Kosh had run, which wasn't in his character in the first place, someone else would've paid that price. Londo still has chances, if he doesn't blow them. You'll see a bit more about this in the two-parter. Yes, some Vorlons do appear to us as female versions. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:15:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> Subject: >>Interludes<< Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> asks: > Joe, one question about Kosh: Since the Shadows killed him, did > they see him in that now they know he was one of the Elder race? > Or are they in the dark about the Vorlons? Oh, no, the Shadows and the Vorlons know each other from way, way back. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:15:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> {original post had no questions} You're right; it was a sideways reference, without name, and I was thinking of whether or not the character had been named since. I missed that one. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:15:07 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: David Wilhelmy <73370.1751@compuserve.com> Subject: David Wilhelmy <73370.1751@compuserve.com> asks: > Kosh's ship), are there a bunch of Vorlons in that cruiser or > just one GREAT BIG Vorlon? There's a bunch in the big ship. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:15:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> Subject: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> asks: > "Where?" > How do you *write* like that?!? > Ed just exudes menace like slime, doesn't he? > (I mean that in the best possible way.) An interesting thought: > What are the standing Security orders re: Morden? Yes, there is something thematically present about growing up, and parents, and coming of age that threads through the story. And yes, there's the deliberate irony...that just as we finally start to really hear from Kosh...he's gone. Snatched away just as we got close. Which would add to the feelings. Good analysis. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 16:15:12 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: David Kuhn <73532.741@compuserve.com> Subject: Zocalo Statement David Kuhn <73532.741@compuserve.com> asks: > Any comments on your earlier statement to help us feel better? Still waiting.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:48:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 and J.R.R.Tolkien? {original post unavailable} Odd...they reversed the Michael and the J. Weird they'd do that. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:48:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > So by what authority do you say that "A" is bad and "B" is good > and why should I respect it? "Alright, you and I are both humans. We are in essence equal. So by what authority do you say that "A" is bad and "B" is good and why should I respect it?" You respect if if there are more people than you are who believe A is bad and B is good, and they pass a bunch of laws requiring your adherence to this. Furthermore... You, as a christian, say A is bad, B is good, suggesting the transcendental guidance of your particular deity or prophet. A moslem says B is good, and A is bad, based on the transcendental guidance of HIS particular deity or prophet. So how is this resolved? See, this is one of the problems people bring to the table on this argument; they argue that truth always comes from transcendental god...omitting that they mean THEIR PARTICULAR god, that this alone is real truth...and the other guys are just misled. "Ours is BETTER. Our god can beat up their god." It's like those who want creationism taught in schools...oddly, when they bring this up, it's always the christian version of this...you don't tend to hear much about the one where Earth is carried on the back of a giant turtle.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:48:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Cheers for Mira {original post unavailable} Tell your husband that the Flying Tigers actually have given their permission for us to use their logos and artwork; Sheridan's helmet has a Flying Tigers logo. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:58:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post had no questions} Not everything in life has a clue in front of it.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:58:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: >>Interludes<< Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > If you were still the producer what are the chances that the last > episode of the series would have been about Jessica's friends > using Jessica's investigative techniques to solve Jessica's > murder? The odds of that story are about zip. One doesn't do such things to Jessica Fletcher. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:58:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>Interludes<< {original post unavailable} No, the shadows and vorlons are definitely not the same race. And thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:58:57 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> (blocked) asks: > Now that Kosh is dead (still hard to accept), what happens to > Lyta Alexander? She was Kosh's special attache, wasn't she? > Or is she working with ALL of the Vorlon? She'll now have to work with the incoming replacement Vorlon, who might be just a bit miffed.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:59:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Doolitle's Raid (blocked) asks: > Anyway, was this Vorlon attack synonomous to Jimmy Doolittle's > raid on Tokyo in the early days of WWII? WHat exactly has Sheridan > learned as of now? Will Kosh's replacement become his mentor now? > a Vorlette? Sheridan has almost certainly not learned all he needed to know. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 20:59:04 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Timothy C Schell <71174.2414@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Timothy C Schell <71174.2414@compuserve.com> asks: > How was this fight different than the one we didn't see in "Signs > and Portents"? Were there more Shadows this time or are they > getting stronger? If Kosh did take out some Shadows, will more be > sent to Morden as replacements? Did Kosh project to Delenn, G'Kar, > or anyone else besides Sheridan during the fight? Did Garibaldi > ever get a chance to speak with Kosh about the Talia/Abbut data > crystal as hinted at in "Divided Loyalties"? Besides being > extremely old, was Kosh an average Vorlon or particularly special > in terms of strength, skill, or status? To your questions: 1. Kosh died fighting, I guess, and I'm also guessing that he took some Shadows with him. How was this fight different than the one we didn't see in "Signs and Portents"? Were there more Shadows this time or are they getting stronger? They were not initially prepared to kill him. That was a territorial or jurisdictional squabble. This was retribution. 2. If Kosh did take out some Shadows, will more be sent to Morden as replacements? He didn't. Hurt 'em good, but didn't take them out. 3. Did Kosh project to Delenn, G'Kar, or anyone else besides Sheridan during the fight? No. 4. Did Garibaldi ever get a chance to speak with Kosh about the Talia/Abbut data crystal as hinted at in "Divided Loyalties"? Yes. 5. Besides being extremely old, was Kosh an average Vorlon or particularly special in terms of strength, skill, or status? No other ambassador on the station has demonstrated the clout back home to sortie an entire fleet at a moments notice. Delenn and Londo have only called on forces from a particular faction in their polities. He was certainly well regarded...one of the older of the vorlons. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-May-96 23:47:35 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 and J.R.R.Tolkien? {original post unavailable} "The best place to find out more about Joe is from the Lurker's Guide (http:/www.hyperion.com/lurk/lurkers.html)." Yeah...I suppose...well, that or America's Most Wanted.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 13:39:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Dimitri M LaBarge <71501.3353@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Dimitri M LaBarge <71501.3353@compuserve.com> asks: > Who was right, what was the proper interpretation of this church? > Yet, aren't Pelagius' ideas of an human-powered Christianity > equally as valid as the self-hating Augustinian conception? Good points. (And of course, there's Martin Luther and his fistful of theses nailed to a door....) jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 13:39:21 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} At this point, yes, since Ardwight tends to understand Vorlon. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 13:39:22 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Yeah, and after a while I stopped doing that, because a number of folks couldn't distinguish between nodding to something that went before as an act of tribute or respect, and *doing* that story. So I pointedly don't do that anymore. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 13:39:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> Subject: WwE1 & Zathras Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> asks: > After just watching WwE1, I have to ask: Will we ever learn > exactly who/what/when Zathras' people are? Eventually, though that answer isn't terribly important. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 13:39:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > The only question I have about this is will we, the audience, be > able to tell that there is a different Vorlon on the station, > other than through the personality of said character? You'll know the difference. Believe me. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 13:39:29 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Your impression {original post unavailable} I thought Marcon was quite enjoyable. The organizers were quite pleasant, and the folks who showed up were nothing short of terrific. I think I can speak for Richard and Pat as well, and say that we all had a great time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 13:39:31 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Scott Miller <70562.3656@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Scott Miller <70562.3656@compuserve.com> asks: > Kosh may even have been the one the Shadows' asked, "What do you > want?" Care to comment? No, not really, but you're in intertesting territory. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 13:39:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Stephen M. Demarest <70674.1405@compuserve.com> Subject: Stephen M. Demarest <70674.1405@compuserve.com> asks: > Was Santiago president 8 years ago? > If so, was he (or his govt) working with the Shadows? No, Santiago wasn't involved with the shadows; certain elements within his government, however, *were*. Which was one reason why they needed to get him out of the way. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 22:32:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Scott Miller <70562.3656@compuserve.com> Subject: Scott Miller <70562.3656@compuserve.com> asks: > Am I in the ballpark? You could be in the ballpark...question is, which ballpark? Anything clearer than that will have to wait another week. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:07 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post had no questions} "Generally whichever side has the most people left alive at the end of the war gets to decide." Exactly. So much for eternal verities and transcendental truth. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post had no questions} "The reason for the multiplication of Old Testament laws was because when Moses brought down the first ten the people promised to obey them to God's satisfaction. This proved that they had missed the point, which was that God's law is impossible for man to keep to God's standards because his standard is perfection and we are imperfect." So in other words, this was sort of god's version of "pull my finger...." jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post had no questions} Right. And that's why they were so sad, you see.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:13 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Jon A. Bell <74124.276@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Jon A. Bell <74124.276@compuserve.com> asks: > Is it just me, or is there something wrong with this picture? > (Then again, I live in San Francisco, and becoming an Ordained > Minister of Anything in California is probably just a matter of > filling out a form and paying $20 to someone.) The Church of > Silly Walks, anyone? "My stepfather, a tax accountant, informed me that the pay of ordained ministers does not have Social Security taxes taken out of it, on the grounds that in their dotage, their flock will take care of them. Is it just me, or is there something wrong with this picture?" Yes, it proves that the social security system is completely flocked. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:15 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Prophetic dream {original post unavailable} The origin of that image will be discussed later this season. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Great that the CD got there...and no, Ivanova isn't a strong enough teep for the incoming shadow vessel to really even notice. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:21 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Gail Marsella <71551.3200@compuserve.com> Subject: The Creative Process Gail Marsella <71551.3200@compuserve.com> asks: > Here's a different kind of question for you: When you sit down to > work, I know you're not entirely in charge - the characters are - > but how do you participate? Did you *develop* a sustainable > creative process, or were you just always this way? In short, can > you train - or at least successfully invite - the Muse, and how > do you do it? "Here's a different kind of question for you: When you sit down to work, I know you're not entirely in charge - the characters are - but how do you participate? When I write fiction (admittedly not often), it either flows out onto the page as though someone else were using my hands on the keyboard, or nothing happens at all, no matter how long I sit there. You don't seem to have any "nothing" time. Did you *develop* a sustainable creative process, or were you just always this way? In short, can you train - or at least successfully invite - the Muse, and how do you do it?" Hard to say...it's like any muscle, the more you use it, the easier it gets to use. I think a part of it stems from the fact that I have very little in the way of barriers between me and the writing. Too many people who want to be writers feel that when they sit behind the keyboard, they have to do something different or other...that somehow WRITING has an overlay of some sort, that it's different than talking. But in many ways, it ain't any different. The best writing (IMO) is natural writing, where the words on the page flow very naturally, very smoothly. Every once in a while, you pull out all the stylistic tricks, you thunder and lightning all over the page, when needed for effect...but it's the writing free of artifice that seems, for me, to work well. If you hang out with writers long enough, the really *good* ones, you learn soon enough that most of them talk exactly the way they write. Lemme give you a forinstance...when Asimov was first struggling as a writer, he had lunch with his agent one day. He was having a hard time describing things, using language to paint pictures. The agent said, "You know how Hemingway would describe the sun rising in the morning?" No, Asimov said, leaning in...how? "The sun rose in the morning." There's virtually nothing between my brain and the keyboard; I'm hardwired that way, which is why I can't dictate scripts...I write through my fingers. I write pretty much the way I talk. A lot of folks hereabouts have seen me at conventions, and they've noted that the me you see here is pretty much the me they see there, and the me that's just *there* all the time. If you stop thinking about *trying to write*, and just write...the way you have to stop thinking about the next step you make, and just *dance*...the way you have to forget about technique and just make love...it all comes together. You don't Try To Write. You just write. As for story ideas...it's just nothing I've ever had a problem with. As long as your characters are all distinct personalities, the stories you write will be as distinct and different as they are. Find out who the character is, what he wants, how far he'll go to achieve it, and how far somebody else will go to stop him...and the rest takes care of itself. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Dana Wright <72627.531@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} That's a question that I think I could try and answer here for the next seven hours, and not quite get out the way I want to...it's one of those things you just sorta understand and do intuitively, and leave for the critics later to dissect. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> (blocked) asks: > Will we see Kosh in th epast? > And will we see Valerian? Not exactly, not as you might think, but in a sense.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-May-96 23:13:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Someone find me a very large stick.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 00:59:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Vicki Mitchell <76234.1317@compuserve.com> Subject: Cheers for Mira {original post had no questions} Couldn't agree with you more. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 01:18:59 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Richard M. Perry <76461.2737@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Richard M. Perry <76461.2737@compuserve.com> asks: > FWIW, every time I show that post to anyone who hasn't seen the > show, I get the response, "What show is this? When is it on? Thanks. I will confess I go back and forth about getting into this kind of conversation on the nets; either way, it will have an effect on how people perceive the show. And, basically, I'm here to talk about the show, and be responsive to questions, not necessarily to put my beliefs, attitudes or prejudices out there in other people's faces. I'm not what matters here, I'm not terribly interesting...it's the show, and those two can't ever be allowed to get confused. I was kicking myself for days for allowing myself to get dragged into this (and it's nobody's fault but my own that it happened). It's not really my place to go around lecturing anyone or spouting off to anyone about what they believe, and a few times, when the debate got really warmed up, I did that. What I do or don't believe is fundamentally irrelevant to the discussion, as long as I can keep it out of the show. (The one area where it does get through that you note -- the importance of life and the right to choose one's own road through that -- is there, granted, but there aren't a whole lot of reasonable counter-arguments to that one.) Because I make this show, I have -- for lack of a better phrase -- a platform from which to spout off. People tend to at least note what I say, even though most of it is rather silly, though I don't for a second buy into the notion that people are overmuch influenced by anything I say here. Particularly those on-line, who tend to be a fairly hardy bunch, intellectually speaking. But there's still an obligation not to misuse or abuse that platform, or take advantage of it to spout notions that don't really touch the show per se at any two contiguous points. In short...sometimes I say more than I should, and should learn to just Shut Up once in a while. If this time out the discussion has done some good, then that's great. But I still think some days I shouldn't have allowed it to happen. If somebody wants to take a pot shot at my beliefs, let 'em. It's only pixels. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 01:19:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Richard M. Perry <76461.2737@compuserve.com> Subject: Richard M. Perry <76461.2737@compuserve.com> asks: > Is there a parallel (intended or not) in the "effects" of Kosh's > death and his calling John, son; and the winged legend known as a > Phoenix? If so, will Kosh be re-born in one form or another? > Or has he already? > Also, what was different about Kosh's confrontation with Morden's > associates this time as opposed to the one in "Signs and > Portents"? Was it just that there were more of them this time, or > was there some kind of agreement reached in the earlier one? The earlier confrontation was a jurisdictional one; this one was about retribution. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 12:56:10 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: (blocked) asks: > - Isn't Delenn's sleeve different from the one shown in "Babylon > Squared"? > - Why wasn't B5 destroyed? > Is it because the shadows knew they failed with B4 and so there > was no use in destroying B5? > - Did the first three stations look similar to B4? > - Why didn't Sinclair want Garibaldi along for the ride? > - Is *Sheridan* The One? B5 wasn't destroyed because it wasn't the one that would be taken back. Yes, the prior stations would've looked more like B4 but they were sabotaged *very* early in the construction process. You'll learn why he didn't want Garibaldi along next ep. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 12:56:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Shadows entry to B5 {original post unavailable} They physically come aboard. There's no beaming-in tech in the B5 universe. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 12:56:12 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Brian A. Thomas <75231.1122@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Brian A. Thomas <75231.1122@compuserve.com> asks: > Congrtulations on creating the single greatest hour in television > history, and it's supposed to get better?! Will that be explained > soon? 2) The fact that the Vorlons tiped their hat, and made it > known that they were involved with the Shadow war, seems to bid > ill, as in a previouse ep I seem to recall Delenn or Kosh > remarking how they don't have enouph forces gatherd...or am I > remembering wrong? Actually, no, I never said that we'd show a vorlon as a vorlon this season; in time, yes, but not this season. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 12:56:13 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> asks: > Is that the "pilot", or am I (as my friends maintain) > hallucinating again? It's hallucinations. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 12:56:15 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> Subject: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> asks: > In "Ship of Tears" how did Bester's fighter get into B5 space? > And if he hitched a ride on a larger vessel with jump drive, why > didn't B5 detect the jump point? Is their early warning system > damaged or deficient in some way perhaps? It hitched a ride; and it's far enough outside B5...about an hour or so in normal space...that they wouldn't have picked it up. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 14:49:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > I assume that might be "Walkabout"? Yes, the new Vorlon arrives in Walkabout. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 14:49:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > On that subject, did Ardwight do the voice for the Vorlon that we > saw in "War Without End, Part One"? Yes, that was Ardwight again. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 14:49:54 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> {original post unavailable} I think a yes covers all or most of your questions. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 14:49:57 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: William H. DiPaola <76521.1751@compuserve.com> Subject: The Creative Process William H. DiPaola <76521.1751@compuserve.com> asks: > Can you at all identify as a writer with what I'm relating to you > here? I'm also hard on myself where my writing is concerned > because I constantly find myself in the spot of saying, "Why is > it that I can't do more than I do?!" Any suggestions? That's the hard part, the doing. Lots of folks have ideas, but they flit, or they don't have the discipline to sit down behind a keyboard and just *do it* for the requisite number of hours per day. And that's the one thing neither I nor anyone else can help or advise with. It's what Marcus said: patience, determination, direction and strength. And to quote somebody else, sometimes some people mistake a passion for reading for a desire to write. They're wholly different impulses. Writers write. It's what they do. If you're struggling to do it, maybe it's part of your brain throwing roadblocks in front of you to try and tell you something. Maybe it's a lack of discipline, or attention span, or something deeper, a concern about finishing, or some other area. I dunno...this is one area where I can't advise worth a damn, because I've never had this problem. It's Heinlein's (and Ellison's) rules of writing: you must write, you must finish what you write, you must put it on the marketplace, and you must keep it on the marketplace until sold. Sometimes we get caught by the *idea* of a story, but to actually finish writing it, the *execution* of that idea, takes a great deal of work, and if the basic idea is already down there, the impetus to write it, the steam feeding the machine, evaporates quickly. Only a conscious decision to finish the damned thing can carry you the rest of the way, a commitment to follow through on the craft of the STORYTELLING. It's the difference between two kinds of people who talk about how they met their respective spouses. One says "at a party," the other says, "at Bob's part in Toluca Lake, and she was wearing a red dress, and I couldn't take my eyes off her until I got her alone for a minute." Idea vs. execution, telling the idea vs. telling the *story*. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 14:54:45 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post unavailable} Nah, it really isn't understatement...people who spend a day in my company invariably come away with the suspcion that there's considerably less there than meets the eye. The invitation is, however, much appreciated. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 14:54:47 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? {original post had no questions} Oddly enough...I think there's room for arc series elsewhere. What I think is killing Murder One is that we just lived *through* this with the OJ Simpson trial, and everybody kind of got uniformly fed up with it, and so just don't have it in them to go through it again in a fictional environment. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 19:28:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com> asks: > Do you actually find this when you spend time with the folks that > know you online?? No, it's not that...but in person, I generally tend to be fairly quiet and reserved, almost verging on shy. In groups I tend to vanish into the wallpaper. You'll usually find me at the back of the room, observing. I'm not terribly extraordinary looking, rather average really, in contrast with what some perceive of me online, as evidenced by an email note I got just today where someone fancied me a mix of Sam Kinneson and Sean Connery, based on the messages here and elsewhere. I can gear it up when I have to go to a convention and perform, but the rest of the time...I'm nearly invisible. And I mean *invisible*. As some small proof of this, when I went to my 20th high school reunion, I knew every face and every name I saw. Out of the hundreds of people who showed up, two -- TWO -- vaguely sorta kind remembered me, but that's about it. I passed through their ranks without leaving even a footprint. This is the norm, not the exception. Online, I can be Cary Grant...but offline, closer to Don Knotts. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 19:28:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> Subject: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> asks: > Could you suggest some of his other works? > Did he write any novels? I'd highly recommend The Stars My Destination. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 22:52:13 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: The Creative Process {original post unavailable} Thanks.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:09:46 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Joe an atheist? {original post unavailable} It's okay, kiddo...I'm used to it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:09:47 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: The Creative Process {original post had no questions} Yes, I think I've seen stories about that on the news...fun stuff. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:09:48 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Cheers for Mira {original post had no questions} Exactly. A Heinlein hero isn't a bad description. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:09:50 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Matthew D. Woudstra <71073.540@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Matthew D. Woudstra <71073.540@compuserve.com> asks: > is Sinclair Valen? > Am I even close? Best to watch and find out.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:09:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Matthew D. Woudstra <71073.540@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} No, B4 survived the prior shadow war, but in very bad shape; didn't last much longer after that. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:09:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > Have the Spitfires changed shape a little? Not that I know of. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:09:57 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Toni Muller <75223.1575@compuserve.com> Subject: >>War Without End: 1<< Toni Muller <75223.1575@compuserve.com> asks: > Me: Wanna watch Babylon 5? > Him: (Sound of extreme disappointment and look of consternation) > Why do they do that? Inch by inch, we're taking over the world.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:09:58 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Toni Muller <75223.1575@compuserve.com> Subject: >>War Without End: 1<< {original post had no questions} Exactly. The quote Delenn recited in "Parliament" was the quote from Valen when he formed the first Grey Council. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-May-96 23:10:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Story Arc Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> asks: > In "Infection," I was thinking, "Gee, what's this got to do with > anything?" 1) Will we see Ironheart again? > 2) Are Sinclair and Delenn married? > 3) Will we see the ship or beings that Catherine saw on Sigma 957 > again? 4) Whatever happened to the insect-like being from Down > Below? Thanks. I've actually heard similar from others who've gone back and done the same thing...including some who, as you did, were kinda "Oh, yeah?" for the first part. But as long as someone's willing to go back and look at what's there with an open mind, I don't have any complaints, and no apologies are ever required. SF fans have so often been disappointed by shows that it's natural after a while to have "a chip on one's shoulder," as you say...I think it's based on a desire to defend oneself, to not get sucked in One More Time. It's understandable. To your questions: no plans for Ironheart at this time, omnipotent beings running around my universe make me nervous...Sinclair and Delenn aren't married, it was stated as a *rebirth ceremony* which CAN sometimes double as a marriage ceremony, the rebirth being Delenn's upcoming change... she became more "passive," more insecure, after her change; that began to turn around after her encounter with Mr. Sebastian...and we saw the Sigma 957 ship again in "Voices of Authority." Beyond that...thanks for the great words. They help. Pulling this show off is a tough job, harder than I think anyone knows, or ever will know, or ever *should* know, since that's irrelevant to what's on the screen. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 02:31:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Dimitri M LaBarge <71501.3353@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Dimitri M LaBarge <71501.3353@compuserve.com> asks: > Is one set more valid just because it's got "production values" > and a storyline? Hrmmm...I dunno...maybe. I'll have to think about it. I guess it's this particular topic, more than anything else, that has the potential to polarize people the most, and B5 tends to be about bringing folks together, not splitting them apart into camps. We'll see.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 16:37:35 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Joe an atheist? (blocked) asks: > Surely, someone who does not question themselves, their beliefs > and their opinions cannot grow? Lengthy, perhaps; confused post, no. Thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 16:37:36 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: ATTN JMS: How old is... {original post unavailable} I'll put it to you this way...Kosh was old enough to have had a first hand familiarity with Valen. Vorlons live a REAL long time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 16:37:37 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS /Dr Who? {original post had no questions} I don't consider them a "rival," there's room enough for everybody. The more the merrier. We're glad to have them on. As for my personal view, I rather like the new Doctor. He's probably the best they've had since Tom Baker, who for me has always been the quintessential Doctor. There were some story lapses, and the female doctor is a good performer but needs to be written less annoyingly...but all the ingredients are there. I hope they get approved to series; I'll be watching. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 16:37:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> Subject: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> asks: > .did you ever get any stick time in that part of the Wing > Commander universe? No, actually, I've never gotten into the Privateer stuff...I have the new Wing Commander, but my joystick is screwed up (others have made that observation before), so it's waiting until I can yank the computer out of its niche and install the Fancy New Joystick I bought that has fifteen thousand different plug-in points. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 16:37:42 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Terry Cotant [RSS] <70313.1103@compuserve.com> Subject: >>War Without End: 1<< Terry Cotant [RSS] <70313.1103@compuserve.com> asks: > If what happened to Shariden was a "time" thing, how did get get > moved all the way from sector 14 to Centauri Prime? Must be > "time/space", not just "time", right? The time-flash (which in Sheridan's case is much more pronounced than what we've seen before) slides you forward or backward in time to where you are at that moment. At that moment, 18 years from now (in the story), Sheridan was/will be on Centauri Prime. So when he slid along the time line, that's where he ended up. Just as in Babylon Squared, when Garibaldi had a timeflash back to his time on Mars. It blips your perception to another point in your life, wherever you happen to be. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:35 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > You want to censor the internet, or ban guns? Daniel, you Keep Missing the Point. If "free speech (and) the right to keep and bear arms are God given rights," then why didn't God give them? Why did it take a number of humans to *decide* that it was time to strive for something better? The rights you speak of were never given by god, they were given by those who spent their life's blood in an effort to create something better for their inheritors. If god had anything to say on this issue, he should've said it in the 6,000 years preceding, and *done* something about it. He didn't. We did. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:37 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? {original post unavailable} Thanks, if you were able to suss anything out of those ramblings, then it's a Good Thing...and sorry about the delay. Sometimes answers to old questions come when you least expect them. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS /Dr Who? Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com> asks: > Say, would you mind if I reposted your message into the Doctor > Who section on SF Media 2? Sure, anything I write can be crossposted. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Al Lipscomb <75204.2225@compuserve.com> Subject: Spoilers Al Lipscomb <75204.2225@compuserve.com> asks: > Any info on that project (I think you said 'GrimJack', I don't > get out much :) who is the author and when do you think it will > be out? I'm futzing around with several projects whilst awaiting word on B5; nothing concrete I want to talk about just yet. And I've grown a beard since the photos you saw. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:44 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: Moved John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > Any reasons why you didn't do the scene that way (or was this a > budgetary constraint?) ? I thought about that long and hard when writing the script, and I finally came to the conclusion that there was literally *nothing* we could show that wouldn't be disappointing...it's a conflict on another whole plane, and should have an almost cosmic or ethereal feel to it. If we showed Kosh shooting a defensive field, or a shadow opening his suit with a can opener, or anything else obvious and physical, it would've diminished the scene. The vorlons are mythic, indirect, you see them out of the corner of your eye, so it fit that the proper metaphor would be to handle the battle that way. Even if we'd had ten million bucks to do that sequence...I would've made the same choice. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > Did the Minbari agree to help fund B5 after getting a look at the > nearly finished B4 and realizing what it was? No, because if you remember, even Delenn didn't know where B4 came from until she came to B5, well after completion. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} There probably wasn't a credit there because it was an incidental voice rather than a recurring voice. The other Vorlon also sounded different because I directed Ardwight in different inflections...literally stood there outside the booth using my hand like a baton to indicate the rising and falling inflections as he spoke, to give it a wave kind of sound. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>War Without End: 1<< {original post unavailable} With this show, it's never safe to assume *anything*. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> Subject: >>War Without End: 1<< Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> asks: > You can't become unstuck in time and slide past your own > lifetime, can you? Or is there a difference in Sheridan's > "unstickiness"? Garibaldi & Sinclair get the "perceptual trip" but > Johnny gets the Real Thing (tm)? Help? Well, who can say at this point *what* happens on Z'ha'dum...? jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:33:58 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Arline Williams <102551.2346@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Story Arc Arline Williams <102551.2346@compuserve.com> asks: > How do you do it? Actually, the scary thing is...I wrote 12 the first year, 15 the second, and 22 the third, so that's 49 out of 66 altogether. That's about 2,400 pages in 3 years, equal to 5 full-length novels. Suddenly I have the overwhelming urge to take a nap.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:34:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> Subject: Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> asks: > Did you work out in your head the sequence of events that created > the circular timeline, or did you just throw up your hands and > say, "Who cares about explaining it? No, it all has to hang together, or it's kinda useless. It just required working out the details of what was, is, and will be. Then I walked on water.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:34:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> Subject: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> asks: > What brand of stick did you buy? > Did you go with an optical design? Optical design? Whuzzat? I don't recall the make, but it plugs in at the game card, the mouse port, AND the keyboard port. Frankly, it scares the hell out of me. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:41:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? {original post had no questions} The real drag about Twin Peaks is that, apparently, as told to me by some of the writers who worked on the show, they really had NO idea where they were going. They just kept throwing stuff out there. I was vastly disappointed. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:41:57 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 Screen Saver sound {original post unavailable} There's not a fix; that's the Identicard Scanner sound, which you hear on the show from time to time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:41:58 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} No, the B1-B3 sabotages had nothing at all to do with the B4 situation; it was just done by forces opposed to the very notion of the Babylon Project. jms ------------------------------ Date: 16-May-96 22:41:59 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} Careful...we're straying into story ideas here.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 01:08:57 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mark D. Smith <70254.107@compuserve.com> Subject: ATTN JMS: How old is... Mark D. Smith <70254.107@compuserve.com> asks: > OK, question though, how long ago (now being 2260 on B5) did > Valen live and come up with his ideas? Valen led the prior shadow war and formed the grey council roughly 1000 years before B5's current time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 01:08:58 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} That would certainly get in the way, yes. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 01:09:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} We've shown the saucer-shaped ship before; it's a Vree ship, first seen in Deathwalker. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 01:09:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: War I {original post unavailable} Thanks. Yeah, next week's a corker. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Penny J. Legner <103643.763@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Penny J. Legner <103643.763@compuserve.com> asks: > Isn't that what we're doing here? Yes, that's the dream...of course, there are many days when netspeak and the dream are far, far removed from one another..... jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:10 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: ATTN JMS: How old is... {original post unavailable} All I'll say is that I have nothing to do with the previews, and I never see them or know what's in them until the broadcast. I see 'em when you do. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:12 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Screen Saver sound Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> asks: > Joe, Has the B5 Screen Saver been released in a Mac version yet? I've been told that the early decision to do a Mac version wasn't actually a decision, but a thought experiment, and for now they're staying with a PC version. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:15 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Robin L. Small <76640.2012@compuserve.com> Subject: Hole in Sinclair's Mind Robin L. Small <76640.2012@compuserve.com> asks: > was that a sort of "bleed-through" when he was recalling what > happened? or did that happen the first time, when he was being > interrogated at the battle of the line? If it's the latter, has > 'Sinclair knowing who delenn was before he ever met her' been > addressed yet?? Yes, it was bleed-through. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:16 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: (blocked) asks: > Was John thinking about his role in the destruction of the Black > Star, or the fact that he is now leading every race he can > influence into (possibly suicidal) battle with the Shadows? In a way, each subsequent season tends to become stronger because now you know who these people are. If you come to care about them, then the events that affect them have more power. I've heard from folks who've watched the first season or two over again, and now that they know who these people are, found them much stronger than the first time through. It's the nature of the beast. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Cheers for Mira Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > Any suggestions? A toast for a wedding, eh? I'm not usually asked to do this sort of thing -- I generally avoid those morbid parentheticals of the human soul, weddings and funerals -- but off the top of my head.... The heart is an inland sea, surrounded on either side by infinities of time. On one side, the unsteady molecule, shaken by storm and the unlikely perambulations of amino acids, paraded across the centuries until their name was man, and woman, until they created poetries and cities and walked across the Sea of Tranquility. On the other side, an uncertain future, waiting to be shaped by hands clasped across that ocean of possibilities. Looked at from here, in the starlight of sanctified vows, that horizon can be daunting, even frightening. But there is nothing so dark or so profound that it can outwit the infinity that is behind you, or undo all that went into creating you. Any problems before you are temporary; but the inland sea of the heart is eternal. May your journey be filled with calm seas and clear skies, guided by the compass of your entwined souls. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:23 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Story Arc {original post had no questions} Thanks; foreshadowing is tough, because it implies the audience is going to BE there x-years down the road to Get It, and you have to risk the audience going "huh?" one time too many and wandering away...but nothing good comes without risk. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bruce "Firestorm" S. <72571.1722@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} Not a problem. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post had no questions} I try.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:29 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Watching the Shadows. {original post unavailable} Bloopers and video releases aren't going to be happening for a bit yet. In time.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:31 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Avery C. Innis <74642.3366@compuserve.com> Subject: >Delein's Head< Avery C. Innis <74642.3366@compuserve.com> asks: > How is this going to be explained away? Won't have to, because you never saw what you think you saw. All you saw was an arm. jms ------------------------------ Date: 17-May-96 19:10:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Delenn (blocked) asks: > Q: "What are the chances of Delenn evolving beyond her present > state of being?" Depends on what he means by evolving; internally, yes; externally, no. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 00:43:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>Interludes<< (blocked) asks: > Was the physical force used on Sheridan projected by Kosh or the > encountersuit? Yes. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 00:43:04 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Celia J. Penham <102454.540@compuserve.com> Subject: Celia J. Penham <102454.540@compuserve.com> asks: > Ok, this doesn't have anything to do with the current message > thread, but has there been any thought about a B5 novel? I mean, > one that tells THE ENTIRE STORY? A lot of folks have suggested it...only time will tell if it ever gets done. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 00:54:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? {original post had no questions} Your observation is correct; the structure of B5 to a great extent is that of the novel, which is, after all, what's being attempted. So you go from introduction, to rising action, to conflict, complication, climax and denouement. A novel for TV. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 00:54:04 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Matthew D. Woudstra <71073.540@compuserve.com> Subject: Matthew D. Woudstra <71073.540@compuserve.com> asks: > How long can one person wear the same outfit??? > say, one of the principle players, one with a bony head crest and > long black hair...? Actually, Delenn probably has more outfits than just about anyone else; there's the blue outfit, the rose colored outfit, the green active-wear look, her grey cloak and white religious caste robes, one more change of color...so I think your observation here is flawed. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 00:54:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joseph Coulter <75272.3005@compuserve.com> Subject: Joseph Coulter <75272.3005@compuserve.com> asks: > ?" > And really "Don't you trust me, John?" That's because tachyons are unique particles; they appear to be moving the wrong way through time. So they're natural for this purpose. ST didn't make up the idea of tachyons. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: ralph venables <101500.3333@compuserve.com> Subject: JMS: Arc a Fake? {original post had no questions} Thanks, and it's just fun hanging around. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> (blocked) asks: > Since when does Zack know about the White Star, and is it now > general knowledge among the B5 staff? Yeah, the White Star has been common knowledge ever since it came in at the end of "Severed Dreams." Certainly, by virtue of being Garibaldi's second in command, he'd know about it. At this point, most everything is out in the open now. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: WwE Part 1 Question {original post unavailable} It was done for story purposes. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > Now that Kosh is dead (and I presume that you won't be bringing > this character back to life), what was it about the character of > Kosh that you really liked and really disliked? Actually, there wasn't much about Kosh I disliked...except his cryptic ways...they're all annoying that way. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> Subject: >>War Without End: 1<< Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> asks: > You are saying that *in one alternate universe* Sheridan will be > on Centauri Prime, just like in 8 days in one alternate universe > Ivanova will cry to the universe for help while the Shadows blast > B5 to hell and in one alternate universe Garibaldi sacrifices > himself for Sinclair? There are no alternate univeses, only alternate or possible futures. If they didn't go back, the future in which Sinclair is there with Garibaldi -- having come back to see through the final battle -- and in which Sheridan is killed, and Ivanova is calling for help...that future will come true. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Carol Naylor <100645.2613@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Story Arc Carol Naylor <100645.2613@compuserve.com> asks: > Quick question - is the "rebirth ceremony" from Parliament of > Dreams what we would have seen had the full ceremony gone ahead > in Ceremonies of Light and Dark or are there several different > versions - each with their own significance? Did you know that he > used to be a monk? Yes, it's the same ceremony; Delenn states as much in the episode. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:23 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Jonathan Hoopingarn <73172.1065@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Jonathan Hoopingarn <73172.1065@compuserve.com> asks: > Dosen't this blow the mystery of whether Sheridan goes to > Z'ha'dum? Or would that event be later in his life than his going > to Centauri Prime? And are we going to find out why older-Sheridan > was on C-prime in the first place and not off someplace > collecting his pension? I guess the question might be what are > Minbari feelings about such things? Who said there was a mystery about Sheridan going to Z'ha'dum? Kosh seems to treat it as a fait accompli; so does Sheridan. It seems fated that he will go...the question is when, why, and under what circumstances, with what results? See, sometimes the story works in the shadows (so to speak)...and other times we're right out in the open, we hand you the playbook and tell you we're coming right up the middle. And *that's* when you've got to really worry. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: Series Thoughts John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > Come to think of it, how's the business of renewal for Year 4 > coming? No, it seems that WB is set on airing the last batch of episdodes in October, to ramp up for the November sweeps, assuming renewal. We won't hear final word on this for another week or two. jms ------------------------------ Date: 18-May-96 20:10:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: WWE PART ONE {original post unavailable} The name of the station is still the same; it was built by the Earth Alliance. So that's how she'd refer to it. The rest will probably be clearer after part two. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 14:08:22 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mark D. Smith <70254.107@compuserve.com> Subject: ATTN JMS: How old is... Mark D. Smith <70254.107@compuserve.com> asks: > Is my assumption that the different Minbari castes were on the > verge of destroying themselves prior to the war and the > appearance of Valen? There was certainly some division among Minbari; Valen straightened a lot of that out. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 14:08:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> Subject: WwE Part 1 Question Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> asks: > Had Sinclair stayed on as B5 commander, who would have been > zapped to Centauri Prime to confront Londo on the destroyed > Centauri Prime? I appreciate the questions, but there are so many alternate timelines flying around right now...I'm not sure I want to further complicate the issue. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:08:54 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> (blocked) asks: > * So is the NightWatch done for now? > (such as another assault on the station by EA forces)? > * Is Corwin and everyone else on the B5 command staff cool with > B5's seccession now? All I'll say for now is that we'll obviously have to get back into the Earth situation sooner or later; that still has to be dealt with. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:08:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Harlequin <73122.2300@compuserve.com> Subject: Appreciation {original post had no questions} Thank you for all of that. It's a hell of a fight some days to get this show made, and believe me, the appreciation is....well...appreciated. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:08:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Brian A. Thomas <75231.1122@compuserve.com> Subject: Fan club Brian A. Thomas <75231.1122@compuserve.com> asks: > Since I don't have a printer, do you think it would be perfectly > fine to just hand print the form to join the club, so long as I > give all the same information? That'd be fine, sure. Thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:09:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Once I finish the show, then I'll have time to consider this. For now, it's just too daunting an idea. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:09:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>War Without End: 1<< {original post unavailable} Part two will clear that up. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:09:04 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Puppet riots {original post unavailable} Saw it...weird.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:09:06 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} She said it came from Draal and Epsilon 3, which has been monitoring the area for the last 500 years. (It's stated in dialogue.) jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:09:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <<<>>> {original post unavailable} His clothing is different because that's the future Sheridan, into whom the current Sheridan has sort of slid.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:09:10 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > In the original version of the story where Sinclare stayed and > there was no Sheridan was Babylon 4 brought forward in time to > replace the destroyed Babylon 5? Was the ageing of Sinclare to > have been explained by the fact that he had given his time > stabilizer to Zathras? What did the Soul Hunter mean when he told > Sinclare "they are using you"? No, B4 was never intended to go forward in time. The aging was done pretty much as intended. And the Soul Hunter meant they're using him to create their old Leader. Still tracks. I'll have more to say about all this after everyone's seen the episode. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:38:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com> asks: > Geez, would she REALLY have blasted Bester?? > After that final conversation between Bester and his ascociate, - > is it possible that the Psi-corp PUT that Dust dealer onboard B5 > as an excuse to come on and do some snooping? Am I man enough to > say I could have cryed? Yes, she would've blasted...she gave the order to fire; only the fact that Sheridan gave the over-ride at the same moment stopped it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:38:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Fan Club Stuff? Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> asks: > Joe, What's the word of Fan Club stuff? > And the Webpage? We're just awaiting final word from WB before releasing the fan club web site; newsletters should be going out soon. We're just waiting until there's a slight lull in memberships so we won't have to do too many multiple mailings. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:38:44 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> {original post unavailable} Thanks, I'm glad it's come out to be your favorite; it's a good ep. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:38:46 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Grabois <74737.2600@compuserve.com> Subject: Michael Grabois <74737.2600@compuserve.com> asks: > Are these forces incidental or important to the rest of the > series, or can't you say? Can't you EVER be predictable? Yes, a number of folks took speculations and began posting them about as True Things set to happen. Always an error.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:38:48 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > Even if the machine that Sinclare used was a copy where did the > knowledge come from to build it originally? Nope. The machine came up with Zathras from Epsilon 3. It first appeared with Sinclair, then later got into Delenn's hands. So she still has that version of it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 19-May-96 20:38:50 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> Subject: Chad Underkoffler <102512.1310@compuserve.com> asks: > Are we to assume that if all goes well, the variant future of > Sinclair and Garibaldi's flashforwards will be wiped out of > existence? Are these flashforwards becoming 'unstuck in time'? > If so, why didn't Sinclair and Garibaldi vanish like Johnny did? > Is Johnny's unstuck jump *able* to be wiped out of existence like > the visions mentioned above? In B^2, do we ever see Sinclair or > Garibaldi in oldstyle EA uniforms, or just the black riot gear? > (Lucy and Ethel? Was Kosh *taller* than this guy? > *Why does Lennier seem to always mention new functionalities of > the ship in the middle of combat? *Why hasn't Johnny gotten fully > checked out on the ship as he did with the Thunderbolts in SoT? > *BTW, what phrases were thrown up on the screen behind Delenn in > Minbari script? Was it like Vir's Aloha shirt, or actual > Minbarese? * Just *when* is Johnny supposed to go to Z'ha'dum? > And just what does "If you go to Z'ha'dum, you will die" MEAN? > What does that MEAN? > why does there have to be seven days between episodes? > F Thanks. To the questions...no, we only saw the black flak uniforms in B2, because I knew we'd be changing them, but wanted to hide that fact (as I did with Delenn's line to Sinclair in B2, done off-camera to hide her change). And the Minbar cityscape was done by Eric Chauvin. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mark D. Smith <70254.107@compuserve.com> Subject: ATTN JMS: How old is... {original post had no questions} Yes, that divisiveness has been growing lately, culminating in the breakup of the Grey Council which Valen formed. There's bound to be some fallout.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> Subject: Meryl Yourish <103470.2703@compuserve.com> asks: > On a similar topic, do you have a favorite character? They're all favorites. If I had to pick one, it might well be Londo, simply because of the scope of the character, and what he lets me write. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:44 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> asks: > I've been thinking about this quite a bit after I&E, and it seems > to me that we may not have entirely realized what Kosh was saying > (no surprise, eh? On the right track? > Or derailed? Interesting speculations. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:46 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <<<>>> {original post unavailable} There's a reason Garibaldi can't be there.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> Subject: Daniel M. Upton <75442.1331@compuserve.com> asks: > If you want to wait to answer this that's OK, but did the Minbari > *know* that Sinclare was going to become Valen when they backed > his assignment to B5? Is that what Delenn meant when she said she > knew that they were not wrong about him? And if that is the case > why was Delenn told to kill Sinclare if he remembered what > happened to him at the Battle of the Line? No, they didn't know at the time; most of them were still trying to figure the whole damned thing out; some refused to accept it, and if he was indeed bogus, wanted him killed to avoid becoming a false prophet and undoing Minbari society; some *did* believe it was him. This disagreement in a sense became the first loose thread in unraveling parts of Minbari society. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: David Cerreta <72630.3433@compuserve.com> Subject: <> David Cerreta <72630.3433@compuserve.com> asks: > But the other you'll get asked a lot and so I'll ask it now: was > this always Sinclair's path and if it was, was it your intention > (originally) to reveal it much later in the show, say season 5? To the latter question...I think I'll hold off on commenting on this for a while. Other than that...I'm happy you liked the episodes. It's a good point to go out on for the break. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Matthew D. Woudstra <71073.540@compuserve.com> Subject: WwE1 & Zathras Matthew D. Woudstra <71073.540@compuserve.com> asks: > Where on earth did you get the inspiration for Zathras? > Was the character a product of your vision or what the actor > brought to the role...? Well, Zathras appeared in Babylon Squared, so you might have seen him there. Beyond that...no, the actor came to what was written on the page and made it come to life, but didn't invent the character. I just sorta thunk him up. It's what I do. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:54 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} Re: G'Kar and Londo changing positions as Sinclair and Sheridan have done, these two moving from certainty to uncertainty in either direction, that ain't bad. That ain't bad at *all*. I like symmetry, and both journeys are interesting explorations. What I've been doing in complex terms, you explained in an astonishingly few words. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:48:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Doug Quinn <76330.350@compuserve.com> Subject: << WWE, Pt.1 Spoilers >> Doug Quinn <76330.350@compuserve.com> asks: > Now, the question is, how long has Deleen known that Sinclair > was/is/will be Valen? Did they discover this when he was captured? > (I'd think not, else the Grey Council would not have told deleen > to kill Sinclair should he remember being captured.) Did Deleen > find out when Kosh came on board? (Kosh clearly knew what the deal > was, which explains why he didn't hang around the Council much > when Sinclair was in charge of the Station -- didn't want to > accidentily mess the time line up.) Did Deleen find out when she > came into posession of the "cocoon" machine? And here, since I > haven't seen the second part of this yet, I'm assuming that the > thing Sinclair is clearly putting a triluminary on in the preview > is the machine that goes into the past with him and later -- 1000 > years later -- comes into Deleen's posession, since this explains > the "Valen was more than Minbari" line.) Or was she as much in > the dark as Sinclair himself was, right up to the moment when he > got a letter from his future/past self telling him what was going > to happen? What was in the note she received just prior to > Sinclair arriving on B5? What must Deleen think of this? > A _human_ becoming half-Minbari as the founder of her > civilization's government? Valen is also apparently looked up to > as a _religious_ figure -- how might other Minbari react to the > knowledge that Valen was half human? Or that Sinclair's Minbari > name sounds almost identical to the stone in the Ranger's pin, a > stone which represents the coming together of the human and > Minbari halves into one whole (a la Deleen's fusion, a la > Sinclair's coming fusion into Valen)? On the Grey Council and Sinclair, I just left a note on this, so you may want to check that one rather than my repeating it here. But yes, you seem to be close to it all...which is good. All the pieces have been there, certainly. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 03:49:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Yeah, the Londo stuff is just incredibly powerful...very moving. As for the voice...well, we'll just have to wait a bit, won't we? jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 17:59:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Hypernauts Cancelled? (blocked) asks: > If nobody else picks it up, is there any chance that the B5 fan > club could issue the completed episodes as videos? There's no relation between B5 and Hypernauts, and it would be contractually impossible for us to do tapes of that show. Still trying to work out the B5 tapes at present. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 17:59:26 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Catherine Becic <73414.2603@compuserve.com> Subject: MYSTERY ALIEN SWEEPSTAKE Catherine Becic <73414.2603@compuserve.com> asks: > Who won? I haven't heard yet. When I do, I'll post the info soonest. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 17:59:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> Subject: I&E Thought Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> asks: > Was this little parallel intentional? > And if so, is that worth noting for later or was it just one of > the many tools you employ? Not an intentional parallel, no, but often to achieve something, one must decide if it's more important than one's life. That's kind of descriptive of the whole of human history, frankly.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 17:59:31 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Toby Johnson <104305.1442@compuserve.com> Subject: Kosh's Ship Toby Johnson <104305.1442@compuserve.com> asks: > Was his ship made/created for him?? > and if so was it as old as he was?? It was made for Kosh, as Delenn points out, was almost a part of him; it wouldn't function as well, if at all, for anyone else. There was nothing else to be done. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 17:59:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Trent K. Johnson <71020.1052@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Story Arc {original post had no questions} Thanks.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 17:59:35 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bert Johnson <102476.201@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Bert Johnson <102476.201@compuserve.com> asks: > Two, who did Delenn see in Sheridan's quarters? > In the future of that timeline, did they have a daughter? > I think they identify with him ("No one listen to Zathras") Will > we see him again? The eye was of the keeper on Londo's shoulder, you can see G'Kar's fingers gripping a part of it. It woke up. The other questions will have to wait, and be answered in the series. jms ------------------------------ Date: 20-May-96 17:59:36 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: op {original post unavailable} They've played with some research in this area, but they aren't anywhere near the tech required to actually do anything with time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 00:12:13 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Jon Wolf <76103.2541@compuserve.com> Subject: <> {original post had no questions} Actually...incorrect. Whenever there's a timeflash, people see one thing or another. When Sinclair and Garibaldi first came aboard, there was a timeflash. We saw what Sinclair saw, we have no idea from that scene what Garibaldi saw. No reason he couldn't have seen something from about that same period. It wasn't stated either way at the time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 00:24:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> Subject: <<<>>> Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> asks: > Yes, but *how* does Sinclair *know* this? > Will this be addressed in more detail? Yes, in part two. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 00:24:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: WWE Question (blocked) asks: > Why hasn't the design changed? > Ritual? > Also, where did Sinclair get the scar? > Could you please 'Splain this to me, Lucy? The design *has* changed; the main section is much longer, and more primitive looking, less tricked out. You can see a bit of it there, but you will see them in more detail in part two. Sinclair was scarred during ranger training duties. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 00:24:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: David Kuhn <73532.741@compuserve.com> Subject: WWE2 & Kosh Naranick(sp) David Kuhn <73532.741@compuserve.com> asks: > Could that have been our favorite vorlon back 1000 years ago? Suffice to say that Kosh knew Valen from way, way back.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 15:52:36 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Hypernauts Cancelled? (blocked) asks: > You've mentioned recently about trying to get things moving for > the UK viewrs/fans/rabid mottley crew (that's US!) over here, but > I've not seen anything of late: What's the score, please? Still working at it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 23:07:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} It's been established that there have been previous riots on Mars, including the food riots referenced in, I believe, the pilot. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 23:18:50 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Joe an atheist? (blocked) asks: > This is a bit off-subject, but I was wondering: as an athiest, > where do you believe that life came from originally? The cell > theory states that all cells must come from pre-existing cells, > but where did the first one come from? You tell me where god came from originally, and I'll tell you where that first bit of matter came from originally. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 23:18:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Imran Naqvi <100533.273@compuserve.com> Subject: <> {original post had no questions} Good. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 23:18:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: michael kazalski <72357.2642@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Story Arc {original post had no questions} I truly appreciate that, thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 23:18:54 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Jonathan Kass <74130.443@compuserve.com> Subject: <> {original post had no questions} I don't recall the question, but Ivanova's uniform in the flash forward was only 8 days ahead, so it'd be the same. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 23:18:57 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> Subject: Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> asks: > JUST WHAT DO YOU HAVE IN MIND, YOUNG MAN??? Escalation. jms ------------------------------ Date: 21-May-96 23:18:59 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: (blocked) asks: > Or am I just seeing things? You're seeing things. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 04:37:47 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Alan D. Brown <74407.3015@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} Thank you. And stop sitting in the dark; you'll trip when you stand up. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 04:47:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Cathy Holley <75204.1515@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe an atheist? Cathy Holley <75204.1515@compuserve.com> asks: > Then if I told you that God always existed, you'd tell me that > matter has always existed as well? Yup. In one form or another, one Big Bang leading to a collapse, and another Big Bang...if one can say god has always existed, then one can equally say that perhaps the universe has always existed, in one form or another.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 04:47:34 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Screen Saver sound Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> asks: > Anyone have the address? > At least I've got the show...well...an hour next Sunday, > anyway...Joe, is it October before we get the remaining episodes? Yup...October......yikes. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 04:47:35 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> {original post had no questions} Thanks. It was a good sendoff. (At one point, Bruce said to me over lunch, with Michael sitting with us, "Hey, so how come HE gets to go off and become the next best thing to God and I get the crap kicked out of me?" I shrugged. "Seniority.") jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 04:47:36 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Jerome Keating <76243.620@compuserve.com> Subject: Jerome Keating <76243.620@compuserve.com> asks: > I have a question - remember when Ivanona when to go meet with > those "old ones" and they they said to come get them when it is > time - well isn't now a good time???? with the shadow in the open > attacking many races - now would seem opportune - do you plan on > bringing them in the fourth season?? second question - were those > old ones the only ones contacted by "our heros" ?? Tentatively, they'll show up in the fourth season...and they will have to get some more First Ones on board. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 04:47:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Jonathan Kass <74130.443@compuserve.com> Subject: <> {original post had no questions} Yes. Up until that moment, the total forces available to the shadows were an unknown to us...sort of like Shroedinger's Cat, is it alive in the box or is it dead? It could be either one. If they didn't go into the past, didn't affect the outcome, it would be one reality; if they did, then it'd be another. As soon as they achieved one or the other of those two, the two possible results collapsed into the one, singular possibility. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 12:29:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 Music Video {original post unavailable} The video is something we'd like to release eventually, but still have to negotiate the right to do so with actors and others involved. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 12:29:16 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Thank you. I agree, in the beginning of the show, there was the occasional rough spot; when you're trying to do something nobody's really ever done before, there's a certain amount of trial and error. But we learn *real* fast. Thanks again. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 12:29:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: - My Head Hurts (blocked) asks: > Have I got this right: Delenn saw John attempting to synch back > up so gave up her stabilizer for him; this caused her to become > unstuck and put her in the space suit so that Zathras could give > her the repaired stabilizer when she appeared later; Delenn was > "missing" from the time she stuck her head out of the hole until > Zathras gave her the stabilizer and no one noticed? How long was > B4 in the past before the Minbari showed up to search it? > Obviously long enough for the 2 Vorlons to show up, but how long > was that? Yes, you're correct about the Delenn material; she left the ship to do this, and not that much time had passed. It was, in fact, to check on Delenn that Marcus was coming out as well. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 12:29:18 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: >>Interludes<< {original post unavailable} Because it was they who took it back, at this point; if they didn't do it, then they wouldn't have done it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 12:29:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: WWE PART ONE {original post unavailable} It's not expensive per se, but it is time consuming. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 12:33:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: JMS: Renewal? Y or N? {original post unavailable} We should hear in the next few weeks; we have to know by June 10th or so in order to pick up the actors' contracts. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 21:18:37 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> Subject: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> asks: > Is that also the case with WwE (1 and/or 2)? > If so, would you be able to comment on the scenes cut or is that > right out? Thanks. There were a few small bits cut out of WWE2, but at this late remove, I honestly can't remember what they were now. It's all a blur.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 21:18:38 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> Subject: I&E Thought Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> asks: > Joe, As painful as Adera's (sp?) death was for Londo, is it > likely that Londo will discover the truth about Morden's > involvement? Anything's possible. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 21:18:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: US tapes vs Brit tapes? {original post unavailable} WB thinks there isn't a market in the US. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 21:18:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bob Hodge <74774.1747@compuserve.com> Subject: WWE2 (slight spoiler) Bob Hodge <74774.1747@compuserve.com> asks: > One nagging question in my mind - Has Sinclair, Delenn, and > Sheridan gone too far? Thanks. No, that's not it; you're right, it'd make the story 'way too convoluted. But Delenn may have made some questionable decisions at various points. jms ------------------------------ Date: 22-May-96 21:18:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <