|
|
- This file contains messages posted by J. Michael Straczynski on GEnie from
- Dec 16th - Dec 31st, 1994. Postings are copyright 1994 by J. Michael Straczynski
- with compilation copyright by GEnie.
-
- ************
- Topic 1 Mon Oct 26, 1992
- SF-MARSHALL [Dave ] at 18:50 EST
- Sub: Babylon 5 - The Series (Non-Spoiler)
-
- Welcome to the Babylon 5 General category. This is the main topic for the
- hit SF series. We discuss all general information on the series in this
- topic. Topic 2 is for SPOILERS! DO NOT POST STORY IDEAS!
-
- 584 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 99 Fri Dec 16, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 02:22 EST
-
- I guess I'm always amazed when *other people* are amazed when Trek is
- called a franchise by those who make it. They've never made any bones about
- it; ST is their license to print money, a franchise, pure and simple. When
- asked to do more unusual or challenging or different stories, Piller/Berman
- have said, repeatedly and quite openly, "If it ain't broke, why fix it?"
- Don't endanger the franchise.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 112 Fri Dec 16, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:24 EST
-
- It wasn't a producer, it was a civilian, one of a focus group asked about
- B5 and SF.
-
- Jose: you're quite correct; I know that many of the writers over at ST
- have been chafing for a *very* long time to do more challenging stories. It's
- just that overall, the Big Two there have been sitting on them, keeping the
- stories as tame as possible. With any luck, our continuing presence will be
- enough to provoke them into allowing more challenging or controversial or just
- *different* kinds of shows to be written.
-
- Speaking of which...on Monday I turned in a script called "And Now For a
- Word." It's probably the most unusual episode to date...so much so that I was
- very concerned about Warners approving it, and indicated in my letter (which
- explained why it was done, and why it should be produced) that I wouldn't be
- putting in for a script payment until I knew they would accept it and let us
- make it. Finally heard back today that they've approved it. This will be
- shot as episode 214, and what you've just read is ALL I intend to say about
- this script between now and shortly before it airs in May. (Though when we
- cast the guest star, which we're in the process of selecting now, that I'll be
- able to announce.) It's not controversial per se, but does take our entire
- show and put it on its head for the entire hour. (I also had to make sure we
- *could* physically produce the darned thing prior to turning in the script.)
- No speculation, please; just let it be what it is, and see it cold.
-
- Suffice to say, though, that I'm VERY pleased and relieved right now.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 180 Mon Dec 19, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 02:48 EST
-
- Generally, nobody goes over our scripts with a fine toothed comb looking
- for things to object to (a la network censors). In the case of this new
- script, the situation was so large that it could not be missed, or not
- referenced. It had to be raised with PTEN before doing it. You'll
- understand when you see it.
-
- I should mention again that our contacts at PTEN have been nothing less
- than terrific in that they leave us to our own devices and allow us to tell
- our stories with virtually no interference. They've been great.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 188 Mon Dec 19, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 18:12 EST
-
- Pat, by that reasoning, you shouldn't write the second half of a movie
- until you've filmed the first half, which is silly.
-
- A story isn't about the nuances an actor brings to a performance, the
- story is about the *story*, and the characters' role in that story. One of
- the biggest areas of misinformation in the public consciousness is how much
- imput actors and directors have on characters and stories in TV. If you
- don't know what it is you want to say in your story, and want to wait for the
- actor's choices in determining how to read your lines before you figure out
- what story you're telling, you're in serious trouble.
-
- It comes down to, Are you just filling out time, being arbitrary, or do
- you have something to *say* in your story? If the former, then sure, be
- arbitrary, be kicked around on the winds of public opinion, let the actor's
- sudden decision to smile instead of frown in a scene dictate your story. Me,
- I'd rather tell a story, and risk failing a few times, than abrogating my
- responsibility as a storyteller and a writer.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 204 Tue Dec 20, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:32 EST
-
- Insofar as I know, KCOP, like many other stations, will shift B5 to
- Thursday nights when the new networks come on-line. (Paramount gets Monday
- and Tuesday nights, Warners gets Wednesdays, PTEN gets Thursdays.)
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 215 Tue Dec 20, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:55 EST
-
- Pat, with all due respect, you *really* don't know what you're talking
- about here. First, there's a substantial and profound difference between not
- knowing where you're going in a regular two-part episode (for which there is
- no excuse), and leaving it open to accommodate a possible cast change. You're
- talking apples and oranges. You can't use the one to prove the other; this
- kind of "will-he-won't-he-return" situation is absolutely the exception to the
- norm; I think most people are talking about all the OTHER two-parters NOT
- based around this logistical problem.
-
- Second, every single series in TV has a slush fund in which you can
- afford to junk X-number of scripts, because no matter what happens, some
- scripts just don't work out. Usually the number is 5-6 scripts that can be
- canned. Even if for some reason one script had to be trashed (part two),
- you're talking *one script*...are you seriously trying to tell me that the
- mega-million-dollar Star Trek series, which spends anywhere from 19-23 MILLION
- dollars on their PILOTS and anywhere from $1.5-1.9 million per episode is
- going to implode because one $17,000 script falls out? C'mon.....
-
- Further, if the script is written one way, with Stewart out, and he ends
- up coming back after all...you just REWRITE the damned thing. For starters,
- these kinds of scripts are almost NEVER done by freelancers, so it's an in-
- house script, and that means staffers, and that means yhou tend to get more
- drafts than the usual two...and ST scripts generally go through endless
- rewrites ANYway. That's what they PAY staffers for, to write and to rewrite.
- Hell, I've had cast members fall in and out of scripts on many different
- occasions; I've rewritten scripts when cast members got sick and couldn't be
- there, broke their feet, you name it. It's what one DOES. It's why one has
- the JOB. If you're indicating that they couldn't compensate for this over on
- ST, then you're saying they're utterly incompetent at their work, and I don't
- believe this to be true.
-
- And any decent staffer would always prepare for either eventuality in
- working out the storyline, whether or not the actor does or doesn't return.
-
- C'mon...as you say...let's have some reality here....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 216 Tue Dec 20, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 21:04 EST
-
- Cross-posted with Hutts...yes, it's generally much looser in syndication.
- I don't think we've gotten a note yet saying "You can't do X because we think
- it would offend someone."
-
- And one does not have to see "sexual diversity," one can prefer not to.
- Yes, it's everywhere, and yes, it may even be somewhere in this show, but one
- can certainly put one's fingers in one's ears and hum loud until the scene is
- over....
-
- I think it depends on how it's done; if it's just *there* as part of the
- background, not given any special treatment, not hammered home, not made into
- a Major Storyline...I don't see a problem.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 231 Wed Dec 21, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 02:11 EST
-
- PTEN is a completely separate entity from the Warners network, and there
- is a strong competition between the two.
-
- Kia: yeah, there's religion all over the darned place.
-
- (In the voice of Chico Marx:) I don' know, Boss. I don' like-a the
- religion, but everywhere I go, boom, there it is. I open up a can of
- sardines, ey, there's a religion, no kiddin', you gotta believe in somethin'
- afterward to eat those things-a, you know? I go for a walk, I get cold, I
- sneeze, and som'body says-a to me, "God bless." Again with the religion. So
- I give-a up. I go inna church. You know what they got goin'? Bingo. So I
- stayed. Made fifteen dollars. Hey, you and me, we go get-a some tootsie-
- fruitsie ice-a cream, eh?
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 235 Wed Dec 21, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:35 EST
-
- "...get it out the ying-yang"....well, yes, that's one of the forms of
- sexual diversity....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 241 Wed Dec 21, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 16:17 EST
-
- K.Wicker...good scripts and bad scripts cost *exactly* the same amount of
- money.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 259 Thu Dec 22, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 00:57 EST
-
- B5 has no involvement with the Warners network.
-
- K.Wicker...there's no sliding scale in TV scriptwriting; all writers are
- paid the same, scale, though there's some variance between network scale and
- syndication scale. A Baywatch script, a B5 script, a DS9 script...they're all
- basically the same. And that fee is set by the Writer's Guild. You can't
- spend more dollars on EFX, and then scrimp and pay cheap for scripts...it's
- all the same fee. I get exactly the same script fee as any of my freelancers.
- So when someone says of a show, "They can't afford to buy good scripts, they
- spent it all on EFX," this is simply a misnomer. If a script is good or bad
- is the function of the staff, pure and simple. If a script comes in and it's
- weak, it's the job of the staff to make it better.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 264 Thu Dec 22, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:59 EST
-
- We're talking here *episodic* TV, remember. Not specials, movies or
- events. And insofar as I know, even Bochco gets the same fee as everybody
- else, because the LAST thing the networks want is for a sliding scale to come
- into play in script fees for TV.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 269 Thu Dec 22, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:10 EST
-
- Pat: and I still say that if you don't have anything to say in your
- story, then sure, let the audience reaction tell you what to write. That just
- doesn't do it for me.
-
- PTEN = Prime Time Entertainment Network.
-
- I really don't have a problem with fixed writer fees in TV (and bear in
- mind that directors also have fixed fees in TV). Would I like those fees in
- general to be a bit more? I could be greedy and say yes; actors' fees aren't
- really set, they're very much open to negotation, and can range from scale of
- maybe $9,000 an episode to $30,000 or $60,000 per episode. And I would
- certainly like it if syndication fees were made to equal network fees (right
- now it's about $17,000 for an hour syndicated script, and about $22,000 for a
- network script). If both those figures were bumped, say, five grand, I
- wouldn't object.
-
- But I just can't seem to get too exercised about the whole thing, mainly
- because I know what writers get in other fields, like novels and short
- stories. Also, the residuals schedule for writers and directors is a bit
- better than for actors. (BTW, residuals aren't a gift; they're deferred
- payment. The writer gambles with the producer; if the show's a flop, there
- ARE no residuals, and the producer gets off cheap. If the show's a hit, then
- the writer gets additional fees in the form of deferred payments on the
- script...residuals.) So in the long run, they probably break even all around
- between actors, writers and directors.
-
- In feature films, you've got a definite ranking system, and you can get
- anywhere from scale ($60,000 or so) for a feature film up to the $1-2 million
- range for a select few. The budgets of feature films are MUCH higher per hour
- than a TV show, so a sliding scale seems to me quite appropriate. TV budgets
- are limited, and much, MUCH smaller.
-
- Producing fees are also a separate category in TV, ranging from $6,500 an
- episode to $25,000 or so per episode, depending on title and responsibilities
- and how good your agent is.
-
- What isn't generally understood is that most TV/film writers earn less
- than the average elementary school teacher on an annual basis; that roughly
- 50% or more of the Writers Guild of America are *unemployed* at any given
- moment; that the percentage of WGA members who earn in the six figure category
- comprise maybe 3-4% of the total WGA membership. There's this illusion that
- being in this business means major bucks. It doesn't.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 279 Thu Dec 22, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 23:21 EST
-
- Never said that "nobody's making any money," just that the majority of
- writers aren't (but that applies to both print and media). If someone is
- coming here with dreams of megadollar success dancing before their eyes,
- they're in trouble.
-
- Which answers your other question. Why are they sending in endless
- numbers of scripts? Because they've bought the okeydoke that there's money
- just hanging on trees here, and lots of it; that while most of them would
- never consider writing a novel, it's just TeeVee, they can do as good a job as
- anyone else (I've gotten letters from people who say that most of the writing
- on TV sucks, that I'm not doing a good job on my own show, but THEY can save
- it for me with their stories if I'll just buy them en masse)...the majority of
- them really don't want any kind of CAREER in TV writing, they're not willing
- to come out here and hustle; they just want either a) the money, or b) the
- Pointy Hat that says they did it.
-
- Which is exactly why it's so hard to sell for a newbie; you're competing
- with all these other folks who think they can write for TV, and you're lost in
- all the background noise.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 288 Fri Dec 23, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:19 EST
-
- Answer: you really can't. As for imaginging the future, SF writers have
- to some extent an undeserved perceived level of accuracy; if you've got two
- thousand writers all envisioning the future, *somebody's* got to come close by
- sheer chance. And for all the future postulating, almost no SF writers even
- up to the 1970s foresaw the desktop computer....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 295 Fri Dec 23, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 18:27 EST
-
- Peter: yes, I constantly get those as well for scripts. I think every
- writer does.
-
- If an actor isn't sure about a scene, for whatever reason, they are
- encouraged to come to me and discuss it. (And it doesn't matter WHERE I am,
- if I'm reachable by phone, I'm there.) That's happened a few times this
- season, most of which were handled by explaining how the scene relates to
- things that're going to happen in the future. Sometimes the intent isn't
- necessarily as clear as had been thought, or even the emphasis on one word
- rather than another can change the meaning. There's only been one case in all
- two seasons and pilot to date where an actor felt uncomfortable doing
- something, and in that case I think it was correct to adjust the scene
- slightly. Didn't affect the story as much as just one scene within the story.
- You have to give them a fair hearing.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 308 Sat Dec 24, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 00:33 EST
-
- Perhaps the whole gay issue might be better moved elsewhere; it's lately
- caused quite a conflagration over on Internet, and it'd be unfortunate if the
- same began to happen here.
-
- Re: 'zines...basically, I'm dealing with it the only way I can, which is
- to ask if such 'zines could be confined to nonfiction stuff during the first-
- run of the series. Afterward, do as you wish.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 311 Sat Dec 24, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:01 EST
-
- The average TV writer is doing good to sell 2-3 scripts per year; a lot
- don't get that many. Some get more. But even there you run the risk of
- selling only the outline (about half the money), or being rewritten, which --
- if the other writer adds his or her name to your own, usually a staff person --
- you lose 50% of your residuals in perpetuity. Which is why on B5 you'll
- never see more than one writer's name on a script; we don't arbitrate, don't
- jump credits. Ditto for when I was on Murder, She Wrote, and (pardon the
- expression) Jake. I've accepted shared credit on freelance scripts by other
- people maybe a total of six times out of over 350 scripts that I've story
- edited or produced. I don't think it's appropriate to dip into a freelancer's
- money, and have only done so under *extremely* unusual or specific
- circumstances.
-
- To answer your question about my situation, yes, I get both writing and
- producing fees, which under WGA rules are separate and distinct entities. I
- get a script fee, same amount as any freelancer, and a per-episode salary.
- (And btw, to further illustrate the differences between network and
- syndication, my salary as executive producer of the B5 series is LESS than
- what I was earning as a basic producer on Murder, She Wrote.) Having created
- the series, I get a small creator's royalty as well on each episode. Over the
- last nine years, I have had an average of 13 TV scripts produced each year, a
- little over one per month, for a total of roughly 120 or so produced scripts.
- (This doesn't count the scripts written but not produced.) And, obviously,
- this varies depending on the season; in some cases, such as recently, I wrote
- 4 scripts in just a tick over four weeks; but during the spring hiatus, when
- we're obviously not in production on the series, that drops (though I did
- write one two hour pilot over the last break).
-
- It's been a fairly interesting career so far....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 320 Sat Dec 24, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 19:01 EST
-
- ...ah hates santa claus....
-
- Re: have I rejected any of my own scripts...as a matter of fact, yes, I
- have. There was a version of SOUL HUNTER which went out as a first draft,
- which when I read it again, I realized was just *wrong*. So I had all copies
- of the script recalled, sending a memo explaining that "I had been momentarily
- possessed by an idiot."
-
- In addition, last season I started writing a very different two parter
- than "Voice." I turned in the first part, and while a number of folks liked
- it, it *really* wasn't up to par. (This was the first part of the flu I'd
- gotten.) So I chucked it completely, and wrote what ended up as "Voice."
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 334 Sun Dec 25, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 19:10 EST
-
- General agreement with some of the points raised below. Just to further
- clarify on the subject of residuals...they diminish with time. The first
- rerun on broadcast gets you about 45% of the original price of the script.
- Then it begins falling pretty fast. My most recent residual for one of my
- Twilight Zone episodes was about fifteen dollars.
-
- And also correct; while the pay can sometimes be good, remember that
- things cost more in LA than anywhere but New York. Even a small (1 or 2
- bedroom) house, in a not altogether terrific neighborhood, in not terribly
- great shape, will run you $200,000 or more. Ren on a small two-bedroom
- apartment (make that rent) generally runs $900 and up.
-
- That's one of the real dangers of this town; you can have a year or two
- where you earn good money. You even manage to sock some away. Then you have
- a year or two when you don't work, and if you lived anywhere else, you could
- get by pretty easily on that. But here, it's gone with astonishing speed.
- And then of course your agent gets 10%, the government gets 40-50%...you know
- the drill.
-
- And there's always somebody trying to find some new and creative way to
- screw writers. Here's a forinstance: I did Murder, She Wrote for two years.
- Network fees for a one-hour script are about $20,000, rounded off. Second run
- is about 40-50% when you hit syndication. So figure that that check should be
- about $9,500. Not bad. Except Universal realized one day that it'd be better
- off selling the show to itself, in the form of the USA Network, co-owned by
- Universal. Cable residuals are figured on a PERCENTAGE basis, meaning you get
- a percentage of the overall sale price of the series to cable, per episode
- you've written. And Universal sells the show to itself at the lowest
- conceivable price (about $500 per episode, give or take).
-
- So what is my residual on a second-run of a Murder episode on USA, which
- would be about $9,500 on a broadcast station? Twenty four dollars and change.
-
- But hey...it's Hollywood, Jake.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 373 Mon Dec 26, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 23:12 EST
-
- There are micromachines on the way, eventually, I'm told.
-
- To the query in message 666 (hrmmmm)...the relationship between series
- producer and director is fairly close. The producer looks for and hires a
- director whose vision seems to match his own. This is what I do. The
- director gets the script after it's in final-draft form. (To the question
- "Who writes the shooting script?" it's basically the same script from
- beginning to end, but with the scene numbers broken out. You usually assign
- scene numbers as quickly as possible, to allow CGI and stuff to get going.)
- As producer, once I'm satisfied with the script, and it goes to the director,
- sometimes s/he'll have questions about it which may need to be clarified or
- explained. As part of prep, the director and I have a "tone meeting," in
- which we go through each scene page by page, and I explain what I have in mind
- in each scene, and the director talks about what s/he sees in it, making sure
- that we both understand what's going on, and agree on the vision and approach.
- Usually this goes very smoothly. Very, very rarely will you get a situation
- where there are two opposed viewpoints on how to direct a scene, in which case
- either a) I win, or b) the director shoots it both ways, and we see which way
- works better on film.
-
- Television is more fundamentally a writer's medium than a director's
- medium; film tends to be more the director's purview.
-
- There is interaction with the editors at every stage of the process. We
- make sure the editor is on hand for the production meeting, and discusses with
- the director what is desired. If there's something that needs to be made
- clear from my POV, then I call the editor and make this point. The director
- then shoots the episode, and the editor begins assembling the episode in
- consultation with the director. Upon the completion of principal photography,
- the director gets several days to play with the editor's cut, creating the
- director's cut of the episode.
-
- When this is finished, then I and John Copeland go into the editor's wing
- and work with the editor to create the producer's cut. This can be very close
- to the director's cut...or it can be a total restructure, depending on
- circumstance. There were a few occasions last season where John and I went in
- and re-edited every single scene. Sometimes this process can take half a day,
- or several days.
-
- One of the main things we do is to tighten the hell out of the episode.
- Invariably, when the director finishes, we're told "The episode is still ten
- minutes long, we had to cut scenes." Because directors like long, lingering
- pans and establishers. We go in and tighten the screws until the film
- screams...and with *very* few exceptions, it ALL fits.
-
- Some episodes last season, like "War Prayer," and "Grail," and
- "Infection" were absolute pains in the ass to edit. Getting those episodes to
- work practically required a trip to Lourdes, and there's still stuff I'm not
- happy with in those episodes. On the other hand, episodes like "The Geometry
- of Shadows" you barely have to touch, because it's all put together
- seamlessly.
-
- To your question of who has creative control on the series...when you
- come down to brass tacks, it's me. I have a *very* specific vision for the
- series, which comes about because I have incredibly talented people working
- for me. Ann Bruice comes to me with costume sketches that I have to approve
- (an easy task, since she's terrific); ditto with set designs from John
- Iacovelli, prosthetic designs from Optic Nerve, props, set dressing, casting,
- music....
-
- As a result, most things that are on the show are either very close to
- what I saw in my head, or in some cases even better, because of the input of
- all these people. My job is basically to say yes, or no, or maybe, and to
- point to a spot on the horizon where I want us all to go. It's then up to
- the rest to find ways to actually make these crazy notions WORK...they do the
- actual work, the thought, the effort, and I get to bask in the reflected glow
- of their efforts as though somehow I was responsible, when my main
- responsibility was to look at a sketch and say, "Uh.....yup."
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 388 Tue Dec 27, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:46 EST
-
- For the most part, yeah, I think everyone involved with the show sets
- aside ego to do what's best for the show itself. When there are department
- meetings, no idea is ever scrubbed saying "That's dumb." There are frank and
- often blunt conversations, but because everyone is free to be equally blunt,
- and we all know everyone respects one another, we don't tend to have real
- problems. Now obviously you're going to have small conflicts when you dump a
- whole lot of creative people in a room and have them attack a problem. But
- they're generally *about the problem*, not about each other.
-
- You *can't* bring your ego with you to work and expect to get anything
- worthwhile done. And you can't play Untouchable Boss. Anybody who has a
- question or a criticism about a script can come to me about it, whether it's
- mine or somebody else's. Doesn't matter if it's a grip, or a stunt double, or
- somebody from craft services; a valid point is a valid point. I may not agree
- with it, and I reserve the right to do it as written if I don't agree, but
- I'll *listen*, and if the person's got a point, I'll address it.
-
- There are several people here who've been in the B5 offices on many
- occasions, and they can chime in if I'm lying...but honest, the one sound you
- hear the most in the hallways of the B5 production office is that of laughter.
- We try to keep stress out of the workplace as much as possible, to make it a
- pleasant place to work.
-
- Everybody eats together out behind the stage at lunchtime -- writers,
- producers, directors, cast, crew, production staff, groups of crew go out
- together for dinner, or drinks after shooting, they go off on vacation in
- groups (a bunch of them were off at Mammoth when the quake hit last year), the
- actors are free to come into my office and hang out, ask questions, same with
- anyone else...there's always a birthday cake somewhere in the studio it
- seems...it's just A Nice Place To Work. Which helps tremendously when it
- comes time to actually work together.
-
- For Christmas, btw, we purchased for the crew, production staff and
- others Swiss Army Watches with the B5 logo engraved on the back, with 1994-
- 1995 beneath it, for those who've been on the show for two years. For those
- serving here as their first year, they got the nifty B5 leather jackets that
- all the first timers got last year.
-
- Life's too short not to enjoy where you work...especially on Barbeque
- Day at the studio, or Funny Hat Day.....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 407 Tue Dec 27, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:03 EST
-
- Funniest hat...that was last season, and it's not anything startling;
- just a lobster hat, big claws coming down off it, bug-eyes, legs all around
- the head...just struck me as funny.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 419 Wed Dec 28, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 01:32 EST
-
- The assumption above is correct; one shouldn't consider B5 to be
- exclusive in this approach. Folks like David Moessinger, my Executive
- Producer on MURDER, JAKE and (albeit briefly, before I ran screaming out into
- the night) WALKER...Mark Shelmerdine, my Executive Producer on the new
- Twilight Zone...and others I could name, all people of conscience and
- integrity and loyalty, who create a healthy and positive place to work.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 429 Wed Dec 28, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:37 EST
-
- Oh, yeah, and these next six are gonna be major head-thumps too, that
- much I can promise right now. (It occured to me, I think that we go on the
- air with new eps about the same time Voyager hits the air; this should be an
- interesting contrast, 'cause there's some stuff in this next batch that just
- goes balls to the walls.)
-
- And yes, THAT "Walker." When the show was still with Cannon TV, David
- got jammed up and asked me to come in for a while, in between leaving "Murder,
- She Wrote" and starting B5. I came on as Supervising Producer...and the
- second I walked into the Cannon building, I knew this was gonna be trouble.
- I've got a good snake detector, and it was going off like crazy. I tried to
- warn David, but David is a good soul, and he trusts people, and figured he
- could make it work. But I knew we were standing on the deck of the Titanic
- and somebody'd just ordered ice....
-
- I rewrote several scripts (no credit taken), and wrote one of my own,
- which got produced and aired. Nobody was being paid, there was mass chaos at
- the top, and finally I just bolted over the barbed wire and escaped. David
- understood, tried to find some way to stop the hassles, but in time the whole
- damned thing exploded, and CBS took the show away from Cannon after David
- finally bailed. It's a nightmare organization.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 453 Thu Dec 29, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 01:04 EST
-
- We'll probably know come April about a third season, in any definitive
- sense, though we may have hunches before then.
-
- Actually, "The exception proves the rule" is a corruption of the original
- Latin, which I believe is something along the lines of, "Exceptio probat
- regulum," which as a phrase translates out to, "The exception puts the rule to
- the test of proof."
-
- I have no real desire to direct; I could if I so desired (and sometimes
- I'll make murmurings about setting aside an episode to direct myself, which is
- a perk I have if desired, just to watch producer John Copeland turn a whiter
- shade of pale), but I just don't think it's something I want to do. My other
- writer-friends think I'm crazy to pass this up, since Writer/Director
- hyphenates are kind of the In thing, and command major bucks and deals...but
- ehh...I'm a writer.
-
- One's relations with a given studio are in large measure affected by the
- person you're working with. There are good folk and bad folk. We have been
- very, very fortunate in that our PTEN liaison is a very smart fellow, very
- thoughtful, reasonable, who kinda understands where we're going with this
- story, and allows us to go where we wish. I've been on other shows where the
- network or studio liaison can destroy a series and make your life a living
- hell. It's really the luck of the draw.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 463 Thu Dec 29, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 02:19 EST
-
- Kevin: part of my hope is that this modem-experiment will help to put out
- information on how TV is made, and de-mystify the process a bit.
-
- How to Space Someone A Bit At A Time: elect them to Congress.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 466 Thu Dec 29, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:24 EST
-
- Only because I'm crummy at this stuff...anybody wants to send me cheat
- codes for Wing Commander III will live in my heart forever.
-
- Damned kilrathi....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 482 Fri Dec 30, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 00:18 EST
-
- Tell you what...I could either struggle through Wc3 without the cheat
- codes, or make Babylon 5. Understand that I am obsessive/compulsive in
- nature....
-
- Will try the alt-o. It's some solace....
-
- Only four people have seen the five-year arc (and not all of it at that,
- only about a 10 page summary of the thing), which is about three too many for
- my tastes. None of them are execs with PTEN.
-
- Maybe the symbol for B5 fandom might be >@<, which is a starfury.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 483 Fri Dec 30, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 00:22 EST
-
- You'll see more of Na'Toth in "Acts of Sacrifice."
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 494 Fri Dec 30, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:14 EST
-
- Re: moving airdates...this is stuff I mentioned some time ago, so no one
- should be startled now. As stated before, Paramount is taking Monday and
- Tuesday nights; Warner Network is getting Wednesdays; so you HAVE to move B5
- somewhere. There's only Thursday-Sunday left, so it has to go somewhere in
- there.
-
- The cheat code for Babylon 5? PERCIVAL.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 508 Fri Dec 30, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 22:02 EST
-
- T'ain't luck, lemme tell you; we haven't had a break from day one. Old
- fashioned hard work.
-
- Expect new episodes the week of January 23rd.
-
- Anybody here who knows computer stuff, maybe you can answer a Stoopid
- Question for me in the appropriate topic down below....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 1
- Message 523 Sat Dec 31, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:32 EST
-
- Re: my doing promos for the show on-air...I'm not an on-air personality.
- I'm just not good at that. A few weeks of my face on the air, and viewers
- would probably start asking for their previous ratings points back....
-
- jms
- ------------
-
- ************
- Topic 2 Wed Nov 20, 1991
- STARR [Arne] at 19:41 EST
- Sub: Babylon 5 -- The Series!! >>SPOILERS<<
-
- Babylon 5 is moving into a second season of 22 episodes. This series can be
- seen at 8 Pm on Wednesdays, in most areas. This topic is for SPOILERS only.
- Just remember our NO STORY IDEAS rule and we'll let you live. <g>
-
- 296 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 2
- Message 150 Sun Dec 18, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:30 EST
-
- However, I believe that a great deal of that time comes from the ST
- opening and closing credits, which are longer than ours. Just count the "dry
- time," meaning program content ONLY, minus opening title/credit sequences and
- end credits. And there's never any variance in the length of our show unless
- someone at your end of the signal is making trims here and there; the length
- of each episode is always *exactly* the same, right down to the frame-count.
- So there's *no way* you can be seeing a 30-second variance between episodes.
- When it leaves our hands, all of the episodes are *exactly* the same length.
- I know because I'm part of the final edit, and we have to hit exactly the same
- count every time.
-
- It's altogether possible that your station is either trimming scenes or
- running the show through a compression system.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 2
- Message 170 Mon Dec 19, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 02:51 EST
-
- Generally, credits are negotiated, or assigned on merit. My assistant
- on the show didn't negotiate for a credit, but gets one at the end, along with
- Doug's. A lot of the office staff doesn't get credited on-screen, or some of
- the support personnel in the art department, construction, costuming, makeup,
- and other areas, because there simply isn't time; Babylon Productions, which I
- co-own with Doug, employs about 225-250 people in order to make B5. So
- generally the key people in each department, and their seconds, get on-screen
- credit.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 2
- Message 200 Sat Dec 24, 1994
-
- The next batch of new episodes will be six-eps long; so append to that
- list "Acts of Sacrifice" and "Hunter, Prey."
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 2
- Message 223 Wed Dec 28, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:59 EST
-
- Well, here's an episode title for a script-in-progress that ought to
- scare the hell out of anybody who's paying attention: "In the Shadow of
- Z'ha'dum."
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 2
- Message 240 Thu Dec 29, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 01:16 EST
-
- Figure "In the Shadow of Z'ha'dum" for about episode 19 (once I finish
- writing the darned thing).
-
- We have roughly 16-17 standing sets, and as many as 60 swing sets
- available to us, the largest of any TV series that I know of. Just the number
- of clubs/restaurants is amazing...the Eclipse Cafe, Earhart's, Happy Daze, the
- Dark Star, the Fresh Air Restaurant, the banquet hall, Doug's Dugout Sports
- Bar (seen in TKO), the smaller restaurant seen in "Eyes," the Zocalo Cafe, and
- of course the mess hall.
-
- Yes, we've seen the length of the central corridor several times now;
- that you haven't noticed is the point, rather than seeing a painted backdrop,
- which sticks out.
-
- "Why should everyone stay on B5?" says G.Popovich. *Exactly*, says jms,
- pointing to Sinclair. As to living and dying...I wouldn't be at all surprised
- if something fatal happened to one or more of the characters in the main title
- before too long....
-
- What's great, from my POV, is that in the first season, folks could sense
- there was *something* going on, but now with the second season, more are
- starting to see the shape of it gliding just beneath the surface, and note
- the occasional shark-fin rising up out of the water....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 2
- Message 278 Sat Dec 31, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 22:09 EST
-
- Insofar as I know, in the B5 universe, dead is dead.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 4 Tue Nov 03, 1992
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:12 EST
- Sub: Babylon 5 - Cast & Characters
-
- For discussion of the actors who will be bringing BABYLON 5 to life with their
- performances...for information before, and discussion after the airing of "The
- Gathering" pilot.
- 264 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 4
- Message 154 Thu Dec 15, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:58 EST
-
- Also add Bernie Casey.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 4
- Message 175 Mon Dec 19, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 22:13 EST
-
- Shock Treatment's out on CD? Really? Gotta pick that one up; all I have
- is the vinyl, well-worn by now.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 4
- Message 206 Sun Dec 25, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 22:55 EST
-
- It kinda bothered their sense of superiority; also, their sense of honor
- lies more in the direction of one-to-one combat, rather than mining something
- as a trap. Consider it the way British troops did toward American
- revolutionary fighters who hid behind trees and used guerilla tactics rather
- than fighting the way the British *wanted* them to fight, out in the open, in
- nice, easily shot-at rows....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 4
- Message 210 Mon Dec 26, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 23:14 EST
-
- Sean: as was stated in the episode, we still haven't been able to crack
- the Minbari stealth technology. It's not that they're old or deficient, we
- just haven't broken their system yet. As Sheridan says in the conference
- room.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 4
- Message 217 Tue Dec 27, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 05:45 EST
-
- Sheridan asked what kind of scanners the fighters were using because he
- couldn't figure out why they were picking up the Minbari fighters. He wanted
- to be sure nobody had snuck by some kind of new tech. Once he knew they were
- the same tech as before, he knew something screwy was up.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 4
- Message 236 Wed Dec 28, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 01:34 EST
-
- Well, that's it; this topic has now become canon fodder.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 5 Tue Nov 03, 1992
- T.ORTH [Mr. Rico] (Forwarded)
- Sub: Grid Epsilon Irregulars - News & Info.
-
- This topic is for information about Babylon 5 fan groups, newsletters,
- fanzines, get-togethers, B-5 at conventions, and other general fun.
- 434 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 5
- Message 395 Sun Dec 18, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 19:10 EST
-
- And from now on, freedom is slavery.
-
- George Orwell
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 10 Thu Nov 12, 1992
- SANDMAN [Henry] at 19:25 EST
- Sub: Sex in Babylon 5
-
- Can't do without this one!!
-
-
- 413 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 10
- Message 381 Tue Dec 27, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:49 EST
-
- Don' wanna do no message. Peoples be peoples, they jus' do what they do.
- Jus' show it, don't dwell on it.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 10
- Message 387 Tue Dec 27, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:11 EST
-
- Ah has only one other thing to say on this whole left wing/right wing
- CONtroversy (and why ah'm talkin' like ah jus' escaped from a play by that
- Tennessee Williams fella is anybody's guess)...stone cold fact is, unless that
- eagles got a left AND a right wing, in perfect balance and given equal
- respect, it ain't NEVER gonna fly.
-
- jmsTELLLLLLLAAAAA
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 11 Sat Nov 14, 1992
- J.SHEEN1 [Leviathan] at 18:09 EST
- Sub: B5 Adrift!
-
- BABYLON 5 Topic Drift
- If you feel like talking about it, but it doesn't fit anywhere else... If its
- only connection to B-5 is that you thought of it in this CAT...
- This is where to come and get it out.
- 351 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 11
- Message 280 Thu Dec 15, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 05:16 EST
-
- Actually, that 800/200 split ain't far off the truth, as I dimly recall.
- Crummy with figures, good with words.
-
- Funny thing, sorta...see, according to most IQ tests, I come in just over
- the edge on the so-called genius ("Come, Join Mensa, Join Us, Join Us...")
- level. Around 160 or so. Which, frankly, is absolutely meaningless, except
- that it helps me skate throuth stuff I have no business doing or no chance of
- *really* understanding. I come in very high on intuitive scores; I can often
- figure out *what* is the correct answer, but am damned if I can tell you
- *why*.
-
- As a kid, we moved around a lot for (let's just say this for now and let
- it go at this) economic reasons. Literally every year from birth through
- about age 17 was a different house, a different city, often a different STATE.
- I learned fast that if you were too smart, and showed it...you got beat up a
- lot. So at a very early stage I found I could just shave it close enough to
- pass, without raising any red flags or drawing attention. The one thing I
- didn't want was to be noticed, because that usually preceded getting the
- stuffings knocked out of me (and being who I am, *that* was usually followed
- by my mouthing off to whoever just beat the crap out of me...at which point
- they pound me again...at which point this little bump on the playground mouths
- off again, at which point, well, you get the idea).
-
- I'd gotten pretty good at riding the line, but goofed one year in junior
- high. I screwed up my math term (no surprise there), but usually I knew I
- could ace lit classes to make up for it...except I got sick, missed several
- tests and papers...and dropped beneath the line I needed to get advanced to
- the next level. So I had to attend summer school to make up the difference.
-
- This was under the Headstart Program of those days, and the sort of kids
- you found in this one in New Jersey...Future Muggers of America founding
- members. Anyway (and this is a hell of a lot longer and more involved than
- I'd intended to get), one day they said they were going to give all of us in
- summer school a series of tests/evaluations to determine just where we
- stood...what grade reading level, comprehension, math, that sort of thing.
- Now normally I'd always held back in this stuff, but this wasn't my regular
- school, I'd be going to high school after this, so what was lost? So I just
- went for it.
-
- A few days later the test results came in, and I got suddenly called to
- the office of the head of the program. He sat me down and said, honest to
- god, "You'll forgive my langauge for a moment, but what the HELL are you DOING
- here?" Apparently for a 9th grader my language, reading, writing, and general
- intelligence figures came in at approximately that of a college graduate.
- (Though my math skills were, to be charitable, considerably lower. Bargain-
- basement, to be precise.) So I told him what I'd been doing all this time.
- He sat there, slack jawed, the whole time, at the premeditation and all the
- rest. (Though I wouldn't have gotten nailed if I'd been better at some of the
- other areas.)
-
- Later, to my chagrin, I discovered that he wrote up a memo about all this
- and attached it to my transcripts, so that when I transferred to the high
- school, I found myself assigned to several advanced classes in English lit and
- other areas, college-prep level classes. So I instantly went back to my old
- habits, and soon enough managed to get out of that one and into a regular
- class.
-
- Tests are fine, advanced classes are fine, but frankly, none of it was
- worth getting stomped on a regular basis....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 11
- Message 301 Sat Dec 17, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:05 EST
-
- BTW, and not to get off on a whole SeaQuest tangent, but...today I saw
- something even rarer than a unicorn: a good SQ episode. It hasn't aired yet,
- probably won't for a few weeks yet, but as you check your TV Guide, look for
- the one where a new experimental sub sporting artificial intelligence tied to
- Bridger gets loose. It's actually quite nice.
-
- Of the "SeaQuest Meets the Triffids" episode yet to come...the less said,
- the better.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 13 Mon Nov 23, 1992
- T.ORTH [Mr. Rico] at 21:00 EST
- Sub: Babylon 5 - Science & Technology
-
- Jump gates, nanotech, high-tech weapons, starship drives, sound in space, and
- other subjects of science and technology in Babylon 5.
- 341 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 13
- Message 325 Fri Dec 30, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 00:26 EST
-
- Not all jumpgates are hooked/linked with one another. Very ofteen you
- DON'T have to leave hyperspace, just jump from A to C, and from C to Z, riding
- the lock-on to each one (Catherine Sakai programmed in just such a sequence in
- MIND WAR, in fact). You don't usually have to leave hyperspace to go from one
- gate to another; usually, in the case of the freighter being discussed, it
- left hyperspace at the last jumpgate stop to pick up supplies, people, cargo,
- other stuff, and was heading back to the gate again.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 17 Tue Jan 19, 1993
- C.STOBBE [Colin] at 21:02 EST
- Sub: Babylon 5 - Merchandising
-
- A place to discuss all the neat Babylon 5 merchandising coming out (hopefully)
- soon
- 295 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 17
- Message 193 Thu Dec 22, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:14 EST
-
- There is no reference in the liner notes to ANY of the characters, and
- there is NO "outlining of the story of B5." The report you've heard has been
- mischaracterized. There *is* a photo of Sinclair there. And from what I
- understand, the license/promotional deal emphasized that the current cast
- should be specified in the thing, since it's being released in the current
- year, to make clearer it's a 1995 release. A cast list put out right now
- would not have Sinclair on it; that's the same situation as this.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 17
- Message 243 Tue Dec 27, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:13 EST
-
- I have seen some fuzzy black-and-white photos of the MicroMachines, and
- though I can't testify yet about the colors, since I couldn't see them, they
- LOOK majorly cool. Want 'em. Want 'em NOW.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 17
- Message 260 Thu Dec 29, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 01:22 EST
-
- The zero is probably a German zero, which usually has a crossbar through
- it, /.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 23 Fri Feb 12, 1993
- V.VAIDY1 [Vijay] at 23:00 EST
- Sub: "OtherWorks" by JMS
-
- Before there was "B5" and when "JMS" was just another Plain Joe, there was
- OtherSyde
- [A discussion of the other works of J. Michael Straczynski]
- 227 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 23
- Message 209 Fri Dec 16, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 02:27 EST
-
- It was a regular episode done for ABC as part of the Saturday morning
- season that ended up garnering a lot of attention. It's also a favorite of a
- lot of the folks who run that department at ABC. It came out *very* nicely.
- I'm pretty sure it was season one stuff.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 23
- Message 212 Tue Dec 20, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 04:35 EST
-
- Well, it's confirmed; my episode of THE REAL GHOSTBUSTERS, "Xmas Marks
- the Spot," will air Saturday morning at 8:30 a.m. (probably 7:30 central) on
- ABC. It's in TV Guide and everything.
-
- Kinda dopey, but fun....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 23
- Message 215 Tue Dec 20, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:58 EST
-
- There's business stuff being worked out on Grimjack, and I've said to all
- parties that to avoid doing less than standard work, I'd prefer to not start
- the script until January/February, when most of the writing on B5 will be
- finished.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 23
- Message 217 Tue Dec 20, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 23:35 EST
-
- Eek, and just turned on USA network tonight and caught one of my Murder,
- She Wrote episodes, "The Committee." The world is getting too small for
- comfort.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 23
- Message 219 Fri Dec 23, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:23 EST
-
- As long as we're talking about other stuff...this Friday one of my
- episodes of "Murder, She Wrote" that got a lot of press will be run on USA,
- "Incident in Lot 7," set on the Universal Studios lot, in the old Psycho
- house. It's kinda fun, got some good lines here and there.
-
- I was talking to somebody who worked it out the other day, and having
- written over 120 *produced* episodes of TV, the fact is that one day out of
- every three, you're going to find something of mine somewhere on the schedule,
- which is probably why I don't mention it much.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 23
- Message 221 Sun Dec 25, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 00:07 EST
-
- Except the creeps at ABC reversed the order, so my machine got a
- different show on tape; wanted to see if they'd cut anything.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 23
- Message 225 Wed Dec 28, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 01:36 EST
-
- Got nothing to do with me.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 24 Fri Jun 04, 1993
- J.ROY18 [Jonathan] at 21:11 EDT
- Sub: Babylon 5 - Weapons and Warfare!
-
- For discussion about the weapons, counter weapons, armor, shielding, tactics,
- logistics, and so forth, of small combat and large scale war in the Babylon 5
- universe.
- 237 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 24
- Message 211 Thu Dec 29, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 01:24 EST
-
- Or they could've shattered the moon, and used mass drivers to hurl huge
- sections of it down onto us.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 29 Thu Jun 30, 1994
- B.SHERRIS [Brett] at 00:03 EDT
- Sub: The Master Plan
-
- WARNING! THIS TOPIC MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS VITAL TO THE FIVE YEAR
- STORY ARC OF BABYLON 5. DO NOT READ THIS TOPIC IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO
- POSSIBLY DISCOVER THE PURPOSE OF THE FIVE YEAR STORY ARC!
- 261 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 29
- Message 252 Thu Dec 22, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 05:01 EST
-
- Londo does not have the Eye. If he'd failed to turn it over, his career
- would've been ruined; getting it back was the only thing that kept him on B5.
-
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 31 Sat Jul 09, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 20:23 EDT
- Sub: Really Stupid Questions from JMS
-
- Every so often, I need Information. (You won't get it!) Technical stuff,
- research or reference stuff...and given the brain trust here, I figured this
- could be a useful resource from time to time. With appreciation.
- 194 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 31
- Message 167 Mon Dec 26, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 19:18 EST
-
- Caitlin wanted to go off and pursue romantic leading roles in films.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 18, Topic 31
- Message 169 Fri Dec 30, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 22:08 EST
-
- Okay, here's the deal...my Spousal Overunit some time ago installed a
- sound card into her computer. From that point on (at least we're fairly sure
- that was the deciding point), she could no longer access both her serial
- of to try and make the darned thing work; so now she has to keep switching
- between modem and mouse. If there's ANYone out there with some suggestions on
- how to fix this, that'd be great (given in very plain layperson's terms,
- because neither of us is a rocket scientist at this stuff, real step-by-step
- stuff).
-
- jms
- ------------
-
- ************
- Topic 13 Sun Oct 17, 1993
- STARR [Arne] at 15:15 EDT
- Sub: #110 - "Mind War"
-
- by JMS. Co-Starring Walter Koenig.
- 234 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 13
- Message 234 Thu Dec 29, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 01:26 EST
-
- Yep, I wrote this one.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 27 Mon Aug 29, 1994
- STARR [Arne] (Forwarded)
- Sub: #201 - "Points of Departure"
-
- by JMS. Directed by Janet Greek.
- 181 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 27
- Message 168 Thu Dec 22, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 19:58 EST
-
- Correct above; Sheridan says, quite specifically, in the conference room
- with Ivanova after the Grey Council guy is gone, "they used some kind of
- stealth technology WE'VE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO BREAK." It's not a matter of old
- or cheaper tech; we just haven't broken their technology yet.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 32 Mon Aug 29, 1994
- STARR [Arne] at 23:36 EDT
- Sub: #206 - "A Spider in the Web"
-
- by Lawrence G. DiTillio. Director : Kevin Cremins
- 109 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 32
- Message 108 Sun Dec 18, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:21 EST
-
- The security guard didn't trigger the detonation; he picked up some
- energy buildup on his scanner the moment Horn's heart stopped.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 34 Thu Oct 20, 1994
- STARR [Arne] (Forwarded)
- Sub: #208 - "Soul Mates"
-
- Londo's wives in a tale by Peter David.
- 179 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 34
- Message 56 Thu Dec 15, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 19:04 EST
-
- How weird...I hadn't ever seen any messages here, and I couldn't figure
- why...just checked and for some reason it was IGNored. Odd....
-
- Anyway...the production numbers (207, 208) are not for the order in which
- they're aired, but the order they're PRODUCED in. So the numbers don't
- change. We just air 208, then 207. This is very common in TV.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 34
- Message 74 Fri Dec 16, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 02:18 EST
-
- Peter Jurasik has made it clear that he wants the 30-foot portrait of
- Londo...he wants to hang it outside his house...facing the neighbors who keep
- annoying him....
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 34
- Message 81 Fri Dec 16, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 16:44 EST
-
- Anytime we have someone who's a) of shorter stature, and b) of any kind
- of aggressive or unusual type, people say we're doing Harlan. (Here, and in
- "Deathwalker," with Abbut.) If we ever end up *doing* Harlan, the part will
- be PLAYED by Harlan. The rest...forget it.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 34
- Message 95 Sat Dec 17, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 03:55 EST
-
- Re: pacing...quite correct. I think the pacing should vary
- according to the story we're telling; some are slower, some fairly average,
- and some are written, acted and directed at a dead run. I like tuning into a
- series and never quite knowing what the hell to expect each time.
-
- All things considered, the episode went through fairly cleanly, script-
- wise, not much in the way of revision. Peter has a good ear for dialog (not
- surprising). So for the most part it was little stuff; for example...Peter
- came up with, "Either I'm in hell or in medlab," to which I appended,
- "...either way, the decor needs work." Which is kind of the fun in getting an
- outside script; you can hear the first part of a line you'd never considered,
- and knowing the character, you can take it just a little further.
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 34
- Message 114 Sun Dec 18, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 19:06 EST
-
- Actually, Delenn explains why she made the transformation right after we
- see it, in the council chambers in "Revelations."
-
- jms
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 34
- Message 120 Mon Dec 19, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 02:42 EST
-
- Complaints here have to come from local residents.
-
- jms
- ------------
- ************
- Topic 35 Tue Nov 01, 1994
- STARR [Arne] (Forwarded)
- Sub: #209 - "The Coming Of Shadows"
-
- The episode that also gives us the title of season 2.
- 18 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 19, Topic 35
- Message 18 Sun Dec 25, 1994
- STRACZYNSKI [Joe] at 18:59 EST
-
- This is a baseless rumor. This episode title was always intended to
- reflect the season overall title. There may or may not ever be an episode
- entitled "The Shadows Fall," but since I've never discussed that title with
- anyone, ever, any reports of it are a rumor.
-
- jms
- ------------
|