|
|
@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ working on other things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are definitely bugs in this implementation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is meant to enable unixy one-tool-one-job patterns: |
|
|
|
This is meant to enable unixy one-tool-one-job patterns (thanks to Joey Hess |
|
|
|
for the suggestion): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```sh |
|
|
|
marks + *.foo |
|
|
@ -106,8 +107,8 @@ mv $(marks) dest |
|
|
|
clear files from the list as they're manipulated, and have a few extra built-in |
|
|
|
guard rails. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm also not sure how interactive this should be / how much handholding I want. |
|
|
|
I'm not totally sure how interactive this should be / how much handholding I |
|
|
|
want. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TODO |
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
@ -120,3 +121,4 @@ TODO |
|
|
|
- [ ] `remove` feels like it's going to get confused with an operation that |
|
|
|
deletes the file rather than removing the mark from the list. Should |
|
|
|
this be called `unmark` or something instead? |
|
|
|
- [ ] it'd be cool to plumb this into fzf a little bit |