|
|
- JMS CompuServe messages for August 1997. Collected by John Hardin
- <jhardin@wolfenet.com>.
-
-
- Date: 01 Aug 1997 01:56:09 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: wolf 359
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- "I would like to express my appreciation for the way that you and all
- the members of the cast at Blackpool gave no hint of the turmoil going
- on over that weekend."
-
- Thanks. You are kinder than honesty would warrant. We were all
- more than a bit upset as we watched things unravel in front of our
- eyes; Bruce was about as upset as I've ever seen him, although he
- buttoned it up beautifully when the fans came around, because they
- deserved only the best. I did my best there, but there were lapses...I
- was sharper tempered than I should have been with a couple of stewards,
- because I was more at the direct center of the whole situation, and
- immensely frustrated and bugged at the whole thing. I guess that's why
- I'm a writer and not an actor. But it's been nagging at me ever since
- I left, frankly, because they had no way of knowing what was going on,
- or why I was in that state, and they certainly didn't do anything to
- merit that.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 01 Aug 1997 01:56:12 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The Casting Process
-
- Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Since the you are undoubtedly being besieged by "you should cast
- > <insert name of choice> for your new character," could you shed
- > light on the casting process, whether it be for a regular or a
- > guest shot? You've said that you (as execprod) wait for someone to
- > come in and knock you socks off (or something to that effect),
- > but is there a sort of cabal of casting directors (now there's a
- > term of venery for you <g>) who get together from time to time
- > and trade promising people ("Whoziwhatsis wasn't right for the
- > show we're casting, but he/she might be dynamite for your
- > show...")? Do casting directors actively seek out actors they've
- > seen do guest shots on other shows, or do they wait for the more
- > savvy actors' agents to do their thing?
-
- Our casting director, Fern Champion (and I can't tell you the
- amount of humor we have with that name), like all casting directors,
- makes the rounds of theaters and movies and TV shows to see who's hot.
- So she has her own list. On top of that, once a role comes out in a
- script, it goes out to actor's agents in what's called a "breakdown," a
- two- or three-paragraph description of the character: age, sex,
- attitude, the part itself, guest or recur or regular...all that. The
- various agents then send the info on to their clients who seem to fit
- the bill. Then if the actor is interested, the agents sends "sides,"
- meaning pages from the script in which the character appears.
-
- If the actor likes the sides, and the character, the agent then
- contacts the casting director and tries to get their client into the
- audition. There's some prescreening...if we see the resume ahead of
- time, and actor X doesn't have the training or experience, we move
- on...but in the end, we get anywhere from 5-9 people in for an
- audition. If we like one of those, we cast that person. If we're
- caught on two, we do a callback with those two and decide. (We = the
- CD, me, John, Doug and the director.)
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 01 Aug 1997 01:56:15 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: ->402
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- I could write all of S5, but at this point there is no *need* to
- do so, so why do it? Just for the record? No...I'm just as happy to
- bring in a few outside scripts. Not many, only about 5, just to break
- it up a little.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 01 Aug 1997 16:35:14 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: ->402
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > Any chance of another Peter David Script???
-
- Yes, Peter David and Bill Mumy will jointly be writing at least
- one script.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 03 Aug 1997 01:51:02 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The Casting Process
-
- Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com> asks:
- > So <g> ...any ideas so far concerning who may stand to replace
- > Claudia?
-
- No, we're totally open to whoever walks in the door for the
- part.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 03 Aug 1997 01:51:05 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The Casting Process
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- Actually, our casting director at the time (not the same as
- Fern) apparently didn't feel Wayne had enough credits for our show, and
- it took John Copeland (who'd seen his work) finally pulling rank to get
- him in the door to where I could see him. Once in...that was that.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 03 Aug 1997 01:51:07 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Outside proj/scripts?
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- The problem over there isn't the material, it's the restraints
- put *on* the material by Paramount. Jeri Taylor is one of the best
- writers and best show runners in town; give her room to flex her
- muscles, and she can flatten any show around and blow the doors off SF
- TV. Unfortunately, due to the Paramount heavy-handedness and
- restrictions on all their writers, you have a situation with a Ferrari
- sitting in a garage and never allowed to go more than 20 miles around
- the block.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 03 Aug 1997 02:10:16 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: SysOp Dupa T Parrot <70040.104@compuserve.com>
- Subject: B5FC Merchandise
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- "A three week turn-around time for mail order isn't too shabby but I'm
- getting spoiled by online merchandise vendors. I'd like to see the B5FC
- offer merchandise online using current technologies.:"
-
- Already in process; we just changed providers at thestation.com
- in search of a really stable and safe charge system, and should have an
- online credit charge system up and running very shortly.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 03 Aug 1997 02:10:19 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5FC Merchandise
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- "We haven't ordered anything from the B5 Fan Club website because we
- can't get into it without Netscape..."
-
- This is one of the things we're now correcting, with the change
- in providers.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 03 Aug 1997 14:10:32 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5FC Merchandise
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > Meanwhile, on the subject of merchandise, I assume the
- > collectible card game I just plunked down pre-order money on is
- > legit? comments than "What's that?"
-
- Thanks, and yes, the collectible card game is legit.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 03 Aug 1997 14:10:37 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: ->402
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- I'm keeping DC and David in my hip pocket for the moment; there
- are an awful lot of writers who've wanted desperately to write for the
- show in the last few years, who couldn't because I did two seasons
- alone. I have kind of a moral obligation to give those folks a shot,
- and since there are only about 5 open assignments, I have to be very
- selective. If I can in good conscience give one to David or DC, I will
- definitely consider doing so. But the new guys deserve a shot.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 04 Aug 1997 21:04:14 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Michael Nelson <70403.1270@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Last Four of Season 4
-
- Michael Nelson <70403.1270@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Do the PTEN stations have an obligation to show the remaining
- > episodes of Season 4? I have not called the station yet, but if
- > they (and other stations) have decided to not show any more
- > episodes, will the debut on TNT in January take care of this
- > problem? Would TNT begin with the last four episodes of Season 4
- > and then go immediately into Season 5?
-
- No, the final four contractually belong to the local stations;
- they may not be showing it *now*, but should be showing it in October.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 04 Aug 1997 21:04:16 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com>
- Subject: ->402
-
- Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks:
- > One thing that has me curious -- when another writer does a B5
- > ep, and you feel the need to ask for revisions, does it tend to
- > be because they don't have the characters' "voices" quite right,
- > or do they throw in elements that skew your arc? In other words,
- > is it character or plot that more frequently needs adjusting
- > before going to film?
-
- It's never any one thing...it always varies from writer to
- writer.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 05 Aug 1997 16:28:21 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Jonathan Kass <74130.443@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Shadow Within> <COS
-
- Jonathan Kass <74130.443@compuserve.com> asks:
- > could you comment on what isn't?
- > I'm pretty sure I get what that means, can you comment on whether
- > that figures in to the remainder of the TV series?
-
- "Going beyond" was left deliberately vague...we may see
- something of this in time.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 06 Aug 1997 23:02:36 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Michael Nelson <70403.1270@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Bureau 13 Question
-
- Michael Nelson <70403.1270@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Do you have any plans for Bureau 13?
- > Has it been mentioned in any episodes after its introduction?
-
- No, Bureau 13 was subsumed into the larger organizations. After
- we did the episode, we learned of a rpg called bureau 13, and decided
- not to use it again just to avoid confusion.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 07 Aug 1997 13:50:58 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Ed Brandt <100274.2672@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The Casting Process
-
- Ed Brandt <100274.2672@compuserve.com> asks:
- > mission, sheep farm and/ or afterlife)?
-
- It's a different character, not a recast...Ivanova's away on
- another assignment.
-
- jms (who still remembers the new Darrin)
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 12:51:15 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Neville White <100335.2721@compuserve.com>
- Subject: the Summoning - doink!
-
- Neville White <100335.2721@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Was this what they meant when they said 'we are not ready yet'?
- > Where they waiting to get this monster grown/finished/whatever?
- > Don't believe in half measures, do they?
-
- Thanks...we do try.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 12:51:16 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Third TNT film???
-
- Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Any details available?
-
- Lemme get S5 off the ground, then I'll deal with this.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 13:07:56 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Jonathan Kass <74130.443@compuserve.com>
- Subject: <NSNR> <EVP>
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- Thanks...the key is to always stay true to what the *character*
- thinks is true...whether that came genuinely, or he convinced himself
- of a certain position, you have to advance that position honestly.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 23:02:29 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The Casting Process
-
- Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Joe, Will we be hearing about her from time to time throughout
- > the season?
-
- No, there are no plans for Ivanova to appear in S5.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 23:02:31 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: S5 Episode Titles
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- No, just that since I ain't doing that story, the title became
- available, and it was most apt for this episode.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 23:02:33 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Summoning: Translation
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Hatrack would, of course, be a loose interpretation of the bony
- crest at the top of a Minbari's head.
-
- (long pause to see if he buys it or not)
-
- Okay, okay...bear in mind that if you misuse the language you
- can create words that don't actually exist. In German, for instance,
- they create new words by adding suffixes and prefixes to previous words
- (as Mark Twain said, they eventually acquire a perspective, like a
- train receding into the distance). The fact that Ivanova came up with
- that word -- taking English in her head and trying to find Minbari
- equivilants -- doesn't mean that it *is* a word to the Minbari. I can
- say, "uberfleidermaus," which would mean "the supervising bat," but
- that ain't a word the Germans would recognize, even though it is in
- German.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 23:02:36 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: ->402
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Harlan is working on something now, and suggested something that
- I then based an episode on, so we share story credit on "A View from
- the Gallery."
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 23:12:44 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The Casting Process
-
- Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Joe, Will we be hearing about her from time to time throughout
- > the season?
-
- She'll be mentioned here and there.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 08 Aug 1997 23:12:45 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: The Big Picture
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- There will be closure provided to that relationship.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 10 Aug 1997 22:24:08 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com>
- Subject: ->402
-
- Shane S. Shellenbarger <104305.3404@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Trent or totally unrelated?
-
- It's an unrelated story.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 10 Aug 1997 23:39:07 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: DS9 = Babylon 5
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- B5 was created in 1987; the pilot was shot actually before the
- DS9 pilot was shot, but they rushed their version out before B5 could
- air. There were only a few weeks between the airing of the two pilots.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 10 Aug 1997 23:39:09 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Son of B5 Benchmark
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- Yeah, a number of shows are now adapting the B5 storytelling
- model, with an overarching arc and shows that keep it going. The new
- Roddenberry series has a five year arc of its own, apparently. More
- will follow, now that we've broken the ice.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 11 Aug 1997 21:25:47 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Son of B5 Benchmark
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- I honestly don't know how important the web has been because
- frankly, if you added up all the web-users out there, it wouldn't be a
- blip on the ratings charts. That said, our audience has definitely
- increased over the last 4 years, one of the few syndicated shows that
- has grown while nearly all the rest have fallen. Xena has grown, and I
- think one or two others, but that's it.
-
- It just takes any show a while to find its audience, or in this
- case, for our audience to find *us*, given scheduling. We've begun
- doing that, and are nearly at critical mass.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 13 Aug 1997 11:58:39 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Son of B5 Benchmark
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- There's a follow-up story in the works...we'll see....
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 13 Aug 1997 11:58:40 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: New Cast Member
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- No, we're still in the process of casting. We have some
- interesting prospects, but nothing's been finalized yet.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 13 Aug 1997 18:11:36 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Carol Naylor <100645.2613@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Son of B5 Benchmark
-
- Carol Naylor <100645.2613@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Ever since I realised that you'd been on-line long before B5 got
- > off the ground, I've wondered whether your on-line participation
- > as the show's producer was something you'd conciously decided to
- > do or whether it was something that, like Topsey, just 'growed'?
-
- No, it was just a natural extension of already being online.
- The only deliberate decision involved was, "Do I *change* my life and
- what I do for pleasure just because I'm more well known now than
- before?" I'm still the same person, so the answer was no.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 14 Aug 1997 03:49:55 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Story Arc challeges
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- One of the first things I had to do, in plotting out the
- storyline, was to set aside trap doors for *every single character*,
- because you never know when or how the real world is going to impinge
- upon you. An actor can quit, or get hit by a car, or slammed by a
- meteor...there's no way to control the characters the way you do in a
- novel. That's a given. But you can't bring X-million viewers along to
- a certain point, then say, "Well, all the stuff we were going to do we
- can't because X isn't here."
-
- So in a way, the structure of the story is kind of like a
- computer game tree...pull out a piece along the way, and it goes down a
- different path, but ends up at exactly the same point at the end. It's
- the difference between different *results* and different ways of
- *getting* there.
-
- You can do a story about a platoon in WW II, for instance, and
- some of the platoon may live, die, be injured, whatever...but the story
- of WWII is the story of WWII.
-
- Beyond that, a challenge is just that: a call to see just how
- good you *really* are, kid. If you've ever seen GLORY, there's the
- scene in which one of the Massachusetts 54th is being taught to shoot.
- He does just fine, hits the target, reloads fine...when nobody's
- shooting at him. At which point the colonel starts firing a revolver
- right next to his head, teling him to try and do it NOW, and do it
- FAST, with ten thousand guns firing at him.
-
- That's when the art comes in, that's when the skill comes
- in...in dealing with what you *don't* expect.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 14 Aug 1997 03:49:58 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Summoning: Translation
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Danke.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 14 Aug 1997 17:40:05 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Roseann M. Caputo <103510.1542@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Scripts
-
- Roseann M. Caputo <103510.1542@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Are these legal?
- > Are they being sold legally?
- > Would appreciate any info you might have and if you or one of the
- > cast is presented with one of these, would it get signed or would
- > I get a smack in the head?
-
- No, these scripts are *not* legitimate or legal. I know they
- say they buy from "script dealers," but that translates out to "people
- who stole scripts from studios." WB is aware of this one, and
- preparing to go after them. The actual ownership of the physical
- *script* itself is shared and/or alternated by the studio and the
- writer, and it *cannot* be sold without the permission of the writer.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 14 Aug 1997 21:42:17 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Ron Chusid <74756.3150@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Story Arc challeges
-
- Ron Chusid <74756.3150@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Have you considered writing it once you are finished with the
- > series (assuming your time doesn't get monopolized by the next
- > show)?
-
- "It would be interesting to read an outline of the original arc, and
- the various changes which you have had to make along the way. I'm sure
- there is quite enough inside information for a book. Have you
- considered writing it once you are finished with the series (assuming
- your time doesn't get monopolized by the next show)?"
-
- One heart attack at a time.
-
- "You might consider a writing a more general book rather than one
- directed towards aspiring scriptwriters. You'd have a lot more
- competition, but a considerably bigger potential audience."
-
- See above.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 15 Aug 1997 14:09:13 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Stephen Burrow <70640.40@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Bruce on Pol. Incorrect
-
- Stephen Burrow <70640.40@compuserve.com> asks:
- > What happened, and was it any big deal?
- > Have you ever been invited on PI?
- > Would you even be interested?
-
- Yes, the union came in on season 3, on a Wednesday, if I
- recall, and by the end of the week it was resolved, and that was the
- extent of it.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 15 Aug 1997 14:09:14 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Roseann M. Caputo <103510.1542@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Scripts
-
- Roseann M. Caputo <103510.1542@compuserve.com> asks:
- > When you do the marketing thing, will you be making any of the
- > scripts available, or is that one of those things that you
- > haven't really been able to give a lot of time/attention to?
-
- Selling B5 scripts is something I'd like to do, with the
- difference that the writers involved -- David, Larry, Peter, everybody
- -- would get a percentage, just as with a book publication. That's the
- way it *should* be done. These guys who sell scripts through stores
- and mail order don't give a penny to the creators or writers whose work
- they are selling.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 15 Aug 1997 14:09:15 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: All
- Subject: Bruce on Claudia
-
- For those who've wanted to hear another point of view on the CC
- thing, check out http://www.tvguide.com/tv/circuits/0815A.htm for Bruce
- Boxleitner's comments, since Bruce was there when it all went down, and
- saw everything firsthand. His comments are as straightforward and
- uncensored as ever.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 15 Aug 1997 21:20:17 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Jimmy K <110435.632@compuserve.com>
- Subject: New B5 Novels
-
- Jimmy K <110435.632@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Have you decided what the new B5 novels from Dell will be about?
- > Will they be more canon, like Book #9 was?
-
- There's something very exciting in the works for the next batch
- of B5 novels, but I can't or shouldn't say anything until the
- announcements come at WorldCon.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 15 Aug 1997 21:20:19 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Bruce on Claudia
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- "I went over to the site with the address you gave and got a file not
- found on server error. I ended up just using
- www.tvguide.com/tv/circuits and then clicking on the Bruce B. story
- from there. I looked at the url at that point and saw
- "www.tvguide.com/tv/circuits/0815a.htm". The only difference I see is
- that small "a" after the 0815, where you had a capital. I don't know
- if that's what the problem was or not."
-
- Yeah, apparently that makes all the difference...so anyone
- looking on, make the a lower case not upper case, or just go to the TV
- Guide main menu.
-
- "From what I've seen of Bruce B. on shows like PI and the like, he
- must be one of the most unpretentious TV stars I've seen. I wonder how
- much this has to do with him working with James Arness."
-
- I don't know if it's specifically that, but yeah, Bruce does
- have a kind of outspokenness and frankness and "ah, hell," attitude
- that comes from his long association with westerns. He's absolutely a
- straight shooter.
-
- "I can't imagine what B5 would have been like without Bruce. Bruce
- has brought a LOT to the show. You, and the fans, really lucked out by
- Bruce getting on board."
-
- Bruce has done a great job. He loves the role, he *is* the
- Captain, and around the stage he's the show's cheerleader, team
- captain, and resident bright spirit. Peter also does a lot of that, as
- does Rick, but Bruce is just an amazing team player.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 15 Aug 1997 21:20:22 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Ron Chusid <74756.3150@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Bruce on Claudia
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- Huh...I totally missed that one...thanks.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 16 Aug 1997 15:52:30 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Scripts
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- "Am I out of touch, but doesn't the Basic Agreement with the Guild
- give the writer the exclusive to sell the physical copies of the work?
- Or is that something that died with the Strike of '61?"
-
- Yes and no. For instance...my script for "The Coming of
- Shadows" is being published in the UK by Boxtree, and subsequently in
- the US. There is no ancillary payment for this other than the general
- licensing fee that goes against the overall merchandising revenue
- stream. (Showbiz talk, folks, pay no attention.) So I don't get any
- kind of royalty on the script book per se at all. I called the WGA,
- and this is entirely within their purview. Also, Fox is selling
- X-Files scripts by their writers, and I believe the arrangement is the
- same, or close to it.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 16 Aug 1997 15:52:33 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Claudia's replacement
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- No; we're still in the process of casting, and no offer has been
- put forth yet.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 16 Aug 1997 23:54:11 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Son of B5 Benchmark
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > Sound like anybody we know??
-
- I haven't seen much of Buffy, due to work schedules, but what
- I've seen, I've liked. I also commend Tales from a Parallel Universe
- on the Movie Channel to you...great stuff.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 17 Aug 1997 00:02:59 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Bruce on Claudia
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- Yes, Bruce is definitely a history buff, from the civil war
- period up through WWII and beyond. That's one thing he and John
- Copeland share, a real interest in WWII history and the like. Bruce,
- being something of a cowboy in real life, also has a substantial
- interest in, and familiarity with, the old west and native american
- histories. He also reads and enjoys SF.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 17 Aug 1997 16:06:58 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Claudia's replacement
-
- Michael Beemer <71551.1670@compuserve.com> asks:
- > So, you've written the first 4-5 scripts, but don't have the role
- > cast? How much slack do you have to cast and begin shooting?
- > Or, can you write the character out of 501 if there's a delay in
- > casting?
-
- No, you almost always write the character long before you have
- the actor; you just find the actor that fits the character, then slowly
- the two begin to merge once the role is cast. When Bruce came on
- board, I think we already had the first 4-5 scripts in hand.
-
- In the case of Lochley, she isn't in 501 anyway, that's the 422
- replacement...she's in 502, and we still have time on that one.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 17 Aug 1997 16:07:01 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Claudia's replacement
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- "One of the magazines have said that Bill Mumy and Stephen Furst will
- NOT appear in front of the camera for season five....Say it aint so
- Joe..."
-
- Ain't so. They're both in 503, and will appear thereafter as
- well. Also in the main credits as usual.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 17 Aug 1997 16:07:03 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5, TNT, and Censorship
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > Will TNT silence out words unacceptable to their bizarre
- > standards from the original episodes of B5 (pilot and seasons one
- > through four) and from the new fifth season and it's
- > "made-for-cable" movies?
-
- Dunno...nobody's said boo to us about this one yet.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 17 Aug 1997 20:42:26 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: No Word on Fifth Season
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- PTEN is more or less defunct as of this year. The syndicated
- stations that normally carried B5 were not available. TNT rode to the
- rescue.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 17 Aug 1997 22:08:58 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Scripts
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Oh...got it. Yes, the places that are under discussion, like
- scriptshop.com, which sell scripts without the permission of the
- writer, who does control the physical script, are ripping the writers
- off. Yes, they are definitely in violation of the basic
- agreement...but then, they aren't signatories, either. They're just
- crooks.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 17 Aug 1997 22:09:00 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Don Crossman <75147.175@compuserve.com>
- Subject: B'more Sun Article
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- Thanks, I didn't know it was out, will check it asap.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 18 Aug 1997 00:18:50 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Jimmy K <110435.632@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The future of Draal
-
- Jimmy K <110435.632@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Is the actor that plays him available for the show or has he
- > permanently left to do other things?
-
- The actor is on Broadway playing in Hello, Dolly, which makes
- his appearance in Hello, Draaly improbable for the moment.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 18 Aug 1997 15:45:06 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Bruce on Pol. Incorrect
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Like virtually all syndicated shows, we were non-union below
- the line (meaning not counting actors, directors, and writers). There
- actually wasn't a syndicated TV contract in existence...which is why
- most shows shoot out of LA, because they were afraid to work something
- out with the union. So we then negotiated the first syndicated TV
- contract that I'm aware of for shooting here in LA, and which is now
- being used to bring other shows back to LA that had left previously.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 18 Aug 1997 15:45:07 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Bruce on Claudia
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Certainly a number of cast members are very upset with her, so
- we'll have to see where that goes. We're finalizing the casting now on
- the part of Lochley.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 18 Aug 1997 15:45:08 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Scripts
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Because we're siccing Warner Bros. on 'em instead...and letting
- the other studios know about it. Let the big boys go in there and slug
- it out with 'em.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 18 Aug 1997 15:45:09 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Stathis in Cinescape!!!
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > Guess who turned up in Cinescape magazine's letters column?
- > Is this guy for real?
- > Has he paid any attention to the actual practice of TeeVee?
-
- He's a bitter, mean-spirited person who feels he has to tear
- down the show. It's his obsession. Trying to explain it rationally is
- like trying to play golf without those tiny holes in the ground, you've
- got no basis for the conversation to take place.
-
- As for his prediction...back when B5 was first getting going,
- and I was at a convention in San Francisco that actually booed me when
- I said that this show might eventually give Star Trek a run for its
- money, one woman in the audience -- two Presidential elections ago --
- yelled out, "Yeah, right, and Clinton will be President."
-
- 'nuff said.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 19 Aug 1997 00:19:28 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Bruce on Claudia
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Either a) it's been replaced, it's a daily column, or b) try a
- lower-case a in the address, not a capital A. Either way, if you do a
- search on the names involved, the article will show up in the archives.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 19 Aug 1997 15:11:01 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Kristen Cloke on B5 ;>)
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- I think it would be the wrong choice because she played a very
- similar role over on SAAB. I'd rather go for someone who hadn't been
- that closely identified with another military space series.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 19 Aug 1997 21:23:17 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Kristen Cloke on B5 ;>)
-
- Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Wouldn't she be too young for the part anyway?
-
- You're quite correct, she's definitely too young to be
- realistic. Which is why all the actors we're seeing are in their late
- 30s to early 40s range.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 19 Aug 1997 21:23:19 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Richard P. Manny <70762.141@compuserve.com>
- Subject: B5 Action Figures
-
- Richard P. Manny <70762.141@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Is this correct?
-
- Yep, they'll be out soonish.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 20 Aug 1997 12:09:49 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: August 29th 1997
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Re: Judgement Day....
-
- Oh...is *that* what that sound was...?
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Aug 1997 15:40:27 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Jonathan Kass <74130.443@compuserve.com>
- Subject: UT vs. Shadow Within
-
- Jonathan Kass <74130.443@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Could you shed some light on which way this really works?
-
- Nuts...I missed that when I went over the text. I guess I got
- so used to seeing him in relation to the Aggy that I just went past it.
- No, the mining incident took place when he was first officer on the
- Lexington, under Captain Sterns.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Aug 1997 15:40:32 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: JOEL ARAUJO <76016.122@compuserve.com>
- Subject: B5 sims
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- No, it's WB's position that sims constitute copyright
- infringement.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 21 Aug 1997 11:39:29 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: JOEL ARAUJO <76016.122@compuserve.com>
- Subject: B5 sims
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- Since the copyright rules are made by Congress, no, I'd imagine
- not.
-
- "Whenever a copyright law is to be made or changed, the idiots
- assemble."
-
- "One thing is impossible for god: to make sense of any
- copyright rule in any country in the world"
-
- (both from Mark Twain)
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 21 Aug 1997 11:39:30 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Neville White <100335.2721@compuserve.com>
- Subject: TLN - Minbari phrase
-
- Neville White <100335.2721@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Could you tell me what the minbari phrase was that Ericsson used
- > at the end of the conversation, and again just before he died?
-
- The Minbari phrase was the standard way for Rangers to end a
- conversation, with a salute to the Entil-zha, the head of the Rangers,
- which is Delenn in this case.
-
- And thanks....
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 21 Aug 1997 22:58:37 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: The Big Picture
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- "I expect that new fans who are introduced to the show by 522
- sequential episodes - daily - are going to be in dire need of
- industrial strength tranquilizers."
-
- Cool....
-
- jm(getting kickbacks from the AMA)s
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 21 Aug 1997 22:58:39 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: T.P. Chai <104674.3064@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The Gathering done?
-
- T.P. Chai <104674.3064@compuserve.com> asks:
- > I assume the re-editing and re-scoring is complete and you have
- > delivered it to TNT?
-
- No, TNT still hasn't commissioned the re-edit and re-mix of the
- pilot.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 21 Aug 1997 22:58:42 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Roseann M. Caputo <103510.1542@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Angela
-
- Roseann M. Caputo <103510.1542@compuserve.com> asks:
- > What was it like working with Angela Landsbury?
- > Had you heard that too?
- > Would you work with her again?
- > Any chance she could do B5 or Crusade?
-
- The improvements were instituted when David Moessinger was
- brought on as Executive Producer. He did a year of the show and then
- left when Angela was named exec. The improvements were already in
- place by then.
-
- Re: Angela...I have to say I enjoyed working with her. She
- struck me as a woman of tremendous integrity and honesty, not to
- mention skill. As an example...when she took over as exec, there was
- one episode being directed by her son, who had been doing them here and
- there for about a year. As I watched the dailies, I found he had
- gotten the episode *completely* wrong and was, in my view, undercutting
- the whole episode.
-
- I went out, very upset and angry, and confronted him in front of
- the whole crew. Suffice to say it's bad form (I was angry, it was
- stupid, I make no excuses) to do after a director in front of his crew
- in *any* event, even if you are a writer/producer but to go after the
- *son* of the *star and executive producer*?
-
- I got back to the offices and everybody was just
- dead-white...they said, "You're going to be fired the second she hears
- about this." About an hour or two later, the phone rang, and she
- wanted to see me. I went to her office, and she asked, "What happened,
- and why did you do what you did?"
-
- I explained the situation, why I was upset, and explained how
- the episode was being killed in the directing because he didn't
- understand a large part of it. She considered it for a moment...and
- finally nodded. "You did the right thing," she said, and that was the
- end of it.
-
- That took a lot of guts and integrity on her part. She knew me
- well enough to know that I leave my ego at the door, and all that
- concerns me is doing what's best for the show, and the story.
- Sometimes, on some shows, that ain't enough. With her, it was. 'nuff
- said.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 21 Aug 1997 22:58:46 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com>
- Subject: 'Science Fiction Age'Mag
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- It was a very flattering editorial, and they are very kind over
- at SFA. As are your comments.
-
- Re: shooting...yes, it started on Monday the 18th and is
- proceeding apace.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 22 Aug 1997 15:09:04 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5 TV Guide
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > How the heck did he know that I was going to get water stains on
- > my first copy?
-
- Actually, the B5 cover has become an instant collector's item,
- selling for anywhere from $20-50 in some places, and more overseas, so
- those who bought multiple copies now have a good little investment on
- their hands.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 22 Aug 1997 15:19:40 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: JOEL ARAUJO <76016.122@compuserve.com>
- Subject: B5 sims
-
- JOEL ARAUJO <76016.122@compuserve.com> asks:
- > It is not a against copyrights to post everything and anything
- > about the series on any given website but it is totally agaisnt
- > copyrights to host a sim? WHAT'S UP WITH THAT?
-
- Because posting material already existant about a show is one
- thing (and WB requires that the proper copyright be appended to all
- such web sites in any event). A different situation is a sim, which
- *uses* copyrighted characters and situations, creating a *game* which
- is not licensed, which also results in *story material* that also
- infringes on the copyright and could create further complications.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 22 Aug 1997 15:19:41 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Brent Barrett <75063.3305@compuserve.com>
- Subject: To Kill a Cow?
-
- Brent Barrett <75063.3305@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Since the machine obviously works on alien life, why wouldn't it
- > work on, say, cattle? Why couldn't some sort of animal raised for
- > food (such as cattle) be used on the "killing" end to save (or at
- > least help) a dying patient? I mean, the animal would be killed
- > anyway for its meat, so why not? And, BTW, how's Captain
- > Freakdaddy doing now that filming has started again?
-
- I think that one could argue that the life force of a sentient
- creature is considerably different from that of a cow or dog...unless
- one wanted one's loved one to start moo'ing....
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 22 Aug 1997 17:29:02 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Kevin P. Kenney <104102.352@compuserve.com>
- Subject: The Gathering done?
-
- Kevin P. Kenney <104102.352@compuserve.com> asks:
- > But has it been rescored, as it has been re-edited, in
- > preparation of a late commissioning? If not, might it be?
- > BTW, is the price tag still around the previously mentioned
- > $150K?
-
- No, the re-editing has not been completed; the editors jumped
- in and did some of it, based on my notes, in their spare time, because
- they want to see it done, but the actual
- sitting-with-the-editors-and-slogging-through-it that John and I do is
- yet to be done, and that's where the main part of the work happens.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 23 Aug 1997 03:15:47 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com>
- Subject: B5 sims
-
- Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com> asks:
- > What about hosting an RPG using a website AND using the properly
- > licensed RPG The Babylon Project? Wouldn't that be seen as a
- > proper use of the game? Or, does the fact that it's on the Web
- > mean you're publishing a new story?
-
- "What about hosting an RPG using a website AND using the properly
- licensed RPG The Babylon Project? Wouldn't that be seen as a proper
- use of the game?"
-
- My guess is that yes, that would be kosher...but then, I ain't a
- lawyer and am basically pulling that answer out of my butt....
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 23 Aug 1997 22:42:18 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5 TV Guide
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > You *are* joking, right?
-
- Nope, quite true.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 24 Aug 1997 00:47:34 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Enigmatic Credits
-
- Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks:
- > How does one sort out the creators from the funders in this
- > salad?
-
- One really can't tell these things from the credits...it's kind
- of an industry-wide concern, actually.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 24 Aug 1997 00:47:37 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5 TV Guide
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > Are you starting to catch up with season five?
- > How's the stress?
-
- Racing as fast as I can to keep up...got hit with a flu bug for
- a few days, which put me behind, but working now to catch up.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 24 Aug 1997 02:03:01 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: DS9 = Babylon 5
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- "Originally, the creators of B5 went to the ST folks with the concept.
- They thought it would be easier to launch the B5 concept in the ST
- Universe. However, after much talk, the Trek folks turned it down.
- Soon after, DS9 was launched."
-
- This has been repeated elsewhere and needs to be corrected.
-
- 1) B5 was *never* at any time submitted to anyone at Star Trek.
-
- 2) B5 was *never* considered by me, or anyone involved with B5,
- or discussed with anyone, as taking place in the ST universe. This
- story could flatly and simply not take place within the confines of the
- ST universe as set up and maintained.
-
- 3) B5 was *never* turned down by the ST folks for reasons 1 and
- 2 above.
-
- 4) B5 *was* submitted (treatment, artwork, series bible, pilot
- screenplay) to Paramount Television, which did review the material for
- some time before deciding to try other avenues.
-
- Just to clarify....
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 24 Aug 1997 17:51:41 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: DS9 = Babylon 5
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Actually, the concept for DS9 was not put forth to Paramount
- until about 2 months after the announcement was made in the trades
- about B5 going into production as a pilot. The B5 material was in
- Paramount's hands in 1989. Just trying to keep the timeline straight.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 24 Aug 1997 17:56:51 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: !intense Garibaldi News
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- The only thing that is intense about this news is that it's
- massively untrue.
-
- Jerry is *in* the fifth season...he just finished shooting his
- stuff for 501, and has a major personal arc throughout the first part
- of this season, another toward the end of the season, and is on board
- for all 22 episodes.
-
- He didn't make it into the movies because of agent stuff, but
- that's only the two movies, and we have every intention of having him
- in the third one.
-
- This is one of the problems with the internet...someone mishears
- something, posts it, and because it came from "an authoritative
- source" in this case Peter, it gets picked up as real. And then I have
- to spend days correcting and "contradicting the cast, so who's telling
- the truth?" You misheard. He's *in*. Has been from day one.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 25 Aug 1997 00:11:58 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: All
- Subject: B5 Fanclub Merchandise
-
- I have the information a lot of folks have been asking for on the
- merchandise being put out by the B5 fan club. Orders can be sent to
- the Babylon 5 Fan Club, P.O. Box 856, North Hollywood, CA 91603.
-
- T-SHIRTS - B5 club logo on front, saying on back, shirt color
- indicated:
-
- FCS-01 "We have always been here." Black on white.
- FCS-02 "We stand between the Darkness and the Light." (black on grey)
- FCS-03 "No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow. There's Always a Boom
- Tomorrow." White on black.
-
- Cost: (blocked)
- members, $18.95 non-members
-
- FAN CLUB POSTER
-
- Sent rolled $8.00 members, $10 non-members
-
- SOUNDTRACKS
-
- Original sountrack, and "Messages from Earth" available. Each selling
- for $14.95 members, $16.95 non-members.
-
- EPISODE SOUNDTRACKS
-
- Chris is now releasing soundtracks for each individual episode on its
- own special CD: "A Late Delivery from Avalon," "Z'ha'dum," "Shadow
- Dancing," "Severed Dreams" and "Walkabout." $11.95 members, $13.95
- non-members.
-
- AGAMEMNON CAPS
-
- Worn by Sheridan in "Knives." Has the silhouette of the Agamemnon
- embroidered on the front, on a grey cap, with the ID# of the Aggy
- beneath (OCG-05, standing for Omega Construction Group, Hull 5) and the
- name above the silhouette. $16 members, $18 non-members.
-
- Members should include membership number on all orders. The Fan Club
- can do Visa and Mastercard as well as check, but be sure to include the
- expiration date, total amount to be billed, and daytime phone number.
-
- Shipping and handling: (blocked)
- $35.01-50 $8.50 $50.01-75 $10.50 $75.01-100 $12.95
- Over $100 $15.50
-
- For 2nd day air add $10, for Next Day Air add $15.
-
- We will have prices and info on international shipping soon.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 25 Aug 1997 12:39:22 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5 Fanclub Merchandise
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > Aren't these being put together in a single compilation?
- > Or is this our only chance to get them?
-
- Selected bits of music from these have ended up in the first
- two main soundtracks, but these contain *all* the music, sequentially,
- from the episodes named.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 25 Aug 1997 12:39:23 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Ed Brandt <100274.2672@compuserve.com>
- Subject: CC
-
- Ed Brandt <100274.2672@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Will Ivanova be in "Sleeping in Light"?
-
- We already shot her in SiL, so yes.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 25 Aug 1997 12:39:24 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: DS9 = Babylon 5
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- I believe that some development execs at Paramount may have
- guided the development process along parallel lines, without those at
- ST knowing what was going on.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1997 13:34:20 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5 Fanclub Merchandise
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > No, I mean, aren't all 5 going to be released in a collection?
-
- No, the Cult soundtrack is from a variety of TV series, using
- only a piece of each, and not the original music from Chris in this
- case. It's another party just re-recording the music (and not as
- well).
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1997 13:34:23 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com>
- Subject: B5 Fanclub Merchandise
-
- Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Do you have any info as to when they will actually be available?
-
- They can be ordered now via the fanclub.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1997 13:34:27 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: !intense Garibaldi News
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- I understand, and that's fine, but then you should have posted
- the message as an inquiry, not an annoucement of "news." Because too
- many people take what they read on the nets uncritically. The way I
- first found out about your message was through a number of *extremely*
- angry, offensive and insulting emails I got on another account saying
- how dare I "get rid of" both Ivanova and Garibaldi in the same season,
- accusing me of trying to sneak the "firing of Garibaldi" under the
- radar while everyone was off looking at the Claudia situation...so I
- spent a great deal of time calming people down, then backtracking it to
- the original source (which would've been faster if I'd just done a
- tapcis sweep here, but the notes all came to me from the internet,
- from those with shared CIS accounts, or who knew someone who had a CIS
- account). The root for all of them was your note, or someone who'd seen
- your note and went ballistic.
-
- People need to understand that when they post unverified
- information as "news," and it's wrong...and it's wrong about 9 times
- out of ten... ultimately, I'm the one who pays the price for it.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1997 13:34:29 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Ep 502
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > How did her first day go ???
-
- Her first day is today. She's working out swimmingly.
- Everyone is finding her a real joy to work with. She took home about
- 30 tapes of prior shows to watch over the weekend, has buried herself
- in homework studying scripts and articles about the show, and has
- basically impressed the hell out of the cast and crew.
-
- And no, I can't tell you yet.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1997 13:41:49 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: B5 Fanclub Merchandise
-
- (blocked) asks:
- > No, I mean, aren't all 5 going to be released in a collection?
-
- Oops, confused Chris's the Cult with the CultTV
- soundtrack...never mind.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1997 22:13:32 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: T.P. Chai <104674.3064@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Into the Fire
-
- T.P. Chai <104674.3064@compuserve.com> asks:
- > JMS, when Emperor Turhan asked Kosh "How will it all end?"
- > Is that why the episode where the Vorlons left called "Into the
- > Fire" or was it just a coincidence?
-
- One of the reasons, yeah.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1997 22:13:34 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: !intense Garibaldi News
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- No, he wasn't named after a fish, rather he was named after a
- famous Italian war hero.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1997 22:17:26 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: what next?
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- No, Judith...the TNT only rule applies only to the US. WB
- International will be selling the show to broadcast stations in Canada
- and all other countries. This ONLY affects the U.S.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 27 Aug 1997 16:54:50 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: DS9 = Babylon 5
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Actually, this is not "a stupid rumor," in that Paramount did
- have the material dating back well before DS9 was conceived. It's a
- rumor if it comes from somebody outside. It's my show, I was there.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 27 Aug 1997 22:25:22 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: SysOp Dupa T Parrot <70040.104@compuserve.com>
- Subject: WorldCon and B5
-
- SysOp Dupa T Parrot <70040.104@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Or maybe not?
-
- We'll have to see...should be interesting.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 27 Aug 1997 22:25:24 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Ep 502
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- The news should be out in the next 24 hours or so.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 27 Aug 1997 22:25:26 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Wrong Spoiler apology
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- Over and done with. We move on.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 28 Aug 1997 02:44:56 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Carl Cantarella <105030.3700@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Creative Screenwriting
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- No, I didn't know the review was there...can you pass along the
- comments, if they were brief? (If long, I'll go out and try to find a
- copy.)
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 28 Aug 1997 02:44:57 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Get outta my GALAXY!
-
- Simon Grierson <100407.2075@compuserve.com> asks:
- > So no more Shadows?
- > No more Vorlons?
- > No more First Ones?
-
- Thanks...it's an amusing little entertainment....
-
- Now (well, after a few episodes designed to provide a bit of a
- break) it gets serious.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 28 Aug 1997 13:24:26 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: The Future
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- No, no plans to put B5 into book form; it was designed to be
- told for TV, and that's where it should stay...and the sequel is still
- being negotiated.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 28 Aug 1997 13:24:26 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: SysOp Lee Whiteside <76711.2660@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Ep 502
-
- SysOp Lee Whiteside <76711.2660@compuserve.com> asks:
- > I'm assuming the info there is correct?
-
- Yep, the info is correct.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 28 Aug 1997 17:47:53 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: (blocked)
- Subject: Vir on a diet?
-
- {original post unavailable}
-
- No, he's worked hard to lose weight.
-
- jms
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 28 Aug 1997 22:34:55 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Free Polazzo <72653.47@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Creative Screenwriting
-
- {original post had no questions}
-
- Thanks (thanks three times, actually). Good luck to all of you.
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
-
- Date: 29 Aug 1997 15:18:46 -0700
- From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
- To: Ruth Spradlin <73477.3155@compuserve.com>
- Subject: Indigo Slam
-
- Ruth Spradlin <73477.3155@compuserve.com> asks:
- > Are you a mystery fan?
-
- That's funny, I hadn't known Bob had done that. (Bob Crais is a
- friend.) Gotta remember to thank him next time....
-
- jms
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
-
|